RESUMO
AIM: BK polyomavirus infection is a challenging complication of renal transplantation. The management is not standardized and is based on reports from transplantation centers' experiences, usually with small sample sizes. Therefore, we aimed to present our countrywide experience with BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) in renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study was carried out with the participation of 30 transplantation centers from all regions of Turkey. Only cases with allograft biopsy-proven BKVN were included in the study. RESULTS: 13,857 patients from 30 transplantation centers were screened, and 207 BK nephropathy cases were included. The mean age was 46.4 ± 13.1 years, and 146 (70.5%) patients were male. The mean time to diagnosis of BK nephropathy was 15.8 ± 22.2 months after transplantation. At diagnosis, the mean creatinine level was 1.8 ± 0.7 mg/dL, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 45.8 ± 19.6 mL/min/1.73m2. In addition to dose reduction or discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs, 18 patients were treated with cidofovir, 11 patients with leflunomide, 17 patients with quinolones, 15 patients with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), 5 patients with cidofovir plus IVIG, and 12 patients with leflunomide plus IVIG. None of the patients receiving leflunomide or leflunomide plus IVIG had allograft loss. During follow-up, allograft loss occurred in 32 (15%) out of 207 patients with BK nephropathy. CONCLUSION: BKVN is still a frequent cause of allograft loss in kidney transplantation and is not fully elucidated. The results of our study suggest that leflunomide treatment is associated with more favorable allograft outcomes.
Assuntos
Vírus BK , Transplante de Rim , Infecções por Polyomavirus , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus , Humanos , Masculino , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Polyomavirus/diagnóstico , Feminino , Turquia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/diagnóstico , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/virologia , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/epidemiologia , Biópsia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Nefropatias/virologia , Rim/patologia , Rim/virologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Filtração GlomerularRESUMO
Q fever is a zoonosis caused by the intracellular gram-negative bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Infection can be asymptomatic, acute or can cause chronic disease. Chronic disease often presents with infective endocarditis (IE). Diagnosis of IE is difficult because the agent does not grow easily in standard blood cultures and valve vegetations are difficult to detect. Glomerular involvement in patients with Q fever endocarditis is limited to the case reports. In addition, a total of three cases of Q fever endocarditis from Türkiye have been published so far. In this case report, a fourth case of Q fever endocarditis from Türkiye accompanied by immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis was presented. A 35-year-old male patient with a history of mitral and aortic heart valve replacement was admitted with complaints of fever, night sweats and involuntary weight loss. Cervical lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly were found during the examination. Laboratory investigations revealed anemia inflammation, acute kidney injury (AKI), hematuria and proteinuria. While no causative agent was detected in blood and urine cultures, no diagnosis could be made as a result of bone marrow and cervical lymph node biopsies.Transesophageal echocardiography was performed for the etiology of fever and revealed 7 mm vegetation on the prosthetic mitral valve. C.burnetii phase 1 IgG tested with indirect immunofluorescent antibody method was reported positive at 1/16384 titer and doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine treatments were initiated. Kidney biopsy for the etiology of AKI revealed focal segmental endocapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis with C3, C1q and IgM immunocomplex deposition. After the addition of methylprednisolone to the treatment, the patient's symptoms improved and creatinine and proteinuria levels decreased dramatically. Although Q fever is endemic in our country, it is detected in fewer numbers than expected. In addition to the difficulties in microbiological and clinical diagnosis, the low awareness of physicians about the disease is one of the important reasons for this situation. When the disease comes to mind, the diagnosis can be easily reached by serological methods. Therefore, Q fever should be investigated in the presence of lymphoproliferative disease-like findings fever of unknown origin and culture-negative endocarditis.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Coxiella burnetii , Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Glomerulonefrite , Febre Q , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Febre Q/complicações , Febre Q/diagnóstico , Febre Q/microbiologia , Complexo Antígeno-Anticorpo/uso terapêutico , Endocardite Bacteriana/complicações , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Endocardite/microbiologia , Glomerulonefrite/complicações , Injúria Renal Aguda/complicações , Proteinúria/complicações , Doença CrônicaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Incremental peritoneal dialysis (IPD) could decrease unfavorable glucose exposure results and preserve (RKF). However, there is no standardization of dialysis prescriptions for patients undergoing IPD. We designed a prospective observational multi-center study with a standardized IPD prescription to evaluate the effect of IPD on RKF, metabolic alterations, blood pressure control, and adverse outcomes. METHODS: All patients used low GDP product (GDP) neutral pH solutions in both the incremental continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (ICAPD) group and the retrospective standard PD (sPD) group. IPD patients started treatment with three daily exchanges five days a week. Control-group patients performed four changes per day, seven days a week. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients (47 IPD and 47 sPD) were included in this study. The small-solute clearance and mean blood pressures were similar between both groups during follow-up. The weekly mean glucose exposure was significantly higher in sPD group than IPD during the follow-up (p < 0.001). The patients with sPD required more phosphate-binding medications compared to the IPD group (p = 0.05). The rates of peritonitis, tunnel infection, and hospitalization frequencies were similar between groups. Patients in the sPD group experienced more episodes of hypervolemia compared to the IPD group (p = 0.007). The slope in RKF in the 6th month was significantly higher in the sPD group compared to the IPD group (65% vs. 95%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: IPD could be a rational dialysis method and provide non-inferior dialysis adequacy compared to full-dose PD. This regimen may contribute to preserving RKF for a longer period.