RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The presence of tumor cells at the margins of breast lumpectomy specimens is associated with an increased risk of ipsilateral tumor recurrence. Twenty to 30 % of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery require second procedures to achieve negative margins. This study evaluated the adjunctive use of the MarginProbe device (Dune Medical Devices Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) in providing real-time intraoperative assessment of lumpectomy margins. METHODS: This multicenter randomized trial enrolled patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. The study evaluated MarginProbe use in addition to standard intraoperative methods for margin assessment. After specimen removal and inspection, patients were randomized to device or control arms. In the device arm, MarginProbe was used to examine the main lumpectomy specimens and direct additional excision of positive margins. Intraoperative imaging was used in both arms; no intraoperative pathology assessment was permitted. RESULTS: In total, 596 patients were enrolled. False-negative rates were 24.8 and 66.1 % and false-positive rates were 53.6 and 16.6 % in the device and control arms, respectively. All positive margins on positive main specimens were resected in 62 % (101 of 163) of cases in the device arm, versus 22 % (33 of 147) in the control arm (p < 0.001). A total of 19.8 % (59 of 298) of patients in the device arm underwent a reexcision procedure compared with 25.8 % (77 of 298) in the control arm (6 % absolute, 23 % relative reduction). The difference in tissue volume removed was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of the MarginProbe device during breast-conserving surgery improved surgeons' ability to identify and resect positive lumpectomy margins in the absence of intraoperative pathology assessment, reducing the number of patients requiring reexcision. MarginProbe may aid performance of breast-conserving surgery by reducing the burden of reexcision procedures for patients and the health care system.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/instrumentação , Mastectomia Segmentar/instrumentação , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual/prevenção & controle , Prognóstico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Disparities are evident in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. This study examines multiple socioeconomic and geographic regions across the US to determine if disparities exist in the type of reconstruction obtained after mastectomy. This is a retrospective study evaluating socioeconomic and geographic variables of 14,764 women who underwent mastectomy in 2008 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Statistical analysis was performed on three groups of women: patients without reconstruction (NR), patients who underwent breast implant/tissue expander reconstruction (TE), and patients with autologous reconstruction such as free or pedicled flaps (FLAP). The majority of patients (63.9%) had NR, while 23.9% had TE and 12.2% underwent FLAP. Compared to patients with NR, women with TE or FLAP were younger (64.9 years versus 51.3 and 51.1 years, p < 0.001), had fewer chronic conditions (2.60 and 2.54 chronic conditions for TE and FLAP respectively versus 3.85 for NR, p < 0.001) and higher mean hospital charges ($42,850 TE and $48,680 FLAP versus $22,300 NR, p < 0.001). Both Medicare and Medicaid insurance carriers had a higher proportion of women that did not get reconstructed compared to other insurance types (p < 0.001). Compared to NR, reconstructed women more often lived in urban areas and zip codes with higher average incomes (p < 0.001). This is the first national study analyzing insurance type and geographic variations to show statistically significant disparities in rate and type of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. These inequalities need to be addressed to extend immediate reconstruction options to all women undergoing mastectomy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamoplastia/economia , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We have been studying the native autoimmune response to cancer through the isolation of human monoclonal antibodies that are cancer specific from cancer patients. To facilitate this work we previously developed a fusion partner cell line for human lymphocytes, MFP-2, that fuses efficiently with both human lymph node lymphocytes and peripheral blood lymphocytes. Using this unique trioma fusion partner cell line we isolated a panel of autologous human monoclonal antibodies, from both peripheral blood and lymph node lymphocytes, which are representative of the native repertoire of anti-cancer specific antibodies from breast cancer patients. METHODS: The current study employs immunocytochemistry, immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis as well as Northern blots, Scatchard binding studies and finally SEREX analysis for target antigen identification. RESULTS: By application of an expression cloning technique known as SEREX, we determined that the target antigen for two monoclonal antibodies, 27.B1 and 27.F7, derived from lymph node B-cells of a breast cancer patient, is the PDZ domain-containing protein known as GIPC1. This protein is highly expressed not only in cultured human breast cancer cells, but also in primary and metastatic tumor tissues and its overexpression appears to be cancer cell specific. Confocal microscopy revealed cell membrane and cytoplasmic localization of the target protein, which is consistent with previous studies of this protein. CONCLUSION: We have determined that GIPC1 is a novel breast cancer-associated immunogenic antigen that is overexpressed in breast cancer. Its role, however, in the initiation and/or progression of breast cancer remains unclear and needs further clarification.
Assuntos
Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal/biossíntese , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal/química , Anticorpos Monoclonais/química , Antígenos de Neoplasias/química , Autoanticorpos/química , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Autoimunidade , Neoplasias da Mama , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Membrana Celular/metabolismo , Citosol/metabolismo , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Cinética , Estrutura Terciária de ProteínaRESUMO
Studies show decreased risk of breast cancer recurrence and improved survival with statin use, but data on racial disparities regarding breast cancer prognosis and statin use are lacking. Our objective was to investigate if racial disparities in breast cancer prognosis can be partially explained by differences in pre-diagnosis statin use. Patients were identified from a prospective, multicenter study examining the effects of metabolic factors on breast cancer prognosis in Black and White women. Statin use, prognosis (as measured by Nottingham Prognostic Index), anthropometric, tumor, and socio-demographic characteristics were examined. Five hundred eighty-seven women (487 White, 100 Black) with newly diagnosed primary invasive breast cancer were recruited. Obesity was more prevalent in Black women than White women (47 vs 19%, p < 0.01); both groups had similar low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (113 ± 41 vs 113 ± 36 mg/dl, p = 0.90). More Black women used statins than White women (18 vs 11%, p = 0.06). Black women had a worse prognosis in an adjusted model than White women (OR 2.13 95% CI 1.23-3.67). Statin use was not associated with prognosis in unadjusted (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.53-2.0) and adjusted models (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.56-2.31). In women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, Black women were more likely to be treated with statins than White women, contrary to previous studies. Black women had worse prognosis than White women, but this difference was not explained by differences in pre-diagnosis statin use. Our study suggests that differences in pre-diagnosis statin use do not contribute to racial disparities in breast cancer prognosis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico , Negro ou Afro-Americano/genética , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/sangue , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , População Branca/genéticaRESUMO
The landscape of breast reconstruction has changed significantly. This study assesses trends in type of reconstruction performed after mastectomy and impact on immediate postoperative complications. METHODS: Data for 67,450 patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer were analyzed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for years 2005-2014. Primary outcomes were wound, nonwound related infections, and bleeding complications. Data were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The percentage of patients that underwent reconstruction after breast cancer increased from 26.94% in 2005 to 43.30% in 2014 (p < 0.01). There was increased wound (5.59%), bleeding (6.82%), and infection (1.80%) complications after flap-based reconstruction (p < 0.01). There was no difference in wound, infection, and bleeding complications between immediate implant reconstruction and tissue expander (TE) at 4.38 vs. 3.89% (p = 0.18), 0.82 vs. 0.7%, p = 0.46), and 0.76 vs. 0.64% (p = 0.45), respectively. Several independent factors were associated with increased wound complications in patients undergoing all or any forms of reconstruction after mastectomy such as being overweight (OR 1.38, CI 1.23-1.55), obese (OR 2.11, CI 1.89-2.35), morbidly obese (OR 3.84, CI 3.34-4.43), ASA Class III (OR 1.35, CI 1.08-1.69), ASA Class IV (OR 1.49, 1.06-2.10), diabetic (OR 1.28 , CI 1.14-1.43), and smokers (OR 1.76, CI 1.59-1.94). TRAM flap was associated with increased risk of wound complication (OR 1.87, CI 1.28-2.75). CONCLUSION: More women are undergoing reconstruction as utilization of TE increases drastically. Immediate implant placement has only seen moderate increase likely due to surgeon preference.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Implantes de Mama/efeitos adversos , Implantes de Mama/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mamoplastia/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sobrepeso/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Dispositivos para Expansão de Tecidos/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos para Expansão de Tecidos/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of sonography as a sole identifier of breast malignancy remains undetermined. Currently, the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) trial, protocol 6666, is accruing high risk patients, with dense breast tissue on mammography, to evaluate the performance of screening sonography. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective single institution review to identify the detection rate of nonpalpable, mammographically occult breast malignancies identified solely by sonography. RESULTS: A total of 34,694 breast sonograms were performed at our outpatient radiology affiliate between April 1998 and April 2006. This number includes unilateral and bilateral examinations, and, 6-month followup examinations. Computerized databases and individual charts were retrospectively reviewed. Sonographic and mammographic findings were compared to determine concordance of identified lesions. Four thousand ninety-one ultrasound guided biopsies, (fine needle aspiration biopsy [FNA] and core needle biopsy [CNB]) were performed over the 8-year period, and 452 malignancies were identified. Discarded fluid contents of pure cyst aspirations were not included in this number. Seven percent (32) of the biopsy-proved malignancies were mammographically occult, of which 59% (19) were palpable, and 31% (10) were not palpable. Of all cancers diagnosed, 2.2% were identified solely by sonography. The number of cancers identified solely by sonography relative to the total number of sonograms done was 0.03%. CONCLUSIONS: Given these results, we advocate the selective use of sonography in appropriate populations, namely, in those with palpable findings, mammographic abnormalities, and in women with dense tissue who have personal or family history of breast cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Mamária , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia por Agulha , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The significance of surgical margins for patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed our experience with atypical ductal hyperplasia and correlated the margin status of the specimens removed with the risk of recurrence as atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma. Seven hundred forty-seven patients were identified between February 1995 and September 2005 as having biopsy proven atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). One hundred fifty-five of these patients were found to have "pure" atypical ductal hyperplasia without associated premalignant or malignant breast disease or a history of ipsilateral disease. Margin status of the initial excisional biopsy was noted and was correlated with the risk of recurrence. RESULTS: Of the 155 patients whose excisional biopsy specimens were "pure" atypical ductal hyperplasia, 44% (68) had negative margins, 5% (7) had positive margins, and 52% (80) were not reported. No patient underwent re-excision for close or positive margins. Follow-up ranged from 0 to 119 months, with a mean of 26 months. Seven patients (5%) presented with new findings at the site of their initial excisional biopsy, 1 of whom was found to have an invasive ductal carcinoma and 6 of whom had benign findings. Of the 87 patients with margins positive or unknown for ADH at surgical excision, none went on to develop malignancy. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that clear surgical margins at surgical excision for atypical ductal hyperplasia did not affect the risk of subsequently developing a malignancy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/etiologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/etiologia , Glândulas Mamárias Humanas/patologia , Glândulas Mamárias Humanas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hiperplasia/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study compares early postoperative breast cancer outcomes between patients 80 years and older (older patients) and those younger than 80 years (<80 years). METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who had breast surgery between 2005 and 2013 for malignancy. RESULTS: Older patients had a significantly higher percentage of comorbidities and partial mastectomies. Postoperatively, they had higher rates of pneumonia, urinary tract infection, cardiac arrest, and mortality but had lower rates of wound dehiscence, deep wound, and organ space infections. Thirty-day mortality is independently associated with hypertension, coronary artery disease, American Society of Anesthesiology class IV, and older age. CONCLUSIONS: The overall perioperative morbidity and mortality after breast surgery, regardless of age, is low. Older patients had a significantly higher rate of mortality and systemic complications but a lower rate of wound complications, likely because of less invasive surgical procedures.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia Segmentar , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The recent American Joint Committee on Cancer revision of the staging system for breast cancer classifies sentinel node metastases < 0.2 mm (pN0[i+]) as node negative and those > 0.2 mm but < 2 mm are designated pN1(mi). We examined the association between size of sentinel node metastases and rate of nonsentinel node metastases, specifically in the subgroup of patients with micrometastases. STUDY DESIGN: We examined the nonsentinel nodes of 124 patients with positive sentinel nodes and correlated the likelihood of nonsentinel node involvement with the size of the metastasis in the sentinel node and primary tumor characteristics. RESULTS: Nonsentinel node metastases were found in 19% (6 of 31) of patients with sentinel node metastases
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/secundário , Carcinoma Lobular/secundário , Linfonodos/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Axila , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiologia , Carcinoma in Situ/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Lobular/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Invasividade Neoplásica , Cintilografia , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Coloide de Enxofre Marcado com Tecnécio Tc 99mRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Because breast cancer survival after breast conservation has proved comparable to mastectomy, contraindications to mastectomy are increasingly being challenged. We treated the majority of our patients with multiple synchronous ipsilateral cancers with breast conservation and we compared them with patients who underwent mastectomy for comparable disease during the same interval. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with multiple ipsilateral synchronous breast cancers between 1989 and 2002 were identified from prospective databases maintained by us. A comparison was made between 36 patients treated with lumpectomy and 19 patients treated with mastectomy. RESULTS: There were no significant (all p values >0.2) differences between mastectomy and breast conservation patients in age, racial distribution, size of cancers, pathology, tumor differentiation, nodal involvement, or hormone receptor positivity. The majority of patients treated with breast conservation underwent at least one reexcision to obtain clear pathologic margins, and they were more likely to receive postoperative radiotherapy than patients treated with mastectomy. There were no significant differences in the local (97% versus 100%, p = 0.54) or distant (97% versus 95%, p = 0.20) 5-year disease- free survival between the group treated with breast conservation and the group treated with mastectomy. One patient in each group developed distant metastases. One patient in the breast conservation group developed local recurrence at both primary sites simultaneously 39 months after lumpectomies. She is free of disease 78 months after mastectomy. The remaining 52 patients are alive and free of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Breast conservation is an effective treatment for patients with synchronous ipsilateral breast cancers.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia Radical Modificada , Mastectomia Segmentar , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Carcinoma in Situ/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Lobular/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Contraindicações , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia Radical Modificada/efeitos adversos , Mastectomia Radical Modificada/métodos , Mastectomia Segmentar/efeitos adversos , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/mortalidade , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Because many risk factors for breast cancer are related to hormonal factors and hormonal factors influence breast cancer prognosis, risk factors may have prognostic value. In order to assess the prognostic value of risk factors for breast cancer we divided patients with breast cancer into those at high risk and low risk using the Gail model. METHODS: Patients with available follow-up and information concerning age, age at menarche, number of children, age at first birth, number of first degree relatives with breast cancer, and number of previous breast biopsies were divided into low and high-risk groups by the average relative risk calculated using the Gail model. Risk factors, clinical presentations, pathologic findings, tumor characteristics, extent of disease, treatment and outcomes for the 106 high-risk women were compared with the 206 low-risk women. Stage IV patients were excluded. RESULTS: The average relative risk of breast cancer was 2.09. The 106 high-risk women were significantly older (58 years versus 53 years; P = 0.001), older at first live birth (30 years versus 23 years; P <0.001), more likely to have a first degree relative with breast cancer (57% versus 0%; P <0.001), and more likely to have previously had a breast biopsy (19% versus 1%; P <0.001). There was no difference in the average age at menarche. Low-risk patients were significantly more frequently nulliparous (40% versus 22%; P = 0.002). Clinical presentation, pathologic findings, extent of disease, and treatment were comparable in high and low-risk patients. Cancers of low-risk patients were more frequently poorly differentiated (39% versus 25%, P = 0.044). Tamoxifen was used more frequently in high-risk patients (56% versus 41%; P = 0.012). High-risk patients exhibited significantly better 5-year (95% versus 88%; P = 0.047) and 10-year distant disease-free survival than low-risk patients (88% versus 79%; P = 0.050). In multivariate analysis only the number of involved lymph nodes was related to local (P = 0.001) and distant (P <0.001) disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients considered high risk by the Gail model have significantly better disease-free survival than low-risk patients. This study does not support the notion that risk factors for breast cancer are prognostic factors.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Objectives. To determine the incidence and type of premalignant or malignant changes in mammaplasty specimens and to determine the incidence of these changes according to age distribution. Methods. Retrospective database review of patients who underwent a reduction mammaplasty between 1999 and 2009 was performed from pathology records at a single institution. Results. 700 patients were identified. Of the 644 patients who had bilateral reductions, 25 (4%) had significant pathologic findings. The likelihood of finding premalignant changes or cancer increased with advancing patient age (0.8 percent for patients <40 years old and 10 percent for patients >60 years old). Of the 56 patients who underwent unilateral mammaplasty, 12 patients (21%) had significant pathologic findings. The incidence of finding premalignant changes or cancer in this population also increased with advancing patient age (0 for patients <40 years old to 25 percent for patients >60 years old). Conclusions. When a unilateral mammaplasty is performed to match a breast reconstructed after cancer surgery, the likelihood of identifying premalignant changes or cancer increases more than fourfold. Therefore, one should consider additional radiologic imaging in the preoperative workup of patients with a history of carcinoma prior to undergoing unilateral mammaplasty.
RESUMO
Breast cancer in African-American (AA) women occurs at an earlier age than in European-American (EA) women and is more likely to have aggressive features associated with poorer prognosis, such as high-grade and negative estrogen receptor (ER) status. The mechanisms underlying these differences are unknown. To address this, we conducted a case-control study to evaluate risk factors for high-grade ER- disease in both AA and EA women. With the onset of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, creative measures were needed to adapt case ascertainment and contact procedures to this new environment of patient privacy. In this paper, we report on our approach to establishing a multicenter study of breast cancer in New York and New Jersey, provide preliminary distributions of demographic and pathologic characteristics among case and control participants by race, and contrast participation rates by approaches to case ascertainment, with discussion of strengths and weaknesses.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is little information on patient-driven noncompliance of adjuvant therapies and its consequences. METHODS: This retrospective study compares clinical, pathological features and outcomes of breast cancer patients who were compliant to recommended radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapies to those who were noncompliant. RESULTS: Noncompliance rates for chemotherapy, radiation, and tamoxifen were 31 of 421 (7%), 30 of 855 (4%), and 294 of (37%) respectively. Old age was associated with noncompliance to chemotherapy and radiation, but younger women tend to be more often noncompliant to tamoxifen. Noncompliance with chemotherapy or radiation did not significantly affect 5-year local and distant disease-free survival rates. Noncompliance with tamoxifen was associated with decreased 5-year local and distant disease-free survivals (87% versus 96%, 76% versus 87%, respectively, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Noncompliance with tamoxifen is the most common, resulting in significantly increased risk of local and distant disease recurrence.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Cooperação do Paciente , Tamoxifeno/administração & dosagem , Fatores Etários , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia Segmentar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oncotype DX is a 21-gene assay that calculates a risk of distant recurrence in women with estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the results of Oncotype DX influence the decision to administer chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 85 consecutive patients with estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer who had an Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) obtained. Tumor size, tumor grade, and treatment were then compared within each risk category. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA software. RESULTS: Tumors that were high grade and Her-2/neu positive more frequently had a high RS. Treatment was changed as a result of Oncotype DX in 44% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Oncotype DX RS is significantly related to tumor grade and Her2/neu status. In this study, the treatment of 44% of patients was altered as a consequence of Oncotype DX RS.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/genética , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/metabolismo , Prognóstico , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered a standard of care in the staging of breast cancer. The objective was to examine our experience with reoperative SLNB. METHODS: We identified 19 patients in our breast cancer database who had a SLNB in the reoperative setting. All 19 patients had undergone previous breast-conserving surgery with either an axillary lymph node dissection or an SLNB. The reoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) was identified using blue dye, radioisotope, or both. RESULTS: The SLN was identified in 84% of the reoperative cases. Of these successful cases, both blue dye and radioisotope were used in five cases, and radioisotope alone was used in 11 cases. Radioisotope identified the SLN in the 100% of successful SLNB cases (P = .0003). There were 3 unsuccessful cases in which blue dye and radioisotope failed to identify the sentinel node. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative SLNB after previous axillary surgery is technically feasible.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The management of nonpalpable papillary lesions found in specimens obtained by percutaneous breast biopsy is controversial. We reviewed the treatment of patients found to have papillary lesions by stereotactic, sonographic, or fine-needle aspiration breast biopsy to identify indications for surgical excision. METHODS: Consecutive patients with intraductal papilloma, atypical papilloma/papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia, papillary neoplasm, and papillomatosis according to percutaneous breast biopsy were identified from radiology records. The charts were reviewed to identify patients who had subsequent surgical excision, and the pathologic findings were correlated with the biopsy method and indications for surgery. RESULTS: Papillary lesions were found in 120 biopsy samples from 109 patients. Malignancy was found at operation in 19 (24%) of 80 lesions that underwent surgical excision: 12 (63%) were ductal carcinoma-in-situ, 4 (21%) were infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 2 (11%) were infiltrating papillary carcinoma, and 1 (5%) was intracystic papillary carcinoma. Malignancy was found in 9 (30%) of 30 fine-needle biopsy papillary lesions, 6 (35%) of 17 core biopsy papillary lesions, and 4 (12%) of 33 stereotactic biopsy papillary lesions. Malignancy was missed significantly less frequently with stereotactic biopsy (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Malignancy is frequently found at surgical excision for papillary lesions found on percutaneous breast biopsy. Malignancy is missed significantly less frequently with stereotactic biopsy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Papilar/patologia , Papiloma/patologia , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma in Situ/patologia , Carcinoma in Situ/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Papilar/cirurgia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperplasia/patologia , Papiloma Intraductal/patologia , Papiloma Intraductal/cirurgia , Ultrassonografia MamáriaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Microscopically clear lumpectomy margins are critical for optimizing local control with breast conservation for cancer. Re-excisions are often necessary to achieve clear surgical margins. Factors that contribute to nonnegative margins and necessitate re-excision may increase the risk of local recurrence. METHODS: Patients who were treated with breast conservation for breast cancers were identified from a prospective database maintained by one of the authors. Factors associated with local recurrence were evaluated in 459 consecutive patients with attention to the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (5%) developed local recurrences at a mean follow-up of 78 months. In multivariate analysis, local recurrence was most significantly associated with the omission of radiotherapy (19% vs. 5%; relative risk [RR], 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-8.2), followed by young age (52 vs. 58; 95% confidence interval, -.83 to -10.6 years) and the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins (none, 4%; one, 7% [RR, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, .86-4.89]; two or more, 17% [RR, 5.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-18.8]). Tumor size, the number of involved nodes, pathology, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly related to local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of local recurrence after breast conservation for breast cancer increases progressively with the number of re-excisions needed to achieve clear margins. Patients in whom the cancer is fully excised with clear margins in the first excision will have less of a chance of local recurrence compared with patients who need further re-excision to achieve clear margins.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia Segmentar , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The preferred technique for intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel lymph node has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and accuracy of intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel lymph node by touch preparation cytology and frozen section. METHODS: A total of 117 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer or ductal carcinoma-in-situ undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy had intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel node by touch preparation, frozen section, or both. The results of the intraoperative evaluation were compared with the final histological results of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) paraffin section and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: Twenty-six (57%) of the 46 patients with nodal involvement had metastases detected during surgery. The sensitivity of touch preparation for detecting macrometastases was 78%; for detecting all H&E metastases, including micrometastases, was 57%; and for detecting all metastases, including those seen on IHC, was 40%. The sensitivity of frozen section for detecting macrometastases was 83%; for detecting all H&E metastases, including micrometastases, was 78%; and for detecting all metastases, including those seen on IHC, was 64%. Both have a low sensitivity for micrometastases seen by H&E paraffin section: 57% and 78%, respectively. Neither detected micrometastases diagnosed by IHC only. CONCLUSIONS: Both touch preparation and frozen section seem to be accurate in detecting macrometastases, but not micrometastases. Intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel lymph node by touch preparation allows for a quick evaluation of the node without wasting significant tissue and without detecting occult microscopic metastases, which may be beneficial because the clinical importance of these has yet to be elucidated.
Assuntos
Axila , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma in Situ/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Citodiagnóstico/métodos , Secções Congeladas , Linfonodos/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma in Situ/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is occasionally found in specimens obtained by percutaneous stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for microcalcifications. Since malignancy is often found at surgical excision when atypical ductal hyperplasia is found at percutaneous biopsy, we reviewed our pathologic findings from surgery for ALH at percutaneous biopsy. This was a retrospective review of all percutaneous breast biopsy specimens for mammographic microcalcifications obtained from a single institution over a 30-month period. The pathologic findings from percutaneous biopsy were correlated with the radiologic appearance and the pathology from surgical excision. ALH was found in 13 of 766 (1.7%) stereotactic vacuum-assisted core needle biopsies performed for mammographic microcalcifications. Subsequent surgery in six patients revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in two patients and one case of invasive ductal carcinoma. Surgical excision is indicated for areas with ALH discovered by percutaneous biopsy for mammographic microcalcifications.