Clinical Impact of Positive Surgical Margins in Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the Era of Preoperative Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Microscopically positive (R1) surgical margins after gastrectomy increase gastric cancer recurrence risk, but optimal management after R1 gastrectomy is controversial. We sought to identify the impact of R1 margins on recurrence patterns and survival in the era of preoperative therapy for gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma during 1998-2017 at a major cancer center were enrolled. Clinicopathologic factors associated with positive margins were examined, and incidence, sites, and timing of recurrence and survival outcomes were compared between patients with positive and negative margins. RESULTS: Of 688 patients, 432 (63%) received preoperative therapy. Thirty-four patients (5%) had R1 margins. Compared with patients with negative margins, patients with R1 margins more frequently had aggressive clinicopathologic features, such as linitis plastica (odds ratio [OR] 7.79, p < 0.001) and failure to achieve cT downstaging with preoperative treatment (OR 5.20, p = 0.005). The 5 year overall survival (OS) rate was lower in patients with R1 margins (6% vs 60%; p < 0.001), and R1 margins independently predicted worse OS (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% CI 1.51-3.75, p < 0.001). Most patients with R1 margins (58%) experienced peritoneal recurrence, and locoregional recurrence was relatively rare in this group (14%). Median time to recurrence was 8.5 months for peritoneal dissemination and 15.7 months for locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSION: R1 margins after gastrectomy were associated with aggressive tumor biology, high incidence of peritoneal recurrence after a short interval, and poor OS. In patients with R1 margins, re-resection to achieve microscopically negative margins has to be considered with caution.

Men1 maintains exocrine pancreas homeostasis in response to inflammation and oncogenic stress.

A more comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying pancreatic diseases, including pancreatitis and cancer, is essential to improve clinical management. MEN1 has established roles in epigenetic regulation and tumor suppression in the endocrine pancreas; however, intriguing recent data suggest MEN1 may also function in the exocrine pancreas. Using physiologically relevant genetic mouse models, we provide direct evidence that Men1 is essential for exocrine pancreas homeostasis in response to inflammation and oncogenic stress. Men1 loss causes increased injury and impaired regeneration following acute caerulein-induced pancreatitis, leading to more severe damage, loss of the normal acinar compartment, and increased cytokeratin 19-positive metaplasias and immune cell infiltration. We further demonstrate the Men1 protein is stabilized in response to insult, and loss of Men1 is associated with the overexpression of proinflammatory Jund target genes, suggesting that loss of Men1-mediated repression of Jund activity is, at least in part, responsible for the impaired response. Finally, we demonstrate that Men1 loss significantly accelerates mutant Kras-dependent oncogenesis. Combined, this work establishes Men1 as an important mediator of pancreas homeostasis in vivo.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma - does pathologic response mean better outcomes?

BACKGROUND: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unknown. We sought to evaluate our experience treating high-risk ICC with NAC and to determine the prognostic significance of pathologic response. METHODS: Patients with ICC treated with NAC and surgery were analyzed using a prospectively maintained database. Pathologic response was graded by a blinded pathologist. Clinicopathologic/treatment variables were evaluated for associations with survival. RESULTS: Among 45 patients who received NAC followed by hepatectomy for high-risk ICC, 32(71%) were considered stage III, and 6(13%) were considered stage IV at time of diagnosis. Major response was identified in 39% of cases, including 2 with pathologic complete response. Patients with major response had a longer median NAC duration than patients with minor response (6 vs 4cycles, P=0.02). Regimen (gemcitabine/cisplatin vs gemcitabine/cisplatin/nab-paclitaxel) was not associated with response rate. Median recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11 and 45 months. Pathologic response was not associated with improved survival. CONCLUSION: Pathologic response to NAC was not associated with survival in this highly selected cohort. Nonetheless, the extended OS experienced by these high-risk patients is encouraging and suggests that NAC may help select patients who stand to benefit from aggressive resection.

Genomic profiling of multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reveals intraindividual concordance of genetic alterations.

In multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC), intrahepatic metastases (IM) represent a contraindication to surgical resection, whereas satellite nodules (SN) do not. However, no consensus criteria exist to distinguish IM from SN. The purpose of this study was to determine genetic alterations and clonal relationships in surgically resected multifocal IHC. Next-generation sequencing of 34 spatially separated IHC tumors was performed using a targeted panel of 201 cancer-associated genes. Proposed definitions in the literature were applied of SN located in the same liver segment and ≤2 cm from the primary tumor; and IM located in a different liver segment and/or >2 cm from the primary tumor. Somatic point mutations concordant across tumors from individual patients included BAP1, SMARCA4 and IDH1. Small insertions and deletions (indels) present at the same genome positions among all tumors from individuals included indels in DNA repair genes, CHEK1, ERCC5, ATR and MSH6. Copy number alterations were also similar between all tumors in each patient. In this cohort of multifocal IHC, genomic profiles were concordant across all tumors in each patient, suggesting a common progenitor cell origin, regardless of the location of tumors in the liver. The decision to perform surgery should not be based upon a perceived distinction between IM and SN.

Cancer of Unknown Primary Presenting as Bone-Predominant or Lymph Node-Only Disease: A Clinicopathologic Portrait.

BACKGROUND: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) presenting as bone-predominant (BCUP) or lymph node-only disease (LNCUP) represents two clinically distinct subsets of nonvisceral CUP. These present a diagnostic challenge with a large differential of putative primary cancers and defy the "one-treatment-fits-all" approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with BCUP (n = 29) and LNCUP (n = 63) using a prospectively collected CUP database and tumor registry of patients seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2001 to 2017. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were abstracted. A control group of non-BCUP/LNCUP cases (n = 443) from the database was used for comparison. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and compared using log-rank test. RESULTS: In this cohort, 64% and 60% patients had disseminated disease at diagnosis and 39% and 23% had Culine poor-risk disease in BCUP and LNCUP, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for BCUP was 14.5 months and for LNCUP was 32.6 months. For BCUP, gemcitabine plus platinum was the most common initial chemotherapy (54%). For LNCUP, carboplatin plus paclitaxel was the most common initial chemotherapy (38%). Radiation was given to 74% of patients with BCUP and 37% of those with LNCUP. On multivariate analysis, poor-risk Culine group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; p < .001) and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (HR, 2.38, p < .001) were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION: BCUP and LNCUP are rare subsets within CUP with varying prognosis. Poor-risk Culine group and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with poor survival. Select patients with limited metastases can have long-term survival with aggressive multimodality treatment. Careful clinicopathological review can facilitate chances of site-directed therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) rarely presents as bone-predominant (BCUP) or lymph node-only (LNCUP) disease. This article describes a cohort of each and compares with a larger CUP cohort. Patients with BCUP have unique issues with fractures and pain, often receiving radiation. Overall survival of 14.5 months was similar to a larger CUP comparison cohort. Patients with LNCUP had improved overall survival at 32.6 months, with longer survival in patients without disseminated disease. Culine poor-risk group and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with worse overall survival. Tips regarding diagnosis and management of these rare malignant subsets are provided.

Intestinal Epithelial TBK1 Prevents Differentiation of T-helper 17 Cells and Tumorigenesis in Mice.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) regulate intestinal immune cells, particularly development of T-helper 17 (Th17) cells. Deregulation of this process leads to intestinal inflammation and tumorigenesis, via unknown mechanisms. TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) is expressed by IECs and cells in the innate immune system. We studied the functions of TBK1 in the intestinal immune response and tumorigenesis in mice. METHODS: We performed studies of wild-type mice, mice with conditional disruption of Tbk1 (Tbk1IEC-KO), Tbk1IEC-KO mice crossed with ApcMin/+ mice, and Mt-/- mice crossed with ApcMin/+ mice. Some mice were given intraperitoneal injections of a neutralizing antibody against interleukin 17 (IL17) or IL1ß. Intestine tissues were collected from mice and analyzed by histology, for numbers of adenomas and Th17 cells, and expression of inflammatory cytokines by real-time PCR. IECs were isolated from wild-type and Tbk1IEC-KO mice, stimulated with lipopolysaccharide, co-cultured for with bone marrow-derived macrophages, and analyzed by RNA sequencing and biochemical analyses. RESULTS: Compared to ApcMin/+Tbk1WT mice, ApcMin/+Tbk1IEC-KO mice had significant increases in number and size of intestinal polyps, and significantly more Th17 cells in lamina propria. Administration of an antibody against IL17 reduced the number of intestinal polyps in ApcMin/+Tbk1IEC-KO mice to that observed in ApcMin/+Tbk1WT mice. In culture, TBK1-deficient IECs promoted expression of IL1ß by macrophages, which induced differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th17 cells. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that the TBK1-deficient IECs had increased expression of metallothionein 1 (MT1), an immune regulator that promotes intestinal inflammation. Intestine tissues from ApcMin/+Mt-/- mice had significant fewer Th17 cells than ApcMin/+Mt+/+ mice, and a significantly lower number of polyps. Analyses of colorectal tumors in the Cancer Genome Atlas found colorectal tumors with high levels of MT1 and IL17 mRNAs to be associated with reduced survival times of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of TBK1 by IECs suppresses expression of MT1 and prevents expression of IL1ß by macrophages and differentiation of Th17 cells, to prevent inflammation and tumorigenesis. Strategies to block this pathway might be developed for colorectal tumorigenesis.

Determinants of Survival for Patients with Neoadjuvant-Treated Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine prognostic markers for disease recurrence and survival in a cohort of neoadjuvant-treated, node-negative gastric cancer patients (ypT0-4N0M0). METHODS: Clinicopathologic data from patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative-intent gastrectomy at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1995 to 2017 were evaluated. Patients with AJCC TNM stage ypT0-4N0M0 were considered for analysis. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 212 patients with a mean age of 58.3 years. Of these patients, 60 % were male, 53 % were Caucasian, 87 % received chemoradiation, and 13 % received chemotherapy. The findings showed a median overall survival (OS) rate of 11.3 years, a 5-year survival rate of 72 %, and a 10-year survival rate of 57 %. During a median follow-up period of 5.5 years, 38.2 % of the patients died. In the multivariable analysis, ypT4-stage and nodal yield fewer than 16 were significantly associated with reduced OS. Cancer classified as ypT4 had more aggressive biologic traits, including lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and was treated more aggressively with total gastrectomy and additional organ resection despite frequent positive margins. Depth of invasion remained significantly associated with worse outcome after the analysis controlled for nodal yield and possible stage migration. Compared with ypT0-3 tumors, ypT4 cancers were associated with significantly more recurrences (13 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.05), and the primary modes of failure for ypT4 lesions were local recurrence and peritoneal metastases (88 % of recurrences). CONCLUSIONS: Depth of primary tumor invasion and nodal yield were significantly associated with OS among the patients with ypT0-4N0M0 gastric cancer. Serosal invasion (ypT4) was associated with a high rate of peritoneal recurrence, and trials of intraperitoneal therapy targeting these patients should be considered.

Influence of Baseline Positron Emission Tomography in Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer on Survival and Response to Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The value of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) remains uncertain once gastroesophageal cancer is metastatic. We hypothesized that assessment of detailed PET-CT parameters (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and/or total lesion glycolysis [TLG]), and the extent of metastatic burden could aid prediction of probability of response or prognosticate. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed treatment-naive patients with stage 4 gastroesophageal cancer (December 2002-August 2017) who had initial PET-CT for cancer staging at MD Anderson Cancer Center. SUVmax and TLG were compared with treatment outcomes for the full cohort and subgroups based on metastatic burden (≤2 or >2 metastatic sites). RESULTS: We identified 129 patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer who underwent PET-CT before first-line therapy. The median follow-up time was 61 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months; the first progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months. SUVmax or TLG of the primary tumor or of all metastases combined had no influence on OS or PFS, whether the number of metastases was ≤2 or >2. Overall response rates (ORRs) to first-line therapy were 48% and 45% for patients with ≤2 and >2 metastases, respectively (nonsignificant). ORR did not differ based on low or high values of SUVmax or TLG. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first assessment of a unique set of PET-CT data and its association with outcomes in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. In our large cohort of patients, detailed analyses of PET-CT (by SUVmax and/or TLG) did not discriminate any parameters examined. Thus, baseline PET-CT in untreated metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients has limited or no utility.

Navigating Nodal Metrics for Node-Positive Gastric Cancer in the United States: An NCDB-Based Study and Validation of AJCC Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) and the positive lymph node ratio (LNR) for potentially curable gastric cancer are not established. We sought to determine clinical benchmarks for these values using a large national database. METHODS: Demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment-related data from patients treated using an R0, curative-intent gastrectomy registered in the National Cancer Database during 2004 to 2016 were evaluated. Patients with node-positive (pTxN+M0) disease were considered for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 22,018 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median follow-up of 2.2 years. Mean age at diagnosis was 65.6 years, 66% were male, 68% were White, 33% of tumors were located near the gastroesophageal junction, and 29% of patients had undergone preoperative therapy. Most primary tumors (62%) were category pT3-4, 67% had a poor or anaplastic grade, and 19% had signet features. Clinical nodal staging was inaccurate compared with staging at final pathology. The mean [SD] number of nodes examined was 19 [11]. On multivariable analysis, the pN category, ELNs, and LNR were independently associated with survival (all P<.0001). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, an optimal ELN threshold of ≥30 was established for patients with pN3b disease and was applied to the entire cohort. Node positivity and LNR had minimal change beyond 30 examined nodes. Stage-specific LNR thresholds calculated by ROC analysis were 11% for pN1, 28% for pN2, 58% for pN3a, 64% for pN3b, 30% for total combined. By using an ELN threshold of ≥30, prognostically advantageous stage-specific LNR values could be determined for 96% of evaluated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large national cancer registry, we determined that an ELN threshold of ≥30 allowed for prognostically advantageous LNRs to be achieved in 96% of patients. Therefore, ≥30 examined nodes should be considered a clinical benchmark for practice in the United States.

Concurrent lymphovascular and perineural invasion after preoperative therapy for gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with decreased survival.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) on survival outcomes in gastric cancer patients treated with preoperative therapy. METHODS: Patients with gastric cancer treated with preoperative therapy and potentially curative resection were stratified according to the presence of LVI, PNI, or both. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The study included 281 patients, of whom 93 (33%) had LVI, 69 (25%) had PNI, 51 (18%) had both LVI and PNI, and 170 (61%) had neither. LVI and PNI were each associated with higher ypT and ypN categories and more positive lymph nodes (all p < .001), associations that were emphasized with both factors present. On multivariable analyses, ypN (p < .001) and concurrent LVI/PNI (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.55-4.45; p = .001) were predictive of OS and DFS (ypN: p < .001; both LVI/PNI: HR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.34-3.82; p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Gastric cancer patients with concurrent LVI and PNI after preoperative therapy have more advanced disease and worse survival outcomes than patients with neither or only one of these factors.

Impact of tumor regression grade on recurrence after preoperative chemoradiation and gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is unknown whether the degree of response to preoperative therapy correlates with locoregional recurrence (LR) or distant recurrence (DR) after resection of gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection of gastric adenocarcinoma following chemotherapy and chemoradiation (1995-2015) were reviewed. The tumor regression grade (TRG) was defined by the percentage of viable tumor cells in the specimen (TRG0 = 0%; TRG1 = 1%-2%; TRG2 = 3%-50%; TRG3 ≥ 50%). The relationships among TRG, recurrence-free survival (RFS), LR, and DR were examined. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria (TRG0, 52 [21%]; TRG1, 49 [20%]; TRG2, 98 [40%]; TRG3, 48 [19%]). LR and DR occurred in 6.1% and 32.0% of patients, respectively. No patient with TRG0 experienced LR. R1 resection (6%-15%) and LR (6%-8%) rates were similar among TRG1-3 patients. R1 resection was associated with LR (hazard ratio [HR], 17.85; P < .001). ypN status (HR, 2.44; P = .004) and linitis plastica (HR, 2.90; P < .001) were associated with DR. TRG was not independently associated with RFS, LR, or DR. CONCLUSIONS: TRG0 imparted excellent local control. However, TRG1-3 patients had similar R1 resection rates and therefore similar LR. DR is associated with ypN status and linitis plastica, not TRG.

Low metabolic activity in primary gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with resistance to chemoradiation and the presence of signet ring cells.

PURPOSES: Preoperative chemoradiation is a potential treatment option for localized gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). Currently, the response to chemoradiation cannot be predicted. We analyzed the pretreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on positron emission tomography/computed tomography as potential predictors of the response to chemoradiation. METHODS: We analyzed the SUVmax and TLG data from 59 GAC patients who received preoperative chemoradiation. We used logistic regression models to predict a pathologic complete response (pCR) and Kaplan-Meier curves to determine overall survival among patients with high and low SUVmax or TLG. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (49%) had Siewert type III adenocarcinoma and 30 (51%) had tumors located in the lower stomach. Forty-one patients had poorly differentiated GAC, and 26 had signet ring cells. The median SUVmax was 7.3 (0-28.2) and the median TLG was 56.6 (0-1881.5). Patients with signet ring cells had a low pCR rate, as well as a low SUVmax and TLG. In the multivariable logistic regression model, high SUVmax was a predictor of pCR (odds ratio = 11.1, 95% confidence interval = 2.12-50.0, p = 0.004). Overall survival was not associated with the SUVmax (log-rank p = 0.69) or TLG (log-rank p = 0.85) CONCLUSION: A high SUVmax was associated with sensitivity to chemoradiation and pCR in GAC, and signet ring cells seemed to confer resistance.

Laparoscopic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy is Safe for Patients with Peritoneal Metastases from Gastric Cancer and May Lead to Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (LS-HIPEC) is a novel strategy for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) metastatic to the peritoneum. We evaluated the safety profile of LS-HIPEC for patients with positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) or carcinomatosis from GA. METHODS: Outcomes were reviewed of patients with stage IV GA with peritoneal involvement who received LS-HIPEC from June 2014 to January 2017. LS-HIPEC included a 60-minute perfusion of mitomycin-C (30 mg) and cisplatin (200 mg) with inflow temperatures of 41-42 °C and outflow temperatures of 39-40 °C. RESULTS: A total of 71 LS-HIPEC procedures were performed in 44 patients. At diagnosis, 68% (n = 30) had carcinomatosis and 32% (n = 14) had isolated PPC. Three patients (7%) underwent LS-HIPEC for intractable ascites. All patients initially received systemic chemotherapy, and 20 patients (45%) received pre-procedural chemoradiotherapy. The median number of LS-HIPEC procedures performed per patient was one (range 1-5 procedures). There were no conversions to laparotomy, two outflow catheter obstructions, and one major (Clavien-Dindo grade III) surgical complication within 30 days. A total of seven postoperative adverse hematologic events (> CTCAE 2) were observed in five patients (11%), without any major renal or gastrointestinal adverse events within 30 days. The median overall length of hospital stay after LS-HIPEC was 2 (range 2-11) days. Eleven patients (25%) underwent secondary gastrectomy following resolution of peritoneal cytology. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic HIPEC is a safe procedure and may be repeated in patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer. Future studies are required to determine the optimal HIPEC regimen and timing relative to systemic therapy to best minimize morbidity.

Characteristics and Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients with Pathologic Complete Response to Preoperative Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response of a primary tumor (ypT0) after preoperative therapy is associated with improved overall survival (OS). However, whether other variables are associated with outcome for gastric cancer patients with ypT0 status is unknown. METHODS: This study reviewed an institutional database of patients who underwent resection of gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma after preoperative therapy and identified patients with ypT0 status. Cox regression models were used to identify clinicopathologic predictors of OS. RESULTS: Of 77 patients with ypT0 status identified in this study, 36 (47%) had gastroesophageal junction tumors. At presentation, 62 patients (81%) had clinical T3 disease, and 7 (9%) had clinical T4 disease. The clinical nodal status was positive (cN+) for 45 patients (58%). Preoperative chemoradiation was administered to 75 patients (97%). The median follow-up duration was 3.54 years. The median OS was 10 years, and the 5-year OS rate was 61%. Univariable analysis identified age of 65 years or older at the time of diagnosis, histologic grade, and ypN status as significant predictors of OS. Multivariable analysis confirmed age of 65 years or older [hazard ratio (HR), 4.26; p < 0.001] and persistent nodal disease (ypN+ status; HR, 5.12; p < 0.001) to be independently associated with OS. Clinical stage was not associated with survival. In the subset of ypT0N0 patients, no clinicopathologic feature was predictive of survival. CONCLUSION: For gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients with ypT0 status after preoperative therapy, ypN+ status substantially reduced survival. Pretreatment clinical stage had no impact on OS for patients with a pathologic complete response.

Sarcomatoid carcinoma presenting as cancers of unknown primary: a clinicopathological portrait.

BACKGROUND: Sarcomatoid carcinoma of unknown primary (SCUP) is a rare entity of either poorly differentiated carcinoma with sarcoma-like differentiation or a true mixed lineage neoplasm. Limited data regarding clinicopathological profile and management exists. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the MD Anderson Cancer of Unknown Primary database and tumor registry to identify 48 SCUP patients between 2001 and 2017. Patient characteristics, pathology, molecular diagnostics, treatments, and outcomes were obtained. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and compared using log rank test. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range 27-86). Majority of patients were female (58%) and presented with ≥3 metastatic sites (52%), commonly lymph node (50%), bone (42%), lung (27%), and liver (21%). First line treatment included chemotherapy (35%), surgery (27%), and radiation (24%). Gemcitabine and docetaxel (18%) was the most common chemotherapy regimen. Median OS for entire cohort was 11 months (95% CI: 5.6 to 16.4). Poor performance status (PS), > 1 metastatic site, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significantly associated with worse OS on univariate analyses. On multivariate analyses, poor PS (HR 8.7; 95%CI: 3.0-25.0; p <  0.001) and high NLR (HR 3.4; 95%CI: 1.3-8.8; p = 0.011) emerged as independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: SCUP is a rare presentation with an aggressive clinical course and limited survival. Diagnosis is difficult to make and requires careful review and synthesis of histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular diagnostics. Chemotherapy resistance remains a challenge. Early mutational profiling is warranted, and clinical trial participation should be encouraged for this subset.

Gastric cancer in the remnant stomach after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) occasionally develops in the remnant stomach following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In those who have undergone PD for adenocarcinoma, however, the interval and frequency of anastomotic GC are unknown. METHODS: We searched our institutional database for patients who had undergone PD for adenocarcinoma and subsequently developed GC between 1994 and 2018 and found six patients. We summarized the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of these patients with anastomotic GC. RESULTS: The median interval from PD to development of GC was 111.5 months. Four patients underwent curative resection of gastrojejunal anastomosis. Pathologic analysis showed signet ring cell carcinoma in four patients. The median overall survival after developing GC was 61 months. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that GC in the remnant stomach after PD is rare but can occur at gastrojejunostomy anastomosis after a prolonged period. Periodic and long-term follow-up +/- surveillance endoscopy to facilitate early detection of GC in the remnant stomach is recommended, particularly for symptomatic patients. Recognition of the anastomotic tumor as a second primary and not a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma recurrence/metastasis is crucial in the optimal treatment of these patients, as curative resection of early-stage GC may prolong survival.

Galectin-3 expression is prognostic in diffuse type gastric adenocarcinoma, confers aggressive phenotype, and can be targeted by YAP1/BET inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Overexpression of Galectin-3 (Gal-3), a ß-galactoside binding protein, has been noted in many tumour types but its functional significance and clinical utility in gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) are not well known. METHODS: We studied 184 GAC patients characterised by histologic grade, sub-phenotypes (diffuse vs intestinal), and ethnicity (Asians vs North Americans). Immunohistochemistry was performed to assess the expression of Gal-3 in human GACs and we correlated it to the clinical outcomes. Cell proliferation, invasion, co-immunoprecipitation and kinase activity assays were done in genetically stable Gal-3 overexpressing GC cell lines and the parental counterparts to delineate the mechanisms of action and activity of inhibitors. RESULTS: Most patients were men, Asian, and had a poorly differentiated GAC. Gal-3 was over-expressed in poorly differentiated (P=0.002) tumours and also in diffuse sub-phenotype (P=0.02). Gal-3 overexpression was associated with shorter overall survival (OS; P=0.026) in all patients. Although, Gal-3 over-expression was not prognostic in the Asian cohort (P=0.337), it was highly prognostic in the North American cohort (P=0.001). In a multivariate analysis, Gal-3 (P=0.001) and N-stage (P=<0.001) were independently prognostic for shorter OS. Mechanistically, Gal-3 induced c-MYC expression through increasing RalA activity and an enhanced YAP1/RalA/RalBP complex to confer an aggressive phenotype. YAP1/BET bromodomain inhibitors reduced Gal-3-mediated aggressive phenotypes in GAC cells. CONCLUSIONS: Gal-3 is an independent prognostic marker of shorter OS and a novel therapeutic target particularly in diffuse type GAC in North American patients.

Nodal Downstaging in Gastric Cancer Patients: Promising Survival if ypN0 is Achieved.

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer's 8th edition introduced ypStage, a separate staging system for patients with gastric cancer having undergone preoperative therapy. Overall, ypN0 patients have better survival outcomes than ypN+ patients. However, whether patients with cN+/ypN0 disease ("downstaged N0") and those with cN0/ypN0 disease ("natural N0") have similar survival is unknown. METHODS: An institutional database was reviewed to identify gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent potentially curative R0 resection after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiation. Patients were categorized into three groups based on nodal status: cN0/ypN0, cN+/ypN0, and ypN+. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 316 patients who met the study criteria. Ninety-four patients (30%) had cN0/ypN0 disease, 93 (29%) had cN+/ypN0 disease, and 129 (41%) had ypN+ disease. The median OS was 7.7 years, and the 5-year OS was 60.3%. In the multivariate analysis, OS did not differ between the cN0/ypN0 and cN+/ypN0 patients (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI 0.54-1.48]; p = 0.666), but it was shorter in ypN+ patients (hazard ratio, 1.82 [95% CI 1.15-2.87]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In gastric cancer patients who underwent preoperative therapy, we found similar OS in cN0/ypN0 and cN+/ypN0 patients. Because ypN+ patients had poor OS, achieving ypN0 status is an important hallmark demonstrating the effectiveness of preoperative therapy for gastric cancer.

Repeat staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer after preoperative therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Staging laparoscopy is recommended before preoperative therapy in patients with locoregional gastric cancer, but yield of repeated diagnostic laparoscopy at the time of resection is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective database of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (1994-2016) who had negative staging laparoscopy followed by preoperative therapy and subsequent attempted resection. Primary outcome was positive exploration (peritoneal or unresectable disease) at the time of resection. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with positive exploration. RESULTS: Of the 451 patients with attempted resection, 54 (12.0%) had positive explorations, including 48 with peritoneal disease. Patients with positive explorations were more likely to be female and have poorly differentiated tumors, linitis features, and signet-ring morphology. There was no significant difference by exploration results in age, race, clinical stage, or delayed definitive surgery. Positive explorations were independently associated with poor differentiation (OR 4.6, 95%CI 1.4-15.3; P = 0.01) and linitis (OR 4.2, 95%CI 1.9-9.2; P < 0.001). Positive explorations were seen in 14.0% of patients with poor differentiation, 36.6% of patients with linitis, and 5.8% of patients with neither linitis nor poor differentiation. CONCLUSION: Despite negative pretreatment laparoscopy, post-treatment repeat laparoscopy may prevent non-therapeutic laparotomies. At a minimum, we recommend selective repeat laparoscopy for patients with linitis features.