The complexity of reproductive decision-making in asymptomatic carriers of the Huntington mutation.

The aim of this study was to describe reproductive decisions in mutation carriers after predictive testing for Huntington's disease (HD) and to identify factors that play a role in decision-making. In 1987-2004, 245 individuals received a predictive test result; 89 of them were carriers and seven received an equivocal result. Quantitative data on reproductive behaviour have been collected during all follow-up contacts. The follow-up time in this study was 1-16 years (mean: 7.1 years). Qualitative data on reproductive decision-making have been collected by the means of semistructured interviews during the 5-year follow-up study. For 46 carriers and two persons with an equivocal result, family planning was one of the motives for predictive testing. In this group, slightly more than half of the carriers (58%) had chosen to have children with prenatal diagnosis or preimplantation genetic diagnosis and about one in three (35%) decided to have no children anymore after the test. A minority (7%) was undecided or had no children for other reasons. Factors playing a role in the decision-making process were the carrier's sex, ethical issues about PD and PGD, the strength of the desire to have children, illness representations including personal experiences with HD in the family and the technological imperative. Some of these elements were in conflict and induced ambivalence towards reproductive choices. The results illustrate the complexity of the decision-making process and the necessity of in-depth counselling. Counselling should pay special attention to conflicting values and beliefs and to all kinds of pressure.

The interface between assisted reproductive technologies and genetics: technical, social, ethical and legal issues.

The interface between assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and genetics comprises several sensitive and important issues that affect infertile couples, families with severe genetic diseases, potential children, professionals in ART and genetics, health care, researchers and the society in general. Genetic causes have a considerable involvement in infertility. Genetic conditions may also be transmitted to the offspring and hence create transgenerational infertility or other serious health problems. Several studies also suggest a slightly elevated risk of birth defects in children born following ART. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become widely practiced throughout the world for various medical indications, but its limits are being debated. The attitudes towards ART and PGD vary substantially within Europe. The purpose of the present paper was to outline a framework for development of guidelines to be issued jointly by European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology for the interface between genetics and ART. Technical, social, ethical and legal issues of ART and genetics will be reviewed.

Partners of mutation-carriers for Huntington's disease: forgotten persons?

This study focuses on psychological distress and coping strategies in partners of tested persons 5 years after predictive testing for Huntington's disease. A total of 16 carrier-couples and 17 noncarrier-couples participated in the study. Self-report questionnaires were used, assessing depression level, anxiety, intrusive and avoidance thoughts and coping strategies. Partners of carriers have as much distress as carriers, and for some distress variables even more (P<0.05-0.001). They clearly experience more psychological distress than noncarriers' partners, as expected (P<0.05-0.001). Regarding coping strategies, carriers' partners adopt more passive strategies (passive-regressive and avoiding reactions; P<0.05) and less active strategies (social support seeking and problem solving; P<0.05-0.001), compared to carriers. For both carriers and partners, the adoption of more passive strategies for coping was associated with more distress and the use of more active strategies with less distress (for carriers: P<0.05-0.001; for carriers' partners: P<0.05). The presence of children before predictive testing was an additional result-specific distress factor in carriers and their partners. In conclusion, carriers' partners have at least as much psychological distress as carriers, but partners have the tendency to draw back. The results suggest that the grief of carriers' partners may be 'disenfranchised', or not socially recognised, as if they have no right to mourn. We moreover interpreted the results referring to concepts such as anticipatory grief, psychological defences, dissonance processes and imbalanced partner relationship. Finally, we formulated some implications for genetic counselling.

Medically assisted reproduction and ethical challenges.

Many of the ethical challenges associated with medically assisted reproduction are societal. Should the technique be restricted to only ordinary couples or could it be used also to single females or couples of same sex? Should the future child be entitled to know the identity of the gamete donor? Should there be age limits? Can embryos or gametes be used after the death of the donor? Can surrogate mothers be part of the process? Can preimplantation diagnostics be used to select the future baby's sex? In addition, there are several clearly medical questions that lead to difficult ethical problems. Is it safe to use very premature eggs or sperms? Is the risk for some rare syndromes caused by imprinting errors really increased when using these techniques? Do we transfer genetic infertility to the offspring? Is the risk for multiple pregnancies too high when several embryos are implanted? Does preimplantation diagnosis cause some extra risks for the future child? Should the counselling of these couples include information of all these potential but unlikely risks? The legislation and practices differ in different countries and ethical discussion and professional guidelines are still needed.

Predictive testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: subjective perception regarding colorectal and endometrial cancer, distress, and health-related behavior at one year post-test.

This study evaluated illness representations, distress, and health-related behavior one year after disclosure of a predictive genetic test result for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in 36 carriers and 36 noncarriers. Post-test, no significant differences between carriers and noncarriers were found in perceived risk and perceived seriousness of colorectal and endometrial cancer or in perceived control over endometrial cancer. Confidence in the controllability of colorectal cancer by means of medical examinations was higher for carriers than noncarriers post-test. Mean levels of distress (cancer-specific distress, state anxiety, psychoneuroticism) were within normal ranges and none of the participants had an overall pattern (on all scales) of clinically elevated levels of distress. Carriers had significantly higher cancer-related distress one year posttest than noncarriers. In both groups, colorectal cancer-related distress decreased. Noncarriers additionally showed decreased endometrial cancer-related distress and state anxiety. Within the year after testing, none of the noncarriers had a colonoscopy and all carriers where adherent to the recommendations regarding colorectal cancer screening. Although interview data delineated individually different problems specifically related to predictive testing (e.g., worry, difficulties in relation to other relatives, burden of regular follow-up), generally, predictive testing for HNPCC does not seem to induce major psychological problems. Moreover, the presented data are promising regarding the impact on health-related behavior.

Surveillance behavior and prophylactic surgery after predictive testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

This article describes breast or ovarian cancer surveillance practices and prophylactic surgery involving 34 carriers and 34 noncarriers of a BRCA1/2 mutation within the year after predictive testing. It also evaluates the effect of the predictive test result on cancer screening practices and provides insight into factors important in the decision-making process about health-related behavior. Within the year following predictive testing, 9% (3 of 34) of the carriers decided to have a prophylactic mastectomy. The majority of the carriers was adherent to recommendations regarding regular cancer surveillance following predictive testing. Furthermore, carriers' adherence to clinical breast examination and mammography recommendations significantly increased from pre- to posttest and was significantly higher than noncarriers' utilization after testing. Of the carriers eligible for prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy, 75% had this operation. All carriers who were advised to have regular surveillance of the ovaries had ovarian ultrasounds. The authors gave major attention to factors playing a part in the decision-making process about health-related behavior.

Population genetic screening programmes: principles, techniques, practices, and policies.

This paper examines the professional and scientific views on the principles, techniques, practices, and policies that impact on the population genetic screening programmes in Europe. This paper focuses on the issues surrounding potential screening programmes, which require further discussion before their introduction. It aims to increase, among the health-care professions and health policy-makers, awareness of the potential screening programmes as an issue of increasing concern to public health. The methods comprised primarily the review of the existing professional guidelines, regulatory frameworks and other documents related to population genetic screening programmes in Europe. Then, the questions that need debate, in regard to different types of genetic screening before and after birth, were examined. Screening for conditions such as cystic fibrosis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, familial hypercholesterolemia, fragile X syndrome, hemochromatosis, and cancer susceptibility was discussed. Special issues related to genetic screening were also examined, such as informed consent, family aspects, commercialization, the players on the scene and monitoring genetic screening programmes. Afterwards, these questions were debated by 51 experts from 15 European countries during an international workshop organized by the European Society of Human Genetics Public and Professional Policy Committee in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 19-20, November, 1999. Arguments for and against starting screening programmes have been put forward. It has been questioned whether genetic screening differs from other types of screening and testing in terms of ethical issues. The general impression on the future of genetic screening is that one wants to 'proceed with caution', with more active impetus from the side of patients' organizations and more reluctance from the policy-makers. The latter try to obviate the potential problems about the abortion and eugenics issues that might be perceived as a greater problem than it is in reality. However, it seems important to maintain a balance between a 'professional duty of care' and 'personal autonomy'.

Psychological distress in the 5-year period after predictive testing for Huntington's disease.

The paper reports on a 5-year longitudinal study on psychological distress after predictive testing for Huntington's disease (HD) and on correlates of post-test distress. Psychometric tests and questionnaires were used. The tested persons were invited to participate in the follow-up study; the uptake rate was 75% (24 carriers, 33 non-carriers). Three time points were included: baseline, 1 year and 5 years post-test. Five years after the test, mean distress scores of both carriers and non-carriers were within the normal range. Carriers did not differ from non-carriers with regard to mean general distress. Compared to non-carriers, however, carriers had significantly less positive feelings (P<0.001) and were more consciously avoiding HD-related situations and thoughts (P<0.01). These findings reflect the carriers' conscious and unconscious attempt to escape from pessimism and to minimise negative consequences of the test result. Psychological distress 5 years post-test was significantly associated with ego-strength (P<0.05 to P<0.001). Except for intrusion and avoidance, distress was also associated with test motivation (P<0.05 to P<0.01). Compared with baseline level, mean depression, general and specific anxiety had significantly decreased 1 year and 5 years post-test (P<0.05 to 0.01). This evolution was independent of the test result. However, based on test motivation, a subgroup of tested persons having long lasting psychological distress could be identified, also irrespective of test result. Persons who asked the test to get rid of the uncertainty, without being able to specify implications for substantial life areas, had more psychological distress before and after the test than those who wanted the test for specific reasons (P<0.001 to P<0.0001). Moreover, the pattern of post-test anxiety differed over time, depending on the test motivation (P<0.05). The findings suggest that pre- and post-test counselling should pay special attention to persons with lower ego-strength and with an unspecified test motivation, because they are at higher risk for long-term psychological distress, independently of the test result.

Predictive DNA-testing for Huntington's disease and reproductive decision making: a European collaborative study.

This European collaborative study addresses the question whether a predictive test result for Huntington's disease (HD) has an effect on subsequent reproduction by comparing carriers and non-carriers of the Huntington mutation. A unique characteristic of this study is that this evaluation is done in persons at reproductive age who had a predictive test after the identification of the Huntington gene and who were counselled in one of the participating centres. Data were collected for 180 carriers and 271 non-carriers who received a predictive test result in the period 1993-1998 in Aberdeen, Athens, Cardiff, Leiden, Leuven, Paris or Rome. The mean age of the total study group was 31.5 years and for about half of the group the follow-up interval was 3 years or more, with a maximum of 7 years. The collaborative study clearly revealed an overall impact of the predictive test result on subsequent reproduction: 14% of the carriers had one or more subsequent pregnancies vs 28% of the non-carriers. In the total carrier group a prenatal test was carried out in about two thirds of the pregnancies and one child was born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis; artificial insemination by donor, egg cell donation or adoption were not reported. A more refined analysis was performed in the subgroup with a follow-up interval of at least 3 years and who reported 'family planning' as a motive to apply for predictive testing in the pretest period. The complexity of this motive is discussed. In this subgroup with a desire for children in the pretest period the effect of the predictive test result was more pronounced: 69% of the non-carriers had subsequent pregnancies while only 39% of the carriers who mentioned 'family planning' as one of the major reasons to apply for predictive testing had a subsequent pregnancy. Of the carriers with one or more subsequent pregnancies the percentage using prenatal diagnosis was slightly higher than the percentage not using it, although there were clear differences from one centre to another. The latter group's decisions may seem more intriguing but may be partially understood based on stage theories of health behaviour. Last, but not least, whatever option is chosen by a couple at increased risk of transmitting the Huntington mutation, it is of the utmost importance that professionals fully respect this decision and support the couple.

Prenatal testing for Huntington's disease: a European collaborative study.

This European study involving seven genetic centres from six countries - Aberdeen, Cardiff (UK), Leiden (Netherlands), Leuven (Belgium), Paris (France), Rome (Italy), Athens (Greece) has gathered information on prenatal testing by direct mutation analysis and exclusion testing for Huntington's disease (HD) from the six European countries during the period 1993-1998. Data describing the parent belonging to the HD family was collected; this included their sex and age as well as their risk of developing HD. Information about previous pregnancies, the rank of the pregnancy being tested and its outcome was also gathered. In addition the number of previous prenatal tests for HD was recorded. Three hundred and five results were recorded by the participating countries between 1993 and 1998. The largest groups came from the UK (157) and the Netherlands (90). The mean age for the parent from the HD family was 30.8 years. In half of the tests the prospective parent was an asymptomatic gene carrier, 42% remained at risk, and 6% of the prospective parents were already showing clinical features of HD. 65% of tests performed used mutation analysis.

Diagnostic genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients: women's looking back on the pre-test period and a psychological evaluation.

The aim of this retrospective, exploratory study was to gain insight into how cancer patients who had a diagnostic genetic test for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer looked back on the pre-test period and to gain insight into the psychological impact of the genetic test result. Data were collected by semistructured interviews and self-report questionnaires in 19 BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, 7 noncarriers, and 36 patients with an inconclusive genetic test result. Cancer patients had a genetic test mainly for other persons, especially relatives in the descendant line. Mutation carriers felt more in control, but they also reported negative effects of genetic testing such as negative emotional impact and being concerned about their children. Non-carriers were relieved. The group of women where no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was found in the family was heterogeneous. Some misinterpreted the genetic test result as revealing the absence of a genetic predisposition. Others were relieved but also still aware of an increased risk, whereas a last group experienced continuing uncertainty and felt less in control. Self-report questionnaires did not reveal differences in general and cancer-specific distress as a function of the genetic test result. Furthermore, no differences among the three groups were found regarding perceived seriousness of breast and ovarian cancer and perceived control of breast cancer. Perceived control of ovarian cancer was highest in the inconclusive group.

Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.

This paper describes the motivation, recall of cancer risks, and illness representations of 40 individuals who had a predictive test for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) as well as the short-term impact of predictive testing by means of a semi-structured interview and self-report questionnaires. The main motives for predictive testing were early detection of cancer, knowledge of the children's risk and reduction of uncertainty. Overall, recall of cancer risks was good. Measurements of illness representations revealed low perceptions of "threat" of cancer and high confidence in the controllability of the disease. Distress was within normal ranges. Distress decreased significantly from pre- to post-test in non-carriers and did not in carriers. It also decreased in individuals for whom "reducing uncertainty" was a very important motive for the test, not in the others. Although part of the carriers did not have colonoscopies, all carriers intended to have regular colonoscopies in the future.

Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Although various guidelines and position papers have discussed, in the past, the ethical aspects of genetic testing in asymptomatic minors, the European Society of Human Genetics had not earlier endorsed any set of guidelines exclusively focused on this issue. This paper has served as a background document in preparation of the development of the policy recommendations of the Public and Professional Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics. This background paper first discusses some general considerations with regard to the provision of genetic tests to minors. It discusses the concept of best interests, participation of minors in health-care decisions, parents' responsibilities to share genetic information, the role of clinical genetics and the health-care system in communication within the family. Second, it discusses, respectively, the presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing for adult-onset disorders, childhood-onset disorders and carrier testing.

Predictive genetic testing for breast cancer and Huntington's disease: the opinions of midwives and nurses in Flanders.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate attitudes of midwives and nurses regarding predictive testing for hereditary breast cancer and Huntington's disease. METHODS: Mail questionnaires were sent to 119 midwives and 881 nurses. RESULTS: The response rate was 58% for midwives, but only 33% for nurses. The attitude toward predictive testing in an asymptomatic adult was more favourable in case of hereditary breast cancer than in case of Huntington's disease, mostly because prevention or therapy is unavailable for the latter condition. Prevention of breast cancer through prophylactic mastectomy elicited adverse reactions among 40% of the participants. Predictive testing for these diseases in an adolescent at the own request was also rated favourably while testing in children at the parents' request was less acceptable. For both diseases, concealing carrier status information from the employer or the insurance company was judged as acceptable by the majority. CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute to the understanding of nurses' and especially midwives' attitudes to predictive testing, which may in turn serve as a basis for genetic education for these groups of health care professionals.

The reactions of general practitioners, nurses and midwives in Flanders concerning breast cancer risks in a high-risk situation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reactions of general practitioners (GPs), nurses and midwives concerning the cancer risks in a high-risk family. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 356 GPs, 881 nurses and 119 midwives. RESULTS: The response rate was 60% for GPs, 58% for midwives and 33% for nurses. The breast cancer risk of an unaffected patient from a high-risk family as well as the risk of her daughter were mostly (>80%) correctly evaluated as increased. The percentage answering 'increased risk' dropped to 40% for the daughters of the patient's brother. Half of the GPs and nurses/midwives explicitly mentioned that a predictive DNA test was available. Less than one third would recommend such a test for a young child. Reluctance was also observed regarding prophylactic mastectomy. CONCLUSION: These results should be taken into account in genetic education initiatives for GPs, nurses and midwives.

Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients.

The psychological aspects of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in cancer patients (diagnostic genetic testing) have so far received less attention than predictive genetic testing in unaffected persons. Our study is aimed at gaining insight into the psychological aspects of diagnostic genetic testing and at formulating practical recommendations for counseling. Cancer patients often play a key role in the communication of information to relatives because they were the first individuals to be tested in the family. The present article focuses on the communication to close and distant relatives about the hereditary cancer, the genetic test and its result. Participants previously diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer, with a family history of these cancers and who requested DNA-testing, were eligible for the study. Of the 83 eligible patients who could be contacted, 63 participated (response rate = 76%). Twenty-six participants were members of a family where a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was detected. The DNA-analysis in the family of 37 participants had not revealed any mutation. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and psychological tests and questionnaires. The dissemination of information was largely focused on first-degree relatives. Communication to distant relatives about the genetic test and its result was problematic. Other than the genetic test result and age as "objective" predictors of informing distant relatives, little and/or superficial contact seemed to be the major subjective barrier to informing distant relatives. Furthermore, the knowledge about HBOC of these messengers reveals several shortcomings. Communication within the family should receive special attention during counseling.