Active narcotic use and post-peroral endoscopic myotomy outcomes in esophageal motility disorders.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive technique used to treat esophageal motility disorders. Opioid use has been demonstrated to adversely affect esophageal dysmotility and is associated with an increased prevalence of esophageal motility disorders. Our aim was to investigate the effect of narcotic use on success rates in patients undergoing POEM. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing POEM between February 2017 and September 2021. Primary outcomes were post-POEM Eckardt score (ES), distensibility index, and length of procedure. Secondary outcomes included technical success, myotomy length, length of stay, adverse events, reintervention rates, and postprocedure GERD. RESULTS: During the study period, 90 patients underwent POEM for treatment of esophageal dysmotility disorders. Age, sex, race, indications for POEM, and body mass index were not significant between those with or without narcotic use. There were no differences in procedure time, preprocedure ESs, or length of stay. Postprocedure ESs were higher in the group with active narcotic use compared to the group with no prior history (2.73 vs 1.2, P = .004). Distensibility indexes measured with EndoFLIP (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn, USA) were not different in patients using narcotics compared with opioid-naïve patients. CONCLUSION: Active narcotic use negatively affects symptom improvement after POEM for the treatment of esophageal motility disorders.

Comparing clinical success and procedural difficulty between treatment-naïve and treatment-refractory patients with esophageal motility disorders during peroral endoscopic myotomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) can successfully treat patients with achalasia. Prior therapy with Botox (Allergan, Madison, NJ, USA) injections, pneumatic dilation (PD), and/or laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) is believed to increase the difficulty of POEM procedures. We aimed to determine if prior treatment methods were associated with longer procedure times or lower clinical success. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, consecutive patients who underwent POEM for achalasia between February 2017 and September 2021 were studied. Collected data were patient demographics, prior treatment, pre- and postprocedure Eckardt score (ES), distensibility indices (DIs), and procedure times. Primary outcomes were clinical success and procedure difficulty. RESULTS: Of 95 patients (mean age, 55.6 years; 45% women), 25 patients underwent POEM for type I achalasia, 31 for type II achalasia, and 33 for spastic esophageal pathologies. Thirty-three patients (34.7%) were treated for achalasia before POEM with onabotulinumtoxinA injections (n = 18), PD (n = 17), and LHM (n = 3). There were no significant differences in post-treatment ESs or technical success between the 2 groups (P = .98 and P = .66, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that prior treatment was associated with decreased case time and easier tunneling during POEM. CONCLUSIONS: Prior treatment did not impact the clinical success rate of POEM and led to decreased case times and easier tunneling difficulty, likely because of persistent lower esophageal sphincter changes and differences in diagnostic indications. POEM should be considered for patients with treatment-refractory symptoms as a safe and feasible option. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate our findings.

Anesthesia Choice and Its Potential Impact on Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Measurements in Esophageal Motility Disorders.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The widespread use of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has revolutionized the management of esophageal motility disorders (EMDs). The introduction of an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) can serve as a complimentary diagnostic tool to assess the mechanical properties (i.e., pressure, diameter, distensibility and topography) of the esophagus. During EndoFLIP measurements, different anesthesia techniques may induce variable degrees of neuromuscular blockade, potentially affecting esophageal motility and altering the results of EndoFLIP metrics. Our study aimed to compare the impact of using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) versus general anesthesia with inhalational anesthetics (GAIA) on diagnostic EndoFLIP measurements. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing EndoFlip during the POEM procedure at our institution between February 2017 and February 2022. We obtained the differences in pressure, diameter, and distensibility index using propofol-based TIVA vs sevoflurane-based GAIA with a 30ml and 60ml balloon. The differences were divided into terciles and compared between diagnoses using univariate comparisons and logistic regression models. RESULTS: 49 patients were included (39% Type 1 achalasia, 43% Type 2 or 3 achalasia, and 18% jackhammer esophagus (JE)). Compared to spastic disorders (Type 2, 3 and JE), Type 1 had lower values of pressure differences at 60 mL in univariate (3.75 vs 15.20 p=0.001) and multivariate (aOR 0.89 95%CI 0.82-0.978) analyses. Compared to Type 1, Type 2 and 3 had higher rates of pressure differences at 60 mL in univariate (9.85 vs 3.75 p=0.04); and nearly reached significance in multivariate analysis (1.09 95%CI 1-1.20). Compared to Type 1, JE demonstrated higher values in pressure differences at 60 mL (27.7 vs 3.75 p<0.001) CONCLUSION: Esophageal pressure, as measured by EndoFLIP, was significantly reduced when patients were sedated with sevoflurane-based GAIA. The use sevoflurane-based GAIA for diagnostic EndoFLIP may potentially lead to the misclassification of spastic disorders as Type I achalasia. Therefore, propofol-based TIVA should be considered over sevoflurane-based GAIA for sedation during the diagnostic test.

Benefits of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy over surgical gastrojejunostomy in the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a large multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) allows resumption of peroral intake. Although surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ) provides durable relief, it may be associated with a higher morbidity, interfere with chemotherapy, and require an optimum nutritional status. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. We aimed to conduct the largest comparative series to date between EUS-GE and SGJ for mGOO. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing SGJ or EUS-GE at 6 centers. Primary outcomes included time to resumption of oral intake, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Secondary outcomes included technical and clinical success, reintervention rates, adverse events (AEs), and resumption of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients were included (EUS-GE, n = 187; SGJ, n = 123). EUS-GE exhibited significantly lower time to resumption of oral intake (1.40 vs 4.06 days, P < .001), at lower albumin levels (2.95 vs 3.33 g/dL, P < .001), and a shorter LOS (5.31 vs 8.54 days, P < .001) compared with SGJ; there was no difference in mortality (48.1% vs 50.4%, P = .78). Technical (97.9% and 100%) and clinical (94.1% vs 94.3%) success was similar in the EUS-GE and SGJ groups, respectively. EUS-GE had lower rates of AEs (13.4% vs 33.3%, P < .001) but higher reintervention rates (15.5% vs 1.63%, P < .001). EUS-GE patients exhibited significantly lower interval time to resumption of chemotherapy (16.6 vs 37.8 days, P < .001). Outcomes between the EUS-GE and laparoscopic (n = 46) surgical approach showed that EUS-GE had shorter interval time to initiation/resumption of oral intake (3.49 vs 1.46 days, P < .001), decreased LOS (9 vs 5.31 days, P < .001), and a lower rate of AEs (11.9% vs 17.9%, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date showing that EUS-GE can be performed among nutritionally deficient patients without affecting the technical and clinical success compared with SGJ. EUS-GE is associated with fewer AEs while allowing earlier resumption of diet and chemotherapy.

The Impact of Race and Sex on the Clinical Outcomes of Homeless Patients With Alcoholic Liver Disease: Propensity Score Matched Analysis of US Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD), homelessness poses significant medical and psychosocial risks; however, less is known about the effects of race and sex on the hospital outcomes of admitted homeless patients with ALD. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2017 was used to isolate homeless patients with ALD, and the cohort was further stratified by race and sex for comparisons. Propensity score matching was utilized to minimize covariate confounding. The primary endpoints of this study include mortality, hospital length of stay, and hospital costs; secondary endpoints included the incidence of liver complications. RESULTS: There were 3972 females/males postmatch, as well as 2224 Blacks/Whites and 4575 Hispanics/Whites postmatch. In multivariate, there were no significant differences observed in mortality rate, length of stay, and costs between sexes. Comparing liver outcomes, females had a higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, P<0.001]. In comparing Blacks versus Whites, Black patients had higher hospitalization costs (aOR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.24, P=0.01); however, there were no significant differences in mortality, length of stay, or liver complications. In comparing Hispanics versus Whites, Hispanic patients had longer length of hospital stay (aOR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.06-1.19, P<0.001), greater costs (aOR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09-1.22, P<0.001), as well as higher prevalence of liver complications including varices (aOR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, P<0.001), hepatic encephalopathy (aOR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04, P<0.001), and hepatorenal syndrome (aOR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, P=0.03). However, there was no difference in mortality between White and Hispanic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Black and Hispanic ALD patients experiencing homelessness were found to incur higher hospital charges; furthermore, Hispanic patients also had greater length of stay and higher incidence of liver-related complications compared with White counterparts.

The Trends in Health Care Utilization and Costs Associated With Primary Liver Cancer: An Analysis of United States Hospitals Between 2016 and 2019.

BACKGROUND: Primary liver cancer (PLC) has placed an increasing economic and resource burden on the health care system of the United States. We attempted to quantify its epidemiology and associated costs using a national inpatient database. METHODS: Hospital discharge and insurance claims data from the National Inpatient Sample were used to conduct this analysis. Patients diagnosed with PLC (hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma) were included in the study population, which was then stratified using patient demographics, comorbidities, degree of cancer spread, liver disease complications, and other descriptors. Trends were analyzed via regression curves for each of these strata from the years 2016 to 2019, with special attention to patterns in hospitalization incidence, inpatient mortality rate, total costs, and average per-capita costs. The resulting curves were evaluated using goodness-of-fit statistics and P-values. RESULTS: Aggregate hospitalization incidence, inpatient mortality rates, and total costs were found to significantly increase throughout the study period (P=0.002, 0.002, and 0.02, respectively). Relative to their demographic counterparts, males, White Americans, and those older than 65 years of age contributed the largest proportions of total costs. These population segments also experienced significant increases in total expenditure (P=0.04, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively). Admissions deemed to have multiple comorbidities were associated with progressively higher total costs throughout the study period (P=0.01). Of the categorized underlying liver diseases, only admissions diagnosed with alcoholic liver disease or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease saw significantly increasing total costs (P=0.006 and 0.01), although hepatitis C was found to be the largest contributor to total expenses. CONCLUSIONS: From 2016 to 2019, total costs, admission incidence, and inpatient mortality rates associated with PLC hospitalization increased. Strata-specific findings may be reflective of demographic shifts in the PLC patient populations, as well as changes in underlying chronic liver disease etiologies.

Health care leaders' perspectives on the business impact of mobile health clinics.

BACKGROUND: By analyzing how health care leaders in the United States view mobile health programs and their impact on the organization's bottom line, this study equips those who currently operate or plan to deploy mobile clinics with a business case framework. Our aim is to understand health care leaders' perspectives about business-related incentives and disincentives for mobile healthcare. METHODS: We conducted 25 semi-structured key informant interviews with U.S. health care leaders to explore their views and experiences related to mobile health care. We used deductive and inductive thematic analysis to identify patterns in the data. An advisory group with expertise in mobile health, health management, and health care finance informed data collection and analysis. RESULTS: In addition to improving health outcomes, mobile clinics can bolster business objectives of health care organizations including those related to budget, business strategy, organizational culture, and health equity. We created a conceptual framework that demonstrates how these factors, supported by community engagement and data, come together to form a business case for mobile health care. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates that mobile clinics can contribute to health care organizations' business goals by aligning with broader organizational strategies. The conceptual model provides a guide for aligning mobile clinics' work with business priorities of organizations and funders. CONCLUSIONS: By understanding how health care leaders reconcile the business pressures they face with opportunities to advance health equity using mobile clinics, we can better support the strategic and sustainable expansion of the mobile health sector.

The Impact of Malnutrition on the Hospital and Infectious Outcomes of Patients Admitted With Alcoholic Hepatitis: 2011 to 2017 Analysis of US Hospitals.

GOALS: We specifically evaluate the effect of malnutrition on the infection risks of patients admitted with alcoholic hepatitis using a national registry of hospitalized patients in the United States. BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a common manifestation of alcoholic hepatitis that affects patient outcomes. STUDY: 2011 to 2017 National Inpatient Sample was used to isolated patients with alcoholic hepatitis, stratified using malnutrition (protein-calorie malnutrition, sarcopenia, and weight loss/cachexia) and matched using age, gender, and race with 1:1 nearest neighbor matching method. Endpoints included mortality and infectious endpoints. RESULTS: After matching, there were 10,520 with malnutrition and 10,520 malnutrition-absent controls. Mortality was higher in the malnutrition cohort [5.02 vs. 2.29%, P<0.001, odds ratio (OR): 2.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.93-2.63], as were sepsis (14.2 vs. 5.46, P<0.001, OR: 2.87, 95% CI: 2.60-3.18), pneumonia (10.9 vs. 4.63%, P<0.001, OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 2.25-2.81), urinary tract infection (14.8 vs. 9.01%, P<0.001, OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.61-1.91), cellulitis (3.17 vs. 2.18%, P<0.001, OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24-1.74), cholangitis (0.52 vs. 0.20%, P<0.001, OR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.59-4.35), and Clostridium difficile infection (1.67 vs. 0.91%, P<0.001, OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.44-2.37). In multivariate models, malnutrition was associated with mortality [P<0.001, adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.61, 95% CI: 1.37-1.90] and infectious endpoints: sepsis (P<0.001, aOR: 2.42, 95% CI: 2.18-2.69), pneumonia (P<0.001, aOR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.96-2.46), urinary tract infection (P<0.001, aOR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.53-1.84), cellulitis (P<0.001, aOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.22-1.74), cholangitis (P=0.002, aOR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.36-3.80), and C. difficile infection (P<0.001, aOR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.46-2.44). CONCLUSION: This study shows the presence of malnutrition is an independent risk factor of mortality and local/systemic infections in patients admitted with alcoholic hepatitis.

The impact of frailty on the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing cholecystectomy: propensity score matched analysis of 2011-2017 US hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is an aggregate variable that encompasses debilitating geriatric conditions, which potentially affects postoperative outcomes. In this study, we evaluate the relationship between clinical frailty and post-cholecystectomy outcomes using a national registry of hospitalized patients. METHODS: 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients who underwent cholecystectomy. Patients were stratified using the Johns Hopkins ACG frailty definition into binary (frailty and no-frailty) and tripartite frailty (frailty, prefrailty, no-frailty) indicators. The controls were matched to study cohort using 1:1 propensity score-matching and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Post-match, using the binary term, frail patients (n = 40,067) had higher rates of mortality (OR 2.07 95%CI 1.90-2.25), length of stay, costs, and complications. In multivariate, frailty was associated with higher mortality (aOR 2.06 95%CI 1.89-2.24). When using tripartite frailty term, prefrail (n = 35,595) and frail (n = 4472) patients had higher mortality (prefrailty: OR 2.04 95%CI 1.86-2.23; frailty: OR 2.49 95%CI 1.99-3.13), length of stay, costs, and complications. In multivariate, prefrailty and frailty were associated with higher mortality (prefrailty: aOR 2.02 95%CI 1.84-2.21; frailty: aOR 2.54 95%CI 2.02-3.19). CONCLUSION: This study shows the presence of frailty (and prefrailty) is an independent risk factor of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Trends of Costs and Admission Rates Among Patients Admitted With Autoimmune Hepatitis: Analysis of US Hospitals Using the NIS Database.

Background and aim: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a prominent cause of chronic liver disease in the United States. This study aims to characterize the incidence, mortality, and cost implications of this condition using a national database. Method: The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample was used to select patients with AIH. After adjusting for inflation, weighted charge data were used to calculate the admission costs using charge-to-cost ratios. Demographic, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity values were used to build strata to characterize admission incidence, mortality data and aggregate and per-capita cost values. Furthermore, additional sensitivity analysis was performed using a stratified set of patients with AIH as one of the top 10 diagnosis (AIH-specific subsample). Multinomial regression curves were graphed and assessed to derive goodness-of-fit for each trend. R2 and P-values were calculated. Results: From 2016 to 2019, the total admissions related to AIH were approximately 20,984, 21,905, 22,055, and 22,680 cases, respectively (R2: 0.93, P-value: 0.03). AIH-related hospitalization aggregate costs came to $338.18, $369.17, $355.98, and $387.25 million dollars (R2: 0.75, P-value: 0.17). Significant admission growth was seen in the Southern region (R2: 0.91, P-value: 0.05). Most notably, increasing trends in total admissions were found across older age, those of White and Hispanic descent, and those with comorbidities. On the other hand, the AIH-specific subsample illustrated decreasing trends in admissions across demographics (i.e., age, gender, and race) and comorbidities; however, those with hepatic complications saw a rise in the admission trends (cirrhosis - R2: 0.98, P-value: 0.009; multiple liver complications - R2: 0.95, P-value: 0.03). Conclusion: Among AIH-specific admissions, there was a decreasing trend overall; however, there was an exceptional increase in the admissions among those with hepatic complications.

The impact of cirrhosis on the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing splenectomy: Propensity score matched analysis of the 2011-2017 US hospital database.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: While splenectomy is performed for various trauma and non-trauma indications, there is little information about the impact of cirrhosis on the post-splenectomy outcomes, despite the intricate physiological and vascular connection between the liver and the spleen. METHODS: 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample was used to select patient cases who underwent the splenectomy procedure, who were further stratified using cirrhosis. The cirrhosis-absent controls were matched to the study cohort using propensity score matching with nearest neighbor matching method. Endpoints included mortality, length of stay, hospitalization costs, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were 675 patients with cirrhosis and 675 matched controls identified from the database. Cirrhosis cohort had higher mortality (20.0 vs 7.26%, p < 0.001, OR = 3.19, 95% CI = 2.26-4.52) and hospitalization costs ($210,716 vs $186,673, p = 0.003), but shorter length of stay (11.8 vs 12.5d, p = 0.04). In terms of complications, cirrhosis cohorts had higher postoperative bleeding (7.26 vs 4.3%, p = 0.027, OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.09-2.80) and shock (3.7 vs 1.04%, p = 0.002, OR = 3.67, 95% CI = 1.58-8.54), and were more likely to be discharged to short-term hospitals and home with home health care. On multivariate analysis, presence of cirrhosis resulted in higher mortality (p < 0.001, aOR = 3.30, 95% CI = 2.33-4.69). CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhosis is an independent risk factor of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing splenectomy; given this finding, further precautious and multidisciplinary care should be rendered in these at-risk patients with cirrhosis in the setting of splenectomy.

The Clinical Impact of Cirrhosis on the Hospital Outcomes of Patients Admitted With Influenza Infection: Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 2011-2017 US Hospital Data.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Patients with cirrhosis have liver-related immune dysfunction that potentially predisposes the patients to increased influenza infection risk. Our study evaluates this cross-sectional relationship using a national registry of hospital patients. METHODS: This study included the 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample database. From this, respiratory influenza cases were isolated and stratified using the presence of cirrhosis into a cirrhosis-present study cohort and cirrhosis-absent controls; propensity score matching method was used to match the controls to the study cohort (cirrhosis-present) using a 1:1 matching ratio. The endpoints included mortality, length of stay, hospitalization costs, and influenza-related complications. RESULTS: Following the match, there were 2,040 with cirrhosis and matched 2,040 without cirrhosis admitted with respiratory influenza infection. Compared to the controls, cirrhosis patients had higher in-hospital mortality (7.79 vs 3.43% p < 0.001, OR 2.38 95% CI 1.78-3.17), longer length of stay (7.25 vs 6.52 d p < 0.001), higher hospitalization costs ($70,009 vs $65,035 p < 0.001), and were more likely be discharged to a skilled nursing facility and home healthcare (vs routine home discharges). In terms of influenza-related complications, the cirrhosis cohort had higher rates of sepsis (29.8 vs 22% p < 0.001, OR 1.51 95% CI 1.31-1.74). In the multivariate regression analysis, cirrhosis was associated with higher mortality (p < 0.001, aOR 2.31 95% CI 1.59-3.35) and length of stay (p = 0.018, aOR 1.03 95% CI 1.01-1.06). In subgroup analysis of patients with decompensated (n = 597) versus compensated cirrhosis (n = 1443), those with decompensated cirrhosis had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (12.7 vs 5.75% p < 0.001, OR 2.39 95% CI 1.72-3.32), length of stay (8.85 vs 6.59 d p < 0.001), and hospitalization costs ($92,858 vs $60,556 p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, decompensated cirrhosis was associated with increased mortality (p < 0.001, aOR 2.86 95% CI 1.90-4.32). CONCLUSION: This study shows the presence of cirrhosis to result in higher hospital mortality and postinfluenza complications in patients with influenza infection.