Acute pharmacodynamic responses to exenatide: Drug-induced increases in insulin secretion and glucose effectiveness.

AIM: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists provide multiple benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes, including improved glycaemic control, weight loss and decreased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Because drug responses vary among individuals, we initiated investigations to identify genetic variants associated with the magnitude of drug responses. METHODS: Exenatide (5 µg, subcutaneously) or saline (0.2 ml, subcutaneously) was administered to 62 healthy volunteers. Frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests were conducted to assess the impact of exenatide on insulin secretion and insulin action. This pilot study was a crossover design in which participants received exenatide and saline in random order. RESULTS: Exenatide increased first phase insulin secretion 1.9-fold (p = 1.9 × 10-9 ) and accelerated the rate of glucose disappearance 2.4-fold (p = 2 × 10-10 ). Minimal model analysis showed that exenatide increased glucose effectiveness (Sg ) by 32% (p = .0008) but did not significantly affect insulin sensitivity (Si ). The exenatide-induced increase in insulin secretion made the largest contribution to interindividual variation in exenatide-induced acceleration of glucose disappearance while interindividual variation in the drug effect on Sg contributed to a lesser extent (ß = 0.58 or 0.27, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study provides validation for the value of a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (including minimal model analysis) to provide primary data for our ongoing pharmacogenomic study of pharmacodynamic effects of semaglutide (NCT05071898). Three endpoints provide quantitative assessments of the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on glucose metabolism: first phase insulin secretion, glucose disappearance rates and glucose effectiveness.

Acute pharmacodynamic responses to exenatide: Drug-induced increases in insulin secretion and glucose effectiveness.

Background: GLP1R agonists provide multiple benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes - including improved glycemic control, weight loss, and decreased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Because drug responses vary among individuals, we initiated investigations to identify genetic variants associated with the magnitude of drug responses. Methods: Exenatide (5 µg, sc) or saline (0.2 mL, sc) was administered to 62 healthy volunteers. Frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests were conducted to assess the impact of exenatide on insulin secretion and insulin action. This pilot study was designed as a crossover study in which participants received exenatide and saline in random order. Results: Exenatide increased first phase insulin secretion 1.9-fold (p=1.9×10 -9 ) and accelerated the rate of glucose disappearance 2.4-fold (p=2×10 -10 ). Minimal model analysis demonstrated that exenatide increased glucose effectiveness (S g ) by 32% (p=0.0008) but did not significantly affect insulin sensitivity (S i ). The exenatide-induced increase in insulin secretion made the largest contribution to inter-individual variation in exenatide-induced acceleration of glucose disappearance while inter-individual variation in the drug effect on S g contributed to a lesser extent (ß=0.58 or 0.27, respectively). Conclusions: This pilot study provides validation for the value of an FSIGT (including minimal model analysis) to provide primary data for our ongoing pharmacogenomic study of pharmacodynamic effects of semaglutide ( NCT05071898 ). Three endpoints provide quantitative assessments of GLP1R agonists' effects on glucose metabolism: first phase insulin secretion, glucose disappearance rates, and glucose effectiveness. Registration: NCT02462421 (clinicaltrials.gov). Funding: American Diabetes Association (1-16-ICTS-112); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (R01DK130238, T32DK098107, P30DK072488).

Minimal Model-Derived Insulin Sensitivity Index Underestimates Insulin Sensitivity in Black Americans.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the ethnic differences in insulin sensitivity (SI) as measured by the minimal model approach (SI-MM) and the reference method, the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (EHC). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective study design, thirty Black Americans (BA) were age, sex, and BMI matched with non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Participants underwent frequently sampled intravenous tolerance test (FSIVGTT) and EHC on 2 separate days during a single visit. RESULTS: SI-MM values were significantly lower in BA when compared with NHW (0.035 ± 0.025 vs. 0.058 ± 0.036 [dL/min]/[µU/mL]; P = 0.003). However, there were no ethnic differences in SI measured by EHC (0.028 ± 0.012 vs. 0.035 ± 0.019 [dL/min]/[µU/mL]; P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: SI-MM systematically underestimates SI in BA when compared with NHW. These findings suggest that studies inferring lower SI in BA based on FSIVGTT and SI-MM should be interpreted cautiously.