Influence of the Intracranial Contents on the Head Motion under Bone Conduction.

INTRODUCTION: The mechanism of non-osseous bone conduction pathways, involving the intracranial contents (ICC) of the skull, is still not well understood. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the ICC on the skull bone wave propagation, including dependence on stimulation location and coupling. METHODS: Three Thiel-embalmed whole-head cadaver specimens were studied before and after the removal of the ICC. Stimulation was via the electromagnetic actuators from commercial bone conduction hearing aids. Osseous pathways were sequentially activated by mastoid, forehead, and bone-anchored hearing aid location stimulation via a 5-Newton steel headband or percutaneously implanted screw. Non-osseous pathways were activated by stimulation on the eye and dura via a 5-Newton steel headband and a custom-made pneumatic holder, respectively. Under each test condition, the 3D motion of the superior skull bone was monitored at ∼200 points. RESULTS: The averaged response of the skull surface showed limited differences due to the removal of the ICC. In some isolated cases, the modal pattern on the skull surface showed a trend for an upshift (∼1/2 octave) in the observed natural frequencies for drained heads. This was also consistent with an observed trend for an upshift in the transition frequency in the estimated deformation across the lateral surfaces of the temporal bones. Such changes were consistent with the expected reduction in mass and damping due to the absence of the ICC. CONCLUSION: Overall, the ICC affect to a limited extent the motion of the skull bone, with a limited trend for a reduction of its natural frequencies.

Wave propagation across the skull under bone conduction: Dependence on coupling methods.

This study is aimed at the quantitative investigation of wave propagation through the skull bone and its dependence on different coupling methods of the bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA). Experiments were conducted on five Thiel embalmed whole head cadaver specimens. An electromagnetic actuator from a commercial BCHA was mounted on a 5-Newton steel headband, at the mastoid, on a percutaneously implanted screw (Baha® Connect), and transcutaneously with a Baha® Attract (Cochlear Limited, Sydney, Australia), at the clinical bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) location. Surface motion was quantified by sequentially measuring ∼200 points on the skull surface via a three-dimensional laser Doppler vibrometer (3D LDV) system. The experimental procedure was repeated virtually, using a modified LiUHead finite element model (FEM). Both experiential and FEM methods showed an onset of deformations; first near the stimulation area, at 250-500 Hz, which then extended to the inferior ipsilateral skull surface, at 0.5-2 kHz, and spread across the whole skull above 3-4 kHz. Overall, stiffer coupling (Connect versus Headband), applied at a location with lower mechanical stiffness (the BAHA location versus mastoid), led to a faster transition and lower transition frequency to local deformations and wave motion. This behaviour was more evident at the BAHA location, as the mastoid was more agnostic to coupling condition.

Transcutaneous and percutaneous bone conduction sound propagation in single-sided deaf patients and cadaveric heads.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate transcranial transmission (TT) and the dampening effect of the skin in patients and cadaver heads. DESIGN: In patients a pure tone bone conduction audiogram for ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation was performed. The TT was defined as the difference between ipsilateral and contralateral hearing thresholds. In cadaver heads ipsilateral and contralateral promontory motion was measured using a three-dimensional Laser Doppler Vibrometer system. STUDY SAMPLE: Seven single-sided deaf patients fitted with a Baha® Connect, fifteen single-sided deaf patients without a bone conduction hearing aid and five Thiel-embalmed cadaver heads were included. RESULTS: The TT decreased with increasing frequency in patients and cadaver heads. No significant difference was seen between patients and cadaver heads. Measurements on patients and cadaver heads showed increasing skin attenuation with increasing frequency. However, the dampening effect was 3-12 dB higher in patients than in cadavers at all frequencies. CONCLUSION: The TT was not significantly different for patients compared to cadaver heads. The value of promontory motion to estimate TT in patients need to be further evaluated. The skin attenuates a BC stimulus by 10-20 dB in patients and by a smaller amount in cadaver heads, probably due to changes in the properties of the Thiel-conserved skin.

[Experimental Evaluation of the Adhear, a Novel Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Aid]. / Experimentelle Evaluation des Adhear, eines neuen transkutanen Knochenleitungshörgeräts.

OBJECTIVE: Different bone conduction hearing aids (BCHA) are commercially available. They are attached to the head in different ways. The aim of this work is an experimental evaluation of the performance of a new transcutaneous (surface mounted via adhesive pad) actuator of a BCHA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experiments were conducted on a Thiel embalmed whole head cadaver specimen. The electromagnetic actuators from a commercial BCHA (Adhear) was used to provide stepped sine stimulus in the range of 0.1-10 kHz. The BCHA was coupled to a skin surface adhesion that was placed on the mastoid. The response was monitored as motions of the ipsi- and contralateral promontory, and as motions of the ipsi-, top- and contralateral skull surface. Promontory motion was quantified via a three-dimensional laser Doppler vibrometer (3D LDV) system. Analogously, surface motion was registered by sequentially measuring ~200 points on the skull surface (~ 15-20 mm pitch) via 3D LDV. The data were compared to corresponding measurements obtained with a Baha Power that was coupled to skin on the Mastoid via a 5 Newton steelband. RESULTS: Ipsilateral and contralateral promontory vibration for stimulation with the Adhear are comparable to stimulation with the Baha Power on the 5 Newton steelband with regard to frequency dependent amplitude and phase, as well as the contribution of the motion components. The surface motion of the skull experiences a similar complex motion for both stimulation modes. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Adhear is coupled without any pressure to the skin over the mastoid whereas the Baha power is attached with a 5 Newton steelband, the vibration parameters investigated are comparable.

Dependence of skull surface wave propagation on stimulation sites and direction under bone conduction.

In order to better understand bone conduction sound propagation across the skull, three-dimensional (3D) wave propagation on the skull surface was studied, along with its dependence on stimulation direction and location of a bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA) actuator. Experiments were conducted on five Thiel embalmed whole head cadaver specimens. Stimulation, in the 0.1-10 kHz range, was sequentially applied at the forehead and mastoid via electromagnetic actuators from commercial BCHAs, supported by a 5-N steel band. The head response was quantified by sequentially measuring the 3D motion of ∼200 points (∼15-20 mm pitch) across the ipsilateral, top, and contralateral skull surface via a 3D laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) system, guided by a robotic positioner. Low-frequency stimulation (<1 kHz) resulted in a spatially complex rigid-body-like motion of the skull that depended on both the stimulation condition and head support. The predominant motion direction was only 5-10 dB higher than other components below 1 kHz, with no predominance at higher frequencies. Sound propagation direction across the parietal plates did not coincide with stimulation location, potentially due to the head base and forehead remaining rigid-like at higher frequencies and acting as a large source for the deformation patterns across the parietal sections.

Intracochlear pressure in cadaver heads under bone conduction and intracranial fluid stimulation.

BACKGROUND: The frequency dependent contributions of the various bone conduction pathways are poorly understood, especially the fluid pathway. The aim of this work is to measure and investigate sound pressure propagation from the intracranial space to the cochlear fluid. METHODS: Stimulation was provided sequentially to the bone (BC) or directly to the intracranial contents (hydrodynamic conduction, or HC) in four cadaver heads, where each ear was tested individually, for a total of 8 samples. Intracranial pressure was generated and monitored via commercial hydrophones, while the intracochlear sound pressure (ICSP) levels were monitored via custom-made intracochlear acoustic receivers (ICAR). In parallel, measurements of the 3D motion of the cochlear promontory and stapes were made via 3D Laser Doppler Vibrometer (3D LDV). RESULTS: Reliability of the intracochlear sound pressure measurements depends on the immobilization of the ICAR relative to the otic capsule. Regardless of the significant differences in absolute stapes and promontory motion, the ratios between the otic capsule velocity, the stapes volume velocity (relative to the cochlea), and the intracochlear pressure were very similar under BC and HC stimulus. Under HC, the cochlear fluid appears be activated by an osseous pathway, rather than a direct non-osseous pathway from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), however, the osseous pathway itself is activated by the CSF pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggests that the skull bone surrounding the brain and CSF could play a role in the interaction between the two CSF and the cochlea, under both stimulation conditions, at high frequencies, while inertia is dominant factor at low frequencies. Further work should be focused on the investigation of the solid-fluid interaction between the skull bone walls and the intracranial content.

Experimental investigation of the effect of middle ear in bone conduction.

OBJECTIVES: Experimental investigation of the contribution of the middle ear to bone conduction (BC) hearing sensation. METHODS: Experiments were conducted on 6 fresh cadaver whole head specimens. The electromagnetic actuators from a commercial bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA), Baha® 5 SuperPower and BoneBridge (BB), were used to provide stepped sine stimulus in the range of 0.1-10 kHz. The middle ear transfer function (METF) of each cadaver head was checked against the ASTM F2504-05 standard. In a first step, the stapes stimulus into the cochlea, under BC, was estimated based on the differential velocity between the stapes footplate and the promontory. This was based on sequential measurements of the 3D velocity of the stapes footplate and the promontory. In parallel, the differential tympanic membrane (TM) pressure was recorded by measuring sound pressure in the middle ear and in the external auditory canal each measured 1-2 mm from the TM. The measurement procedure was then sequentially repeated, after: a) opening the middle ear cavity; b) ISJ interruption; c) closing the middle ear cavity. At the end, the velocity at each actuator is measured for comparison purposes. Stapes footplate and promontory motion was quantified as the 3D motion at a single measurement point via a three-dimensional laser Doppler vibrometer (3D LDV) system. The combined motion was used for all motion parameters. RESULTS: The METF, based on the combined motion, matches better to the ASTM standard, making the measurements resilient to oblique measurement directions. The Baha actuator produced ∼10 dB SPL more output than the BB above 2 kHz. This resulted in 2-5 dB increase in the differential pressure across the TM, after middle ear cavity opening, for Baha stimulation, and up to 9 dB drop (around 2 kHz) for BB stimulation. The differential stapes motion follows linearly the level of motion of the stimulation area, however, it is affected by actuator resonances in a more complex way. Interruption of the ISJ, reduces the differential motion of the stapes with 1-5 dB, only at 1-3 kHz. CONCLUSION: Combined velocity more objectively describes the stapes and skull motion, than any individual motion component. The state of the ME cavity and the ISJ affect the cochlear input of the stapes, however, the effect is limited in frequency and magnitude.