Resection of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme in elderly patients: a pseudo-randomized analysis revealed clinical benefit.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients constitute an expanding part of our society. Due to a continuously increasing life expectancy, an optimal quality of life is expected even into advanced age. Glioblastoma (GBM) is more common in older patients, but they are still often withheld from efficient treatment due to worry of worse tolerance and have a significantly worse prognosis compared to younger patients. Our retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the therapeutic benefit from a second resection in recurrent glioblastoma of elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included a cohort of 39 elderly patients (> 65 years) with a second resection as treatment option in the case of a tumor recurrence. A causal inference model was built by multiple non- and semiparametric models, which was used to identify matched patients from our elderly GBM database which comprises 538 patients. The matched cohorts were analyzed by a Cox-regression model adjusted by time-dependent covariates. RESULTS: The Cox-regression analysis showed a significant survival benefit (Hazard Ratio: 0.6, 95% CI 0.36-0.9, p-value = 0.0427) for the re-resected group (18.0 months, 95% CI 13.97-23.2 months) compared to the group without re-resection (10.1 months, 95% CI 8.09-20.9 months). No differences in the co-morbidities or hemato-oncological side effects during chemotherapy could be detected. Anesthetic- and surgical complications were rare and comparable to the complication rate of patients undergoing the first-line resection. CONCLUSION: Taken together, in elderly patients, re-resection is an acceptable treatment option in the recurrent state of a glioblastoma. The individual evaluation of the patients' medical status as well as the chances of withstanding general anesthesia needs to be done in close interdisciplinary consultation. If these requirements are met, elderly patients benefit from a re-resection.

Accuracy of augmented reality-guided drainage versus stereotactic and conventional puncture in an intracerebral hemorrhage phantom model.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive intracranial drain placement is a common neurosurgical emergency procedure in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to retrospectively investigate the accuracy of conventional freehand (bedside) hemorrhage drain placement and to prospectively compare the accuracy of augmented/mixed reality-guided (AR) versus frame-based stereotaxy-guided (STX) and freehand drain placement in a phantom model. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center analysis evaluated the accuracy of drain placement in 73 consecutive ICH with a visual rating of postinterventional CT data. In a head phantom with a simulated deep ICH, five neurosurgeons performed four punctures for each technique: STX, AR, and the freehand technique. The Euclidean distance to the target point and the lateral deviation of the achieved trajectory from the planned trajectory at target point level were compared between the three methods. RESULTS: Analysis of the clinical cases revealed an optimal drainage position in only 46/73 (63%). Correction of the drain was necessary in 23/73 cases (32%). In the phantom study, accuracy of AR was significantly higher than the freehand method (P<0.001 for both Euclidean and lateral distances). The Euclidean distance using AR (median 3 mm) was close to that using STX (median 1.95 mm; P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the accuracy of the freehand technique was low and that subsequent position correction was common. In a phantom model, AR drainage placement was significantly more precise than the freehand method. AR has great potential to increase precision of emergency intracranial punctures in a bedside setting.