RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Community Mental Health Initiative (CMHI) is mandated to assist offenders with serious mental disorders in their transition from institutions to the community, but this incorporates different styles of service. An important unanswered question is whether these are equivalent. AIMS/HYPOTHESES: Our aim was to compare outcomes for different intervention styles within the CMHI, a programme for serious offenders in prison who also have at least one major mental disorder. Our specific research questions were as follows: do outcomes differ according to whether offenders with mental health difficulties receive (1) clinical discharge planning only; (2) community mental health services only; (3) the combined services or (4) none, although meeting criteria for any CMHI service? METHODS: Survival analyses, controlling for variables with a significant effect on recidivism or return to prison, were used to test for differences in recidivism or return to prison rates between the intervention and no-intervention groups during a fixed follow-up period. RESULTS: Men receiving only community mental health services had a significantly lower risk of returning to custody and of recidivism than men receiving discharge planning alone or no community mental health service at all, even after controlling for potential confounders including age, number of previous imprisonments and number of previous community failures. The advantages were apparent within 3-6 months and sustained for up to 4 years. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Provision of specialised community mental health services for higher-risk male offenders with a mental disorder may reduce recidivism in the short and longer term - within 3 months and up to 4 years respectively. Statistical modelling also pointed to the need to include treatment for substance abuse and assistance in identifying stable accommodation and brokerage of community services among the interventions and services. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Criminosos/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Alta do Paciente , Prisioneiros , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Prisioneiros/psicologia , Prisioneiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Prisões , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Risco , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologiaRESUMO
Drug--including opioid--dependence is common in correctional populations, however little research exists on interventions for women offenders. Based on retrospective administrative data, we examined rates of return to custody (RTC) among three samples of Canadian federal women offenders with problematic opioid use (total n=137): (1) a group initiated on MMT during incarceration who continued MMT post-release (MMT-C; n=25); (2) a group initiated on MMT but who terminated treatment post-release (MMT-T; n=67), and (3) a non-MMT control group (MMT-N; n=45). Study groups were similar regarding socio-demographic, drug use and criminogenic indicators. Based on an unadjusted Cox proportional hazards model, the MMT-C group had a 65% lower risk of RTC than the MMT-N (reference) group (HR 0.35, CI 0.13-0.90); RTC risk was not different between the MMT-T and the reference group. Most RTCs were for technical revocations (e.g. violation of a legal condition of their release). Continuous MMT following release from corrections appears to be effective in reducing recidivism in women offenders with opioid problems; barriers to MMT in the study population should be better understood and ameliorated.
Assuntos
Crime/estatística & dados numéricos , Criminosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/reabilitação , Adulto , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Manutenção , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists in Canada on outcomes related to Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) and/or differences between OAT modalities among persons in correctional institutions. This study addresses this knowledge gap by examining key characteristics and outcomes of men in Canadian federal correctional institutions across treatment modalities. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of men incarcerated in federal correctional institutions (N = 2833) were classified into four groups - three OAT participant groups: prescribed methadone (M-OAT), prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone®; S-OAT) and those who switched between the two OAT modalities at least once (X-OAT). The fourth group was a non-treatment comparison group (Non-OAT). Two-thirds of study participants were released and examined for post-release outcomes. Descriptive statistics and multi-variate Cox proportional hazards regression were used. RESULTS: The X-OAT group was more likely than the other study groups to have positive urinalysis tests, disciplinary charges, or institutional security or behavioral incidents. Survival analysis indicated that the X-OAT had an adjusted hazard of a return to custody that was 57% greater than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that individuals switching OAT modalities are a more complex group needing additional supports, especially for community reintegration. Although few of the returns to custody were due to new offences, a third of participants in the OAT groups had their release revoked, indicating a high need population mostly due to their substance use.
Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Combinação Buprenorfina e Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Canadá , Humanos , Masculino , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Correctional populations with opioid use disorder experience increased health risks during community transition periods. Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) can reduce these risks, but retention is a key challenge. This study addresses a knowledge gap by describing facilitators and barriers to OAT engagement among federal correctional populations released into the community in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: This article describes results from a longitudinal mixed-methods study examining OAT transition experiences among thirty-five individuals released from federal incarceration in Ontario, Canada. Assessments were completed within one year of participants' release. Data were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: The majority (77%) of participants remained engaged in OAT, however, 69% had their release suspended and 49% returned to custody. Key facilitators for OAT engagement included flexibility, positive staff rapport, and structure. Fragmented OAT transitions, financial OAT coverage, balancing reintegration requirements, logistical challenges, and inaccessibility of 'take-home' OAT medications were common barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Post-incarceration transition periods are critical for OAT retention, yet individuals in Ontario experience barriers to OAT engagement that contribute to treatment disruptions and related risks such as relapse and/or re-incarceration. Additional measures to support community OAT transitions are required, including improved discharge planning, amendments to OAT and financial coverage policies, and an expansion of OAT options.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Avena , Humanos , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Ontário , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodosRESUMO
AIMS: Building upon an existing methodology and conceptual framework for estimating the association between the use of substances and crime, we calculated attributable fractions that estimate the proportion of crimes explained by alcohol and six other categories of psychoactive substances. DESIGN: Cross-sectional surveys. SETTING: Canadian federal correctional institutions. PARTICIPANTS: Canadian men (n = 27 803) and women (n = 1335) offenders who began serving a custodial sentence in a Canadian federal correctional institution between 2006 and 2016. MEASUREMENTS: Offenders completed the computerized assessment of substance abuse, a self-report tool designed to assess (1) whether the offence for which they were convicted would have occurred had they not been intoxicated from alcohol or another substance, (2) whether they committed the offence to support their alcohol or other substance use and (3) whether they were dependent on alcohol (alcohol dependence scale) or another substance (drug abuse screening test). Offences were grouped into four mutually exclusive categories: violent crimes, non-violent crimes, impaired driving and substance-defined crimes. This study focused on violent and non-violent crime categories. Substances assessed were: alcohol, cannabis, opioids, other central nervous system (CNS) depressants, cocaine, other CNS stimulants and other substances. FINDINGS: According to offender self-report, 42% of all violent and non-violent crime would probably not have occurred if the perpetrator had not been under the influence of, or seeking, alcohol or other substances. Between 2006 and 2016, 20% of violent crimes and 7% of non-violent crimes in Canada were considered attributable to alcohol. In contrast, all other psychoactive substance categories combined were associated with 26% of all violent crime and 25% of non-violent crime during the same time-frame. CONCLUSIONS: Attributable fraction analyses show that more than 42% of Canadian crime resulting in a custodial sentence between 2006 and 2016 would probably not have occurred if the perpetrator had not been under the influence of or seeking alcohol or other drugs. Attributable fractions for alcohol and substance-related crime are a potentially useful resource for estimating the impact of alcohol and other substances on crime.
Assuntos
Condução de Veículo , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Canadá/epidemiologia , Crime , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Approximately 80% of offenders serving sentences in Canadian federal institutions present a history of substance use that requires psychological services. Correctional substance use programs (SUPs) have been shown to be effective in reducing reconviction for offenders who complete all sessions. However, a significant proportion of offenders entering an SUP do not complete the program for offender-related reasons such as dropping out or suspension. The purpose of the present study was to examine the prevalence of SUP noncompletion and the extent to which offenders who do not complete because of offender-related reasons differ from completers and those who do not complete for administrative reasons (e.g., transferred, released, program cancelled) on demographics, offense characteristics, substance use severity, SUP exposure, criminogenic needs, risk of recidivism, reintegration potential, and institutional charges. The study considered 4,592 federally sentenced men offenders who were enrolled in an SUP. Results showed that noncompleters for offender reasons were younger, less educated, less motivated for intervention, more likely to have committed a violent crime, more likely to have incurred a serious charge while incarcerated, more likely to have presented severe substance use, and more likely to report an unstable employment history. There were relatively few differences between SUP completers and SUP noncompleters for administrative reasons. The results highlight that noncompleters for offender reasons present individual characteristics that might affect their responsivity to treatment. Identifying offenders presenting this specific profile and tailoring psychological services to facilitate their learning could help reduce program noncompletion and improve rehabilitation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos
Criminosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Prisioneiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Adulto JovemRESUMO
We used record linkage to create a data repository of health information of persons who were federally incarcerated in Ontario and Canada. We obtained records from 56,867 adults who were federally incarcerated between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2011 from the Correctional Service of Canada; 15,248 records belonged to individuals residing in Ontario, Canada. We linked these records to the Registered Persons Database (RPDB) which contained records from 18,116,996 individuals eligible for health care in Ontario. Out of 56,867 OMS records, 22,844 (40.2%) were linked to the RPDB. Looking only at those incarcerated in Ontario, 98%, (14 953 of 15248) records were linked to RPDB. Most records of persons in Ontario-based facilities were linked deterministically. Linkage rates were lower for women, minority groups, and substance users. In conclusion, record linkage enabled the creation of a valuable data repository: there are no electronic medical records for correctional populations in Canada, making it more difficult to profile their health.