Impact of Gd-153 scanning line source attenuation correction on downstream invasive testing.

BACKGROUND: Attenuation correction (AC) using hardware and software solutions has been shown to increase the specificity of SPECT MPI by decreasing false positive results and improving prognostic ability. Theoretically this should reduce downstream testing and unnecessary costs. We sought to assess the consequences of the use of Gd-153 scanning line source attenuation correction during SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) on downstream invasive testing. METHODS: All patients who underwent a clinically indicated Tc-99m stress SPECT MPI study from 2013 to 2015 at five hospitals (2 with AC and 3 without) were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, results of testing, subsequent coronary angiography within 3 months, and revascularization were recorded. The results of the MPI studies, downstream angiogram utilization, and results of angiography were compared and a propensity matched subgroup analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 9968 patients underwent SPECT MPI during the study time period (6106 performed with AC and 3862 without). Out of 3928 patients included in the propensity matched cohort, there was no difference in the proportion of abnormal MPI results between the two groups (31.5% vs 30.4%, P = 0.47), however, more patients underwent coronary angiography within 90 days in the AC group (10.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with angiographically significant obstructive disease (53.4% vs 56.1%, P = 0.19), however, fewer patients in the AC group with obstructive coronary disease were revascularized (36.1% vs 46.8%, P = 0.04). The findings remained consistent after sub-group analysis in patients without known coronary disease. CONCLUSION: The use of scanning line source AC did not meaningfully influence the rate of abnormal MPI results or downstream invasive testing in this cohort. The clinical utility of scanning line source AC may be limited to facilitating stress-first imaging protocols.

Correction to: Risk stratification with vasodilator stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers.

The following error (highlighted in bold below) appears in the Results section of the Abstract: A total of 503 patients were followed for an average of 33.6 ± 16.2 months, with a mean age of 69.3 years; 53.7% male; and a majority (88.7%) of them undergoing vasodilator stress. A significant increase in all-cause mortality was seen based on the severity of TPD results for all vasodilators (P < .0001) and regadenoson (P < .0001). Similar prognostic ability was seen for all-cause (this should actually be cardiac) mortality. This association was maintained even after adjustment for cardiac risk factors, previous coronary disease, and troponin quartiles. MPI results (stress TPD and LVEF) added to traditional cardiac risk factors, and troponin values resulted in a significant incremental increase in the ability to predict all-cause and cardiac mortality, and stress TPD remained independently predictive for both all-cause and cardiac mortality in a multivariate model.

Risk stratification with vasodilator stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Although the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic utility of vasodilator stress MPI have been well established in the non-acute setting, the efficacy of all of the vasodilator stressors in risk stratifying post-MI patients as well as the evaluation of cardiac troponin elevation of unclear etiology is not established. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic efficacy of vasodilator stress MPI in the setting of elevated cardiac troponin to accurately risk stratify these higher-risk patients. METHODS: All patients from two tertiary centers, from 1/1/2010 through 12/31/2012, with elevated cardiac biomarkers within < 7 days and undergoing stress SPECT MPI testing were studied. Results of stress MPI were scored using a 17-segment model based on semiquantitative scoring as normal or abnormal (mild, moderate, or severe) using a total perfusion defect (TPD) of 0%, 1-10%, 10-20%, and > 20%. Mortality data through the year 2014 were obtained from the National Death Index, and survival analyses were performed. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality with the secondary endpoint being cardiac mortality. RESULTS: A total of 503 patients were followed for an average of 33.6 ± 16.2 months, with a mean age of 69.3 years; 53.7% male; and a majority (88.7%) of them undergoing vasodilator stress. A significant increase in all-cause mortality was seen based on the severity of TPD results for all vasodilators (P < .0001) and regadenoson (P < .0001). Similar prognostic ability was seen for all-cause mortality. This association was maintained even after adjustment for cardiac risk factors, previous coronary disease, and troponin quartiles. MPI results (stress TPD and LVEF) added to traditional cardiac risk factors, and troponin values resulted in a significant incremental increase in the ability to predict all-cause and cardiac mortality, and stress TPD remained independently predictive for both all-cause and cardiac mortality in a multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Vasodilator stress (including regadenoson) MPI effectively risk stratifies patients with recently elevated cardiac biomarkers, with the increasing risk of mortality with the increasing severity of perfusion defects. It provides incremental prognostic value, in addition to clinical factors and degree of troponin elevation.

Cardiovascular outcomes of emergent vs elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: regression matched meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been highly increased as the recommended option for patients with a high surgical risk. This study aims to commit a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes in severe aortic stenosis patients following emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (emergent TAVR) compared to elective TAVR or eBAV followed by elective TAVR. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. We included nine studies in the latest analysis that reported the desired outcomes. Outcomes were classified into primary outcomes: 30-day all-cause mortality and 30-day readmission rate, and secondary outcomes, which were further divided into (a) peri-procedural outcomes, (b) vascular outcomes, and (c) renal outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata v.17 (College State, TX) software. RESULTS: A total of 44,731 patients with severe aortic stenosis were included (emergent TAVR n = 4502; control n = 40045). 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the emergent TAVR group (OR: 2.62; 95% CI = 1.76-3.92; P < 0.01). Regarding post-procedural outcomes, the length of stay was significantly higher in the emergent TAVR group (Hedges's g: +4.73 days; 95% CI = +3.35 to +6.11; P < 0.01). With respect to vascular outcomes, they were similar in both groups. Regarding renal outcomes, both acute kidney injury (OR: 2.52; 95% CI = 1.59-4.00; P < 0.01) and use of renal replacement therapy (OR: 2.33; 95% CI = 1.87-2.91; P < 0.01) were significantly higher in emergent TAVR group as compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that despite increased 30-day mortality and worse renal outcomes, the post-procedural outcomes were similar in emergent and elective TAVR groups. The increased mortality and worse renal outcomes are likely due to hemodynamic instability in the emergent group. The similarity of post-procedural outcomes is evidence of the safety of TAVR even in emergent settings.

Evaluation of a pharmacist-provider collaborative clinic for treatment of iron deficiency in patients with heart failure.

PURPOSE: Intravenous iron therapy is recommended to improve symptoms and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure (HF) with -reduced ejection fraction and iron deficiency (ID), but there are limited published data on the implementation of intravenous iron therapy in practice. A pharmacist-provider collaborative ID treatment clinic was established within an advanced HF and pulmonary hypertension service to optimize IV iron therapy. The objective was to evaluate the clinical impacts of the pharmacist-provider collaborative ID treatment clinic. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare clinical outcomes among patients of the collaborative ID treatment clinic (the postimplementation group) and a cohort of patients who received usual care (the preimplementation group). The study included patients 18 years of age or older with diagnosed HF or pulmonary hypertension who met prespecified criteria for ID. The primary outcome was adherence to institutional intravenous iron therapy guidance. A key secondary outcome was ID treatment goal achievement. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients in the preimplementation group and 81 in the postimplementation group were included in the study. The rate of adherence to the institutional guidance was significantly improved in the postimplementation group (93%) compared to the preimplementation group (40%). There was no significant difference in the ID therapeutic target achievement rate between the pre- and postimplementation groups (38% vs 48%). CONCLUSION: Implementing a pharmacist-provider collaborative ID treatment clinic significantly increased the number of patients who adhered to intravenous iron therapy guidance compared to usual care.

Nutritional assessment and comparison of nutritional indices in predicting adverse outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative malnutrition has been correlated to postoperative complications in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). We sought to determine whether nutritional risk scores could identify a subset of patients with an LVAD who were at high risk of adverse events. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing LVAD placement at a single center. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), nutritional risk index (NRI), and nutrition risk in the critically ill (NUTRIC) score were calculated retrospectively from data abstracted from chart review. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality and other adverse events associated with LVAD implantation. We used χ2 or Fisher exact tests to compare these three indices against the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients with a mean age of 57.2 ± 13.7 y and a mean body mass index of 29.3 ± 6.3 kg/m2 underwent LVAD placement between 2011 and 2019. The composite outcome at 1 y occurred in 31 (76%) patients. Preoperatively, 3 patients were identified as at high nutritional risk by the PNI score and 39 by the NRI score but none by the NUTRIC score. Most patients received nutritional interventions. The nutritional risk scores did not differ significantly between patients who experienced the composite outcome and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The NRI, NUTRIC, and PNI scores did not identify a subset of patients at high risk for the composite outcome. Further studies are needed to determine how to better assess the true nutritional risk of the LVAD population. However, until better risk stratification is available, all patients with an LVAD should be consider at high risk and given appropriate nutritional interventions.

Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Oxygen therapy is frequently used for patients with acute myocardial infarction. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of oxygen therapy versus no oxygen therapy in post-acute myocardial infarction settings. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted for randomized studies, which reported cardiovascular events in oxygen versus no oxygen therapy. The evaluated outcomes were all-cause mortality, recurrent coronary events (ischemia or myocardial infarction), heart failure, and arrhythmias. Summary-adjusted risk ratios (RRs) were calculated by the random effects DerSimonian and Laird model. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed by Cochrane scale. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included a total of 7 studies with 3842 patients who received oxygen therapy and 3860 patients without oxygen therapy. Oxygen therapy did not decrease the risk of all-cause mortality (pooled RR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.21; P = .43), recurrent ischemia or myocardial infarction (pooled RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.95-1.48; P = .75), heart failure (pooled RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61-1.45; P = .348), and occurrence of arrhythmia events (pooled RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.85-1.2; P = .233) compared with the no oxygen arm. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirms the lack of benefit of routine oxygen therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction with normal oxygen saturation levels.