Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Endosc ; 38(6): 3320-3328, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684527

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity-related comorbidities may relapse in patients with weight regain after bariatric surgery. However, HDL cholesterol (HDLc) levels increase after surgery and seem to remain stable despite a gradual increase in BMI. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of weight regain after bariatric surgery on HDL cholesterol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, cohort study in patients who underwent bariatric surgery in the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona) between 2007 and 2015. Patients without at least 5 years of follow-up after surgery, under fibrate treatment, and those who required revisional surgery were excluded from the analysis. Data were collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months after surgery, and then annually until 5 years post-surgery. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were analyzed. 93.3% of patients reached > 20% of total weight loss after surgery. At 5th year, 37% of patients had regained > 15% of nadir weight, 60% had regained > 10%, and 22% had regained < 5% of nadir weight. No differences were found in HDLc levels between the different groups of weight regain, nor in the % of change in HDLc levels between nadir weight and 5 years, or in the proportion of patients with normal HDLc concentrations either. CONCLUSION: HDLc remains stable regardless of weight regain after bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , HDL-Colesterol , Aumento de Peso , Redução de Peso , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/sangue , Índice de Massa Corporal , Recidiva
2.
Surg Endosc ; 2024 Aug 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39210059

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Splenectomy has been used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the management of hematological diseases for many years. However, the emergence of new medical therapies has modified guidelines for many hematological diseases for which splenectomy was previously considered. We aimed to evaluate the evidence of a decrease in the hematological indications for splenectomy and the reasons and justifications for this change. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological disease between January 2010 and December 2023. Patients were classified into four groups: 1 autoimmune and hemolytic diseases (HAD), (2) lymphomas, (3) myeloproliferative diseases (MPN), and (4) other splenic diseases. We recorded the annual incidence of splenectomy and the ratio of new medical cases, demographic and clinical data and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 98 patients were referred for splenectomy. There was a significant progressive decrease in this surgical indication, particularly regarding HAD (p < 0.001). The indication for splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) declined to zero despite an increase in the number of patients diagnosed with this disorder (p < 0.001). The pattern of decrease in AHAI and Evans syndrome was similar to that in ITP. The group of splenectomies due to lymphoma persisted consistently during the study period, as did the indication for splenectomy in the context of lymphoma treatment. Splenectomy due to massive splenomegaly secondary to MPN was indicated only in one patient. Splenectomies due to other causes were similarly distributed over the years. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm a significant decrease in the indication for elective surgery for hematological diseases, mainly regarding autoimmune disease. The surgical community and surgical departments should be aware of this situation yet maintain the skills to adopt this technique both safely and efficiently.

3.
Ann Surg ; 276(5): 776-783, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35866643

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a risk prediction model of 90-day mortality (90DM) using machine learning in a large multicenter cohort of patients undergoing gastric cancer resection with curative intent. BACKGROUND: The 90DM rate after gastrectomy for cancer is a quality of care indicator in surgical oncology. There is a lack of well-validated instruments for personalized prognosis of gastric cancer. METHODS: Consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy between 2014 and 2021 registered in the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Registry database were included. The 90DM for all causes was the study outcome. Preoperative clinical characteristics were tested in four 90DM predictive models: Cross Validated Elastic regularized logistic regression method (cv-Enet), boosting linear regression (glmboost), random forest, and an ensemble model. Performance was evaluated using the area under the curve by 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: A total of 3182 and 260 patients from 39 institutions in 6 regions were included in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The 90DM rate was 5.6% and 6.2%, respectively. The random forest model showed the best discrimination capacity with a validated area under the curve of 0.844 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.841-0.848] as compared with cv-Enet (0.796, 95% CI: 0.784-0.808), glmboost (0.797, 95% CI: 0.785-0.809), and ensemble model (0.847, 95% CI: 0.836-0.858) in the development cohort. Similar discriminative capacity was observed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: A robust clinical model for predicting the risk of 90DM after surgery of gastric cancer was developed. Its use may aid patients and surgeons in making informed decisions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/métodos , Humanos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia
4.
World J Surg ; 45(2): 465-479, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33179126

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence regarding the outcomes of laparoscopic techniques in cases of splenomegaly. BACKGROUND: Endoscopic approaches such as laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and robotic surgery are commonly used for splenectomy, but the advantages in cases of splenomegaly are controversial. REVIEW METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to February 2020. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included for meta-analysis. In relation to laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) versus open splenectomy (OS), 12 studies revealed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay (LOS) of 3.3 days (p = <0.01) in the LS subgroup. Operative time was higher by 44.4 min (p < 0.01) in the LS group. Blood loss was higher in OS 146.2 cc (p = <0.01). No differences were found regarding morbimortality. The global conversion rate was 19.56%. Five studies compared LS and hand-assisted laparosocpic splenectomy (HALS), but no differences were observed in LOS, blood loss, or complications. HALS had a significantly reduced conversion rate (p < 0.01). In two studies that compared HALS and OS (n = 66), HALS showed a decrease in LOS of 4.5 days (p < 0.01) and increase of 44 min in operative time (p < 0.01), while OS had a significantly higher blood loss of 448 cc (p = 0.01). No differences were found in the complication rate. CONCLUSION: LS is a safe approach for splenomegaly, with clear clinical benefits. HALS has a lower conversion rate. Higher-quality confirmatory trials with standardized splenomegaly grading are needed before definitive recommendations can be provided. Prospero registration number: CRD42019125251.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Esplenectomia/métodos , Esplenomegalia/cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Esplenectomia/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Surg Endosc ; 32(6): 2739-2745, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29313122

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has increased in popularity in recent years as a definitive bariatric procedure. Despite its growing popularity worldwide, the surgical technique is not well standardized. There is a lack of evidence on the matter of the antrum size and its relation to gastric emptying and weight-loss outcomes. The aim of the study is to evaluate the influence of antrum size over gastric emptying and weight-loss outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were prospectively randomized according to the distance between the first firing and the pylorus: AR group (antrum resection-2 cm from the pylorus) and AP group (antrum preservation-5 cm from the pylorus). Gastric emptying (%GE) was evaluated by a gastric emptying scintigraphy before surgery, 2 months and 1 year after LSG. Antrum volume was measured using a MultiSlice CT Scan performed 2 months and 1 year after surgery. The percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) was calculated after 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: At 2 months after LSG the mean %GE was 69.7 ± 18 in the AR group and 72.8 ± 20 in the AP group (p = 0.69). At 1 year it was 66.5 ± 21 and 74.2 ± 16 in the AR and AP groups, respectively (p = 0.30). A significant accelerated gastric emptying was observed at 2 months (p = 0.025) and at 1 year (p = 0.013) in the AP group. Meanwhile in the AR group this increase was not significant (p = 0.12 at 2 months and p = 0.21 at 1 year). Differences regarding the %EWL between groups were no statistically significant (p = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: After LSG there is a global tendency to an accelerated gastric emptying, although only significant in the antrum preservation group; however, no differences were observed regarding the %EWL between groups after 1 year follow-up.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/métodos , Esvaziamento Gástrico/fisiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Antro Pilórico/diagnóstico por imagem , Redução de Peso , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Tamanho do Órgão , Período Pós-Operatório , Antro Pilórico/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Surg Innov ; 25(4): 400-412, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29781362

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The term big data refers to databases that include large amounts of information used in various areas of knowledge. Currently, there are large databases that allow the evaluation of postoperative evolution, such as the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS), and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical impact of information obtained from these registries regarding gastroesophageal surgery. METHODS: A systematic review using the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines was performed. The research was carried out using the PubMed database identifying 251 articles. All outcomes related to gastroesophageal surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 34 articles published between January 2007 and July 2017 were included, for a total of 345 697 patients. Studies were analyzed and divided according to the type of surgery and main theme in (1) esophageal surgery and (2) gastric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The information provided by these databases is an effective way to obtain levels of evidence not obtainable by conventional methods. Furthermore, this information is useful for the external validation of previous studies, to establish benchmarks that allow comparisons between centers and have a positive impact on the quality of care.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Doenças do Esôfago/cirurgia , Esôfago/cirurgia , Gastropatias/cirurgia , Estômago/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
J Minim Access Surg ; 14(3): 177-184, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29319024

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of achalasia fails in 10%-20% of patients. The most frequent responsible cause is the performance of an incomplete myotomy at primary surgery. The treatment when the failure happens is not well defined. In this study, we review and evaluate the possible treatments to be carried out when surgical myotomy fails. We define its benefits and results, with the purpose of defining a therapeutic algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review was performed following the guidelines established by the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement. We searched several electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMED, EMBASE and Cochrane) from January 1991 to March 2017, with the keywords 'recurrent achalasia' 'POEM remyotomy', 'esophagomyotomy failure', 'Heller myotomy failure', 'myotomy failure', 'pneumatic balloon dilatation achalasia' and combinations between them, 'redo Heller', 'redo myotomy', 'reoperative Heller'. RESULTS: A total of 61 observational studies related to the treatment of patients with failure of Heller's myotomy were initially found. Finally, 37 articles were included in our study that provided data on 289 patients. Of these 289 patients, diagnosed of failed Heller's myotomy, 87 were treated with pneumatic dilatation (PD), 166 underwent surgical revision and finally 36 were treated with POEM. No randomised controlled trial was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The three therapeutic options analysed in this review are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with achalasia with failure of surgical myotomy. The best results can be achieved following an algorithm similar to the one proposed here, where each procedure must be performed by well-experienced team in the selected modality.

8.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 402(6): 885-899, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28780622

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The rapid development of technological tools to record data allows storage of enormous datasets, often termed "big data". In the USA, three large databases have been developed to store data regarding surgical outcomes: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of studies found in these databases concerning outcomes of bariatric surgery. METHODS: We performed a systematic review using the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Research carried out using the PubMed database identified 362 papers. All outcomes related to bariatric surgery were analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies, published between 2005 and February 2017, were included. These articles were divided into (1) outcomes related to surgical techniques (12 articles), (2) morbidity and mortality (12), (3) 30-day hospital readmission (10), (4) outcomes related to specific diseases (11), (5) training (2) and (6) socio-economic and ethnic observations in bariatric surgery (7). Forty-two papers were based on data from ACS-NSQIP, nine on data from NIS and three on data from MBSAQIP. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an overview of surgical management and outcomes of bariatric surgery in the USA. Large databases offer useful complementary information that could be considered external validation when strong evidence-based medicine data are lacking. They also allow us to evaluate infrequent situations for which randomized control trials are not feasible and add specific information that can complement the quality of surgical knowledge.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Redução de Peso/fisiologia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Bases de Dados Factuais , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
10.
Surg Endosc ; 28(12): 3458-66, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24950725

RESUMO

Pelvic anatomy and tumour features play a role in the difficulty of the laparoscopic approach to total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyse whether these characteristics also influence the quality of the surgical specimen. We performed a prospective study in consecutive patients with rectal cancer located less than 12 cm from the anal verge who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 2010 and July 2013. Exclusion criteria were T1 and T4 tumours, abdominoperineal resections, obstructive and perforated tumours, or any major contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. Dependent variables were the circumferential resection margin (CMR) and the quality of the mesorectum. Sixty-four patients underwent laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision. Resection was complete in 79.1% of specimens and CMR was positive in 9.7%. Univariate analysis showed tumour depth (T status) (P = 0.04) and promontorium-subsacrum angle (P = 0.02) independently predicted CRM (circumferential resection margin) positivity. Tumour depth (P < 0.05) and promontorium-subsacrum axis (P < 0.05) independently predicted mesorectum quality. Multivariate analysis identified the promontorium-subsacrum angle (P = 0.012) as the only independent predictor of CRM. Bony pelvis dimensions influenced the quality of the specimen obtained by laparoscopy. These measurements may be useful to predict which patients will benefit most from laparoscopic surgery and also to select patients in accordance with the learning curve of trainee surgeons.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Colectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Mesocolo/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Reto/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colonoscopia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Mesocolo/diagnóstico por imagem , Mesocolo/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Reto/cirurgia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Carga Tumoral
11.
Cureus ; 16(3): e56730, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646328

RESUMO

Gastric cancer remains a significant global health challenge with varied survival rates, emphasizing the need for research into effective surgical treatments. In this retrospective study, we compared the 72-month overall and disease-free survival between laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (AG) in a cohort of 139 patients treated for gastric cancer. The analysis revealed that patients undergoing LG exhibited a significantly higher overall survival rate at 72 months compared to those undergoing AG. Although disease-free survival rates were comparable between the two groups, LG showed a marginal advantage. Subgroup analyses based on the type of gastrectomy and anastomosis demonstrated varied survival probabilities, with laparoscopic-assisted partial gastrectomy yielding the most favorable outcomes. These results highlight the importance of the choice of surgical technique in influencing survival outcomes in gastric cancer.

12.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(12)2024 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38927894

RESUMO

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate different preoperative immune, inflammatory, and nutritional scores and their best cut-off values as predictors of poorer overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients who underwent curative gastric cancer resection. Methods: This was a retrospective observational multicentre study based on data of the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Registry. Time-dependent Youden index and log-rank test were used to obtain the best cut-offs of 18 preoperative biomarkers for OS and DFS. An adjusted Cox model with variables selected by bootstrapping was used to identify the best preoperative biomarkers, which were also analysed for every TNM stage. Results: High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), high monocyte systemic inflammation index (moSII), and low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were identified as independent predictors of poor outcome: NLR > 5.91 (HR:1.73; 95%CI [1.23-2.43]), moSII >2027.12 (HR:2.26; 95%CI [1.36-3.78]), and PNI >40.31 (HR:0.75; 95%CI [0.58-0.96]) for 5-year OS and NLR > 6.81 (HR:1.75; 95%CI [1.24-2.45]), moSII > 2027.12 (HR:2.46; 95%CI [1.49-4.04]), and PNI > 40.31 (HR:0.77; 95%CI [0.60,0.97]) for 5-year DFS. These outcomes were maintained in the whole cohort for NLR and moSII (p < 0.05) but not in stage II and for PNI in all tumoral stages. The associations of NLR-PNI and moSII-PNI were also a relevant prognostic factor for OS. Conclusions: High NLR, high moSII (for stages I and III), and low PNI (regardless of tumour stage) were the most promising preoperative biomarkers to predict poor OS and DFS in gastric cancer patients treated with curative intent.

13.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 101 Suppl 4: S26-S38, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37952718

RESUMO

Sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and effective bariatric surgery in terms of weight loss and longterm improvement or resolution of comorbidities. However, its achilles heel is the possible association with the development with the novo and/or worsening of pre-existing gastroesophageal reflux disease. The anatomical and mechanical changes that this technique induces in the esophagogastric junction, support or contradict this hypothesis. Questions such as «what is the natural history of gastroesophageal reflux in the patient undergoing gastric sleeve surgery?¼, «how many patients after vertical gastrectomy will develop gastroesophageal reflux?¼ and «how many patients will worsen their previous reflux after this technique?¼ are intended to be addressed in the present article.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/métodos
14.
Cureus ; 15(12): e51186, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38283490

RESUMO

The evolution of laparoscopic surgery in gastric cancer has advanced significantly, with benefits over open surgery initially demonstrated in early gastric cancer and later in advanced stages. This study aims to evaluate postoperative complications, surgical outcomes, and anastomosis safety by comparing laparoscopic gastrectomy and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. This retrospective, observational, analytical study included patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy at a university hospital from January 2006 to February 2018. Patients were initially divided into two groups based on the type of anastomosis: laparoscopic gastrectomy (intracorporeal anastomosis) and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (extracorporeal anastomosis). Further secondary analysis was done with subgroups based on the type of gastrectomy and anastomosis performed. A total of 139 patients were analyzed, showing significant differences in postoperative complications between the two surgical approaches. The laparoscopic-assisted group exhibited a higher rate of complications. The laparoscopic approach (with intracorporeal anastomosis) was found to have a lower risk of complications and morbidity/mortality compared to the laparoscopic-assisted approach. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis resulted in lower morbidity and mortality than laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. The technique of partial gastrectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis was associated with the lowest rate of postoperative complications.

15.
J Clin Med ; 11(17)2022 Aug 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36079056

RESUMO

(1) Background: Obesity is associated with hypogonadism, sexual dysfunction, and impaired fertility in men. However, its effects on semen parameters or sexual function remain debatable. (2) Methods: This paper involves a longitudinal study in men submitted for obesity surgery at a university tertiary hospital. Patients were studied at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months after obesity surgery. At each visit, anthropometry measures were collected and hormonal and semen parameters were studied. Sexual function was evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). (3) Results: A total of 12 patients were included. The average body mass index of patients decreased from 42.37 ± 4.44 to 29.6 ± 3.77 kg/m2 at 18 months after surgery (p < 0.05). Hormonal parameters improved after obesity surgery. The proportion of sperm cells with normal morphology tended to decrease from baseline and became most significant at 18 months (5.83 ± 4.50 vs. 2.82 ± 2.08). No significant changes were found in the remaining semen parameters. Erectile function improved significantly at six months after surgery. (4) Conclusions: The authors believe that, in general, the effects of obesity surgery on fertility may be limited or even deleterious (at least in the short and midterm follow-up).

16.
Obes Surg ; 32(6): 1909-1917, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35411452

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery in the older population has been the subject of ongoing debate but several studies have recently demonstrated its short-term advantages in this age group. It is not yet clear, however, whether these benefits are long-lasting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with morbid obesity who underwent laparoscopy sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). These patients were divided into two groups: those above 60 years of age (older group) and those of 60 years or under (younger group). Variables evaluated included demographics and anthropometrics data, comorbidities, and daily medication requirements. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-two patients underwent LSG, 57 in the older group and 195 in the younger group. Outcomes related to weight loss in the older subjects were modest compared to those in the younger population (older group %EWL 41.6 vs younger group %EWL 51.1, p < 0.05, older group %TWL 24.9% vs younger group %TWL 25.2%, p < 0.05). During follow-up, both older and younger patients showed an improvement in all the comorbidities: hypertension (older 82.5% vs 38.1%, younger 52.6% vs 29.2%, p < 0.05), type 2 diabetes mellitus (older 38.6% vs 27.3%, 34.9% vs 23.9%, p < 0.05), hyperlipidemia (older 75.4% vs 42.9%, younger 35.9% vs 21.1%, p < 0.05), and OSAHS (older 57.9% vs 30%, younger 40.4% vs 7.1%, p < 0.05). The average number of daily medications used to manage comorbidities decreased in both groups. CONCLUSION: LSG in older patients is effective in terms of weight loss, improvement of comorbidities, and lower daily medication requirements up to 5 years of follow-up.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Idoso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirurgia , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso
17.
Obes Surg ; 31(2): 517-522, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32915359

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bariatric surgery in metabolically healthy obese (MHO) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, we reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent bariatric surgery at a tertiary care hospital between January 2007 and March 2015. Patients who underwent revisional surgery and patients with type 1 diabetes were excluded from the analysis. MHO patients were defined as those without a previous diagnosis of diabetes or atherogenic dyslipidemia and absence of hypoglycemic treatment or treatment with fibrates. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were included (mean age 48.97 ± 10.32 years, 68.6% of women). Sleeve gastrectomy was performed in 121 patients (64%) and a gastric bypass in 67 patients (36%). Prior to surgery, 36 patients (19%) were MHO. In the second- and third-year post-surgery, MHO patients presented a higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) (35.16% vs. 30.34%; p = 0.02 and 33.97% vs. 27.78%; p = 0.013 respectively). Multiple regression analysis showed that MHO was associated with a higher weight loss irrespective of age, sex, baseline BMI, and type of surgery. We did not detect any differences in acute complications between patients with and without MHO after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in MHO patients in our study was associated with higher weight loss than that in MUHO patients. There were no differences between the two groups in respect to acute complications following surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Fenótipo , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 98(7): 373-380, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32600648

RESUMO

It has been suggested that endoprostheses are an effective treatment for fistulae after sleeve gastrectomy, but the results published are very variable. To analyze the effectiveness of stents as treatment of leakage after sleeve gastrectomy, the Spanish Society of Obesity Surgery (SECO) and the Obesity Division of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) set up a National Registry to record treatments of leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. We have analyzed patients with leaks after sleeve gastrectomy and treated with endoprostheses: 19 medical centers reported the use of endoprostheses, where 51 endoprostheses were used in 42 patients (34 women/8 men, mean age: 43.8 years, BMI: 47.6). Global effectiveness was 45%, with a complication rate of 35%. Uni- and multivariate analyses detected no factors influencing the efficacy of treatment. A larger diameter bouggie used to calibrate the stomach was related to a higher incidence of complications. No factors were found related with better stent efficacy. The effectiveness of a second stent was very low when the previous one had not been effective.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fístula/etiologia , Fístula/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 97(8): 438-444, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31138450

RESUMO

Early-stage (T1) esophagogastric junction cancer continues to represent 2-3% of all cases. Adenocarcinoma is the most frequent and important type, the main risk factors for which are gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. Patients with mucosal (T1a) or submucosal (T1b) involvement initially require a thorough digestive endoscopy, and narrow-band imaging can improve visualization. Endoscopic treatment of these lesions includes endoscopic mucosal resection, radiofrequency ablation and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Accurate staging is necessary in order to provide optimal treatment. The most precise staging technique in these cases is endoscopic ultrasound. The suspicion of deep invasion of the submucosa, presence of unfavorable anatomopathological characteristics or impossibility to perform endoscopic resection make it necessary to consider surgical resection.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma/etiologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Esôfago de Barrett/complicações , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Dissecação/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Junção Esofagogástrica/patologia , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Mucosa/patologia , Mucosa/cirurgia , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Seleção de Pacientes , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA