Blockade of the mineralocorticoid receptor improves markers of human endothelial cell dysfunction and hematological indices in a mouse model of sickle cell disease.

Increased endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and transgenic mouse models of SCD contribute to disordered hematological, vascular, and inflammatory responses. Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation by aldosterone, a critical component of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System, modulates inflammation and vascular reactivity, partly through increased ET-1 expression. However, the role of MR in SCD remains unclear. We hypothesized that MR blockade in transgenic SCD mice would reduce ET-1 levels, improve hematological parameters, and reduce inflammation. Berkeley SCD (BERK) mice, a model of severe SCD, were randomized to either sickle standard chow or chow containing the MR antagonist (MRA), eplerenone (156 mg/Kg), for 14 days. We found that MRA treatment reduced ET-1 plasma levels (p = .04), improved red cell density gradient profile (D50 ; p < .002), and increased mean corpuscular volume in both erythrocytes (p < .02) and reticulocytes (p < .024). MRA treatment also reduced the activity of the erythroid intermediate-conductance Ca2+ -activated K+ channel - KCa 3.1 (Gardos channel, KCNN4), reduced cardiac levels of mRNAs encoding ET-1, Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-1, and protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) (p < .01), and decreased plasma PDI and myeloperoxidase activity. Aldosterone (10-8 M for 24 h in vitro) also increased PDI mRNA levels (p < .01) and activity (p < .003) in EA.hy926 human endothelial cells, in a manner blocked by pre-incubation with the MRA canrenoic acid (1 µM; p < .001). Our results suggest a novel role for MR activation in SCD that may exacerbate SCD pathophysiology and clinical complications.

Targeted BRCA1/2 population screening among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals using a web-enabled medical model: An observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate uptake and follow-up using internet-assisted population genetic testing (GT) for BRCA1/2 Ashkenazi Jewish founder pathogenic variants (AJPVs). METHODS: Across 4 cities in the United States, from December 2017 to March 2020, individuals aged ≥25 years with ≥1 Ashkenazi Jewish grandparent were offered enrollment. Participants consented and enrolled online with chatbot and video education, underwent BRCA1/2 AJPV GT, and chose to receive results from their primary care provider (PCP) or study staff. Surveys were conducted at baseline, at 12 weeks, and annually for 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 5193 participants enrolled and 4109 (79.1%) were tested (median age = 54, female = 77.1%). Upon enrollment, 35.1% of participants selected a PCP to disclose results, and 40.5% of PCPs agreed. Of those tested, 138 (3.4%) were AJPV heterozygotes of whom 21 (15.2%) had no significant family history of cancer, whereas 86 (62.3%) had a known familial pathogenic variant. At 12 weeks, 85.5% of participants with AJPVs planned increased cancer screening; only 3.7% with negative results and a significant family history reported further testing. CONCLUSION: Although continued follow-up is needed, internet-enabled outreach can expand access to targeted GT using a medical model. Observed challenges for population genetic screening efforts include recruitment barriers, improving PCP engagement, and increasing uptake of additional testing when indicated.

Patterns of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Prostate Biopsies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: This study examined changes in prostate disease screening (prostatic-specific antigen [PSA] testing), prostate biopsy testing, and prostate cancer diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic through December 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analysis included test results from men ≥ 40 years, without prior International Classification of Diseases-10 record of prostate cancer since January 2016, who received PSA or prostate biopsy testing at Quest Diagnostics during January 2018-December 2020. Monthly trends were evaluated for three periods: prepandemic (January 2018-February 2020), early-pandemic (March-May 2020), and late-pandemic (June-December 2020). RESULTS: Meeting inclusion criteria were 16,365,833 PSA and 48,819 prostate biopsy results. The average monthly number of PSA tests declined from 465,187 prepandemic to 295,786 early-pandemic (36.4% decrease; P = .01) before rebounding to 483,374 (3.9% increase; P = .23) late-pandemic. The monthly average number of PSA results ≥ 50 ng/mL (23,356; 0.14% of all PSA results) dipped from 659 prepandemic to 506 early-pandemic (23.2% decrease; P = .02) and rebounded to 674 late-pandemic (2.3% increase; P = .65). The average monthly number of prostate biopsy results decreased from 1,453 prepandemic to 903 early-pandemic (37.9% decrease; P = .01) before rebounding to 1,190 late-pandemic (18.1% decrease; P = .01). The average monthly number for Gleason score ≥ 8 (6,241; 12.8% of all prostate biopsies) declined from 182 prepandemic to 130 early-pandemic (28.6% decrease; P = .02) and decreased to 161 late-pandemic (11.5% decrease; P = .02). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that a substantial number of prostate screening opportunities and cancer diagnoses have been missed. Efforts are needed to bring such patients back for screening and diagnostic testing and to restore appropriate care for non-COVID-19-related medical conditions.

Optimizing the efficiency and quality of sipuleucel-T delivery in an academic institution.

BACKGROUND: Sipuleucel-T, an autologous cellular immunotherapy, is approved for the treatment of certain patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Sipuleucel-T is the first personalized treatment for prostate cancer to be manufactured using the immune system of each individual patient. Patient preparation and compliance are critical because patients undergo serial leukapheresis and reinfusion procedures within a relatively short time period, which may result in transient reactions. OBJECTIVES: The study aims to identify patients best suited for sipuleucel-T treatment, provide an overview of treatment, and encourage infusion sites to consider a primary contact model for the efficient coordination of care. METHODS: Treatment experiences were evaluated from 124 patients with mCRPC who received sipuleucel-T from January 2010 to August 2013 according to current best practices. Feedback was collected from reflective interdisciplinary discussion within the sipuleucel-T delivery team (nurses, advanced practice providers, urologists, and medical oncologists). FINDINGS: Early patient identification and education on treatment rationale, delivery, and expectations help ensure a successful sipuleucel-T treatment experience. A multidisciplinary coordinated-care process can facilitate proficient sipuleucel-T delivery, and the selection of a primary contact for care coordination offers benefits, such as clear and efficient education.