Optimal Chest Compression Point During Pediatric Resuscitation: Implications for Pediatric Resuscitation Practice by CT Scans.

OBJECTIVES: Current European guidelines for pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) recommend the lower half of the sternum as the chest compression point (CP). In this study, we have used thoracic CT scans to evaluate recommended and optimal CP in relation to cardiac anatomy and structure. DESIGN: Analysis of routinely acquired thoracic CT scans acquired from 2000 to 2020. SETTING: Single-center pediatric department in a German University Hospital. PATIENTS: Imaging data were obtained from 290 patients of 3-16 years old. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured and analyzed 14 thoracic metrics in each thoracic CT scan. In 44 of 290 (15.2%) scans, the recommended CP did not match the level of the cardiac ventricles. Anatomically, the optimal CP was one rib or one vertebral body lower than the recommended CP, that is, the optimal CP was more caudal to the level of the body of the sternum in 67 of 290 (23.1%) scans. The recommended compression depth appeared reasonable in children younger than 12 years old. At 12 years old or older, the maximum compression depth of 6 cm is less than or equal to one-third of the thoracic depth. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of thoracic CT scans in children 3-16 years old, we have found that optimal CP for CPR appears to be more caudal than the recommended CP. Therefore, it seems reasonable to prefer to use the lower part of the sternum for CPR chest compressions. At 12 years old or older, a compression depth similar to that used in adults-6 cm limit-may be chosen.

Hemorrhage, Disseminated Intravascular Coagulopathy, and Thrombosis Complications Among Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: An International COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and outcomes associated with hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, and thrombosis (HECTOR) complications in ICU patients with COVID-19. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Two hundred twenty-nine ICUs across 32 countries. PATIENTS: Adult patients (≥ 16 yr) admitted to participating ICUs for severe COVID-19 from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: HECTOR complications occurred in 1,732 of 11,969 study eligible patients (14%). Acute thrombosis occurred in 1,249 patients (10%), including 712 (57%) with pulmonary embolism, 413 (33%) with myocardial ischemia, 93 (7.4%) with deep vein thrombosis, and 49 (3.9%) with ischemic strokes. Hemorrhagic complications were reported in 579 patients (4.8%), including 276 (48%) with gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 83 (14%) with hemorrhagic stroke, 77 (13%) with pulmonary hemorrhage, and 68 (12%) with hemorrhage associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannula site. Disseminated intravascular coagulation occurred in 11 patients (0.09%). Univariate analysis showed that diabetes, cardiac and kidney diseases, and ECMO use were risk factors for HECTOR. Among survivors, ICU stay was longer (median days 19 vs 12; p < 0.001) for patients with versus without HECTOR, but the hazard of ICU mortality was similar (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% CI 0.92-1.12; p = 0.784) overall, although this hazard was identified when non-ECMO patients were considered (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.02-1.25; p = 0.015). Hemorrhagic complications were associated with an increased hazard of ICU mortality compared to patients without HECTOR complications (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.09-1.45; p = 0.002), whereas thrombosis complications were associated with reduced hazard (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79-0.99, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: HECTOR events are frequent complications of severe COVID-19 in ICU patients. Patients receiving ECMO are at particular risk of hemorrhagic complications. Hemorrhagic, but not thrombotic complications, are associated with increased ICU mortality.

Pyrophosphate as a novel anticoagulant for storage of whole blood: A proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Citrate is the only anticoagulant currently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for the long-term storage of blood for transfusion. Citrate inhibits phosphofructokinase and may play a pro-inflammatory role, suggesting that there may be an advantage to using alternative anticoagulants. Here, we examine the use of pyrophosphate as an anticoagulant. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Whole blood samples from healthy donors were anticoagulated either with citrate-phosphate-adenine-dextrose (CPDA-1) or our novel anticoagulant mixture pyrophosphate-phosphate-adenine-dextrose (PPDA-1). Samples were assessed for coagulation capacity by thromboelastography immediately after anticoagulation (T0) with and without recalcification, as well as 5 hours after anticoagulation (T1) with recalcification. Complete blood counts were taken at both timepoints. Flow cytometry to evaluate platelet activation as well as blood smears to evaluate cellular morphology were performed at T1. RESULTS: No clotting was detected in samples anticoagulated with either solution without recalcification. After recalcification, clotting function was restored in both groups. R-Time in recalcified PPDA-1 samples was shorter than in CPDA-1 samples. A reduction in platelet count at T1 compared to T0 was observed in both groups. No significant platelet activation was observed in either group at T1. Blood smear indicated platelet clumping in PPDA-1. CONCLUSION: We have shown initial proof of concept that pyrophosphate functions as an anticoagulant at the dose used in this study, though there is an associated loss of platelets over time that may limit its usefulness for blood storage. Further dose optimization of pyrophosphate may limit or reduce the loss of platelets.

[Interhospital critical care transport]. / Interhospitaler Intensivtransport.

Critically ill patients in need of specialized diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, but are being cared for in a hospital without such equipment, have to be transferred to appropriate centers without discontinuation of current critical care (interhospital critical care transfer). These transfers are resource intensive, challenging, and require high logistical effort, which must be managed by a specialized and highly trained team, predeployment planning and efficient crew-resource management strategies. If planned adequately, interhospital critical care transfers can be performed safely without frequent adverse events. Beside routine interhospital critical care transfers, there are special missions (e.g., for patients in quarantine or supported by extracorporeal organ support) that might require adaption of the team composition or standard equipment. This article describes interhospital critical care transport missions including their different phases and special circumstances.

[Airwaymangement in Emergencies]. / Atemwegsmanagement im Notfall.

Emergency airway management is a rare but essential emergency medical intervention directly impacting morbidity and mortality of emergency patients. The success of airway management depends on various factors such as patient anatomy, environmental aspects and the provider performing the procedure. Therefore, the use of a clearly structured algorithm for anticipating the difficult airway in emergency situations is strongly recommended. Our article explains different ways of securing the airway as part of a structured algorithm as well as pitfalls and helpful tips.

[Physician-assisted interhospital transfer-an analysis from Schleswig-Holstein]. / Arztbegleitete Interhospitaltransporte ­ eine Analyse aus Schleswig-Holstein.

BACKGROUND: The need for interhospital transport (IHT) of intensive care patients is increasing due to changes in the hospital environment. Interhospital transports are challenging and require careful operational planning of personnel and rescue vehicles. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the need for IHT, an analysis was conducted in the service area of the emergency medical service central dispatch center (IRLS) in Schleswig-Holstein. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Emergency physician-assisted IHT were analyzed in the period from 01.10.2021 to 30.09.2022. RESULTS: Of a total of 158,823 documented IRLS missions, 2264 (1.4%) records could be identified and included as IHT: 1389 IHT (61.4%) were managed by specialized ambulances, 875 (38.6%) by primary care ambulances. Primary care ambulances were mainly used for time-critical transfers and outside the duty hours of the intensive care ambulances, 21.2 % were by air. Of all IHT, 43.1% were required to hospitals with a higher level of medical care. CONCLUSION: Emergency physician-assisted IHT are a relevant part of the emergency service's operational spectrum and concern both primary care and specialized rescue vehicles. A relevant number of urgent IHT were recorded outside the duty hours of the intensive care ambulances. For emergency transports during nighttime, an expansion of air-based transfer capacities should be considered due to the time advantage. For less urgent IHT, an adjustment of the capacities of specialized ground-based vehicles in Schleswig-Holstein seems reasonable.

External Validation of the PREdiction of Survival on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy (PRESET) Score: A Single Center Cohort Experience.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition affecting >10% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients worldwide with a mortality of up to 59% depending on severity. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potentially life-saving procedure in severe ARDS but is technically and financially challenging. In recent years, various scoring systems have been proposed to select patients most likely to benefit from ECMO, with the PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy (PRESET) score being one of the most used. We collected data from 283 patients with ARDS of various etiology who underwent veno-venous (V-V) ECMO therapy at a German tertiary care ICU from January 2012 to December 2022. Median age in the cohort was 56 years, and 64.31% were males. The in-hospital mortality rate was 50.88% (n = 144). The median (25%; 75% quartile) severity scores were 38 (31; 49) for Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, 12 (10; 13) for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and 7 (5; 8) for PRESET. Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II displayed the best prognostic value (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC]: 0.665 [confidence interval (CI): 0.574-0.756; p = 0.046]). Prediction performance was weak in all analyzed scores despite good calibration. Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II had the best discrimination after adjustment of our original cohort. The use of scores explored in this study for patient selection for eligibility for V-V ECMO is not recommendable.

Hemorrhage and thrombosis in COVID-19-patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an international study based on the COVID-19 critical care consortium.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rescue therapy in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19. While bleeding and thrombosis complicate ECMO, these events may also occur secondary to COVID-19. Data regarding bleeding and thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients on ECMO are sparse. METHODS: Using the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium database, we conducted a retrospective analysis on adult patients with severe COVID-19 requiring ECMO, including centers globally from 01/2020 to 06/2022, to determine the risk of ICU mortality associated with the occurrence of bleeding and clotting disorders. RESULTS: Among 1,248 COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO support in the registry, coagulation complications were reported in 469 cases (38%), among whom 252 (54%) experienced hemorrhagic complications, 165 (35%) thrombotic complications, and 52 (11%) both. The hazard ratio (HR) for Intensive Care Unit mortality was higher in those with hemorrhagic-only complications than those with neither complication (adjusted HR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.28-1.99, p < 0.001). Death was reported in 617 of the 1248 (49.4%) with multiorgan failure (n = 257 of 617 [42%]), followed by respiratory failure (n = 130 of 617 [21%]) and septic shock [n = 55 of 617 (8.9%)] the leading causes. CONCLUSIONS: Coagulation disorders are frequent in COVID-19 ARDS patients receiving ECMO. Bleeding events contribute substantially to mortality in this cohort. However, this risk may be lower than previously reported in single-nation studies or early case reports. Trial registration ACTRN12620000421932 ( https://covid19.cochrane.org/studies/crs-13513201 ).

Pharmacologic Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Burn Patients.

The majority of hospitalized burn patients experience pain, agitation, and delirium. The development of each one of these conditions can also lead to, or worsen, the others. Providers, therefore, need to thoroughly assess the underlying issue to determine the most effective treatment. Multimodal pharmacologic regimens are often used in conjunction with non-pharmacologic strategies to manage pain, agitation, and delirium. This review focuses on the pharmacologic management of these complicated patients in a critical-care setting.

[Interhospital critical care transport]. / Interhospitaler Intensivtransport.

Critically ill patients in need of specialized diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, but are being cared for in a hospital without such equipment, have to be transferred to appropriate centers without discontinuation of current critical care (interhospital critical care transfer). These transfers are resource intensive, challenging, and require high logistical effort, which must be managed by a specialized and highly trained team, predeployment planning and efficient crew-resource management strategies. If planned adequately, interhospital critical care transfers can be performed safely without frequent adverse events. Beside routine interhospital critical care transfers, there are special missions (e.g., for patients in quarantine or supported by extracorporeal organ support) that might require adaption of the team composition or standard equipment. This article describes interhospital critical care transport missions including their different phases and special circumstances.

[Ultrasound diagnostics in prehospital emergency care-do we need a standardized educational approach?] / Ultraschalldiagnostik in der prähospitalen Notfallmedizin ­ brauchen wir eine standardisierte Ausbildung?

BACKGROUND: Limited diagnostic capabilities represent an ongoing obstacle in out-of-hospital emergency settings. Prehospital deployment of ultrasound might reduce this particular diagnostic gap. So far, little is known about the availability and usage of ultrasound in emergency medical services (EMS) or about the level of education of EMS physicians regarding prehospital ultrasound (point-of-care ultrasound, POCUS). METHODS: A nationwide survey was conducted among emergency physicians in Germany focusing on POCUS education and experience. RESULTS: Between 02/2022 and 05/2022, 1079 responses were registered, of which 853 complete responses were analyzed. Of the emergency physicians, 71.9% consider POCUS beneficial for out-of-hospital diagnostics and 43.8% had participated in a certified POCUS training prior to the survey. The self-evaluation of POCUS skills among emergency physicians depended significantly on their participation in a certified training (p < 0.001) and frequent ultrasound routine (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The majority of participating emergency physicians in Germany consider POCUS to improve out-of-hospital diagnostic capabilities. Participation in a certified POCUS training and frequent use of ultrasound facilitated higher self-confidence in POCUS skills.