Forklift-related lower limb injuries: a retrospective case series study with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

AIM: Forklift trucks can cause serious lower limb trauma with long-lasting sequelae to patients. The aim of this study was to analyse a case series of patients with forklift-related injuries over 7 years at a level 1 major trauma centre in the UK and present their patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with long-term follow-up. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the largest case series study in the UK describing forklift injuries. METHODS: Retrospective case note analysis of 19 patients over 7 years. Data including demographics, injury mechanism, pattern of injury, management, length of hospital stay, number of operations and complications were extracted from the notes. We used 'Enneking score' as a validated tool for PROMs. RESULTS: Seventeen men and two women with mean age of 47 years; 20% had bilateral injuries and 34% had multi-level fractures. The mean number of theatre sessions was 5.21, while the mean length of hospital stay was 30.10 days. There was one mortality. Twelve patients (63%) required reconstruction with free tissue transfer, with one flap failure. The mean long-term Enneking percentage score was 57.33%. The mean Enneking score for patients in this study is lower than our institute's score for Gustilo 3B, highlighting the gravity of these injuries. CONCLUSION: Forklifts can cause grave injuries with massive energy transfer. This study highlights the seriousness of those injuries, thus guiding patient counselling and optimising planning of management.

From chaos to a new norm: The Birmingham experience of restructuring the largest plastics department in the UK in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented unprecedented challenges for healthcare systems worldwide. The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, has one of the largest burns, hands and plastics department in the UK, totalling 83 doctors. Our response to the COVID-19 response was uniquely far reaching, with our department being given responsibility of an entire 36 bed medical COVID-19 ward in addition to our commitment to specialty-specific work, and saw half of our work force re-deployed to Intensive Treatment Unit (ITU). Our aim was to exploit the high calibre of doctors found in plastic surgery, and to demonstrate, we were able to support the COVID-19 effort beyond our normal scope of practice. In order to achieve this aim, the department underwent significant structural and leadership changes. Factors considered included: rota and shift pattern changes to implement depth and resilience to sudden fluctuations in staffing levels; a preparatory phase for focussed upskilling and relevant training packages to be delivered; managing the COVID-19 ward cover and ITU deployment; adjustments to our front of house and elective specialty-specific service, including developing alternative and streamlined patient pathways; mitigating the effects on plastic surgical training during the pandemic; the importance of communications for patient care and physician wellbeing; and leadership techniques and styles we considered important. By sharing our experience during this pandemic, we hope to reflect on and share lessons learned, as well as to demonstrate that it is possible to rapidly mobilise and retrain plastic surgeons at all levels to contribute safely and productively beyond a specialty-specific scope of care.

A new adaptation for a secure surgical drain placement and a comparison with four common drain fixation methods.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of postoperative drain fixation cannot be overemphasised. There are numerous described techniques for drain fixation. However, to our knowledge, there is no evidence-based comparison between the various techniques of drain fixation used in postoperative management. We describe a new method and compare its reliability with four other commonly used methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five methods were chosen for testing based on current trends in clinical practice: centurion sandal with plastic locking ties, centurion sandal or lattice method, centurion sandal with half-inch Steristrips®, double and multiple looped methods. We used an Instron 8872® tensiometer to apply a measured force to a secured drain. Each fixation method was tested ten times and all fixation methods were performed by the same experienced surgeon. We measured the average number of cycles before failure, the average displacement of the tube at failure and the time needed to apply each fixation method. RESULTS: The number of cycles completed before failure showed that the centurion sandal method, the centurion sandal with plastic ties and the centurion sandal method with Steristrips had the lowest failure rate. The amount of displacement was the least in the centurion sandal with plastic ties followed by the double-loop method and centurion sandal with Steristrips. There was little difference in the time taken to complete the fixation methods (range 21-33 seconds). DISCUSSION: We recommend the use of the centurion sandal with plastic locking ties, centurion sandal with Steristrips followed by the centurion sandal method alone as fixation techniques that are quick to perform, secure and reliable.

Laboratory risk indicator for necrotising fasciitis (LRINEC) score for the assessment of early necrotising fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature.

Introduction Early operative debridement of necrotising fasciitis is a major outcome determinant. Identification and diagnosis of such patients can be clinically difficult. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) score first published in 2004 is based on routinely performed parameters and offers a method for identifying early cases. No literature review has yet been performed on the application of such a score. Methods A systematic review of English-language literature was performed from 2004 to 2014 to identify articles reporting use of LRINEC score and the incidence of necrotising fasciitis. We performed a critical review of PubMed, Medline and Embase in line with the PRISMA statement. A meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model and 95% confidence interval. Suitable correlation coefficient and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also calculated. Results After application of inclusion criteria, 16 studies with 846 patients were included. The mean LRINEC score in patients with necrotising fasciitis was 6.06. Two papers reported LRINEC score in patients without necrotising fasciitis with a mean 2.45. All six studies with a reported coefficient of variance were < 1; Pearson correlation coefficient was r = 0.637 (P = 0.011). An ROC curve showed an area under the curve of 0.927. Conclusions The LRINEC score is a useful clinical determinant in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of patients with necrotising fasciitis, with a statistically positive correlation between LRINEC score and a true diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis.

Split anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap for vulva reconstruction: a case report.

The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is a popular reconstructive choice due to its versatility and minimal donor site morbidity. It has been used in the reconstruction of perineal and vulval defects as a pedicled or free flap. We describe, for the first time, use of a split ALT flap to reconstruct a vulval defect following excision for recurrent tumour. Splitting the ALT increases the versatility yet further without compromising flap vascularity.