Noise in the operating room during induction of anesthesia: impact of a quality improvement initiative.

PURPOSE: Noise in the operating room (OR) is common and associated with negative effects on anesthesiologists, surgeons, and patient outcomes. Induction of anesthesia is among the loudest perioperative periods. Despite its critical nature, there is little data on noise levels during induction, associated patient and anesthesiologist satisfaction, and the effects of noise reduction strategies. METHODS: We conducted a two-part prospective interventional quality improvement project on the care of adult patients receiving general anesthesia for elective noncardiac surgery. For part A, we measured average and peak noise (dB[A]) levels during anesthesia induction in N = 100 cases and administered a satisfaction questionnaire to anesthesiologists. We then applied a multidisciplinary educational program to OR personnel on active noise reduction strategies and subsequently collected data during N = 109 cases in a post-intervention phase. For part B, we administered satisfaction questionnaires to N = 100 patients pre- vs postintervention, respectively. RESULTS: Median [interquartile range] noise levels throughout induction were 66.0 [62.5-68.6] dB(A) preintervention vs 63.5 [60.1-65.4] dB[A] post-intervention (Hodges-Lehmann estimator of the difference, - 2.7 dB[A]; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 4.0 to - 1.5; P < 0.001). Peak noise levels during induction were 87.3 [84.0-90.5] dB(A) preintervention and 86.2 [81.8-89.3] dB(A) postintervention (Hodges-Lehmann estimator of the difference, - 1.8 dB[A]; 95% CI, - 3.3 to - 0.3; P = 0.02). Noise-related anesthesiologist satisfaction postintervention was significantly improved in multiple domains, including assessment of noise having distracted anesthesiologists. Patient satisfaction was high pre-intervention and did not significantly improve further. CONCLUSION: In this quality improvement project, average noise levels during induction of anesthesia, anesthesiologist satisfaction, and anesthesiologists' perceived ability to perform were improved following a multidisciplinary educational program on noise reduction in the OR. STUDY REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04204785); registered 19 December 2019.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le bruit en salle d'opération (SOP) est fréquent et associé à des effets négatifs sur les anesthésiologistes, les chirurgiens et les issues des patients. L'induction de l'anesthésie est l'une des périodes périopératoires les plus bruyantes. Malgré sa nature critique, il existe peu de données sur les niveaux sonores pendant l'induction, la satisfaction des patients et des anesthésiologistes qui y est reliée, et les effets des stratégies de réduction du bruit. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené un projet prospectif et interventionnel, en deux parties, d'amélioration de la qualité sur les soins aux patients adultes recevant une anesthésie générale pour une chirurgie non cardiaque non urgente. Dans le cadre de la première partie A, nous avons mesuré les niveaux de bruit moyen et maximaux (dB[A]) pendant l'induction de l'anesthésie dans n = 100 cas et administré un questionnaire de satisfaction aux anesthésiologistes. Nous avons ensuite appliqué un programme de formation multidisciplinaire au personnel de la salle d'opération sur les stratégies de réduction active du bruit et avons ensuite recueilli des données pour n = 109 cas dans une phase post-intervention. Pour la deuxième partie B, nous avons administré des questionnaires de satisfaction à n = 100 patients pré- vs post-intervention, respectivement. RéSULTATS: Les niveaux de bruit médians [écart interquartile] tout au long de l'induction étaient de 66,0 [62,5­68,6] dB(A) avant l'intervention vs 63,5 [60,1­65,4] dB[A] après l'intervention (estimateur de Hodges-Lehmann, − 2,7 dB[A]; intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 %, − 4,0 à − 1,5; P < 0,001). Les niveaux maximaux de bruit pendant l'induction étaient de 87,3 [84,0­90,5] dB(A) avant l'intervention et de 86,2 [81,8­89,3] dB(A) après l'intervention (estimateur de Hodges-Lehmann, − 1,8 dB[A]; IC 95 %, − 3,3 à − 0,3; P = 0,02). La satisfaction des anesthésiologistes par rapport au bruit après l'intervention a été considérablement améliorée dans de nombreux domaines, y compris l'évaluation du bruit ayant distrait les anesthésiologistes. La satisfaction des patients était élevée avant l'intervention et ne s'est pas améliorée de manière significative. CONCLUSION: Dans ce projet d'amélioration de la qualité, les niveaux de bruit moyens lors de l'induction de l'anesthésie, la satisfaction des anesthésiologistes et la capacité perçue des anesthésiologistes à réaliser leurs tâches ont été améliorés à la suite d'un programme de formation multidisciplinaire sur la réduction du bruit en salle d'opération. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04204785); enregistrée le 19 décembre 2019.

Controlling lipid fluxes at glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase step in yeast: unique contribution of Gat1p to oleic acid-induced lipid particle formation.

The ability to channel excess fatty acids into neutral lipids like triacylglycerol (TAG) is a critical strategy used by cells to maintain lipid homeostasis. Upon activation to acyl-CoA, fatty acids become readily available as substrates for acyltransferases involved in neutral lipid synthesis. Neutral lipids are then packed into organelles derived from the endoplasmic reticulum called lipid particles (LPs). The first acylation step in the de novo pathway for TAG synthesis is catalyzed by glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferases (GPATs). Two isoforms, Gat1p/Gpt2p and Gat2p/Sct1p, are present in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Previous evidence indicated that these enzymes contribute differentially to the synthesis of TAG in actively growing cells. In this work we studied the role of the yeast GPATs in the formation of LPs induced by a surplus of oleic acid. Yeast lacking Gat1p (but not Gat2p) were sensitive to oleate and failed to accumulate LPs induced by this unsaturated fatty acid. It is shown that oleate induces dephosphorylation of Gat1p as well as an increment in its levels. Most importantly, we identified novel Gat1p crescent structures that are formed in the presence of oleate. These structures are connected with the endoplasmic reticulum and are intimately associated with LPs. No such structures were observed for Gat2p. A crucial point of control of lipid fluxes at the GPAT step is proposed.

Does laryngoscopic view after intubation predict laryngoscopic view before intubation?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if an endotracheal (ET) tube will distort the laryngeal view obtained with direct laryngoscopy measuring with the modified Cormack-Lehane scale (MCL). DESIGN: Observational single-arm study. SETTING: The University of Calgary teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients between 18 and 86 years of age undergoing elective surgical procedures. A total of 173 patients were enrolled and analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: Direct laryngoscopy view obtained before ET intubation and directly after intubation. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The MCL scales were described for each view obtained and compared to each other with each patient serving as their own control. The primary objective was a change in the best obtainable view by direct laryngoscopy from an acceptable view (MCLS 1 or 2a) to an unacceptable view (MCLS 2b, 3, or 4) or changing from an unacceptable view (MCLS 2b, 3, or 4) to an acceptable view (MCLS 1 or 2a). The main finding of this study was that the ET tube altered the MCL in 58 (33%) of 173 patients, "worsening" the grade in 30 patients (17.34%) and "improving" the grade in 28 patients (16.18%). CONCLUSIONS: We performed a prospective observational study to address the predictive value of postintubation laryngoscopy grade in adults. The presence of the ET tube both increased visualization of the glottis and worsened the view in different subjects. The important outcome was that the presence of the ET tube did in fact change the view obtained of the larynx during direct laryngoscopy. In conclusion, postintubation MCL grades may not be reliable to predict laryngeal grade and should be used with caution in the right clinical context.