Somatostatin Versus Octreotide for Prevention of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: The PREFIPS Randomized Clinical Trial: A FRENCH 007-ACHBT Study.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatectomy is open to debate. The present study compares clinically significant POPF rates in patients randomized between somatostatin versus octreotide as prophylactic treatment. METHODS: Multicentric randomized controlled open study in patient's candidate for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) comparing somatostatin continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days versus octreotid 100 µg, every 8 hours subcutaneous injection for 7 days, stratified by procedure (PD vs DP) and size of the main pancreatic duct (>4 mm) on grade B/C POPF rates at 90 days based on an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Of 763 eligible patients, 651 were randomized: 327 in the octreotide arm and 324 in the somatostatin arm, with comparable the stratification criteria - type of surgery and main pancreatic duct dilatation. Most patients had PD (n=480; 73.8%), on soft/normal pancreas (n=367; 63.2%) with a nondilated main pancreatic duct (n=472; 72.5%), most often for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n=311; 47.8%). Almost all patients had abdominal drainage (n=621; 96.1%) and 121 (19.5%) left the hospital with the drain in place (median length of stay=16 days). A total of 153 patients (23.5%) developed a grade B/C POPF with no difference between both groups: 24.1%: somatostatin arm and 22.9%: octreotide arm (χ 2 test, P =0.73, ITT analysis). Absence of statistically significant difference persisted after adjustment for stratification variables and in per-protocol analysis. CONCLUSION: Continuous intravenous somatostatin is not statistically different from subcutaneous octreotide in the prevention of grade B/C POPF after pancreatectomy. FINDINGS: In the PREFIPS Randomized Clinical Trial including 651 patients, a total of 153 patients (23.5%) developed a grade B/C POPF with no significant difference between both groups: 24.1%: somatostatin arm and 22.9%: octreotide arm (χ 2 test, P =0.73, ITT analysis). Absence of statistically significant difference persisted after adjustment for stratification variables and in per-protocol analysis.

Optimization of vigabatrin dosage in children with epileptic spasms: A population pharmacokinetic approach.

AIMS: Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug used to treat some forms of severe epilepsy in children. The main adverse effect is ocular toxicity, which is related to the cumulative dose. The aim of the study is to identify an acceptable exposure range, both through the development of a population pharmacokinetic model of vigabatrin in children enabling us to calculate patient exposure and through the study of therapeutic response. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including children with epilepsy followed at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital who had a vigabatrin assay between January 2019 and January 2022. The population pharmacokinetic study was performed on Monolix2021 using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Children treated for epileptic spasms were classified into responder and nonresponder groups according to whether the spasms resolved, in order to identify an effective plasma exposure range. RESULTS: We included 79 patients and analysed 159 samples. The median age was 4.2 years (range 0.3-18). A 2-compartment model with allometry and creatinine clearance on clearance best fit our data. Exposure analysis was performed on 61 patients with epileptic spasms. Of the 22 patients who responded (36%), 95% had an AUC0-24 between 264 and 549 mg.h.L-1. CONCLUSIONS: The population pharmacokinetic model allowed us to identify bodyweight and creatinine clearance as the 2 main factors explaining the observed interindividual variability of vigabatrin. An acceptable exposure range was defined in this study. A target concentration intervention approach using this pharmacokinetic model could be used to avoid overexposure in responder patients.

Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor Population Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A First Step Toward Personalized Therapy.

BACKGROUND: A major breakthrough in cystic fibrosis (CF) therapy was achievedAQ1 with CFTR modulators. The lumacaftor/ivacaftor combination is indicated for the treatment of CF in pediatric patients above 6 years old. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of lumacaftor/ivacaftor in these vulnerable pediatric populations are AQ2crucial to optimize treatment protocols. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The objectives of this study were to describe the population PK (PPK) of lumacaftor and ivacaftor in children with CF, and to identify factors associated with interindividual variability. The association between drug exposure and clinical response was also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 75 children were included in this PPK study, with 191 concentrations available for each compound and known metabolites (lumacaftor, ivacaftor, ivacaftor-M1, and ivacaftor-M6). PPK analysis was performed using Monolix software. A large interindividual variability was observed. The main sources of interpatient variability identified were patient bodyweight and hepatic function (aspartate aminotransferase). Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was statistically associated with the level of exposure to ivacaftor after 48 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first analysis of lumacaftor/ivacaftor PPK in children with CF. These data suggest that dose adjustment is required after identifying variability factors to optimize efficacy. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring as a basis for dose adjustment in children with CF may be useful.