Clinical presentation of young persons with epilepsy who have not transitioned to adult health care systems: A single-site retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the demographics and clinical presentation of young persons with epilepsy (YPE) 18-years and older who have not transitioned to adult health care systems (AHCS) and to investigate the number of neurology-related hospital encounters in this population before and after attaining adulthood. METHODS: We conducted a single-site retrospective cohort study at Dayton Children's Hospital (DCH) between 12/01/2021 and 5/31/2022. We included epilepsy patients 18-years and older. Patient demographics, insurance, number of hospitalizations and Emergency Department (ED) visits before and after 18 years of age, clinical presentation, and comorbidities were collected. RESULTS: 251 patient charts were reviewed. The median age was 20.9 years. The most common comorbidities were intellectual disability (36 %) and psychiatric illnesses (59 %). The majority had generalized epilepsy (52 %) and tonic-clonic seizures (56 %). 58 % of the patients had infrequent seizures in the past year. Documentation of transition to AHCS discussion occurred in only 3 % of patients before age 18 compared to 35 % of patients after age 18. There was a decrease in 30 % for ED visits and 15 % for neurology related hospitalizations after the age of 18. CONCLUSION: YPE 18-years of age and older who were managed by a pediatric neurologist at DCH had significant co-morbidities. However, they were clinically stable and rarely required admission to the hospital. Most of them did not have documentation about transition discussions. At DCH, YPE who have not transitioned to AHCS are clinically stable and well managed.

Sociodemographic profile and clinical presentation of young children unintentionally exposed to marijuana: A single site retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Legalization of medical marijuana has increased unintentional exposure to marijuana in young children. We aim to explore the sociodemographic disadvantage profile, prevalence, and clinical presentation of children diagnosed with unintentional exposure to marijuana. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart abstraction of 121 children (aged 0-6) seen at the Emergency Department (ED) at a single tertiary hospital center in Dayton, Ohio between January 01, 2010 and January 09, 2022. RESULTS: Majority were female (62.8%), white (50.4%), and with Medicaid as their primary insurance (84.3%). The median age at exposure was 1.8 years. There was a 14-fold increase in unintentional marijuana cases pre-2017 (7 cases) versus post-2017 (114 cases), the year of legalization of medical marijuana in the state of Ohio. Majority of the patients were using public assistance (66.4%). 26.7% of the cases had a prior social work consultation and 38.1% had a prior children services consultation. 51.3% of the children had a social disadvantage index score of 3 or greater (range 0-5) with higher scores indicating greater disadvantage. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients presenting to the ED at the hospital has increased 14-fold since the legalization of medical marijuana in Ohio. Half of the children displayed a higher sociodemographic disadvantage index score. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Our study is the first study investigating the sociodemographic profile of children exposed to marijuana. The findings of this study may be utilized to inform policy for safely dispensing recreational and medicinal marijuana products and focus the efforts on families with sociodemographic disadvantage.

Demographic and geographic variations in the access time of pediatric patients presenting with staring spells.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the demographic and geographic variations in access time - defined as years between the date of symptom onset and initial date of neurological care - in pediatric patients presenting with staring spells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a retrospective chart review study from 2011 to 2021. A total of 1,353 staring spell patients, aged 0 to 17.9 years, were analyzed for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, county, average county annual per capita personal income, and access time. RESULTS: Patients aged 0-2.9 years had the shortest median access time of 0.3 years, compared to 1.2 years in patients aged 3-12.9 years and 1.0 year in patients aged 13-17.9 years. Statistically significant differences were seen based on race/ethnicity and insurance with White patients having shorter access time of 0.5 years compared to Black patients with 1.0 year and self-pay patients having the shortest access time of 0.4 years compared to patients with private insurance (0.7 years). Warren County had the largest annual per capita personal income of $65,855 and access time of 0.5 years compared to Preble county with the least annual per capita personal income of $45,016 and access time of 1.1 years. CONCLUSION: Demographic parameters of age, race/ethnicity, insurance, and annual county per capita personal income appeared to be associated with access time to initial neurological care in patients with staring spells. These associations need to be investigated further to ensure timely access to neurological care and to ensure equity in health care.

Reducing Discharge Medication Reconciliation Errors at a Pediatric Neurology Inpatient Unit.

Background and Objectives: Medication reconciliation errors are a common problem in health care, particularly during transitions of care. Discharge medication reconciliation (DMR) errors in a pediatric setting can range from 26% to 42.2%. We conducted a quality improvement project to decrease DMR error rate at Dayton Children's Hospital in Dayton, Ohio. Methods: We conducted 2 interventions, each with 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles from September 2021 through February 2023. The first intervention focused on using current specialty neurology nurses as scribes and creating a template note to include the plan of care and review of DMR before discharge. Our second intervention consisted of standardizing the seizure rescue medication order by creating an order panel within our electronic medical record system for all the rescue medications presently available. Medication errors were documented by the specialty neurology nurse during a phone conversation on the next business day post discharge. DMR error rates were calculated for each week using a control chart. Medication errors and patient harm were classified according to the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Index. Results: One hundred six errors were noted. Of these, 98 (92%) occurred in patients with seizure and 64 (60%) were related to prescription of seizure rescue medication specifically. The baseline error rate was calculated at 15.7% or 7 errors per month (January 2021 through June 2021). The average error rate dropped from 15.7% to 5.3% (2 errors per month) after initiation of our first intervention (September 2021). Twelve weeks after initiation of the second intervention, a 2.9% (1 error per month) was noted. Afterward, there was a ten-week period of 0% errors. Discussion: Sustainable reduction of DMR errors in pediatric patients with epilepsy was achieved by using specialty neurology nurses to scribe the care plan and creating order panels to facilitate accuracy of discharge medication orders without additional cost to the hospital.

Examining Impact of Insurance Type on Genetic Testing in Pediatric Neurology.

BACKGROUND: Studies that examine the impact of insurance type on the ease of obtaining genetic testing are scarce. Therefore, we aim to analyze how different types of insurance influence the time taken to obtain genetic test results among pediatric neurology patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from Dayton Children's Hospital. Patients who had at least one neurological genetic result found in the electronic medical record from January 1, 2014, to March 1, 2023, were included in the study. Variables collected include demographics, health insurance data, and genetic testing results. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were included. Most patients were male (51.8%), white (78.0%), and not Hispanic/Latino (96.5%). The mean age at the time of genetic testing was 7.9 years. Most patients had Medicaid as their primary insurance (60.3%) when compared with private insurance (39.7%). Two hundred fifteen genetic reports were examined (137 Medicaid charts and 78 private insurance charts). There was no statistically significant difference from mean time lapse between test order date and results date for Medicaid patients (27.3 days) versus private insurance (31.5 days, P = 0.40). Molecular genetics testing and epilepsy gene panel order were the most common tests ordered for both Medicaid (86.1%, 37.2%) and private insurance (88.5%, 39.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The mean time between test order date and results date was comparable between private- and Medicaid-insured patients. Our results suggest that there is no significant difference for time to result between pediatric neurology patients who carry public versus private insurance for genetic testing.

Rate and Predictors of Intractable Status Migrainosus among Patients Aged 13-18 Years.

Purpose: To assess associations for intractable status migrainosus in the pediatric inpatient setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 1,805 patients presenting to the pediatric hospital in Dayton, Ohio with status migrainosus from 2017 to 2022, was performed. Among 1,805 patients, 159 received 3 lines of sequentially more aggressive abortive migraine treatment and were included in this analysis. Responders and non-responders were categorized based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain scores from time of admission to discharge with responders having a reduction of 50% or greater in VAS. Patient demographic information, migraine history, headache type, medication history, self-reported pain, anxiety level and co-morbidities were assessed. Results: Out of 159 patients, 125 (78.6%) achieved the target pain control with decrease in VAS pain score by ≥ 50% from the baseline. The remaining 34/159 (21.4%) patients remained refractory to treatment. Non-responder patients had a longer hospital stay (6.1 days) and greater readmission rate within 7 days (17.6%) compared to responders (4.7 days and .8% respectively). Among the non-responder patients, 14/34 (41.2%) had attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to the responder group in which 17/125 (13.6%) had ADHD. Among patients who had comorbidity of anxiety, non-responders had greater severe generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7 ≥15) (6/14, 42.9%) than responders (2/39, 5.1%). Conclusion: ADHD and severe GAD are associated with poorer response to treatment in pediatric patients with refractory migraine admitted for inpatient therapy. This study highlights the prolonged hospital stay and modest clinical outcomes seen with intractable migraine in 13-18-year-old pediatric patients.

Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Tool for Inpatient Pediatric Status Migrainosus.

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of peripheral nerve blocks in the inpatient settings for pediatric patients presenting with status migrainosus. METHODS: An analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients aged 13 to 18 years, admitted for status migrainosus from 2017 to 2022, was performed. Among the 1805 patients who presented with status migrainosus, 265 required hospital admission. A total of 177 patients failed the first- and second-line intravenous therapy and were treated with either peripheral nerve block (PNB) or dihydroergotamine (DHE) intravenous infusions. The primary outcome of the study was pain score level reduction by 50%, and the secondary outcome was duration of hospital stay. Visual analog scale score was used for pain assessment. RESULTS: Among the 177 patients, 100 patients were treated with DHE and 77 were treated with PNB. Target pain control was achieved in 59 of 100 patients receiving DHE and 38 of 77 patients receiving PNB. The average hospital stay of patients who responded to PNB was significantly lower compared with that of patients receiving DHE (3.6 days vs 4.9 days). Among the 41 patients who were refractory to DHE, 30 patients received PNB, of which 12 responded to nerve blocks. The most common side effects for PNBs were pain at injection site in 39% of patients and nausea/vomiting for DHE in 50% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PNB can be safely administered in the hospital setting to pediatric patients with status migrainosus. PNB treatment helped achieve target pain control with minimal side effects and reduced the hospital stay duration.

Staring Spells: An Age-based Approach Toward Differential Diagnosis.

Evaluations to rule out epileptic vs nonepileptic staring spells may entail unnecessary evaluations that can be costly and time consuming. Our study aims to identify common etiologies for staring spells across 3 different pediatric age groups and to propose an age-based clinical guidance to help determine which patients warrant further workup. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective chart analysis of 1496 patients aged 0.0-17.9 years presenting with confirmed staring spell diagnosis from January 2011 to January 2021. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on their age: 0.0-2.9, 3.0-12.9, and 13.0-17.9 years. Patient information collected included demographics, clinical presentation, comorbidities, and final diagnosis. Multilevel likelihood ratios and a receiver operating characteristic curve were determined using 8 of the 11 clinical variables. A total of 1142 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included for the final analysis. The most common final diagnosis was attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (35%), followed by normal behavior (33%). Generalized and focal epilepsy were diagnosed in 8% and 4% of the patients, respectively. In the 0.0-2.9-year age group, normal behavior was the final diagnosis in 72% patients. In the 3.0-12.9-year and 13.0-17.9-year age groups, ADHD was the most frequent final diagnosis in 46% and 60%, respectively. Overall, ADHD and normal behaviors remain the most common final diagnoses. Multilevel likelihood ratios can be used to develop an age-based guidance to differentiate between epileptic and nonepileptic staring spell diagnoses.

Staring spells in children with autism spectrum disorder: A clinical dilemma.

LAY ABSTRACT: It is a common occurrence for children with autism spectrum disorder to be diagnosed with staring spells. Staring spells are defined as periods of time when children "space out" and are subcategorized as either "absence seizures" (brain activity resembling a seizure but with no physical seizure symptoms) or "non-epileptic spells" (inattentiveness or daydreaming). Due to the subtle characteristics of staring spells, they are usually diagnosed via long-term video electroencephalogram. The child is monitored for 3-5 days with an electroencephalogram which records brain waves. An electroencephalogram may be difficult to perform in children with autism spectrum disorder due to behavior, cognitive, or sensory concerns. Therefore, we wanted to investigate other clinical characteristics that may help us differentiate between epileptic seizures versus non-epileptic spells in children with autism spectrum disorder presenting with staring spells. We reviewed 140 charts retrospectively from the years of 2010-2021. We abstracted demographic and clinical information from the electronic medical record system and reviewed electroencephalogram videos to group the 140 children into epileptic seizure diagnosis group versus non-epileptic spell group. Of the 140 children in this study, 22 were diagnosed with epileptic seizures and the remaining were diagnosed with non-epileptic spells. We found that the two groups differed in certain clinical characteristics such as how long the staring spells lasted, how many staring spells the child had in 1 week, and whether they responded to verbal commands. We believe that clinical features may be helpful in differentiating epileptic seizures from non-epileptic spells in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Interpersonal Conflict between Clinicians in the Delivery of Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis.

Background: Conflict between clinicians is prevalent within intensive care units (ICUs) and may hinder optimal delivery of care. However, little is known about the sources of interpersonal conflict and how it manifests within the context of palliative and end-of-life care delivery in ICUs. Objective: To characterize interpersonal conflict in the delivery of palliative care within ICUs. Design: Secondary thematic analysis using a deductive-inductive approach. We analyzed existing qualitative data that conducted semistructured interviews to examine factors associated with variable adoption of specialty palliative care in ICUs. Settings/Subjects: In the parent study, 36 participants were recruited from two urban academic medical centers in the United States, including ICU attendings (n = 17), ICU nurses (n = 11), ICU social workers (n = 1), and palliative care providers (n = 7). Measurements: Coders applied an existing framework of interpersonal conflict to guide initial coding and analysis, combined with a flexible inductive approach allowing new codes to emerge. Results: We characterized three properties of interpersonal conflict: disagreement, interference, and negative emotion. In the context of delivering palliative and end-of-life care for critically ill patients, "disagreement" centered around whether patients were appropriate for palliative care, which care plans should be prioritized, and how care should be delivered. "Interference" involved preventing palliative care consultation or goals-of-care discussions and hindering patient care. "Negative emotion" included occurrences of silencing or scolding, rudeness, anger, regret, ethical conflict, and grief. Conclusions: Our findings provide an in-depth understanding of interpersonal conflict within palliative and end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Further study is needed to understand how to prevent and resolve such conflicts.

Clinicians' views on the use of triggers for specialist palliative care in the ICU: A qualitative secondary analysis.

PURPOSE: To understand clinicians' views regarding use of clinical criteria, or triggers, for specialist palliative care consultation in the ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of a qualitative study that explored factors associated with adoption of specialist palliative care in the ICU. Semi-structured interviews with 36 ICU and palliative care clinicians included questions related to triggers for specialist palliative care. We performed a thematic analysis to identify participants' views on use of triggers, including appropriateness of cases for specialists and issues surrounding trigger implementation. RESULTS: We identified five major themes: 1) Appropriate triggers for specialist palliative care, 2) Issues leading to clinician ambivalence for triggers, 3) Prospective buy-in of stakeholders, 4) Workflow considerations in deploying a trigger system, and 5) Role of ICU clinicians in approving specialist palliative care consults. Appropriate triggers included end-of-life care, chronic critical illness, frequent ICU admissions, and patient/family support. Most clinicians had concerns about "trigger overload" and ICU clinicians wanted to be broadly involved in implementation efforts. CONCLUSIONS: ICU and palliative care clinicians identified important issues to consider when implementing triggers for specialist palliative care consultation. Future research is needed to longitudinally examine the most appropriate triggers and best practices for trigger implementation.

Stress-Related Disorders of Family Members of Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit With COVID-19.

Importance: The psychological symptoms associated with having a family member admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic are not well defined. Objective: To examine the prevalence of symptoms of stress-related disorders, primarily posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), in family members of patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 approximately 90 days after admission. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multisite, mixed-methods observational cohort study assessed 330 family members of patients admitted to the ICU (except in New York City, which had a random sample of 25% of all admitted patients per month) between February 1 and July 31, 2020, at 8 academic-affiliated and 4 community-based hospitals in 5 US states. Exposure: Having a family member in the ICU with COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: Symptoms of PTSD at 3 months, as defined by a score of 10 or higher on the Impact of Events Scale 6 (IES-6). Results: A total of 330 participants (mean [SD] age, 51.2 [15.1] years; 228 [69.1%] women; 150 [52.8%] White; 92 [29.8%] Hispanic) were surveyed at the 3-month time point. Most individuals were the patients' child (129 [40.6%]) or spouse or partner (81 [25.5%]). The mean (SD) IES-6 score at 3 months was 11.9 (6.1), with 201 of 316 respondents (63.6%) having scores of 10 or higher, indicating significant symptoms of PTSD. Female participants had an adjusted mean IES-6 score of 2.6 points higher (95% CI, 1.4-3.8; P < .001) than male participants, whereas Hispanic participants scored a mean of 2.7 points higher compared with non-Hispanic participants (95% CI, 1.0-4.3; P = .002). Those with graduate school experience had an adjusted mean score of 3.3 points lower (95% CI, 1.5-5.1; P < .001) compared with those with up to a high school degree or equivalent. Qualitative analyses found no substantive differences in the emotional or communication-related experiences between those with high vs low PTSD scores, but those with higher scores exhibited more distrust of practitioners. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, symptoms of PTSD among family members of ICU patients with COVID-19 were high. Hispanic ethnicity and female gender were associated with higher symptoms. Those with higher scores reported more distrust of practitioners.

What Affects Adoption of Specialty Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study.

CONTEXT: Although many patients with critical illness may benefit from involvement of palliative care specialists, adoption of these services in the intensive care unit (ICU) is variable. OBJECTIVE: To characterize reasons for variable buy-in for specialty palliative care in the ICU, and identify factors associated with routine involvement of specialists in appropriate cases. METHODS: Qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with ICU attendings, nurses, and palliative care clinicians, purposively sampled from eight ICUs (medical, surgical, cardiothoracic, neurological) with variable use of palliative care services within two urban, academic medical centers. Interviews were transcribed and coded using an iterative and inductive approach with constant comparison. RESULTS: We identified three types of specialty palliative care adoption in ICUs, representing different phases of buy-in. The "nascent" phase was characterized by the need for education about palliative care services and clarification of which patients may be appropriate for involvement. During the key "transitional" phase, use of specialists depended on development of "comfort and trust", which centered on four aspects of the ICU-palliative care clinician relationship: 1) increasing familiarity between clinicians; 2) navigating shared responsibility with primary clinicians; 3) having a collaborative approach to care; and 4) having successful experiences. In the "mature" phase, ICU and palliative care clinicians worked to strengthen their existing collaboration, but further adoption was limited by the availability and resources of the palliative care team. CONCLUSION: This conceptual framework identifying distinct phases of adoption may assist institutions aiming to foster sustained adoption of specialty palliative care in an ICU setting.