Molecular imaging of neuroinflammation in patients after mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal 123 I-CLINDE single photon emission computed tomography study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuroinflammation has been proposed as part of the pathogenesis of post-concussion symptoms (PCS), but the inflammatory response of the human brain to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) remains unknown. We hypothesized that a neuroinflammatory response is present in mTBI at 1-2 weeks post-injury and persists in patients with PCS. METHODS: We scanned 14 patients with mTBI without signs of structural damage at 1-2 weeks and 3-4 months post-injury and 22 healthy controls once using the single photon emission computed tomography tracer 123 I-CLINDE, which visualizes translocator protein (TSPO), a protein upregulated in active immune cells. PCS was defined as three or more persisting symptoms from the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire at 3 months post-injury. RESULTS: Across brain regions, patients had significantly higher 123 I-CLINDE binding to TSPO than healthy controls, both at 1-2 weeks after the injury in all patients (P = 0.011) and at 3-4 months in the seven patients with PCS (P = 0.006) and in the six patients with good recovery (P = 0.018). When the nine brain regions were tested separately and results were corrected for multiple comparisons, no individual region differed significantly, but all estimated parameters indicated increased 123 I-CLINDE binding to TSPO, ranging from 2% to 19% in all patients at 1-2 weeks, 13% to 27% in patients with PCS at 3-4 months and -9% to 17% in patients with good recovery at 3-4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroinflammation was present in mTBI at 1-2 weeks post-injury and persisted at 3-4 months post-injury with a tendency to be most pronounced in patients with PCS.

[Can readmission after apoplexy be prevented? Post-hospital follow-up intervention for apoplexy patients]. / Kan genindlaeggelse af apopleksiramte forebygges? Resultater af et randomiseret interventionsstudium. Posthospital opfølgende indsats til apopleksipatienter.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate two models of an organised postdischarge follow-up service for stroke survivors in comparison with standard aftercare. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-five stroke patients discharged to their homes with lasting impairment were randomised as follows: 54 to follow-up home visits by a physician (INT1-HVP), 53 to instruction by a physiotherapist in their home (INT2-PI), and 48 to standard aftercare (control). Six months after discharge, data on readmission were collected. RESULTS: The readmission rate over the six-month period was 26% in the INT1-HVP group, 34% in the INT2-PI group, and 44% for the controls (p = 0.028). Multivariate analysis of the readmission risk showed a significant, favourable effect of intervention in interaction with the length of hospital stay (p = 0.0332), which indicates that the effect of intervention was strongest for patients with a long inpatient rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: Follow-up intervention after discharge seems to be a way of preventing readmission, especially for patients with a long inpatient rehabilitation.

Can readmission after stroke be prevented? Results of a randomized clinical study: a postdischarge follow-up service for stroke survivors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: About 50% of stroke survivors are discharged to their homes with lasting disability. Knowledge, however, of the importance of follow-up services that targets these patients is sparse. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate 2 models of follow-up intervention after discharge. The study hypothesis was that intervention could reduce readmission rates and institutionalization and prevent functional decline. We report the results regarding readmission. METHODS: This randomized study included 155 stroke patients with persistent impairment and disability who, after the completion of inpatient rehabilitation, were discharged to their homes. The patients were randomized to 1 of 2 follow-up interventions provided in addition to standard care or to standard aftercare. Fifty-four received follow-up home visits by a physician (INT1-HVP), 53 were provided instructions by a physiotherapist in their home (INT2-PI), and 48 received standard aftercare only (controls). Baseline characteristics for the 3 groups were comparable. Six months after discharge, data were obtained on readmission and institutionalization. RESULTS: The readmission rates within 6 months after discharge were significantly lower in the intervention groups than in the control group (INT1-HVP 26%, INT2-PI 34%, controls 44%; P=0.028). Multivariate analysis of readmission risk showed a significant favorable effect of intervention (INT1-HVP or INT2-PI) in interaction with length of hospital stay (P=0.0332), indicating that the effect of intervention was strongest for patients with a prolonged inpatient rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission is common among disabled stroke survivors. Follow-up intervention after discharge seems to be a way of preventing readmission, especially for patients with long inpatient rehabilitation.