Extreme thrombocytosis with an aggressive evolution harboring a novel variant of calreticulin (CALR) in exon 3.

We describe the case of a patient with extreme thrombocytosis whose evolution was rapidly fatal. No cause of secondary thrombocytosis was found. There was no sign of myelofibrosis but the megakaryocytes were small and dysplastic. The patient presented a calreticulin (CALR) variant in exon 3 (C105S), as well as concomitant mutations of ASXL1, U2AF1, and EZH2. This variant of CALR has never been described before, and after sorting, all identified mutations were found in myeloid cells but not in lymphoid cells. Therefore, the diagnosis of a frontier case of myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) was made. A treatment with hydroxycarbamide was started because of a high risk of thrombosis. Upon worsening of the hematological status two new mutations appeared, SETBP1 and ETV6, and the CALR mutation was still detectable, as well as the three other mutations found in the chronic stage. Our results show that this variant could contribute to MDS/MPN pathogenesis in that patient.

Preventive plasmapheresis for rituximab related flare in cryoglobulinemic vasculitis.

Introduction: Rituximab monotherapy represents the main therapeutic option for cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV) with severe organ involvement. However, initial worsening of the CV, known as rituximab-associated CV flare (=CV flare), has been described and are associated with high mortality rates. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the outcomes of plasmapheresis initiated before or during rituximab treatment, as prevention of CV flare. Methods: We conducted a retrospecttive study in our tertiary referral center from 2001 to 2020. We have included all patients with CV receiving rituximab and divided them in two groups whether they had flare prevention by plasmapheresis or not. We evaluated rituximab-related CV flare incidence in both groups. CV flare was defined as the onset of a new organ involvement or worsening of the initial manifestations within 4 weeks following rituximab. Results: Among the 71 patients included, 44 received rituximab without plasmapheresis (control = CT cohort) and 27 received plasmapheresis before or during rituximab treatment (preventive plasmapheresis = PP cohort). PP was given to patients thought to have a high risk of CV flare, with significantly more severe diseases than patients in the CT cohort. Despite this, no CV flare was observed in the PP group. In the other hand, 5 flares occurred in the CT cohort. Conclusion: Our results show that plasmapheresis is efficient and well tolerated to prevent rituximab-associated CV flare. We believe that our data support the use of plasmapheresis in this indication, especially in patients with high risk of CV flare.