Utility of PD-1, PD-L1, and IDO-1 Stains in Ocular Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) is the most common subtype of ocular lymphomas. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and EMZL with large-cell transformation present diagnostic challenges. Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for ocular lymphomas, but complications and relapse are common. Diagnostic utility in challenging cases, as well as treatment options using immune checkpoint inhibitors, are unclear in ocular lymphomas. We herein investigated the PD-1, PD-L1, and IDO1 staining patterns in 20 cases of ocular lymphomas, including EMZL (n=14), EMZL with increased large cells (n=2), and DLBCL (n=4). PD-1, PD-L1, and IDO1 staining was not detected in lymphoma cells in any cases but was observed within the tumor microenvironment in all cases. Positivity for PD-1, PD-L1, and IDO1 in inflammatory cells was seen either intratumorally or peritumorally. In all 6 cases with significantly more large B cells, the density of PD-1, PD-L1, and IDO1 expression in the tumor microenvironment was higher than that of the remaining 14 cases without large B cells (P-value<0.0001), whereas other clinicopathologic features showed no statistical correlation. Increased expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and IDO1 in the inflammatory milieu in cases with large cells may provide diagnostic utility in small biopsies as well as therapeutic potential.

Characterization of Casirivimab Plus Imdevimab, Sotrovimab, and Bamlanivimab Plus Etesevimab-Derived Interference in Serum Protein Electrophoresis and Immunofixation Electrophoresis.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies can be a source of assay interference in clinical serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), producing monoclonal bands that can be misinterpreted as a monoclonal gammopathy related to a B-cell or plasma cell neoplasm. The extent to which new anti-COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies produce this interference is unknown. METHODS: Casirivimab plus imdevimab, sotrovimab, and bamlanivimab plus etesevimab were spiked into patient serum samples to evaluate for SPEP/IFE interference, to characterize the position of therapy-derived bands relative to a reference band (either combined beta band or beta 1 band, depending on instrument platform), and to confirm heavy and light chain utilization of each medication. Serum samples from patients who had recently received casirivimab plus imdevimab or sotrovimab were also evaluated for comparison. RESULTS: When spiked into serum samples, all tested anti-COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies generated interference in SPEP/IFE. Importantly, the patterns of interference differed between spiked serum samples and serum from patients who had recently received casirivimab plus imdevimab or sotrovimab. CONCLUSIONS: Imdevimab can be added to the growing list of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies that produce sustained interference in SPEP/IFE. Although casirivimab and sotrovimab also produce assay interference in vitro, these antibodies are not reliably detected in serum from recently infused patients. The value of relative band position in recognizing bands that may represent therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is also emphasized. Clinicians and laboratorians should consider therapeutic monoclonal antibody interference in diagnostic SPEP/IFE and review a patient's medication list when new or transient monoclonal bands are identified.

A Case Series of Metastatic Malignant Gastrointestinal Neuroectodermal Tumors and Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Analysis of 20 Cases.

Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor (GNET) is an ultra-rare soft tissue sarcoma, therefore often misdiagnosed and has no available standard treatment. Here, we report 3 cases of metastatic GNET with variable clinical courses. Our small case series as well as extensive literature review, further support that GNET is a spectrum of diseases with variable inherent biology and prognosis. Surgical management in the setting of recurrent/metastatic disease may be appropriate for GNET with indolent nature. Response to systemic treatments including chemotherapy and targeted treatments is variable, likely related to heterogenous biology as well. Furthermore, we retrospectively identified 20 additional GNET cases from Foundation Medicine's genomic database and expanded on their clinicopathological and genomic features. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) with DNA and RNA sequencing of this cohort, in the course of clinical care, demonstrated recurrent EWSR1 chromosomal rearrangements and a sparsity of additional recurrent or driver genomic alterations. All cases had low tumor mutational burden (TMB) and were microsatellite stable.