[Does aspirin therapy after desensitization still have a role in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis in the era of biologics?] / Hat die ASS-Desaktivierung in Zeiten von Biologika noch einen Stellenwert bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit nasaler Polyposis?

The prevalence of analgesic intolerance syndrome (AIS), internationally known as NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), is reported to be 0.5-5.7% in the general population. The disease often begins with nasal symptoms, which are later joined by chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), asthma, and respiratory hypersensitivity reactions following use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In the setting of chronic respiratory disease, the type 2 inflammatory endotype is predominant in approximately 80% of patients with CRSwNP, rendering biologics directed against interleukin (IL)-4, IL­5, IL-13, and IgE of high clinical interest, particularly in patients with severe CRSwNP and NERD. NERD is often associated with CRSwNP and asthma. Patients with CRSwNP and NERD have been treated, among other therapies, with aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD). With the approval of monoclonal antibodies for CRSwNP and asthma, the question arises as to what extent ATAD, which is associated with undesirable side effects, is still useful in the treatment of CRSwNP. In this manuscript, the use of ATAD in CRSwNP patients is discussed from different medical and socioeconomic points of view, both alternatively to or in combination with monoclonal antibodies. Accordingly, both ATAD and biologics continue to play a supporting role in modern treatment of CRSwNP in NERD patients, and should be used judiciously to complement each other.

Empfehlungen zur Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit und Verlaufsdokumentation von Mepolizumab bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) im deutschen Gesundheitssystem ­ Empfehlungen des Ärzteverbandes Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA) und der AGs Klinische Immunologie, Allergologie und Umweltmedizin und Rhinologie und Rhinochirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie (DGHNOKHC).

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease of the mucous membranes of the nose and sinuses. Eosinophilic inflammation is described as a common endotype. The anti-IL5 antibody mepolizumab was approved in November 2021 as an add-on therapy to intranasal glucocorticosteroids for the treatment of adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps when systemic glucocorticosteroids or surgery do not provide adequate disease control. While national and international recommendations exist for the use of mepolizumab in CRSwNP, it has not yet been adequately specified how this therapy is to be monitored, what follow-up documentation is necessary, and when it should be terminated if necessary. METHODS: A literature search was performed to analyze previous data on the treatment of CRSwNP with mepolizumab and to determine the available evidence by searching Medline, Pubmed, the national and international trial and guideline registries and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published in the period up to and including 10/2022 were considered. RESULTS: Based on the international literature and previous experience by an expert panel, recommendations for follow-up, adherence to therapy intervals and possible therapy breaks, as well as termination of therapy when using mepolizumab for the indication CRSwNP in the German health care system are given on the basis of a documentation sheet. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the immunological basis of CRSwNP opens up new non-surgical therapeutic approaches with biologics for patients with severe, uncontrolled courses. Here, we provide recommendations for follow-up, adherence to therapy intervals, possible therapy pauses, or discontinuation of therapy when mepolizumab is used as add-on therapy with intranasal glucocorticosteroids to treat adult patients with severe CRSwNP that cannot be adequately controlled with systemic glucocorticosteroids and/or surgical intervention.

Positionspapier: Empfehlungen zur Anwendung von Mepolizumab bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi (CRSwNP) im deutschen Gesundheitssystem ­ Empfehlungen des Ärzteverbandes Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA) und der AGs Klinische Immunologie, Allergologie und Umweltmedizin und Rhinologie und Rhinochirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie (DGHNO-KHC).

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinus mucosa with eosinophilic inflammation as the most common endotype. The anti-IL5 antibody mepolizumab was approved for the treatment of severe CRSwNP in the EU in November 2021. METHODS: A literature search was performed to analyze the immunology of CRSwNP and determine the available evidence by searching Medline, Pubmed, and the German national and international trial and guideline registries and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published in the period up to and including 12/2021 that investigated the effect of mepolizumab in CRSwNP were considered. RESULTS: Based on the international literature and previous experience, recommendations for the use of mepolizumab in CRSwNP in the German health care system are given by an expert panel on the basis of a documentation form. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding about the immunological basis of CRSwNP opens new non-surgical therapeutic approaches with biologics for patients with severe courses. Mepolizumab is approved since November 2021 for add-on therapy with intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of adult patients with severe CRSwNP who cannot be adequately controlled with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgical intervention.

Empfehlungen zur Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit und Verlaufsdokumentation von Dupilumab bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) im deutschen Gesundheitssystem.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease of the nasal and paranasal mucosa. A Type-2 inflammation is described as the most common endotype. Since October 2019 the anti-IL-4/-IL-13 antibody dupilumab has been approved in Germany as an add-on therapy to intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, when systemic corticosteroids alone or surgery do not provide adequate disease control. While recommendations for the use of dupilumab in CRSwNP exist at both national and international levels, until now it has not been adequately established, how therapy should be monitored and when it should be discontinued in the German Health Care System. METHODS: A literature search was performed analyzing previous data on the treatment of CRSwNP with dupilumab and to determine the available evidence by searching Medline, Pubmed, the national and international trial and guideline registries and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published in the period up to 05/2022 were included. RESULTS: Based on international literature and previous experience, recommendations are given by an expert panel for follow-up and possible therapy breaks, therapy intervals or termination of therapy when using dupilumab for the indication CRSwNP in the German health care system based on a documentation form. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the immunological basis of CRSwNP opens new non-surgical therapy approaches with biologics for patients with severe courses. The authors give recommendations for follow-up, possible therapy breaks, therapy intervals and a termination for dupilumab treatment as add-on therapy with intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of adult patients with severe CRSwNP that cannot be adequately controlled with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgical intervention.

Omalizumab in patients with NSAIDs-exacerbated respiratory disease.

BACKGROUND: The association of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) intolerance, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, or chronic urticaria is known as NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). N-ERD patients often suffer from recurrent nasal polyps, severe asthma or also from urticaria. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy of anti-IgE antibody treatment with omalizumab in patients with confirmed N-ERD. METHODS: In the open trial with patients receiving verum patients with CRSwNP, confirmed N-ERD by oral or nasal ASA challenges, asthma or chronic urticaria were included in the study. Rhinological and pulmonary parameters were evaluated before and after 3, 6 and 9 months of therapy by rhinological questionnaires (CRS VAS-scores and RSOM-31), nasal polyp (NP)-, ACT-scores and FEV1 values. Urticaria activity was monitored clinically. N-ERD patients with aspirin desensitization were included as control group (follow-up 9 months). RESULTS: In the omalizumab group 16 patients were included (10 female, 6 male, mean age 51 yrs). CRS symptoms, RSOM-31- and NP-score decreased significantly following omalizumab therapy compared to baseline. The ACT-score (MV 16.5 to 20.6) and FEV1values (MV 80 % to 89 %) improved significantly. No urticaria symptoms were reported after 3 months. Oral prednisolone therapy was required in one case and a repeated nasal sinus surgery in an additional case due to progression of NP. In the control group (8 female, 8 male, mean age 45 yrs) the NP-score was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab is an effective therapy option in N-ERD patients in a 9 month study period.

The GALEN rhinosinusitis cohort: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps affects health-related quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) significantly affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Few multinational observational studies have evaluated the impact of CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) on patients’ HRQoL. This study aimed to assess HRQoL outcomes (including analyses by disease severity and impact of comorbidities and refractory disease) in CRSwNP patients from a large European database. METHODOLOGY: Data were analysed from the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GALEN) Rhinosinusitis Cohort, including sociodemographic data, patient-reported disease severity (visual analogue scale), and scores on the 36-Item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Differences in mean SF-36 scores were evaluated between patients with CRSwNP and population norms and between subgroups of interest (disease severity, comorbidity, and refractory disease, defined by a history of sinonasal surgery). RESULTS: Patients with CRSwNP (N = 445) had significantly lower mean SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores vs population norms, demonstrating that CRSwNP negatively affects HRQoL. The presence of comorbidities affected HRQoL, as shown by significant differences in PCS scores in patients with asthma or non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, compared with patients without asthma. Patients with moderate-to-severe disease had significantly lower PCS scores than patients with mild disease. Severe disease had a significant impact on MCS score. History of surgery had a clinically meaningful negative effect on HRQoL compared with no history of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: CRSwNP patients have significantly lower HRQoL compared with population norms. The impact is greater in patients with greater disease severity, comorbidities, or refractory disease.

[Nasal provocation with increased ASA dose: improved "non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-exacerbated disease" (N­ERD) detection rate in chronic rhinosinusitis patients]. / Nasale ASS-Provokationen mit erhöhter Dosierung: verbesserte Detektionsrate der ASS-Intoleranz bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Analgesic intolerance (AI) is an important diagnostic feature of disease progression in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) accompanied by nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine whether increasing the concentration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) used in the diagnostic nasal challenge would improve detection of ASA intolerance (NSAIDs-exacerbated respiratory disease, N­ERD). METHODS: Patients with CRSwNP, asthma, and with (CRSwNP-AAI, n = 20) or without (CRSwNP-A, n = 15) anamnestically reported AI, as well as control subjects with CRS but no nasal polyps, asthma, or AI (n = 15), were challenged nasally with 16 mg ASA and, in case of a negative result, with 25 mg of ASA. RESULTS: In CRSwNP-AAI subjects, the challenge with 16 mg ASA resulted in detection of AI in 80% of cases; increasing the challenge of ASA to 25 mg improved the AI detection to 95%. In CRSwNP-A subjects, the detection of AI increased from 40% (16 mg ASA) to 53% (25 mg ASA). In the control group, no reaction to nasal ASA challenge was detected. No difference in the diagnosis of positive reactions after provocation was found when using the German vs. the European recommended evaluation criteria. Mild pulmonary symptoms occurred in 2 (10%) CRSwNP-AAI patients following the 16 mg ASA challenge. CONCLUSION: In patients with CRSwNP, asthma, and anamnestic AI, nasal provocation can effectively confirm the diagnosis of N­ERD and can also be recommended for patients with recurrent CRSwNP and asthma but without reported AI. Increasing the ASA challenge to 25 mg increases the overall detection rate.

Long-term clinical effects of aspirin-desensitization therapy among patients with poorly controlled asthma and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity: An exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: According to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), the levels of asthma symptom control can be divided into controlled, partially controlled and uncontrolled asthma. Optional therapy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-hypersensitive asthmatics uses aspirin desensitization, but until now, this therapy is not established in difficult to treat cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of aspirin desensitization in patients with poorly controlled asthma. METHODS: Patients with poorly controlled asthma, NDAIDs hypersensitivity and aspirin desensitization were included in the retrospective study. The data were compared to those obtained from patients with controlled asthma and aspirin therapy. Lung function, levels of asthma symptom control, asthma medication, the size of nasal polyps (NP) and smell function were evaluated over 18 months. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included in the study (uncontrolled/partially controlled asthma n=12; controlled asthma n=20). After 18 months of follow-up, the patients with poorly controlled asthma had significantly increased forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) values, as compared to the baseline (66-82%; p=0.02), the levels of asthma control improved significantly (p<0.01). The asthma medication was reduced. In the group of controlled asthma the FEV1 values did not increase significantly (91.9-92.4%; p>0.05) and the asthma medication was constant. In relation to nasal parameters the sense of smell improved significantly in both groups, NP-scores did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a poorly controlled asthma and NSAIDs hypersensitivity profit from an add-on aspirin therapy.