Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Orthop ; 38(1): 155-61, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24318319

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective randomised trial was to assess whether an intramedullary nail is superior to a sliding hip screw in the treatment of multifragmentary intertrochanteric fractures METHODS: Eighty patients with a 31-A2.2 or A2.3 Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) intertrochanteric fracture were randomly allocated to fixation with either the Gamma nail or the AMBI sliding hip screw device. RESULTS: All patients were followed up at one, three, six and 12 months postoperatively, except for nine who died. There was no statistical difference in Parker mobility score between groups. The Gamma nail group had significantly higher Barthel Index and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) scores than the AMBI group at 12 months. At the same time, the EQ-5D score had returned to its pre-operative values in the Gamma nail group but not in the AMBI group. There were no differences in mortality, radiation time and hospital stay. Duration of the operation, incision length and hip pain occurrence were significantly less in the Gamma nail group. CONCLUSIONS: Few failures occur when unstable 31-A2.2 and A2.3 AO/OTA fractures are fixed with a sliding hip screw. Nevertheless, an intramedullary nail seems superior in reconstituting patients to their pre-operative state.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Parafusos Ósseos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/mortalidade , Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Quadril/cirurgia , Fraturas do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Injury ; 43(6): 686-93, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21752370

RESUMO

Intramedullary nailing is gradually emerging as the treatment of choice for pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Nevertheless, prospective randomised trials have failed to demonstrate the assumed superiority of cephalomedullary nails over the traditional treatment with the sliding hip screw. On the contrary, the gamma nail has been implicated in predisposing to secondary femoral fractures, although this seems to be rectified by newer techniques and nail designs. Sliding hip screw fixation remains the gold standard but can lead certain unstable pertrochanteric fracture subgroups to failure. Amongst these are transverse or reverse obliquity but also multifragmentary fractures, that suffer intra- or postoperative shattering of the lateral trochanteric wall. Nails seem to prevent failure by opposing the uncontrollable medialisation, and eventual failure, that occurs under these circumstances. The importance of the size of the proximal fracture fragment has not yet been elucidated. Nail fixation is, thus, mandatory in a small percentage of grossly unstable fractures, whose characteristics are still undergoing definition.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Parafusos Ósseos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Pinos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Parafusos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fraturas do Quadril/complicações , Fraturas do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA