Multicenter study to assess the use of BL-DetecTool for the detection of CTX-M-type ESBLs and carbapenemases directly from clinical specimens.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the major public health problems worldwide. Multiple strategies have been put in place to address this problem. One of them is the rapid detection of the mechanisms of resistance, such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and/or carbapenemases. We conducted a multicenter study that included nine European centers for the assessment of prototypes of a novel lateral flow immunoassay-based device (BL-DetecTool) for a rapid detection of ESBL (NG-Test CTX-M-MULTI DetecTool) and/or carbapenemases (NG-Test CARBA 5 DetecTool) from Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in positive urine, positive blood cultures, and rectal swabs. We performed a prospective analysis between January 2021 and June 2022, including overall 22,010 samples. Based on each hospital information, the sensitivity to detect CTX-M was 84%-100%, 90.9%-100%, and 75%-100% for urine, positive blood cultures, and enriched rectal swabs, respectively. On the other hand, the sensitivity to detect carbapenemases was 42.8%-100%, 75%-100%, and 66.6%-100% for urine, positive blood cultures, and enriched rectal swab, respectively. BL-DetecTool allows a rapid and reliable detection of ESBL and carbapenemases directly from urine, positive blood cultures, or enriched rectal swabs, being an easy technique to implement in the workflow of clinical microbiology laboratories. IMPORTANCE: The assessed rapid assay to detect CTX-M beta-lactamases and carbapenemases directly from clinical samples can favor in the rapid detection of these mechanisms of resistance and hence the administration of a more adequate antimicrobial treatment.

Evaluation of a new rapid immunochromatographic assay for the detection of GES-producing Gram-negative bacteria.

BACKGROUND: As carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales are increasingly reported worldwide, their rapid detection is crucial to reduce their spread and prevent infections and outbreaks. Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) have become major tools for the detection of carbapenemases. However, as for most commercially available assays, only the five main carbapenemases are targeted. OBJECTIVES: Here, we have developed and evaluated an LFIA prototype for the rapid and reliable detection of the increasingly identified GES-type ß-lactamases. METHODS: The GES LFIA was validated on 103 well-characterized Gram-negative isolates expressing various ß-lactamases grown on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar, chromogenic, and chromogenic/selective media. RESULTS: The limit of detection of the assay was 106 cfu per test with bacteria grown on MH agar plates. GES LFIA accurately detected GES-type ß-lactamases irrespective of the culture media and the bacterial host. The GES LFIA was not able to distinguish between GES-ESBLs and GES-carbapenemases. Because GES enzymes are still rare, their detection as an ESBL or a carbapenemase remains important, especially because extensive use of carbapenems to treat ESBL infections may select for GES variants capable of hydrolysing carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: The GES LFIA is efficient, rapid and easy to implement in the routine workflow of a clinical microbiology laboratory for the confirmation of GES-type ß-lactamases. Combining it with immunochromatographic assays targeting the five main carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP and OXA-48) would improve the overall sensitivity for the most frequently encountered carbapenemases and ESBLs, especially in non-fermenters.

Rapid detection of CTX-M-type ESBLs and carbapenemases directly from biological samples using the BL-DetecTool.

BACKGROUND: Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA) have shown their usefulness for detecting CTX-M- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPEs) in bacterial cultures. Here, we have developed and validated the BL-DetecTool to detect CTX-M enzymes and carbapenemases directly from clinical samples. METHODS: The BL-DetecTool is an LFIA that integrates an easy sample preparation device named SPID (Sampling, Processing, Incubation and Detection). It was evaluated in three University hospitals on urine, blood culture (BC) and rectal swab (RS) specimens either of clinical origin or on spiked samples. RS evaluation was done directly and after a 24 h enrichment step. RESULTS: The CTX-M BL-DetecTool was tested on 485 samples (154 BC, 150 urines, and 181 RS) and revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 97.04% (95% CI 92.59%-99.19%) and 99.43% (95% CI 97.95%-99.93%), respectively. Similarly, the Carba5 BL-DetecTool was tested on 382 samples (145 BC, 116 urines, and 121 RS) and revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 95.3% (95% CI 89.43%-98.47%) and 100% (95% CI 98.67%-100%), respectively. While with the Carba5 BL-DetecTool five false negatives were observed, mostly in RS samples, with the CTX-M BL-DetecTool, in addition to four false-negatives, two false-positives were also observed. Direct testing of RS samples revealed a sensitivity of 78% and 86% for CTX-M and carbapenemase detection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BL-DetecTool showed excellent biological performance, was easy-to-use, rapid, and could be implemented in any microbiology laboratory around the world, without additional equipment, no need for electricity, nor trained personnel. It offers an attractive alternative to costly molecular methods.