[Measuring nursing sensitive outcomes in publicly funded hospitals in the Veneto Region, Italy: the development of a regional policy]. / Misurare gli esiti dell'assistenza infermieristica nelle Aziende Ospedaliere e Socio Sanitarie Locali della Regione del Veneto: sintesi dell'esperienza di sviluppo di una policy regionale.

INTRODUCTION: The indicators used in the Italian National Outcome Strategy does not include measurement of nursing care outcomes so these have not yet been assessed systematically in our country but only in the context of specific research projects. Positive and negative outcomes of nursing care have been documented in the literature, the latter associated with missed nursing care, a phenomenon that occurs when conditions are such that nurses are unable to deliver planned care to patients. OBJECTIVES: To describe the rationale, methodology and main results achieved to date in the development of a regional policy aimed at establishing a panel of indicators for monitoring nursing care-sensitive outcomes hospitals in publicly funded hospitals in the Veneto Region (northern Italy). METHODS: A plurennial, multi-method project based on [1] identification of selection criteria for a Minimum Data Set of indicators; [2] a rapid review of the literature and of the policies established internationally to measure nursing care-sensitive outcomes; [3] the establishment of an initial panel of indicators and evaluation of any critical issues with the chosen indicators, and [4] identification of the most appropriate tool for measuring missed nursing care. RESULTS: The medical and surgical units were considered to be the most suitable settings for the pilot study. Following the literature review, indicators that were already being monitored in the current regional information system were chosen, with the intent to prevent an additional administrative burden to nurses. By using a progressive consensus process, five outcome indicators (functional status, falls, pressure sores, urinary tract infections, aspiration pneumonia) and one process indicator (missed nursing care) were selected., and the tools for measuring the above-mentioned indicators and their related risks, were identified. A regional policy was then established to measure these indicators in a pilot phase, with the intent of implementing them as stable indicators to be measured in the new computerized hospital information system. CONCLUSIONS: An initial panel of nursing-sensitive outcome indicators has been defined to be used in Internal Medicine and General Surgery units of hospitals in Italy's Veneto Region. Despite its limitations, the project represents the first effort to create a regional policy to measure the contribution of nursing care to the health outcomes of patients and that will also the identification of potential relations with other variables such as personnel staffing and/or skill mix.

Mapping SAGE questionnaire to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

The collaborative research on ageing in Europe protocol was based on that of the World Health Organization Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) project that investigated the relationship between health and well-being and provided a set of instruments that can be used across countries to monitor health and health-related outcomes of older populations as well as the strategies for addressing issues concerning the ageing process. To evaluate the degree to which SAGE protocol covered the spectrum of disability given the scope of the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), a mapping exercise was performed with SAGE protocol. Results show that the SAGE protocol covers ICF domains in a non-uniform way, with environmental factors categories being underrepresented, whereas mental, cardiovascular, sensory functions and mobility were overrepresented. To overcome this partial coverage of ICF functioning categories, new assessment instruments have been developed. PRACTITIONER MESSAGE: Mapping exercises are valid procedures to understand the extent to which a survey protocol covers the spectrum of functioning. The mapping exercise with SAGE protocol shows that it provides only a partial representation of body functions and activities and participation domains, and the coverage of environmental factors is poor. New instruments are therefore needed for researchers to properly understand the health and disability of ageing populations.

Validation of the COURAGE Built Environment Self-Reported Questionnaire.

UNLABELLED: The built environment (BE) impacts on people's disability and health, in terms of overweight, depression, alcohol abuse, poor self-rated health and presence of psychological symptoms; it is reasonable to assume that BE also impacts on participation levels. This paper presents the validation of the COURAGE Built Environment Self-Reported Questionnaire (CBE-SR), an instrument designed to evaluate BE in the context of health and disability. Subjects participating to COURAGE, a cross-sectional study conducted on 10,800 citizens of Poland, Finland and Spain, completed a protocol inclusive of the CBE-SR. Psychometric properties and factor structure were analysed, and factor scores created. Gender differences, differences between persons from different age groups and persons reporting the environment as facilitating, hindering or neutral were calculated. Eight items were deleted so that the final version of CBE-SR comprises 19 items. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.743 to 0.906, and test-retest stability was demonstrated for the majority of items. Four subscales were identified: Usability of the neighbourhood environment; Hindrance of walkable environment; Easiness of use of public buildings, places and facilities; and Risk of accidents and usability of the living place. Younger respondents reported their neighbourhood as more usable but perceived walkways as more hindering and public buildings as less easy to use; gender differences were almost inexistent. The CBE-SR is a four-scale instrument with good psychometric properties that measures the person-environment interaction. It is sensitive across age groups and is consistent with the subject's overall judgement of the degree to which the environment is facilitating or hindering. KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE: Poor built environments have a negative impact on the level of a person's participation. However, instruments measuring the person-environment interaction are lacking. The CBE-SR is a valid and reliable instrument that researchers can use to assess the relationships between the intrinsic health state and the objective features of the environment. Understanding this relationship would provide further insight into the need of addressing the individual's functioning either by means of interventions directed to the individual or by making changes to the individual's environment.

The COURAGE Built Environment Outdoor Checklist: an objective built environment instrument to investigate the impact of the environment on health and disability.

UNLABELLED: A tool to assess the built environment, which takes into account issues of disability, accessibility and the need for data comparable across countries and populations, is much needed. The Collaborative Research on Ageing in Europe (COURAGE) in Europe Built Environment Outdoor Checklist (CBE-OUT) helps us to understand when features of the neighbourhood environment have either a positive or negative impact on the accessibility of neighbourhoods for healthy ageing. The CBE-OUT is composed of 128 items that can be recorded when present in the evaluated environment. Audits were performed in households randomly selected from each cluster of the sample for Finland, Poland and Spain, following precise rules defined by experts. Global scores were computed both section by section and in the overall checklist, rescaling the resulting scores from 0 (negative environment) to 100 (positive). The total number of completed CBE-OUT checklists was 2452 (Finland, 245; Poland, 972; and Spain, 1235). Mean global score for our sample is 49.3, suggesting an environment composed both of facilitating and hindering features. Significant differences were observed in the built environment features of the three countries and in particular between Finland and the other two. The assessment of features of built environment is crucial when thinking about ageing and enhanced participation. The COURAGE in Europe project developed this tool to collect information on built environment in an objective evaluation of environmental features and is a recommended methodology for future studies. KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE: The CBE-OUT checklist is an objective evaluation of the built environment and is centred on technical measurement of features present in the environment and has its foundations in the concepts of disability and accessibility operating in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. The CBE-OUT checklist can be analysed using both the total score and the single section score, allowing an evaluation of the facilitating or hindering role of the environment and is usable for predictive analysis of ageing trends. The CBE-OUT checklist makes it possible to collect information about the built environment by means of an objective evaluation of environment features and is a recommended methodology for future studies about the built environment.

The White Book on Disability in Italy: an ICF-based Italian survey.

PURPOSE: To describe the functioning and disability profiles of Italian person with disability (PwD) getting invalidity pension. METHODS: Adult subjects were selected within the registries of local health agencies that provide invalidity certificates. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) checklist was administered by trained interviewers. Count-based indexes were calculated for each ICF chapter and domain. Descriptive analysis and paired-sample t-test for evaluating differences between capacity and performance indexes in Activities and Participation (A&P) were employed. RESULTS: A total of 742 persons were enrolled. Mean age among children and youth (N = 106) was 8.6 years, and among adults (N = 636) was 47.6 years. Most common health conditions are neurological diseases (30.2%), tumors (18.1%) and mental disorders (13.5%). Body Functions and Structures impairments are consistent with sample compositions. In A&P, capacity indexes are higher than performance ones, and facilitators are essentially reported among Environmental Factors (EF). CONCLUSIONS: ICF-based tools are adequate to capture difficulties in different A&P areas, and to estimate EF's effect. In our study, the widest difficulties and the widest impact of EF are reported in areas describing activities of daily living, while areas describing communication, employment and leisure time activities are less problematic but, at the same time, less influenced by EF.