Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 38(9): 1058-65, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26010612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) guidance increases safety and efficacy in vascular cannulation and is considered the standard of care. However, barriers including workflow interference and the need to be assisted by a second operator limit its adoption in clinical routine. The use of wireless US (WUS) may overcome these barriers. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a novel WUS probe during its initial implantation in an electrophysiology (EP) laboratory. METHODS: Thirty-six patients requiring femoral venous cannulation for EP procedures were included in this single center, prospective, observational study, comparing WUS guidance with the anatomical landmark approach. The primary endpoint was time to successful cannulation. Secondary endpoints included rate of unsuccessful punctures, accidental arterial punctures, and workflow interference. RESULTS: Compared with anatomical landmark approach, WUS guidance significantly reduced mean time to successful cannulation (87.3 ± 94.3 vs 238.1 ± 294.7 seconds, P < 0.01). Workflow interference was predominantly nonexistent or mild and decreased after the first three weeks of use. In addition, WUS guidance improved safety and efficacy, reducing the rate of accidental arterial punctures (0.02 ± 0.1 vs 0.25 ± 0.5 arterial punctures per cannulation, P < 0.05) and unsuccessful attempts (0.26 ± 0.8 vs 1.75 ± 2.1 attempts per cannulation, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: WUS guidance resulted in faster, safer, and more effective femoral venous cannulation than the anatomical landmark approach without adding significant workflow interference. The application of wireless technology in this setting contributed to overcoming some of the barriers preventing a more widespread clinical use of US guidance.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/instrumentação , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/instrumentação , Veia Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/instrumentação , Tecnologia sem Fio/instrumentação , Fluxo de Trabalho , Idoso , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo/métodos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Punções/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Transdutores/efeitos adversos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/efeitos adversos , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/etiologia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/prevenção & controle
2.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 159(6): 278-282, 2022 09 23.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35039169

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced interatrial block has been linked with atrial fibrillation (AF) (Bayes syndrome). On the other hand, the aetiology of the stroke remains unknown in approximately 20-25% of patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether advanced interatrial block and CHADS2-VASC scale is linked to AF in patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke without previous AF history. METHODS: A prospective analysis of consecutive in-hospital patients admitted with ischemic stroke between January/2018 and April/2019 in a stroke hospital was performed. Patients had to be in sinus rhythm at admission and without previous history of AF/atrial flutter. During follow up patients receive the usual care. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were included. The median follow-up was 540 days (407-695). 19 patients (8.1%) had advanced interatrial block at admission. Advanced interatrial block was associated with the diagnosis of AF during follow up (5 (26.3%) Vs 21 (9.7%) p=0.027). A CHADS2-VASC score>4 at admission was also associated with AF diagnosis during follow up (23(14.6%) vs 3(3.9%) p=0.009). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the association of advanced interatrial block and CHADS2-VASC>4 at admission with the diagnosis of AF during follow up in patients with ischemic stroke. This association could have important implications in patients with ischemic stroke who present advanced interatrial block and without previous history of AF.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Isquemia Encefálica , Bloqueio Interatrial , AVC Isquêmico , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Bloqueio Interatrial/complicações , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico , AVC Isquêmico/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA