Telehealth Utilization in Oral Medicine and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Objectives: The objectives of this retrospective study were to analyze telehealth utilization for two specialty care practices: oral medicine (OM) and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) during the first 2 years of the pandemic, its impact as a new treatment modality and on participating providers, as well as identify the type of patient visit that most readily adopted telehealth. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who sought specialty services, OM and OMFS, at an outpatient clinic in a university health system setting between March 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022. Source data were obtained from Epic, an electronic medical record application. Data were graphed using Tableau and Microsoft Excel software. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing chi-squared test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: OMFS utilized telehealth 12% of the time, and OM 8% of the time. The majority (87%) of telehealth visits were for return patients (RPs). Compared with the first year of the pandemic, there was a decrease in the number of telehealth visits in the second year (p = 0.0001). As of August 2022, new patient (NP) telehealth encounters have largely returned to prepandemic levels (0-1.5%), whereas RP telehealth visits remained at an average level of 11.4% (9.4-12.4%). Surveyed providers consider telehealth as an effective complement to in-person care and will continue its use (4.2/5 Likert scale). Conclusions: Telehealth has become a viable pathway of care for OM and OMFS who previously did not utilize the remote platform to deliver healthcare. As a new treatment modality, telehealth is perceived as impactful in increasing access to specialty care by participating providers. NP visits are now almost completely in person, but telehealth continues for RPs. Ongoing demand for telehealth highlights urgency to develop appropriate standards and effective remote diagnostic/monitoring tools to maximize telehealth's capability to leverage finite health care resources and increase access to specialty care.

Are Bacteria Just Bystanders in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Jaw Conditions?

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether certain bacteria initiate the development of inflammatory jaw conditions, or whether these diseases create a milieu for dysbiosis and secondary colonization of indigenous flora. At present, there are no comparative studies on the types of bacteria that colonize different inflammatory jaw conditions. Accordingly, this study aims to identify and compare the types of bacteria isolated in osteomyelitis, osteoradionecrosis, and MRONJ. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with inflammatory jaw conditions. The predictor variables were classification of bacteria as oral flora, categorized herein as resident bacteria, non-resident bacteria, or opportunistic organisms. The outcome variables were a diagnosis of osteomyelitis, osteoradionecrosis, and MRONJ. Covariates were age, sex, penicillin allergy, a diagnosis of diabetes and a history of smoking. Data analysis was performed using ANOVA and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients with inflammatory jaw conditions were enrolled. The final sample size was 69 subjects of which 16 were diagnosed with osteomyelitis, 20 with osteoradionecrosis, and 33 with MRONJ. There was no difference in the frequency that resident bacteria were isolated. Non-resident bacteria, which included Staphylococcus and Enterococcus among others, were isolated more frequently at 75% in osteomyelitis compared to 60% in osteoradionecrosis and 48% in MRONJ cases. There is weak evidence of significant difference when comparing osteomyelitis and MRONJ cases (P = .08). Opportunistic organisms, which included Mycobacterium and Candida, were isolated more frequently in osteoradionecrosis at 30% compared to 12.5% in osteomyelitis and 12.12% in MRONJ cases. There is weak evidence of significant difference when comparing osteoradionecrosis and MRONJ cases (P = .1). CONCLUSION: Non-resident bacteria including Staphylococcus and Enterococcus may be more frequently isolated in patients with osteomyelitis, while opportunistic organisms like Mycobacterium and Candida may be more frequently found in patients diagnosed with osteoradionecrosis.

Early Childhood (0 to 5 years) Presents the Greatest Risk for Facial Dog Bites.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to compare the characteristics of dog bite wounds to the face and that of the rest of the body among the pediatric population in the United States and to determine independent risk factors for dog bite wounds to the face. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Kids' Inpatient Database. There were multiple, heterogenous predictor variables. The primary outcome variable was a facial dog bite. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify independent risk factors for the primary outcome variable. A P value less than .05 was the threshold for statistical significance. RESULTS: Our final sample consisted of 9,057 patients who suffered dog bite injuries, of which 2,913 (32.2%) occurred on the face. Relative to individuals aged 16-20 years, individuals aged 0-5 (odds ratio [OR] 5.7; confidence interval [CI] 4.0, 8.1), 6-10 (OR 3.8; CI 2.6, 5.5), and 11-15 years (OR 1.6; CI 1.1, 2.5) were all independently associated with increased odds of incurring a facial dog bite injury. Patients who were not admitted electively were 2.5 times (CI 1.4, 4.6) more likely to incur a facial dog bite injury relative to patients who were admitted electively. CONCLUSIONS: Young children (0-5 years) were at the greatest risk for facial dog bites relative to children aged 16-20 years. Dog bites that were admitted on emergency were more likely to occur on the face relative to those that were electively admitted to the hospital. To reduce the risk for facial dog bites and the host of chronic psychological ramifications that accompany them, established preventative strategies ought to be exercised.

Is maxillary sinusitis and radiographic maxillary sinus opacification associated with an altered microbiology of MRONJ?

OBJECTIVE: Maxillary sinusitis can be a sequela of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This study aims to characterize the microbiome of maxillary MRONJ with concurrent maxillary sinusitis and radiographic maxillary sinus opacification to determine if there is a relationship between the microbiome of MRONJ and sinus disease. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective case series was conducted using electronic health records from the University of Pennsylvania and affiliated hospitals. The target population was surgically managed maxillary MRONJ patients. The primary predictor variables were tissue culture results. The primary outcomes were maxillary sinusitis or maxillary sinus opacification. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared tests at the 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects were selected: 25 had sinus opacification and 11 had sinusitis. Resident bacteria were present in 90% of subjects, nonresident bacteria in 74%, and opportunistic organisms in 15%. There were significantly more subjects with chronic sinusitis microbes (79%) than without. There were significantly more gram-positive anaerobes, specifically Propionibacterium, as well as the gram-negative facultative anaerobe, Capnocytophaga, in subjects with concurrent sinusitis. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary MRONJ with concurrent maxillary sinusitis may be associated with gram-positive anaerobic species, Propionibacterium, and Capnocytophaga colonization. Maxillary MRONJ patients may benefit from sinus evaluation and concurrent surgical intervention.

Cervicofacial hidradenitis suppurativa: A case report and literature review.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the apocrine glands primarily affecting the axillae, perineum, and inframammary regions. It is characterized by painful, inflamed cutaneous lesions causing nodules, sinus tracts, and abscesses. Cervicofacial HS is an atypical presentation of HS in the head and neck region and is scarcely reported in the literature. We present a 34-year-old male who developed a large facial swelling overlying the left inferior mandibular border. Management included surgical incision and drainage, antibiotic therapy, followed by infliximab (Remicade). The purpose of this case report was to highlight the presentation, pathophysiology, interdisciplinary approach to treatment and follow-up of patients with cervicofacial HS, and finally, review the cervicofacial HS literature.

Does systemic steroid use affect the length of hospital stay for head and neck infections?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to perform a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of head and neck infections treated with systemic steroids. STUDY DESIGN: The protocol was registered to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on August 24, 2020. The studies were compiled using PubMed/Medline with a single reviewer from their inception until August 17, 2020. The studies were uploaded onto Convidence.org, and a repeat search was conducted and uploaded on August 17, 2021. Two independent reviewers (J.S. and S.H.) blinded to each other's assessments reviewed the title and/or abstract for inclusion. After a first pass, full-text reviews of the articles were assessed (J.S. and K.F.) for study inclusion. Data were extracted from the steroid (test) and nonsteroid (control) cohorts. RESULTS: The initial search of key terms yielded 2,711 studies. Titles and abstracts were reviewed, and only cohort and/or cross-sectional studies with the relevant study groups and the relevant outcomes were retrieved for the filtration system. The 2 reviewers reviewed 188 full-text studies, and 3 studies met the inclusion criteria. Although all 3 studies included the mean length of stay for the treatment and a control group, only 2 studies included the confidence interval, and only 1 included P values. Overall, the studies presented insufficient data to pool outcomes and ran a statistical analysis for meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid use reduced the length of stay in 2 studies and increased the length of stay in another larger study. Given the lack of data to perform a meta-analysis, more studies need to be conducted, with a prospective randomized control trial design being essential for guiding evidence-based practice regarding the use of steroids in head and neck infections.