Unraveling the Genetic Basis for the Rapid Diversification of Male Genitalia between Drosophila Species.

In the last 240,000 years, males of the Drosophila simulans species clade have evolved striking differences in the morphology of their epandrial posterior lobes and claspers (surstyli). These appendages are used for grasping the female during mating and so their divergence is most likely driven by sexual selection. Mapping studies indicate a highly polygenic and generally additive genetic basis for these morphological differences. However, we have limited understanding of the gene regulatory networks that control the development of genital structures and how they evolved to result in this rapid phenotypic diversification. Here, we used new D. simulans/D. mauritiana introgression lines on chromosome arm 3L to generate higher resolution maps of posterior lobe and clasper differences between these species. We then carried out RNA-seq on the developing genitalia of both species to identify the expressed genes and those that are differentially expressed between the two species. This allowed us to test the function of expressed positional candidates during genital development in D. melanogaster. We identified several new genes involved in the development and possibly the evolution of these genital structures, including the transcription factors Hairy and Grunge. Furthermore, we discovered that during clasper development Hairy negatively regulates tartan (trn), a gene known to contribute to divergence in clasper morphology. Taken together, our results provide new insights into the regulation of genital development and how this has evolved between species.

Wnt gene regulation and function during maxillary palp development in Drosophila melanogaster.

Wnt genes encode secreted ligands that play many important roles in the development of metazoans. There are thirteen known Wnt gene subfamilies and seven of these are represented in Drosophila melanogaster. While wingless (wg) is the best understood and most widely studied Wnt gene in Drosophila, the functions of many of the other Drosophila Wnt genes are less well understood. For example, relatively little is known about Wnt6, which is an ancient paralog of wg and they form a conserved Wnt cluster together with Wnt9 (Dwnt4) and Wnt10. Wg and Wnt6 encode similar proteins and exhibit overlapping expression in several tissues during development. Both wg and Wnt6 were previously shown to regulate the development of maxillary palps, important olfactory organs in flies, but it remained unclear how these two ligands may combine to carry out specific functions and how this is regulated. Here, we have further analysed Wnt6 function in the context of maxillary palp development. Surprisingly, we found that Wnt6 does not appear to be necessary for development of maxillary palps. While a deletion of the 5' region of Wnt6 results in very small maxillary palps, we show that this effect is more likely to be a consequence of removing cis-regulatory elements that may regulate wg expression in this tissue rather than through the loss of Wnt6 function. Although, we cannot completely exclude the possibility that Wnt6 may subtly regulate maxillary palp development in combination with wg, our analysis of Wnt6 loss of function mutants suggests this ligand plays a more general role in regulating growth during development. Taken together our results provide new insights into maxillary palp formation and Wnt6 functions in Drosophila, and further evidence for a complex cis-regulatory landscape in the Wnt9-wg-Wnt6-Wnt10 cluster, which may help explain its evolutionary conservation.

Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution.

Convergent phenotypic evolution is often caused by recurrent changes at particular nodes in the underlying gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The genes at such evolutionary 'hotspots' are thought to maximally affect the phenotype with minimal pleiotropic consequences. This has led to the suggestion that if a GRN is understood in sufficient detail, the path of evolution may be predictable. The repeated evolutionary loss of larval trichomes among Drosophila species is caused by the loss of shavenbaby (svb) expression. svb is also required for development of leg trichomes, but the evolutionary gain of trichomes in the 'naked valley' on T2 femurs in Drosophila melanogaster is caused by reduced microRNA-92a (miR-92a) expression rather than changes in svb. We compared the expression and function of components between the larval and leg trichome GRNs to investigate why the genetic basis of trichome pattern evolution differs in these developmental contexts. We found key differences between the two networks in both the genes employed, and in the regulation and function of common genes. These differences in the GRNs reveal why mutations in svb are unlikely to contribute to leg trichome evolution and how instead miR-92a represents the key evolutionary switch in this context. Our work shows that variability in GRNs across different developmental contexts, as well as whether a morphological feature is lost versus gained, influence the nodes at which a GRN evolves to cause morphological change. Therefore, our findings have important implications for understanding the pathways and predictability of evolution.