Epigenetic Plasticity Enables CNS-Trafficking of EBV-infected B Lymphocytes.

Subpopulations of B-lymphocytes traffic to different sites and organs to provide diverse and tissue-specific functions. Here, we provide evidence that epigenetic differences confer a neuroinvasive phenotype. An EBV+ B cell lymphoma cell line (M14) with low frequency trafficking to the CNS was neuroadapted to generate a highly neuroinvasive B-cell population (MUN14). MUN14 B cells efficiently infiltrated the CNS within one week and produced neurological pathologies. We compared the gene expression profiles of viral and cellular genes using RNA-Seq and identified one viral (EBNA1) and several cellular gene candidates, including secreted phosphoprotein 1/osteopontin (SPP1/OPN), neuron navigator 3 (NAV3), CXCR4, and germinal center-associated signaling and motility protein (GCSAM) that were selectively upregulated in MUN14. ATAC-Seq and ChIP-qPCR revealed that these gene expression changes correlated with epigenetic changes at gene regulatory elements. The neuroinvasive phenotype could be attenuated with a neutralizing antibody to OPN, confirming the functional role of this protein in trafficking EBV+ B cells to the CNS. These studies indicate that B-cell trafficking to the CNS can be acquired by epigenetic adaptations and provide a new model to study B-cell neuroinvasion associated CNS lymphoma and autoimmune disease of the CNS, including multiple sclerosis (MS).

EBNA1 inhibitors have potent and selective antitumor activity in xenograft models of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric carcinoma (EBVaGC) is the most common EBV-associated cancer and accounts for ~ 10% of all gastric cancers (GC). Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1), which is critical for the replication and maintenance of the EBV latent genome, is consistently expressed in all EBVaGC tumors. We previously developed small molecule inhibitors of EBNA1. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and selectivity of an EBNA1 inhibitor in cell-based and animal xenograft models of EBV-positive and EBV-negative gastric carcinoma. METHODS: We tested the potency of an EBNA1 inhibitor, VK-1727, in vitro and in xenograft studies, using EBV-positive (SNU719 and YCCEL1) and EBV-negative (AGS and MKN74) GC cell lines. After treatment, we analyzed cell viability, proliferation, and RNA expression of EBV genes by RT-qPCR. RESULTS: Treatment with VK-1727 selectively inhibits cell cycle progression and proliferation in vitro. In animal studies, treatment with an EBNA1 inhibitor resulted in a significant dose-dependent decrease in tumor growth in EBVaGC xenograft models, but not in EBV-negative GC xenograft studies. Gene expression analysis revealed that short term treatment in cell culture tended towards viral gene activation, while long-term treatment in animal xenografts showed a significant decrease in viral gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: EBNA1 inhibitors are potent and selective inhibitors of cell growth in tissue culture and animal models of EBV-positive GC. Long-term treatment with EBNA1 inhibitors may lead to loss of EBV in mouse xenografts. These results suggest that pharmacological targeting of EBNA1 may be an effective strategy to treat patients with EBVaGC.

Identification of Mubritinib (TAK 165) as an inhibitor of KSHV driven primary effusion lymphoma via disruption of mitochondrial OXPHOS metabolism.

KSHV-associated cancers have poor prognoses and lack therapeutics that selectively target viral gene functions. We developed a screening campaign to identify known drugs that could be repurposed for the treatment of KSHV-associated cancers. We focused on primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), which has particularly poor treatment outcomes. We developed a luciferase reporter assay to test the ability of drugs to inhibit DNA binding of the KSHV LANA DNA binding domain (DBD). In parallel, we screened drugs for selective inhibition of a KSHV+ PEL cells. While potent hits were identified in each assay, only one hit, Mubritinib, was found to score in both assays. Mubritinib caused PEL cells to undergo cell cycle arrest with accumulation of sub-G1 population and Annexin V. Mubritinib inhibited LANA binding to KSHV terminal repeat (TR) DNA in KSHV+ PEL cells, but did not lead to KSHV lytic cycle reactivation. Mubritinib was originally identified as a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor selective for HER2/ErbB2. But recent studies have revealed that Mubritinib can also inhibit the electron transport chain (ETC) complex at nanomolar concentrations. We found that other related ETC complex inhibitors (Rotenone and Deguelin) exhibited PEL cell growth inhibition while RTK inhibitors failed. Seahorse analysis demonstrated that Mubritinib selectively inhibits the maximal oxygen consumption (OCR) in PEL cells and metabolomics revealed changes in ATP/ADP and ATP/AMP ratios. These findings indicate that PEL cells are selectively sensitive to ETC complex inhibitors and provide a rationale for repurposing Mubritinib for selective treatment of PEL.