Predictors of Recurrence and Progression in Poorly Differentiated Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Insights from a Real-Life Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery represents the primary treatment option for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) aiming for complete tumor resection (R0). Recurrence and metastasis significantly affect survival and outcomes, and poorly differentiated (G3) cSCC is associated with a higher risk of recurrence. However, the specific clinical and histopathological features that predict recurrence and progression in G3-cSCC remain unclear. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a series of patients with primary G3-cSCC diagnosed at the Turin University Hospital between January 2016 and January 2021. After independent histological revision, logistic regression models were used to identify clinico-pathological predictors of cutaneous recurrence, lymphnode/metastatic progression, and both types of progression. RESULTS: Among the 161 G3-cSCC patients, 80.1% (129/161) showed no signs of local recurrence or metastatic progression, while 19.9% (32 patients) had progressed. In the univariate logistic regression, tumor clinical diameter, depth of infiltration (DOI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were identified as significant predictors across the various types of progression (p < 0.05). In the context of multivariate logistic regression, distinct models proved to be significant. For skin recurrence, a 3-variable model incorporating DOI (OR 1.16, 95% CI, 1.01-1.35, p = 0.050), LVI (OR 3.61, 95% CI, 1.11-11.8, p = 0.034), and desmoplasia (OR 3.45, 95% CI, 1.25-9.5, p = 0.017) was selected. Regarding lymphnode/metastatic progression, a 3-variable model combining pT2 (OR 6.10, 95% CI, 1.15-32.35, p = 0.034), pT3 (OR 14.33, 95% CI, 2.79-73.63, p = 0.001), and LVI (OR 3.86, 95% CI, 1.10-13.62, p = 0.036) was identified. Lastly, a 2-variable model for both types of progression consisted of vertical tumor thickness (OR 5.45, 95% CI, 1.11-27.32, p = 0.039) and LVI (OR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.04-1.26, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Tumor size, DOI, and LVI were significant predictors of recurrence and metastatic progression. Notably, the size of histologically defined tumor-free margins did not affect the risk of recurrence, whilst LVI emerged as a key predictor of all forms of progression. These findings provide insights into risk stratification and suggest that close monitoring and potential adjuvant therapies, such as radiation therapy, may be necessary especially for patients with lymphovascular involvement.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Stage III Melanoma Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A Real-Life Experience.

Background: Advancements in managing stage III melanoma have involved the implementation of adjuvant therapies alongside a simultaneous decrease in the utilization of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB). Methods: This retrospective study from the University of Turin's Dermatology Clinic analyzed relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among stage III melanoma patients (n = 157) who underwent CLND after positive SLNB versus those who did not receive such procedure. Results: Patients without CLND had a median RFS of 49 months (95% CI 42-NA), while CLND recipients showed 51 months (95% CI 31-NA) (p = 0.139). The 48-month OS for non-CLND patients was 79.8% (95% CI 58.2-91.0) versus 79.2% (95% CI 67.5-87.0) for CLND recipients (p = 0.463). Adjusted Hazard Ratios through inverse probability treatment weighting revealed the impact of CLND to be insignificant on RFS (aHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.37-2.22) and marginal on OS (aHR 0.41, 95% CI 0.13-1.21). Conversely, adjuvant therapy significantly reduced the risk of relapse (aHR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.84), irrespective of CLND. Conclusions: This study corroborates the growing evidence that CLND after positive SLNB does not enhance RFS or OS, while emphasizing the crucial role of adjuvant therapy, be it immunotherapy or targeted therapy, in reducing the risk of relapse in melanoma patients with positive SLNB.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Malignant Melanoma of the Head and Neck: A Single Center Experience.

Purpose: This study evaluated the characteristics of patients with head and neck (H&N) melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) and assessed the clinical course of patients categorizing subjects according to SLNB status and melanoma location (scalp area vs. non-scalp areas). Methods: Patients undergoing SLNB for melanoma of H&N from 2015 to 2021 were prospectively characterized according to sentinel lymph node (SLN) status. SPECT/CT had been previously performed. Patients were followed until the first adverse event to evaluate progression-free survival. Results: 93 patients were enrolled. SLNB was negative in 75 patients. The median Breslow index was higher for patients with positive SLNB compared with patients with negative SLNB. In addition, the Breslow index was higher for melanoma of the scalp compared with non-scalp melanoma. The median follow-up was 24.8 months. Progression occurred at the systemic level in the 62.5% of cases. There was a significant association between positive SLNB and progression (p-value < 0.01) of disease, with lower progression-free survival for patients with melanoma of the scalp compared with those with melanoma at other anatomic sites (p-value: 0.15). Conclusions: Scalp melanomas are more aggressive than other types of H&N melanomas. Sentinel lymph node status is the strongest prognostic criterion for recurrence.