Phase II trial of taxol, an active drug in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Taxol, an antimicrotubule agent, has shown promise for efficacy in treatment of breast cancer, but severe hypersensitivity reactions led to cessation of many phase I clinical trials. Consequently, investigators and the National Cancer Institute recommended that phase I and II studies of this agent use 24-hour infusions and antiallergic medications. Using a premedication regimen effective in preventing hypersensitivity reactions, we have performed a phase II trial of taxol in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Taxol was administered to 25 patients at a dose of 250 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion every 21 days. These patients had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen, either adjuvant to surgery or for metastatic disease; all but two had received doxorubicin. In 60% of the patients, the dominant site of disease was the viscera. All patients were assessable. In April 1991, at a median time on study of 9 months (range, 5-13+ months), the objective response rate was 56% (12% complete and 44% partial; 95% confidence interval, 35%-76%). Disease progressed in only 8% of the patients. The median number of courses of therapy was 11. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect, but neutropenia with fever occurred in only 5% of 232 courses. A chronic glove-and-stocking neuropathy developed in most patients, but no allergic reactions occurred. We conclude that taxol is an active agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and that it warrants continued study. Currently, we are conducting a phase I trial of taxol plus doxorubicin. Future trials should address the optimal effective dose, the optimal sequencing of combinations, mechanisms of drug resistance in tumors, and dose-limiting toxic effects (particularly cardiac toxic effects of taxol given as a single agent or in drug combinations).

Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and blood cell autografts for high-risk primary breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies have reported encouraging outcomes for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare standard-dose chemotherapy with the same therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes after primary breast surgery or patients with four or more positive lymph nodes after four cycles of primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy were eligible. All patients were to receive eight cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide (FAC). Patients were stratified by stage and randomly assigned to receive two cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support or no additional chemotherapy. Tamoxifen was planned for postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors and chest wall radiotherapy was planned for all. All P values are from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (48 after primary surgery and 30 after primary chemotherapy) were registered. Thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned to FAC and 39 to FAC followed by high-dose chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, there have been 41 relapses. In intention-to-treat analyses, estimated 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 62% and 48% for FAC and FAC/high-dose chemotherapy, respectively (P =.35), and 3-year survival rates were 77% and 58%, respectively (P =.23). Overall, there was greater and more frequent morbidity associated with high-dose chemotherapy than with FAC; there was one septic death associated with high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: No relapse-free or overall survival advantage was associated with the use of high-dose chemotherapy, and morbidity was increased with its use. Thus, high-dose chemotherapy is not indicated outside a clinical trial.

c-erbB-2 amplification in node-negative human breast cancer.

c-erbB-2 gene analysis by Southern and DNA dot blot methods was done in 66 tumor samples from patients with histologically node-negative breast cancer. The c-erbB-2 gene was amplified 2- to greater than 8-fold in 13 tumors (20%). None of 59 tumors that were examined by the Southern method showed c-erbB-2 gene rearrangement. c-erbB-2 amplification was analyzed in relation to other prognostic factors. The c-erbB-2 gene was amplified in five of 36 (14%) diploid and eight of 30 (27%) aneuploid tumors. Thirteen of 54 (24%) tumors with nuclear Grade 1 or 2 displayed c-erbB-2 amplification, whereas none of 12 tumors with nuclear Grade 3 did. No correlation was observed with estrogen receptor content, tumor size, histological type, or age of patients. The median follow-up date for these patients was 85+ mo. Of 13 patients whose tumors showed c-erbB-2 amplification, six patients (46%) developed recurrence, and five patients (38%) died of metastatic disease. In contrast, of 53 patients whose tumors did not show c-erbB-2 amplification, 15 patients (28%) developed recurrence, and seven patients (13%) died of disease. In conclusion, our results show that c-erbB-2 gene amplification was more frequent in aneuploid tumors and tumors with poor nuclear grade. c-erbB-2 amplification may be considered a possible prognostic factor in node-negative breast cancer.

Treatment-related leukemia in breast cancer patients treated with fluorouracil-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide combination adjuvant chemotherapy: the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer has been the routine practice in the past decade. A number of studies have observed an increased incidence of treatment-related leukemias following chemotherapy with alkylating agents and/or topoisomerase II inhibitors. We evaluated the incidence of treatment-related leukemias in breast cancer patients treated in four adjuvant and two neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1974 and 1989, 1,474 patients with stage II or III breast cancer were treated in six prospective trials of adjuvant (n = 4) or neoadjuvant (n = 2) chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (CTX) (FAC) with or without other drugs. The median observation time was 97 months. In 1,107 patients, FAC chemotherapy was given postoperatively; 367 patients received induction chemotherapy, as well as postoperative chemotherapy. Eight hundred ten patients had surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy; 664 patients had surgery and chemotherapy only. Patients in two adjuvant and one neoadjuvant study received higher cumulative doses of CTX compared with those in the other studies. RESULTS: Fourteen cases of leukemia were observed. Twelve of these patients had received radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and two had received chemotherapy only. Six of the reported patients with leukemia were treated with a cumulative CTX dose of greater than 6 g/ m2. Five of these patients had received both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The median latency period in the 14 patients was 66 months (range, 22 to 113). Six of 10 patients with adequate cytogenetic analyses had abnormalities that involved chromosomes 5 and/or 7. The rest of the patients had nonspecific cytogenetic abnormalities or lacked cytogenetic information. The 10-year estimated leukemia rate was 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7% to 2.9%) for all patients treated, 2.5% (95% CI, 1.0% to 5.1%) for the radiotherapy-plus-chemotherapy group, and 0.5% (95% CI, 0.1% to 2.4%) for the chemotherapy-only group; this difference was statistically significant (P = .01). The 10-year estimated leukemia risk for the higher-dose (> 6 g/m2) CTX group was 2% (95% CI, 0.5% to 5.0%) compared with 1.3% (95% CI, 0.4% to 3.0%) for the lower-dose group, a difference that was not statistically significant (P = .53). CONCLUSION: These data illustrate that patients treated with adjuvant FAC chemotherapy plus radiotherapy have a slightly increased risk of leukemia. This information needs to be considered in the treatment plans for patients with breast cancer. However, for most patients, the benefits of adjuvant therapy exceed the risk of treatment-related leukemia.

Evaluation of high-dose versus standard FAC chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer in protected environment units: a prospective randomized study.

Fifty-nine evaluable patients under 65 years of age with measurable metastatic breast cancer and without prior chemotherapy were randomly assigned to treatment with fluorouracil, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and cyclophosphamide (FAC) at standard or high doses (100% to 260% higher than standard FAC) following a dose escalation schedule. Patients randomized to the high-dose FAC received the first three cycles of therapy within a protected environment. Subsequent cycles for this group were administered at standard doses of FAC in an ambulatory setting, the same as for the control group. After reaching 450 mg/m2 of Adriamycin, patients in both groups continued treatment with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil until there was disease progression. Analysis of pretreatment patient characteristics showed an even distribution for most known pretreatment factors, although the control group had slightly (but nonsignificantly) more favorable prognostic characteristics. Fourteen patients (24%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and 32 (54%) achieved a partial remission (PR), for an overall major response rate of 78%. There were no differences in overall, CR, or PR rates between the high-dose FAC and control groups. The median response durations were 11 and 10 months for the protected environment and control groups, respectively, and the median survival was 20 months for both groups. Hematologic, gastrointestinal (GI), and infection-related complications were significantly more frequent and severe in the group treated with high-dose chemotherapy. Stomatitis, diarrhea, and skin toxicity were dose-limiting. However, there were no treatment-related deaths. High-dose induction combination chemotherapy with the agents used in this study failed to increase the response rate or survival duration, and resulted in a substantial increase in toxicity.

Impact of selection process on response rate and long-term survival of potential high-dose chemotherapy candidates treated with standard-dose doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Most of the data about high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) for metastatic breast cancer are derived from phase II studies. The interpretation of these data depends on comparisons with data from properly selected historical control patients treated with standard therapy under similar circumstances. We report the long-term results of patients with metastatic breast cancer who were eligible for HDCT but were treated with doxorubicin-containing standard-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 18 successive doxorubicin-containing protocols for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer were evaluated. Using common eligibility criteria for HDCT, we identified patients who would have been candidates for HDCT. We analyzed response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for all patients, potential HDCT candidates, and noncandidates. RESULTS: A total of 1,581 patients was enrolled onto the 18 studies. Six hundred forty-five were HDCT candidates, and 936 were noncandidates. The complete response rate was 27% for HDCT candidates and 7% for noncandidates; median PFS was 16 and 8 months and median OS was 30 and 17 months, respectively. Survival rates for HDCT candidates and noncandidates, respectively, were 21% and 6% at 5 years and 7% and 2% at 10 years. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that encouraging results of single-arm trials of HDCT could partially be due to selection of patients with better prognoses and further stresses the importance of completing ongoing randomized trials of HDCT to assess the relative efficacy of HDCT in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term clinical course of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who achieved a complete remission with doxorubicin-alkylating agent-containing combination chemotherapy programs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To assess the long-term prognosis of MBC, we reviewed our experience with 1,581 patients treated on consecutive doxorubicin and alkylating agent-containing front-line treatment protocols between 1973 and 1982. Treatment was administered for a maximum duration of 2 years. Characteristics of long-term survivors were evaluated, and hazard rates for progression were calculated. RESULTS: From this group, 263 (16.6%) achieved complete responses (CR) and 49 (3.1%) remained in CR for more than 5 years. After a median duration of 191 months, 26 patients remain in first CR, four patients died in CR at times ranging from 118 to 234 months, 18 patients died of breast cancer, and one is alive with metastatic disease. Compared with the overall CR and total patient populations, the long-term CR group had more premenopausal patients, a younger median age, a lower tumor burden, and better performance status. The hazard function shows a substantial drop in risk of progression after approximately 3 years from initiation of therapy. Ten long-term CR patients developed second primary cancers: breast (3), ovary (2), pancreas (1), endometrium (1), colon (1), head and neck (1), and lung (1). CONCLUSION: Most patients with MBC treated with systemic therapies have only temporary responses to treatment, but some patients continue in CR following initial treatment. These data show that a small percentage of patients achieve long-term remissions with standard chemotherapy regimens. Remission consolidation strategies are needed.

Bioequivalence of 20-mg once-daily tamoxifen relative to 10-mg twice-daily tamoxifen regimens for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We studied the bioequivalence of a new once-daily regimen of tamoxifen citrate relative to the standard twice-daily regimen of tamoxifen citrate, an established antiestrogenic treatment for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 30 women with breast cancer, 27 completed this open, two-period, crossover randomized trial. During one 3-month period, patients took one standard 10-mg tamoxifen tablet twice daily; during the preceding or following 3-month period, patients took one of the new 20-mg tablets once daily. Pharmacokinetic profiles and safety parameters were assessed at the end of each 3-month treatment period. RESULTS: Overall, measured concentrations of tamoxifen and its principal active metabolite, N-desmethyltamoxifen, remained relatively constant over the 24-hour sampling periods at the end of each treatment sequence. For both compounds, the percentage differences of the geometric means for all pharmacokinetic parameters indicated bioequivalence of the once-daily regimen of tamoxifen relative to the standard twice-daily regimen. Both treatment sequences were well tolerated; reported adverse events occurred at similar frequencies with the two treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: The 20-mg tamoxifen tablet taken once daily was bioequivalent to the 10-mg tamoxifen tablet taken twice daily, with no difference in relative risk. The once-daily treatment is a simpler regimen and may facilitate compliance, which may enhance therapeutic outcomes during long-term treatment of breast cancer.

Long-term results of combined-modality therapy for locally advanced breast cancer with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

PURPOSE: To determine outcomes in local-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who present with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases and who are treated with combined-modality therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with regional stage IV LABC, which is defined by our institution as LABC with ipsilateral supraclavicular adenopathy without evidence of distant disease, received treatment on three prospective trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil, or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. Patients then received local therapy that consisted of either total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or segmental mastectomy and ALND before or after irradiation. Patients with no response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. After completion of local therapy, chemotherapy was continued for four to 15 cycles, followed by radiotherapy. Patients older than 50 years who had estrogen receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 11.6 years (range, 4.8 to 22.6 years). Disease-free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 34% and 32%, respectively. The median disease-free survival was 1.9 years. Overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 41% and 31%, respectively. The median overall survival was 3.5 years. The overall response rate (partial and complete responses) to induction chemotherapy was 89%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases but no other evidence of distant metastases warrant therapy administered with curative intent, ie, combined-modality therapy consisting of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases should be included in the stage IIIB category of the tumor-node-metastasis classification because their clinical course and prognosis are similar to those of patients with stage IIIB LABC.

Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare prospectively the antitumor activity of single-agent paclitaxel to the three-drug combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with T1-3N0-1M0 disease were randomized to receive either paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) as 24-hour infusion or FAC in standard doses at every-3-week intervals. Each patient was treated with four cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Clinical response and extent of residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes was assessed after four cycles of induction chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were registered, and 87 were randomized to each arm of the study. Clinical response, ie, complete and partial responses, was similar in both arms of the study. Three patients in the FAC arm and one patient in the paclitaxel subgroup had progressive disease. The extent of residual disease by intent-to-treat analysis at the time of surgery was similar between the two arms of the study. CONCLUSION: The results of this prospective study demonstrated that single-agent paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy has significant antitumor activity, and this was clinically comparable to FAC. Similar fractions of patients had clinical complete and partial responses, and very few patients had no response to either therapy. The value of alternate non-cross-resistant therapies as used in this protocol on the clinical course of this disease would require longer follow-up.

Phase II clinical and pharmacological study of pirarubicin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer.

Doxorubicin containing combination chemotherapy regimens are widely used for treatment of breast and other cancers. However, these regimens are associated with significant toxicities including myocardial dysfunction and alopecia. Analogues of doxorubicin are being developed to reduce these side effects. We conducted a Phase II trial of an anthracycline analogue, pirarubicin, administered in combination with 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks, as front-line chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients who had received prior anthracycline therapy were excluded. The chemotherapy doses were as follows: 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8), pirarubicin (50 mg/m2 on day 1), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 on day 1). Among 40 evaluable patients treated on this protocol, a major response (partial or complete remission) was observed in 26 patients (response rate, 62%; 95% confidence interval, 46-77). The median response duration was 8 months, and median survival was 16 months. Grade III/IV myelosuppression occurred in 81% of the courses. The median cumulative pirarubicin dose was 410 (range, 90-870) mg/m2. A significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction occurred in 12 patients (at a median cumulative pirarubicin dose of 460 mg/m2) and led to congestive heart failure in 4 of these patients (cumulative pirarubicin doses of 500, 520, 590, and 730 mg/m2, respectively). Eleven patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy, either because they experienced a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction or because they had received a cumulative pirarubicin dose of 600 mg/m2 and were still responding to the treatment. Of these, only one biopsy was found to be more than grade 1.0 (in an individual who had received a cumulative dose of 705 mg/m2). Severe alopecia occurred in two-thirds of the patients. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed a triphasic elimination of pirarubicin with alpha, beta and gamma half-lives of 0.12, 1.44, and 33.9 h, respectively. Total clearance of drug was 4.2 liters.1 h/kg while the cumulative 24-h urinary excretion was less than 10% of the administered dose. The activity of the combination appears to be similar to doxorubicin-containing regimens, while the incidence of alopecia appears to be lower than the historical experience with doxorubicin. However, cardiotoxicity remains a significant problem.

Doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer. Tolerance and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer in elderly patients is less often treated with chemotherapy than in younger patients because of concerns related to toxic effects and tolerance. This is especially the case with doxorubicin-containing regimens. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 1011 consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy protocols between July 1973 and July 1984. Age was not an exclusion criterion. Patient characteristics, dose intensity, hematologic-related toxic effects, and the cause of death were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and tested by the generalized Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-seven patients aged between 50 and 64 years were identified. While the response rate was higher in the younger group, the overall survival curves were similar for the two groups (P = .06), as well as the time to progression of the disease (P = .15). The dose intensity was comparable between the groups (P = .49), as was the median platelet and white blood cell nadirs. Neutropenic fever occurred in 16% of each group (P = 83), and fever in 12% and 17% of each group, respectively (P = .05). Death from infections occurred in 3.1% and 3.2% of patients in the two groups, respectively (P = .82). CONCLUSION: Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who are older than 65 years tolerate the acute side effects of doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy as well as the younger age group. Time to progression of disease and the overall survival are similar for both groups. Doxorubicin-based regimens are safe and effective for patients older than 65 years.

The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with Taxol in metastatic breast cancer.

Taxol was evaluated in metastatic breast cancer in three trials. In the first, a phase II study, 25 patients who had received only one prior regimen of chemotherapy received Taxol (starting dose of 250 mg/m2). The response rates were 12% complete, 44% partial, and 32% minor. The median duration of response was 9 months (range, 3 to 19 months). The median survival was 20 months (range, 5 to 29+ months). Toxic effects were granulocytopenia less than 500/mm3 in 85% of all courses but serious infection in only 6% of courses, myalgias, and cumulative neuropathy. The second trial was a phase I study of Taxol by 24-hour infusion sequenced with doxorubicin by 48-hour infusion as initial chemotherapy for metastatic disease. In arm 1, Taxol preceded doxorubicin. The starting doses were 125 mg/m2 Taxol, 60 mg/m2 doxorubicin. Neupogen (5 micrograms/kg) was given subcutaneously on days 5 through 19. Ten patients received 96 courses. The maximum tolerated dose was defined by mucositis and infection at the starting dose. Cumulative thrombocytopenia occurred in subsequent courses. The unexpectedly severe toxic effects at doses that were low by comparison to other studies suggested schedule-related toxicity. Therefore, in arm 2 the sequence has been reversed: doxorubicin precedes Taxol. Doses have been escalated to 180 mg/m2 Taxol with 60 mg/m2 doxorubicin without dose-limiting toxic effects occurring. The third trial, a phase II study in patients who have received three or more prior chemotherapy regimens, is ongoing. Twenty-one of a planned 35 patients have been entered. Taxol has shown significant antitumor activity in minimally pretreated patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Phase I/II study of dose-intense doxorubicin/paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide with peripheral blood progenitor cells and cytokine support in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Relapse following complete remission achieved with a single course of high-dose chemotherapy continues to be the main cause of treatment failure in patients with metastatic breast cancer. A phase I/II trial was initiated that combined the two most active drugs against breast cancer, doxorubicin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), with cyclophosphamide, and delivered four cycles of these drugs with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in an outpatient setting. Patients with untreated metastatic breast cancer received two cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2. During recovery from the second cycle, PBPCs were harvested. Responding patients were then admitted for a day to receive escalating-dose doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide followed by PBPC reinfusion on day 3 as outpatients. Seventeen patients have been enrolled to date. Ten patients completed treatment and received 34 cycles of high-dose chemotherapy every 21 days (range, 21 to 28 days). The median age was 47 years (range, 26 to 56 years) and the median number of metastatic sites was two (range, one to three). Five patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy (four cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil and one mitoxantrone-based). The most common toxic reactions were nausea and vomiting (75% of courses) and neurosensory (50% of courses). No patients had a decreased ejection fraction or overt congestive heart failure. Ten patients underwent cardiac biopsy (median doxorubicin, 253 mg/m2; range, 120 to 312 mg/m2); only one showed grade 1 cytotoxic changes with doxorubicin 240 mg/ m2. Six patients were admitted for neutropenic fever. Eight of 10 patients responded (two pathologically confirmed complete remissions in liver). At these doses, four cycles of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide with PBPC and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support every 21 days was well tolerated and showed evidence of activity. Enrollment at higher dose levels continues so that maximum tolerated dose can be defined.

Phase I-II study: triciribine (tricyclic nucleoside phosphate) for metastatic breast cancer.

Triciribine is a purine analogue which inhibits DNA and protein synthesis. We performed two studies to define its activity against metastatic breast cancer. The first study was a phase II study in 14 patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received two or fewer chemotherapy treatments. The treatment schedule was tricirbine 20 mg/m2 per day by 24-h infusion (CI) daily for 5 days every 6 weeks as recommended by a previous open phase I trial. When neither response nor toxicity was seen in the phase II trial, we assumed the starting dose was too low for this group of patients with good performance status and repeated the phase I trial in patients with metastatic breast cancer with good performance status. The starting dose was 35 mg/m2 per day using the same 5-day CI schedule, and starting doses were increased in subsequent cohorts of three patients in increments of 5 mg/m2 until toxicity occurred. In the initial (phase II) study, one patient had stable disease for 18 weeks (three courses), the remainder progressed. There were no significant toxic effects. In the subsequent phase I study, ten patients were treated until the study was closed. The maximum dose was 40 mg/m2. Two patients died, one each at the 35 and 40 mg/m2 levels, respectively, 3 months and 6 weeks after their last course, one without intervening disease progression. Both had severe hypertriglyceridemia (18- and 21-fold elevation) and severe fatigue. At postmortem examination, one had congestive cardiomyopathy, and the other had severe pancreatitis and hypothyroidism. One patient had severe exacerbation of psoriasis which made her bedridden for more than 30 days. Four patients had hyperglycemia. Plasma pharmacology studies showed erratic drug levels, presumably related to enterohepatic circulation. Postmortem pharmacology studies showed residual drug present as long as 12 weeks after the last dose. We conclude that triciribine is ineffective at all doses tested and at doses of > or = 35 mg/m2 has unacceptable toxic effects.

Doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer, with long-term follow-up: the M.D. Anderson experience.

PURPOSE: Correlation between aging and doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure in patients with metastatic breast cancer was studied to determine whether doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer is a clinically significant issue. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with a median follow-up of 16.8 years. The setting was a comprehensive cancer center in a large city. A group of 682 consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer presented to The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1973 and 1980. All patients received doxorubicin by bolus infusion. Patients in group 1 (n = 538) were aged 50 to 64 years; patients in group 2 (n = 144) were aged 65 years and older. Medical records of all patients were reviewed. Patients who had congestive heart failure were identified and analyzed. The diagnosis of doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure was made and confirmed by a cardiologist at the time of its development. The main outcome measure was the cumulative probability of developing doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer compared to a younger age group. RESULTS: In group 1, 33 patients, and in group 2, 13 patients developed doxorubicin-related congestive heart failure. The cumulative doses of doxorubicin administered to patients with congestive heart failure were 410 mg/m2 (range 150-550 mg/m2) and 400 (range 100-570 mg/m2), respectively. The time interval from the last date of doxorubicin treatment to the development of congestive heart failure was, respectively, 5 months (range < 1-65 months) and 9 months (range < 1-28 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the two congestive heart failure subgroups, nor were we able to identify risk factors that could have increased the risk of congestive heart failure among these patients. CONCLUSION: Older patients with metastatic breast cancer and no significant comorbidity can be treated with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy with no added risk of developing congestive heart failure beyond that in the younger age group.

Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast: results of a combined-modality approach--M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

A total of 106 patients with inflammatory carcinoma of the breast underwent combined-modality treatment consisting of doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy. All patients received three cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) before local therapy. From 1974 to 1977 (group A), primary radiotherapy was the local treatment modality and chemotherapy was given for a total of 24 months. From 1978 to 1981 (group B), mastectomy became the primary local treatment modality and FAC was reinstituted within 10-14 days after surgery; after completion of FAC, consolidation radiotherapy was given. From 1982 to 1986 (group C), vincristine and prednisone were added to FAC, and doxorubicin was given by continuous infusion. The median follow-up of the three groups was 56 months. For patients alive at the time of analysis, median follow-ups were 141, 111, and 49 months in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Disease-free survival at 5 years was 35%, 22%, and 41% for groups A, B, and C, respectively, and respective overall survival at 5 years was 37%, 30%, and 48%. Mastectomy in addition to radiotherapy resulted in local control rates similar to those obtained with radiotherapy alone, but this approach would result in fewer late sequelae of high-dose irradiation and provided histologic staging for chemotherapy response. The patients treated on protocol C had slightly better disease-free and overall survival, but the differences were not statistically significant. The 5-year disease-free survival of patients achieving a clinical complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) was superior to that of patients whose response was less than a PR. There was no episode of doxorubicin-related cardiac toxicity in group C. Combined-modality treatment for inflammatory carcinoma of the breast resulted in improved survival.

Combined-modality treatment of inflammatory breast carcinoma: twenty years of experience at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: To review the 20 years of experience at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center with a combined-modality approach against inflammatory breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 178 patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma were treated in the past 20 years at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center by a combined-modality approach under four different protocols. Each protocol included induction chemotherapy, then local therapy (radiotherapy or mastectomy), then adjuvant chemotherapy, and, if mastectomy was performed, adjuvant radiotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) with or without vincristine and prednisone (VP). In protocol D, patients received an alternate adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, methotrexate and vinblastine (MV), if they did not have a complete response (CR) to induction chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up of live patients in group A was 215 months, in group B 186 months, in group C 116 months, and in group D 45 months. An estimated 28% of patients were currently free of disease beyond 15 years. At the time of analysis, 50 patients were alive without any evidence of disease. A further 12 patients died of intercurrent illness, and 15 patients were followed beyond 10 years without recurrence of disease. Among initial recurrence, 20% of patients had local failure, 39% systemic failure, and 9% CNS recurrence. Initial response to induction chemotherapy was an important prognostic factor. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 15 years was 44% in patients who had a CR to induction chemotherapy, 31% in those who had a partial response (PR), and 7% in those who had less than a PR. There was no improvement in overall survival (OS) or DFS among patients who underwent alternate chemotherapy (MV) compared with those who did not. Using surgery and radiotherapy as opposed to radiotherapy alone as local therapy did not have an impact on the DFS or OS rate. CONCLUSION: These long-term follow-up data show that with a combined-modality approach a significant fraction of patients (28%) remained free of disease beyond 15 years. In contrast, single-modality treatments yielded a DFS of less than 5%. Thus, using combined-modality treatment (chemotherapy, then mastectomy, then chemotherapy and radiotherapy) is recommended as a standard of care for inflammatory breast carcinoma.

Dosimetric characterization of radiosurgical beams with a diamond detector.

Dosimetric characteristics of small diameter 6 MV photon beams for a commercial radiosurgery system have been measured in a solid water phantom with a new diamond detector and compared with measurements using a p-type Si photon diode, small volume cylindrical and parallel plate ionization chambers, and radiographic films. Tissue maximum ratios (TMR) and total scatter factors (S c.p) were measured with the three ionometric (diamond, diode, ion chamber) detectors for 12 circular beams ranging in diameter from 12.5 to 40 mm. The TMR values obtained with the three ionometric detectors agreed well (+/- 1%) for all cone sizes and depths investigated when the displacement of the sensitive volume of the detector from its front surface is taken into account. The S c.p factors obtained with the ionometric detectors also agreed well (+/- 1.2%) for field sizes greater than 20 mm in diameter. For smaller field sizes, the cylindrical and parallel plate chambers measure a smaller S c.p factor, as a result of the steep dose gradients across their sensitive volumes. Cross-beam profiles acquired with the diamond detector agree well with the measurements with the diode detector and radiographic film. A distortion in the measured profiles in terms of broadened penumbra is observed with a small volume cylindrical ionization chamber.

Intercomparison of normalized head-scatter factor measurement techniques.

Normalized head-scatter factors were measured with cylindrical beam coaxial miniphantoms and high purity graphite buildup caps for 4-, 6-, 10-, and 24-MV photon beams at field sizes from 4 x 4 to 40 x 40 cm2. The normalized head-scatter factors determined by the two methods matched well for 4- and 6-MV photon beams. The miniphantom technique produced normalized head-scatter factors 1.5% and 4.8% lower than the buildup caps for the 10- and 24-MV beams for large field sizes, respectively. At small field sizes, the miniphantom technique produced larger normalized head-scatter factors than the buildup caps. Measurements made with an electromagnet indicate that a significant portion of the ionization measured in the buildup cap at 24 MV arises from contamination electrons. Measurements made with the miniphantom and magnet found no contamination electron contribution. The miniphantom technique may exclude such contamination electrons, potentially leading to inaccuracies in tissue-maximum ratios and phantom scatter factors, as well as inaccuracies in monitor unit calculations.