The efficacy of eribulin mesylate for patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma previously treated with taxane: a multicentre prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Taxanes are the current first-line treatment for advanced cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) for patients who are considered difficult to treat with doxorubicin owing to advanced age or comorbidity. However, no effective second-line therapy for such patients has been established. METHODS: We designed a single-arm prospective observational study of eribulin mesylate (ERB) administered at a dose of 1·4 mg m-2 on days 1 and 8 in a 21-day cycle. Patients with advanced CAS who were previously treated with a taxane and were scheduled to begin ERB treatment were enrolled. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity assessment. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 25 patients. The median OS and PFS were 8·6 months and 3·0 months, respectively. The best overall RR was 20% (five of 25). In total, 16 grade 3/4 severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred; however, all patients recovered. Patients who achieved partial response or stable disease as best response had longer OS than those with progressive disease (median OS not reached and 3·3 months, respectively; P < 0·001). Patients who did not experience SAEs showed longer OS than those who did (median OS 18·8 months and 7·5 months, respectively; P < 0·05). Patients with distant metastasis had shorter median OS than those with locoregional disease, but without statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: ERB showed a promising RR and is a potential candidate for second-line treatment for patients with CAS, after treatment with taxanes. However, owing to the occurrence of SAEs in over half of the participants, caution should be exercised regarding ERB use in elderly patients. What is already known about this topic? Taxanes are the current first-line treatment for patients with advanced cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) who are considered difficult to treat with doxorubicin owing to advanced age or comorbidity. No effective therapy for taxane-resistant CAS has been established thus far. Eribulin suppresses microtubule polymerization and elicits an antitumour effect similar to that of taxanes. What does this study add? In our single-arm prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy of eribulin for treating patients with advanced CAS who previously received taxanes, the median overall survival and progression-free survival were 8·6 and 3·0 months, respectively. Response rates at weeks 7, 13 and 25 were 20%, 17% and 14%, respectively. Although 16 grade 3/4 severe adverse events occurred, all patients recovered. Eribulin showed a promising response rate and is a potential candidate for second-line treatment in CAS after taxane treatment. Linked Comment: Smrke and Benson. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:797-798.

2-mm surgical margins are adequate for most basal cell carcinomas in Japanese: a retrospective multicentre study on 1000 basal cell carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the gold standard for basal cell carcinomas (BCC). Current recommended surgical margins for BCCs are determined from studies in Caucasian populations. However, the appropriate surgical margins for BCCs in non-white races are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the accuracy of preoperative determination of clinical tumour borders and appropriate surgical margins in Japanese patients with BCC. METHODS: The maximum calculated differences in distance between the preoperatively determined surgical margins and the actual histologic tumour side margins were considered as 'accuracy gaps' of clinical tumour borders. Estimated side margin positivity rates (ESMPRs) with narrower (2 and 3 mm) surgical margins were calculated on the basis of the accuracy gaps. RESULTS: Overall, 1000 surgically excised BCCs from 980 Japanese patients were included. The most frequent histologic subtype was nodular BCC (67%). The median accuracy gap was 0.3 mm [interquartile range (IQR): -0.5 to +1 mm]. The ESMPRs with 2- and 3-mm surgical margins were 3.8% and 1.4%, respectively. Only the ESMPRs between the well-defined (n = 921) and poorly defined clinical tumour border groups (n = 79) showed statistical difference [2-mm margin: 3.1% vs. 11.7%, OR: 3.89, 95% confidential interval (CI): 1.41-10.71, P <0.01; 3-mm margin: 0.97% vs. 6.3%, OR: 6.58, 95% CI: 1.67-25.99, P <0.01]. No significant differences in ESMPRs were noted in other subgroups including risk classifications. CONCLUSIONS: The determined clinical tumour border accuracy gaps in this Japanese cohort were negligible. Dermatologic surgeons may use narrower surgical margins with acceptable margin positivity rates. The clarity of clinical tumour borders could be an appropriate guide for selection of different surgical margins in the Japanese cohort.

Deep-learning-based, computer-aided classifier developed with a small dataset of clinical images surpasses board-certified dermatologists in skin tumour diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Application of deep-learning technology to skin cancer classification can potentially improve the sensitivity and specificity of skin cancer screening, but the number of training images required for such a system is thought to be extremely large. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether deep-learning technology could be used to develop an efficient skin cancer classification system with a relatively small dataset of clinical images. METHODS: A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) was trained using a dataset of 4867 clinical images obtained from 1842 patients diagnosed with skin tumours at the University of Tsukuba Hospital from 2003 to 2016. The images consisted of 14 diagnoses, including both malignant and benign conditions. Its performance was tested against 13 board-certified dermatologists and nine dermatology trainees. RESULTS: The overall classification accuracy of the trained DCNN was 76·5%. The DCNN achieved 96·3% sensitivity (correctly classified malignant as malignant) and 89·5% specificity (correctly classified benign as benign). Although the accuracy of malignant or benign classification by the board-certified dermatologists was statistically higher than that of the dermatology trainees (85·3% ± 3·7% and 74·4% ± 6·8%, P < 0·01), the DCNN achieved even greater accuracy, as high as 92·4% ± 2·1% (P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an efficient skin tumour classifier using a DCNN trained on a relatively small dataset. The DCNN classified images of skin tumours more accurately than board-certified dermatologists. Collectively, the current system may have capabilities for screening purposes in general medical practice, particularly because it requires only a single clinical image for classification.

Comparison of ultrasonographic joint and tendon findings in hands between early, treatment-naïve patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis.

Although both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may lead to joint deformity, SLE arthritis is typically non-erosive and often accompanied by Jaccoud's deformity. Therefore, we examined characteristics of joint and tendon lesions in patients with SLE and RA by ultrasonography. Fifteen treatment-naïve SLE patients and 40 treatment-naïve RA patients with joint symptoms were included in this study. The hand joints and related tendons were ultrasonographically examined using grey-scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD). Joint involvement was comparably observed in patients with SLE and RA (80% versus 95%, p = 0.119). However, tendon involvement was more frequent in SLE than in RA (93% versus 65%, p = 0.045), especially in the wrist joints (73% versus 40%, p = 0.037). When we investigated the intensity of US findings, the joint synovitis score (GS + PD) per affected joint was lower in SLE than RA (2.0 versus 2.6, p = 0.019), while tendon inflammation score was not significantly different (2.1 versus 2.2, p = 0.738). Finally, the examination of concordance between joint and tendon involvement in the same finger revealed that joint lesion appeared in only 49% of fingers having tendon involvement in the SLE group, which was significantly less than 74% in the RA group ( p = 0.010). Thus, as compared with RA, SLE arthropathy is characterized by the predominance of tenosynovitis/periextensor tendon inflammation, which is likely to develop independently from joint synovitis.

Chemoradiotherapy with taxane is superior to conventional surgery and radiotherapy in the management of cutaneous angiosarcoma: a multicentre, retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS), especially for patients with tumours > 5 cm has been reported to be dismal, even after conventional surgery and radiotherapy (S + RT). OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy with taxane (T + RT) and maintenance chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 patients with CAS treated with T + RT and 12 patients treated with S + RT. None had distant metastasis. Tumour sites included the scalp (n = 25) and limbs (n = 3). The chemotherapy regimens used in T + RT were monthly docetaxel (n = 10), biweekly docetaxel (n = 1), weekly docetaxel (n = 5) and weekly paclitaxel (n = 1). The median radiation dose was 70 Gy. Nine patients receiving T + RT continued chemotherapy as maintenance therapy (monthly docetaxel in nine patients and monthly paclitaxel in two patients) and four patients receiving S + RT received adjuvant chemotherapy (weekly docetaxel). RESULTS: The response ratio of T + RT was 94% (14 complete remission and one partial remission). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients receiving T + RT was statistically higher than those receiving conventional S + RT (56% and 8%, respectively; P < 0·01). Moreover, patients who received T + RT with maintenance chemotherapy showed a significant improvement in OS than those receiving T + RT alone (P < 0·01). There was a strong trend for relapse-free survival, but it was not significant (P = 0·07). These data indicate that maintenance chemotherapy is crucial for long-term survival after T + RT. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, we suggest that T + RT followed by maintenance chemotherapy is a plausible method for managing CAS, especially large tumours that are difficult to manage with S + RT alone.