Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 48
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 99: 175-185, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37827211

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients constitute a growing portion of the general population, with particular increase in the prevalence of octogenarians. The incidence and prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have been clearly shown to be associated with advancing age. The effect of advanced age in outcomes from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is unclear. We study the effect of advanced age, as an independent risk factor for mortality in octogenarian geriatric patients (OGPs) compared to nonoctogenarian geriatric patients (NOGPs) undergoing EVAR. METHODS: The 2011-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Procedure-Targeted Vascular database was queried for geriatric patients (>65 years) undergoing EVAR for symptomatic and asymptomatic indications. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed comparing outcomes between OGPs and NOGPs. RESULTS: Of the 10,490 geriatric patients who underwent EVAR, 7,508 (71.6%) were NOGPs and 2,982 (28.4%) were OGPs. Octogenarians were more often female (82.3% vs. 76.7%). In comparison to NOGPs, fewer OGPs were treated for AAA <5.5 cm (46.7% vs. 54.9%, P < 0.001) and AAA <5.0 cm (19.2% vs. 24.0%, P < 0.001). Nearly 90% of male and over 80% of female NOGPs and OGPs treated for AAA <5.0 cm were asymptomatic. Octogenarian geriatric patients (OGPs) had less dyspnea (15.3% vs. 17.3%, P = 0.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16.1% vs. 20.5%, P < 0.001), diabetes (12.7% vs. 17.8%, P < 0.001), and smoking (13.2% vs. 36.3%, P < 0.001) compared to NOGPs. Octogenarian geriatric patients (OGPs) were found to have a greater length of stay (2 days vs. 1 day, P < 0.001), as well as rate of mortality (3.4% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001). Both symptomatic and asymptomatic OGPs had a higher rate of mortality than their NOGP counterparts (symptomatic 16% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001; asymptomatic 1.3% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed OGPs to have increased overall associated risk of mortality compared to NOGPs (odds ratio (OR) 1.88, confidence interval (CI) 1.39-2.54, P < 0.001), as well as in the symptomatic (OR 1.54, CI 1.06-2.23, P < 0.001) and asymptomatic cohorts (OR 2.66, CI 1.59-4.45, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarian geriatric patients (OGPs) accounted for over a quarter of geriatric patients undergoing EVAR. This elderly group was associated with an increased rate and risk of mortality compared to NOGPs, even when controlling for known risk factors for mortality. Given this increased risk of mortality in OGPs undergoing EVAR, elective treatment of AAAs in this advanced age group should be performed with caution, particularly in those with diameters in which the risk of rupture may not warrant repair.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Octogenários , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 79: 440.e1-440.e6, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34653639

RESUMO

The development of a paraanastomotic pseudoaneurysm is a serious complication after open prosthetic reconstruction of the aorta for occlusive or aneurysmal disease. Open repair of these lesions has previously been associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair may provide suitable treatment for proximal paraanastomotic aortic bypass graft pseudoaneurysms in patients who are poor candidates for open surgery. Bilateral renal artery coverage may be necessary to achieve adequate fixation and seal during life-threatening emergency cases of pseudoaneurysm rupture. Due to the infrequency of reported cases, the consequences of bilateral renal artery occlusion during these complex procedures are poorly understood. We present a case of a proximal paraanastomotic aortobifemoral bypass pseudoaneurysm rupture that was managed using endovascular repair with intentional coverage of both renal arteries. We also review the contemporary literature on endovascular management of paraanastomotic aneurysms and discuss the role of bilateral renal artery coverage in treating select patients with complex ruptured aortic pathology.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/cirurgia , Aneurisma Roto/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Artéria Renal/cirurgia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Falso Aneurisma/etiologia , Falso Aneurisma/fisiopatologia , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Roto/etiologia , Aneurisma Roto/fisiopatologia , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Renal/fisiopatologia , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 71: 428-436, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32889159

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Continued advances in endovascular technologies are resulting in fewer open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs. In addition, more complex juxtarenal, pararenal, and suprarenal (JPS) AAAs are being managed with various endovascular techniques. This study sought to evaluate the evolving trends in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of AAAs, hypothesizing increased rate of JPS AAA repair by EVAR. We also sought to evaluate the risk for morbidity and mortality for EVAR and open aneurysm repair (OAR) of JPS AAAs over time. METHODS: The 2011-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure-Targeted Vascular database was queried for patients undergoing OAR or EVAR for AAAs. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for both infrarenal and JPS AAA repairs. RESULTS: Of 18,661 patients who underwent AAA repair, 3,941 (21.1%) were OAR and 14,720 (78.9%) were EVAR. The rate of OAR decreased from 29.5% in 2011 to 21.3% in 2017 (P < 0.001) with a geometric-mean-annual decrease of 27.8%. The rate of EVAR increased from 70.5% to 78.7% during the same time period (P < 0.001) with a geometric-mean-annual increase of 11.6%. These trends remained true for both infrarenal and JPS AAAs. After adjusting for covariates, there was no difference in associated risk of 30-day mortality, renal complications, or ischemic colitis for either OAR or EVAR over each incremental year for infrarenal AAAs (P > 0.05). However, in patients undergoing EVAR for JPS AAAs, the associated risk of mortality increased with each incremental year (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30, confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.69, P = 0.039), whereas there was no difference in the risk of mortality for OAR of JPS AAAs with each incremental year (OR: 1.11, CI: 0.99-1.23, P = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of OAR for AAA has decreased over the past seven years with an increase in EVAR, particularly for more complex JPS AAAs. The associated risk for morbidity and mortality for treatment of infrarenal AAAs was not significantly affected by this increased utility of EVAR. The associated risk of mortality for JPS AAAs treated by EVAR increased over time, whereas this trend for associated risk of mortality was not seen for OAR of JPS AAAs. These findings, especially the increased associated risk of mortality over time with EVAR for JPS AAAs, warrant careful prospective analysis.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 72: 666.e13-666.e21, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346123

RESUMO

Formation of a clinically significant iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula after endovenous laser treatment of the great saphenous vein is an extremely rare complication. Because of the infrequency of reported cases, there is no clear consensus on how to best manage this complication. We present a unique case of an iatrogenic high-output superficial femoral artery-common femoral vein fistula resulting in right heart failure and a distal deep vein thrombosis. Deployment of a covered arterial stent graft resulted in resolution of the arteriovenous fistula and high-output cardiac state. Clinically significant arteriovenous fistulas resulting from inadvertent vessel injury during endovenous laser treatment appear to be amenable to percutaneous endovascular interventions. During these challenging endovascular cases, intravascular ultrasonography can be used to help delineate the morphology of the fistula tract and obtain vessel measurements to ensure accurate endoprosthesis sizing and placement.


Assuntos
Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiologia , Débito Cardíaco Elevado/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Doença Iatrogênica , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Veia Safena/cirurgia , Úlcera Varicosa/cirurgia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/etiologia , Insuficiência Venosa/cirurgia , Idoso , Fístula Arteriovenosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula Arteriovenosa/cirurgia , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Débito Cardíaco Elevado/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Crônica , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Veia Safena/diagnóstico por imagem , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento , Úlcera Varicosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Trombose Venosa/terapia
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 70: 181-189, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32659419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on access type when treating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Our study's objective was to evaluate if the type of access in ruptured AAAs affected outcomes. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried from 2009 to 2018 for all ruptured AAAs treated with an index EVAR. Procedures were grouped by access type: percutaneous, open, and failed percutaneous that converted to open access. Patients with iliac access, both percutaneous and open access, and concurrent bypass were excluded. Baseline characteristics, procedure details, and outcomes were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: There were 1,206 ruptured AAAs identified-739 (61.3%) was performed by percutaneous access, 416 (34.5%) by open access, and 51 (4.2%) by failed percutaneous that converted to open access. Percutaneous access, compared with open access and failed percutaneous access, respectively, had the shortest operative time (min, median) (111 vs. 138 vs. 180, P < 0.001) and was most often performed under local anesthesia (16.7% vs. 5% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001). The amount of contrast used was similar between the approaches. Univariable analysis comparing percutaneous access, open access, and failed percutaneous access showed differences in 30-day mortality (19.9% vs. 24.8% vs. 39.2%, P = 0.002), postoperative complications (33.7% vs. 40.2% vs. 54%, P = 0.003), and cardiac complications (18.2% vs. 19.8% vs. 34.7%, P = 0.018). However, multivariable analysis did not show access type to have a significant effect on cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, any complications, return to the operating room, or perioperative mortality. Open access was independently associated with a prolonged length of stay (means ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.33, P = 0.012). Factors independently associated with failed percutaneous were prior bypass (odds ratio (OR) 9.77, 95% CI 2.44-39.16, P = 0.001) and altered mental status (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.17-5.15, P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Access type for ruptured AAAs was not independently associated with major morbidity or mortality but did have a differential effect on length of stay. Access during these emergent procedures should be based on surgeon preference and experience.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Aórtica/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
6.
J Vasc Surg ; 71(6): 1858-1866, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31699513

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) occurs in less than 0.1% of blunt traumas. A previous multi-institutional study found an associated mortality rate of 39%. We sought to identify risk factors for BAAI and risk factors for mortality in patients with BAAI using a large national database. We hypothesized that an Injury Severity Score of 25 or greater, and thoracic trauma would both increase the risk of mortality in patients with BAAI. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for individuals with blunt trauma. Patients with and without BAAI were compared. Covariates were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to determine mechanisms of injury, examination findings, and concomitant injuries associated with increased risk for BAAI. An additional multivariable analysis was performed for mortality in patients with BAAI. RESULTS: From 1,056,633 blunt trauma admissions, 1012 (0.1%) had BAAI. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident (MVA; 57.5%). More than one-half the patients had at least one rib fracture (54.0%), or a spine fracture (53.9%), whereas 20.8% had hypotension on admission and 7.8% had a trunk abrasion. The average length of stay was 13.4 days and 24.6% required laparotomy, with 6.6% receiving an endovascular repair and 2.9% an open repair. The risk of death in those treated with endovascular vs open repair was similar (P = .28). On multivariable analysis, MVA was the mechanism associated with the highest risk of BAAI (odds ratio [OR], 4.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.87-5.65; P < .001) followed by pedestrian struck (OR, 4.54; 95% CI, 3.47-5.92; P < .001). Other factors associated with BAAI included hypotension on admission (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 3.21-4.66; P < .001), hemopneumothorax (OR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.16-11.58; P < .001), abrasion to the trunk (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.94; P = .003), and rib fracture (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.25-1.70; P < .001). The overall mortality rate was 28.0%. Of the variables examined, the strongest risk factor associated with mortality in patients with BAAI was hemopneumothorax (OR, 12.49; 95% CI, 1.25-124.84; P = .03) followed by inferior vena cava (IVC) injury (OR, 12.05; 95% CI, 2.80-51.80; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest nationwide series to date, BAAI continues to have a high mortality rate with hemopneumothorax and IVC injury associated with the highest risk for mortality. The mechanism most strongly associated with BAAI is MVA followed by pedestrian struck. Other risk factors for BAAI include rib fracture and trunk abrasion. Providers must maintain a high suspicion of injury for BAAI when these mechanisms of injury, physical examination or imaging findings are encountered.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/mortalidade , Aorta Abdominal/lesões , Traumatismo Múltiplo/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Acidentes de Trânsito , Adulto , Idoso , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hemopneumotórax/mortalidade , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Pedestres , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Veia Cava Inferior/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Surg Res ; 256: 163-170, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707399

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) when ≥5.5 cm. This study sought to evaluate the incidence of male patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for AAAs of various diameters (small <4 cm; intermediate 4-5.4 cm; standard ≥5.5 cm). We analyzed predictors of mortality, hypothesizing that smaller AAAs (<5.5 cm) have no differences in associated risk of mortality compared to standard AAAs (≥5.5 cm). METHODS: The 2011-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure-Targeted Vascular database was queried for male patients undergoing elective EVAR. Patients were stratified by aneurysm diameter. A multivariable logistic regression analysis for clinical outcomes, adjusting for age, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities, was performed. RESULTS: A total of 8037 male patients underwent EVAR with 3926 (48.9%) performed for AAAs <5.5 cm. There was no difference in mortality, readmission, major complications, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemic complications among the 3 groups (P > 0.05). In AAAs <5.5 cm, predictors of mortality included prior abdominal surgery (odds ratio [OR], 5.77; confidence interval [CI], 1.38-24.13; P = 0.016), weight loss (OR, 43.4; CI, 3.78-498.7; P = 0.002), disseminated cancer (OR, 17.9; CI, 1.30-245.97; P = 0.031), and diabetes (OR, 6.09; CI, 1.52-24.36; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 50% of male patients undergoing elective EVAR were treated for AAAs <5.5 cm. There was no difference in associated risk of mortality for smaller AAAs compared to standard AAAs. The strongest predictors of mortality for patients with smaller AAAs were prior abdominal surgery, weight loss, disseminated cancer, and diabetes.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 68: 569.e1-569.e7, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32283303

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) is defined as noncyclical pelvic pain or discomfort caused by dilated parauterine, paraovarian, and vaginal veins. PCS is typically characterized by ovarian venous incompetence that may be due to pelvic venous valvular insufficiency, hormonal factors, or mechanical venous obstruction. METHODS: We describe a case of a 38-year-old multiparous female with a history of pelvic pressure, vulvar varices, and dyspareunia. She underwent left gonadal vein coil embolization in 2014 for PCS that lead to symptomatic relief of her pain. Four years later, the patient returned for recurrent symptoms. Magnetic resonance venogram demonstrated dilated pelvic varices. The previously embolized left gonadal vein remained thrombosed, and there was no evidence of right gonadal vein insufficiency. However, catheter-based venography revealed a large, dilated, and incompetent median sacral vein. RESULTS: Pelvic venography demonstrated left gonadal vein embolization without any evidence of reflux. The right gonadal vein was also nondilated without reflux. Internal iliac venography showed large cross-pelvic collaterals and retrograde flow via a large, dilated median sacral vein. Coil embolization of the median sacral vein resulted in a dramatic reduction of pelvic venous reflux and resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence of PCS can occur after ovarian vein embolization through other tributaries in the venous network. The median sacral vein is a rare cause of PCS. We present an interesting case of a successfully treated recurrent PCS with coil embolization of an incompetent median sacral vein.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Ovário/irrigação sanguínea , Dor Pélvica/terapia , Pelve/irrigação sanguínea , Varizes/terapia , Insuficiência Venosa/terapia , Adulto , Embolização Terapêutica/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Pélvica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor Pélvica/fisiopatologia , Recidiva , Retratamento , Síndrome , Resultado do Tratamento , Varizes/diagnóstico por imagem , Varizes/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência Venosa/fisiopatologia
9.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 66: 242-249, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31978483

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery injury (PAI) is a rare occurrence in pediatric patients with significant consequences. Delays in diagnosis lead to severe complications such as lifelong disability and limb loss. We sought to identify outcomes and clinical predictors of PAI in the pediatric trauma population. METHODS: The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014-2016) was queried for patients ≤17 years old with PAI. Patient demographics and outcomes were characterized. A comparison of patients sustaining blunt versus penetrating PAI was performed. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of PAI. RESULTS: From 119,132 patients, 58 (<0.1%) sustained a PAI with 74.1% from blunt trauma. Most of the patients were male (75.9%) with a median age of 15 and median Injury Severity Score of 9. A majority of the patients were treated with open repair (62.1%) in comparison to endovascular repair (10.3%) and nonoperative management (36.2%). The rates of open and endovascular repair and nonoperative management were similar between blunt and penetrating PAI patients (P = not significant). Concomitant injuries included popliteal vein injury (PVI) (12.1%), posterior tibial nerve injury (3.4%), peroneal nerve injury (3.4%), and closed fracture/dislocation of the femur (22.4%), patella (25.9%), and tibia/fibula (29.3%). Overall complications included compartment syndrome (8.6%), below-knee amputation (6.9%), and above-knee amputation (3.4%). The overall mortality was 3.4%. Patients with PAI secondary to penetrating trauma had a higher rate of concomitant PVI (26.7% vs. 7%, P = 0.04) and posterior tibial nerve injury (13.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.02) but a lower rate of closed fracture/dislocation of the patella (0% vs. 34.9%, P = 0.008) and tibia/fibula (0% vs. 39.5%, P = 0.004) compared to patients with PAI from blunt trauma. Predictors for PAI included PVI (odds ratio [OR] 296.57, confidence interval [CI] = 59.21-1,485.47, P < 0.001), closed patella fracture/dislocation (OR 50.0, CI = 24.22-103.23, P < 0.001), open femur fracture/dislocation (OR 9.05, CI = 3.56-22.99, P < 0.001), closed tibia/fibula fracture/dislocation (OR 7.44, CI = 3.81-14.55, P < 0.001), and open tibia/fibula fracture/dislocation (OR 4.57, CI = 1.80-11.59, P < 0.001). PVI had the highest association with PAI in penetrating trauma (OR 84.62, CI = 13.22-541.70, P < 0.001) while closed patella fracture/dislocation had the highest association in blunt trauma (OR 52.01, CI = 24.50-110.31, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher index of suspicion should be present for PAI in pediatric trauma patients presenting with a closed patella fracture/dislocation after blunt trauma. PVI is most strongly associated with PAI in penetrating trauma. Prompt recognition of PAI is crucial as there is a greater than 10% amputation rate in the pediatric population.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Fratura-Luxação/terapia , Traumatismos da Perna/terapia , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Veia Poplítea/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/terapia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Amputação Cirúrgica , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Fratura-Luxação/diagnóstico por imagem , Fratura-Luxação/mortalidade , Humanos , Traumatismos da Perna/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos da Perna/mortalidade , Salvamento de Membro , Masculino , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/lesões , Veia Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Poplítea/lesões , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Penetrantes/mortalidade
10.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 65: 283.e7-283.e11, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31678543

RESUMO

Aortocaval fistulas following endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are rare. We herein describe repair using an Amplatzer Septal Occluder in a 68-year-old male who presented to the emergency department 6 months after ruptured endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR) with right heart failure. With the assistance of diagnostic angiography and intravascular ultrasound, the patient was found to have a 1.2 cm diameter aortocaval fistula and a type-II endoleak. His aortocaval fistula was successfully closed using an Amplatzer septal occluder device after failure of attempted closure with an Amplatzer plug and coiling of the aneurysm sac. His symptoms of heart failure improved, and he was discharged to an acute rehabilitation unit. Follow-up at 3 months demonstrated continued improvement in heart failure symptoms, and a small persistent type II endoleak. Aortocaval fistulae are a potentially fatal complication of rAAA. We discuss the sequelae and treatment strategies of aortocaval fistulas following rEVAR including the use of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Fístula Arteriovenosa/terapia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Dispositivo para Oclusão Septal , Veia Cava Inferior , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Aórtica/complicações , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula Arteriovenosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiologia , Endoleak/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Desenho de Prótese , Resultado do Tratamento , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem
11.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 65: 10-16, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31712187

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) may lead to graft dysfunction and failure. Progressive deterioration of renal allograft function may be exacerbated by contrast-induced nephrotoxicity during iodine contrast administration for renovascular imaging of allografts. We present our institutional experience of endovascular management for TRAS using CO2 digital subtraction angiography (CO2-DSA) and balloon angioplasty to manage failing renal transplants. METHODS: Four patients with renal allografts from March 2017-May 2018 were referred for graft dysfunction and pending renal transplant failure. Indications for referral included refractory hypertension, decreasing renal functioning, and elevated renovascular systolic velocities. RESULTS: Median age of the four patients was 41.5 years (22-60 years). There were two male and female patients. Chronic hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus were the most common comorbidities. An average total of 75 mL of CO2 was used, supplemented with 17.4 mL of iodinated contrast. All patients had improvements in renal function following intervention with a mean decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 25.8% and 21.4%, respectively. We also observed a mean decrease of BUN by 13.6% and creatinine by 37.4%. Additionally, eGFR increased by 37.7%. All allografts survived after surgery, and only one patient required repeat angioplasty for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: CO2-DSA with balloon angioplasty can be successfully utilized to salvage deteriorating kidney allograft function in patients with TRAS.


Assuntos
Angiografia Digital , Angioplastia com Balão , Dióxido de Carbono/administração & dosagem , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/terapia , Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Angiografia Digital/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea , Dióxido de Carbono/efeitos adversos , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Recidiva , Artéria Renal/fisiopatologia , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/etiologia , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Adulto Jovem
12.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 59: 134-142, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30802568

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) and locoregional anesthesia (LA) are two anesthetic options for endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (REVAR). Studies on elective endovascular repair of nonruptured aneurysms have indicated that in select patients, LA may provide improved outcomes compared with GA. We aimed to examine the 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing REVAR using GA and LA in a contemporary nationwide cohort of patients presenting with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Patients who underwent REVAR using GA and LA from January 2011 through December 2015, inclusively, were studied in the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP)-targeted EVAR database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare preoperative demographics, operation-specific variables, and 30-day postoperative outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: Six-hundred ninety patients were identified to have undergone REVAR from 2011 to 2015, of which 12.5% (86) were performed under LA. For the entire cohort, the mean age was 74.3 years, and 80% were male. Mean aneurysm size was 7.6 cm and did not differ between the two anesthetic groups. Major comorbidities were similar between both groups, except a slightly higher rate of congestive heart failure in the LA group (7.0% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.02). Proximal or distal aneurysm extent also did not differ between the two groups. There was a significantly higher rate of bilateral percutaneous access in the LA group (59.3% vs. 25.2%, P < 0.01). REVAR under LA had shorter mean operative time (132 vs. 166 min, P < 0.01) and lower rate of concomitant lower extremity revascularization (2.3% vs. 10.6%, P < 0.01). There were no differences in need for perioperative transfusion or any other adjunctive procedures. Ultimately, 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the LA group (16.3% vs. 25.2%, P < 0.01). This difference was more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with hemodynamic instability (15.4% vs. 39.4%, P < 0.01). The LA group also demonstrated significantly shorter intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (3.0 vs. 5.0 days, P = 0.01) and low rates of postoperative pneumonia (3.5% vs. 10.9%, P = 0.03). After adjustment for demographics, comorbid conditions, hypotensive status, and aneurysm characteristics, there was a two-fold higher mortality in patients undergoing REVAR using GA versus LA, with a four-fold increase in the hemodynamically unstable cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS NSQIP-targeted EVAR database shows that LA is used in only 12.5% of patients undergoing REVAR in this nationwide cohort. This rate does not change when examining the subset of patients who are hemodynamically unstable. Other benefits include shorter ICU lengths of stay and lower rates of pneumonia. These data suggest that LA should be considered in patients undergoing REVAR, regardless of hemodynamic instability.


Assuntos
Anestesia por Condução , Anestesia Geral , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia por Condução/efeitos adversos , Anestesia por Condução/mortalidade , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Aórtica/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 57: 1-9, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30053552

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Popliteal arterial injury (PAI) is the second most common infrainguinal arterial injury after femoral artery injury with an incidence < 0.2%. A 2003 analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) reported a below the knee amputation (BKA) rate of 7.1% in patients with PAI as well as higher risk in those with an associated fracture or nerve injury. Given advances in vascular surgical techniques, improved multidisciplinary care, and expeditious diagnosis with computed tomography angiography, we hypothesized that the national rate of BKA in patients with PAI has decreased and sought to identify risk factors for BKA in patients with PAI. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the NTDB was performed from 2007 to 2015. Patients ≥15 years of age with PAI were included and grouped by mechanism of injury (blunt versus penetrating). Interfacility transfers were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was BKA. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of BKA in patients with PAI. RESULTS: From 4,385,698 patients, 5,143 were identified with PAI (<0.2%) with most involved in a blunt mechanism (56.8%). The overall limb loss rate was 5.1% (decreased from 7.1% in 2003, P = 0.0037). After adjusting for covariates, a blunt mechanism (odds ratio [OR] = 3.53, confidence intervals [CI] = 2.49-5.01, P < 0.001) and open proximal tibia/fibula fracture or dislocation (OR = 2.71, CI = 2.08-3.54, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for BKA in patients with PAI. A combined popliteal vein injury (PVI) did not increase the risk for BKA (P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The national rate of limb loss in trauma patients with PAI has decreased from 7.1 to 5.1%. A blunt mechanism of injury as well as proximal open tibia/fibula fracture or dislocation continue to be the independent risk factors for BKA. Confirming a previous report, we found a combined PVI not to be associated with higher risk for BKA. Future prospective research to determine other possible contributing factors such as intraoperative hemodynamics and utilization of vascular shunt and fasciotomy appears warranted.


Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica/tendências , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Amputação Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Salvamento de Membro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/lesões , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
14.
Vascular ; 27(3): 252-259, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30426848

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Axillosubclavian vessel injury is rare, with most cases occurring after penetrating trauma. A prior database (2002-2006) analysis demonstrated an overall limb loss rate of 2.9%, with no difference between isolated arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury and combined artery/vein axillosubclavian vessel injury. Given increases in advanced vascular surgical techniques, as well as improved multidisciplinary care and expeditious diagnosis with computed tomography angiography, we hypothesized the national rate of limb loss in patients with arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury has decreased. In addition, we attempted to identify current predictors for limb loss in arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury. Finally, we hypothesized that combined artery/vein axillosubclavian vessel injury, as well as associated brachial plexus injury will have a higher risk for limb-loss and mortality compared to isolated arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank was performed between 2007 and 2015. All patients ≥ 18 years of age with arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury were included. The primary outcome was limb loss. After a univariable logistic regression model identified significant covariates, we performed a multivariable logistic regression for analysis. RESULTS: Of the total 5,494,609 trauma admissions, 3807 patients had arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury (<0.1%). Of these, 3137 (82.4%) had isolated arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury and 670 (17.6%) had combined artery/vein axillosubclavian vessel injury. The overall limb loss rate was 2.4% (from 2.9% in 2006, p = 0.47). After adjusting for covariates, independent risk factors for limb loss included a combined artery/vein axillosubclavian vessel injury (odds ratio = 3.54, confidence interval = 2.06-6.11, p < 0.001), blunt mechanism (odds ratio = 7.81, confidence interval = 4.21-14.48, p < 0.001), open repair (odds ratio = 2.37, confidence interval = 1.47-3.82, p < 0.001), and open proximal humerus fracture (odds ratio = 8.50, confidence interval = 4.97-14.54, p < 0.001). An associated brachial plexus injury was not associated with limb loss ( p = 0.37). Combined artery/vein axillosubclavian vessel injury was associated with higher risk for mortality compared to isolated arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury (odds ratio = 2.17, confidence interval = 1.73-2.71, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The national rate of limb loss in trauma patients with arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury has not changed in the past decade. A combined artery/vein axillosubclavian vessel injury is an independent risk factor for limb loss, as well as open repair. However, the strongest risk factor is an open proximal humerus fracture. An associated brachial plexus injury is not associated with increased risk of limb loss. Patients with combined artery/vein axillosubclavian vessel injury have a twofold increased risk of death compared to patients with isolated arterial axillosubclavian vessel injury.


Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica , Artéria Axilar/lesões , Fraturas do Úmero/epidemiologia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Artéria Subclávia/lesões , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/epidemiologia , Veias/lesões , Adulto , Amputação Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Amputação Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Artéria Axilar/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Axilar/cirurgia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Feminino , Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero/diagnóstico , Fraturas do Úmero/mortalidade , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Salvamento de Membro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Traumatismo Múltiplo/mortalidade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Artéria Subclávia/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Subclávia/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/mortalidade , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia , Veias/diagnóstico por imagem , Veias/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Vasc Surg ; 68(3): 731-738.e1, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29622354

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is generally well tolerated. However, the incidence of hospital readmission after EVAR and the risk factors and reasons for it are not well studied. This study sought to determine the incidence, to characterize the indications, and to identify perioperative patient-centered risk factors for hospital readmission within 30 days after elective EVAR. METHODS: All patients who underwent EVAR electively in 2012 to 2013 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Targeted Vascular database (n = 3886). Preoperative demographics, operation-specific variables, and postoperative outcomes were compared between those who were readmitted within 30 days of the index operation and those who were not. Multivariate logistic regression was then used to determine independent predictors of hospital readmission. RESULTS: The unadjusted 30-day readmission rate after EVAR was 8.2%. Of all readmissions, 55% were for reasons related to the procedure. Median time to readmission was 12 days. Significant preoperative risk factors associated with readmission were female sex, preoperative steroid use, congestive heart failure, and dialysis dependence (P < .05). Multiple postoperative medical complications were independently predictive of readmission, including myocardial infarction and deep venous thrombosis (P < .05). Surgical complications that were independently predictive of readmission were surgical site infection (odds ratio, 10.24; 95% confidence interval, 5.31-19.75; P < .01) and need for unplanned reoperation (odds ratio, 17.50; 95% confidence interval, 10.43-29.37; P < .01). Readmitted patients ultimately had significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality (3.5% vs 0.3%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital readmissions remain a costly problem after vascular surgery and are associated with 30-day mortality after elective EVAR. Whereas female sex and certain irreversible medical comorbidities are nonmodifiable, focusing on medical optimization and identifying those perioperative variables that can affect the need for post-EVAR interventions will be an important step in decreasing hospital readmission.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Readmissão do Paciente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
J Vasc Surg ; 66(5): 1364-1370, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29061269

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Ruptured endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (REVAR) is being increasingly used to treat ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). However, the comparison between totally percutaneous (pREVAR) vs femoral cutdown (cREVAR) access for REVAR has not been studied. We used a national surgical database to evaluate the 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing pREVAR vs cREVAR. METHODS: Patients who underwent EVAR for rAAA between 2011 and 2014, inclusively, were studied in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted vascular database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare preoperative demographics, operation-specific variables, and postoperative outcomes between those who had pREVAR and cREVAR. RESULTS: We identified 502 patients who underwent REVAR, of which 129 had pREVAR (25.7%) and 373 cREVAR (74.3%). Between 2011 and 2014, the use of totally percutaneous access for repair increased from 14% to 32%. Of all patients undergoing REVAR, 24% had bilateral percutaneous access, 2% had attempted percutaneous access converted to cutdown, 64% had bilateral femoral cutdowns, and 10% had single femoral cutdown. Univariate analysis showed there were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, AAA size, or other high-risk physiologic comorbidities between the two groups. There was also no difference in rates of preoperative hemodynamic instability (48.1% vs 45.0%; P = .55) or need for perioperative transfusion (67.4% vs 67.8%; P = .94). There was a higher incidence of use of regional anesthesia for pREVAR compared with cREVAR (20.9% vs 7.8%; P < .01). The incidence of postoperative wound complications was similar between both groups (4.8% vs 5.4%; P = .79), whereas hospital length of stay was shorter in the pREVAR group (mean difference, 1.3 days). Overall 30-day mortality was higher in the pREVAR group (28.7% vs 20.1%; P = .04), and operative time was longer (mean difference, 6.3 minutes). However, when pREVARs done in 2011 to 2012 were compared with those done in 2013 to 2014, 30-day mortality decreased from 38.2% to 25.3% and operative time decreased by 25 minutes (188 to 163 minutes). Multivariate analysis showed there were no significant differences in mortality, wound complications, hospital length of stay, or operative time between pREVAR and cREVAR. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS NSQIP targeted vascular database shows that there has been increased adoption of pREVAR in recent years, with improved mortality and operative time over the 4-year study period. At this point, pREVAR has not yet been shown to be superior to cREVAR for rAAA, but these outcome improvements are encouraging and likely attributable to increased operator experience.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Aórtica/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
17.
J Vasc Surg ; 65(6): 1680-1689, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28527930

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Concern over perioperative and long-term durability of lower extremity revascularizations among active smokers is a frequent deterrent for vascular surgeons to perform elective lower extremity revascularization. In this study, we examined perioperative outcomes of lower extremity endovascular (LEE) revascularization and open lower extremity bypass (LEB) in active smokers with intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: Active smokers undergoing LEE or LEB from 2011 to 2014 were identified in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted vascular data set. Patient demographics, comorbidities, anatomic features, and perioperative outcomes were compared between LEE and LEB procedures. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients undergoing revascularization for IC and CLI independently. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2014, 4706 lower extremity revascularizations were performed in active smokers (37% of all revascularizations). In this group, 1497 were LEE (55.6% for CLI, 13.4% for below-knee pathology) and 3209 were LEB (68.9% CLI, 34.7% below-knee). Patients undergoing LEE had higher rates of female gender, hypertension, end-stage renal disease, and diabetes (all P ≤ .02). LEE patients also had a higher frequency of prior percutaneous interventions (22.7% vs 17.2%; P < .01) and preoperative antiplatelet therapy (82.3% vs 78.7%; P = .02). On risk-adjusted multivariate analysis, LEE patients had higher need for reintervention on the treated arterial segment than LEB (5.1% vs 5.2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.13; P = .02) but had lower wound complications (3.1% vs 13.2%; OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.23-0.45; P < .01) and no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality (0.6% vs 0.9%), myocardial infarction or stroke (1.1% vs 2.6%), or major amputation (3.2% vs 2.1%) in the overall cohort of active smokers. In the IC subgroup, myocardial infarction or stroke was significantly higher in the LEB group (1.9% vs 0.6%; OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.17-1.97; P = .03), although no difference was found in the CLI subgroup (2.8% vs 1.4%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.37-1.52; P = .42,). Also in IC group, there was a trend for lower major amputation rates ≤30 days in the LEE group, whereas in the CLI group, LEE had a trend toward higher risk of early amputation compared with LEB. CONCLUSIONS: In active smokers, LEB for IC and CLI requires fewer reinterventions but is associated with a higher rate of postoperative wound complications compared with LEE revascularization. However, the risk for limb amputation is higher in actively smoking patients when treated by LEE compared with LEB for CLI. Importantly, cardiovascular complications are significantly higher in actively smoking patients with IC undergoing LEB compared with LEE. This additional cardiovascular risk should be carefully weighed when proposing LEB for actively smoking patients with nonlimb-threatening IC.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Claudicação Intermitente/cirurgia , Isquemia/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amputação Cirúrgica , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comorbidade , Estado Terminal , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico por imagem , Claudicação Intermitente/mortalidade , Claudicação Intermitente/fisiopatologia , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/mortalidade , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Salvamento de Membro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade
18.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 38: 190.e1-190.e4, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27554701

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute aortic symptomatology is an unusual manifestation of Brucella melitensis infection. We present a rare case of acute multifocal thoracic and abdominal aortic ruptures arising from Brucellosis aortitis managed exclusively with endovascular surgery. METHODS: A 71-year-old Hispanic male with a history of atrial fibrillation and prior stroke on chronic anticoagulation presented with shortness of breath and malaise. In addition, he had been treated approximately 1 year previously in Mexico for B. melitensis bacteremia after eating fresh unpasteurized cheese. Computed tomography (CT) angiography demonstrated an acute rupture of the descending thoracic aorta just proximal to the celiac trunk and synchronous rupture at the abdominal aortic bifurctation. RESULTS: The patient was taken emergently to the hybrid operating room, where synchronous supraceliac thoracic aorta and abdominal aortoiliac stent grafts were deployed under local anesthesia. Completion angiography demonstrated total exclusion of the thoracic and abdominal extravasation with no evidence of endoleak. Twenty hours postoperatively, the patient became acutely obtunded and hypotensive. Repeat CT angiography demonstrated contrast extravasation at the level of the excluded aortic bifurcation. Emergent angiography confirmed a type II endoleak with free extraluminal rupture. Multiple coils were placed at the level of the aortic bifurcation between the left limb of the stent graft and the aortic wall to tamponade the endoleak. No further extravasation was noted on final aortography. Postoperatively, blood cultures confirmed the diagnosis of B. melitensis. The patient was treated with systemic doxycycline, gentamicin, and rifampin. Resolution of the acute event occurred without additional sequelae and he was discharged from the hospital to a rehabilitation facility. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant multifocal aortic ruptures arising from Brucellosis aortic infection is a very rare event. In this case, the patient was successfully treated with thoracic and abdominal endovascular stent-graft exclusion, coiling, and long-term targeted antibiotics.


Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Aortite/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Brucella melitensis/isolamento & purificação , Brucelose/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta Abdominal/microbiologia , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta Torácica/microbiologia , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Aórtica/microbiologia , Aortite/diagnóstico por imagem , Aortite/microbiologia , Aortografia/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Brucelose/diagnóstico por imagem , Brucelose/microbiologia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Embolização Terapêutica , Endoleak/etiologia , Endoleak/terapia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 42: 50-55, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28279723

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Certain critically ill patients with advanced acute limb ischemia with a nonviable extremity may be unsuitable for transport to the operating room to undergo definitive amputation. In these unstable patients, rapid regional cryotherapy allows for prompt infectious source control and correction of hemodynamic and metabolic abnormalities, thereby lessening the risk associated with definitive surgical amputation. We describe our refined technique for lower extremity physiologic cryoamputation and review our institutional experience. METHODS: After adequate analgesia is administered to the patient, a heating pad is secured circumferentially at the proximal amputation margin and the affected extremity is placed in a customized Styrofoam cooler. A circumferential seal is secured at the proximal chill zone without use of a tourniquet and dry ice is placed into the cooler to surround the entire affected leg. Delayed definitive lower extremity amputation is later performed when hemodynamic and metabolic derangements are corrected. RESULTS: We reviewed 5 patients who underwent lower extremity cryoamputation with this technique identified at our institution between 2005 and 2015. Age ranged from 31 to 79 years old. All presented with severe foot infection and septic shock requiring vasopressor support. All 5 patients stabilized hemodynamically following the initial cryoamputation and later underwent definitive lower extremity amputation, with a median time of 3 days following initial cryoamputation. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity physiologic cryoamputation is an effective, immediate bedside procedure that can provide local source control and the opportunity for correction of metabolic derangements in initially unstable patients to lessen the risk for definitive major lower extremity amputation. Refinement of the cryoamputation technique, as described in this report, allows for a predictable and reproducible physiologic amputation.


Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica/métodos , Criocirurgia/métodos , Isquemia/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Choque Séptico/terapia , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Amputação Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , California , Estado Terminal , Criocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/microbiologia , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/microbiologia , Choque Séptico/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Adv Perit Dial ; 33(2017): 22-25, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29668426

RESUMO

Coagulopathies and bleeding disorders can affect dialysis outcomes by increasing the thrombosis risk at the arteriovenous access or by causing prolonged bleeding at access or catheter sites. We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with combined antiphospholipid syndrome and factor XI deficiency, with chronic prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time that was not correctable with fresh-frozen plasma (FFP).The patient had a history of stroke, but was not on antiplatelet therapy because of mucocutaneous bleeding events. She had progressive renal failure attributed to her autoimmune disease, and a decision was made to pursue peritoneal dialysis (PD) when she reached end-stage kidney disease. She was admitted to the hospital the day before her planned PD catheter placement and was transfused with FFP and platelets before placement of a temporary hemodialysis catheter. One session of hemodialysis was performed to minimize uremic platelet dysfunction. The patient was given additional FFP and platelets at the time of PD catheter placement; desmopressin was not used. No thrombotic or bleeding complications occurred, and at 8 months out, the patient has been doing well on PD.In summary, careful perioperative planning led to successful PD initiation in a patient with combined bleeding and clotting disorders.


Assuntos
Síndrome Antifosfolipídica , Deficiência do Fator XI , Falência Renal Crônica , Diálise Peritoneal , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA