Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft maturation is superior to double-bundle hamstring tendon autograft maturation following anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the second-look arthroscopic findings 1 year postoperatively and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BTB) or hamstring tendon autograft (HT). Secondary purpose included clinical results from physical examination, including range of motion, Lachman test, pivot shift test, and knee anterior laxity evaluation, and the clinical score for subjective evaluations at 2 years after surgery. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2018, 75 patients with primary ACL injuries were divided into either the BTB group (n = 30) or HT group (n = 45). When using HT, an anatomical double-bundle ACLR was performed. BTB was indicated for athletes with sufficient motivation to return to sporting activity. Graft maturation on second-look arthroscopy was scored in terms of synovial coverage and revascularization. All participants underwent postoperative MRI evaluation 2 years postoperatively. The signal intensity (SI) characteristics of the reconstructed graft were evaluated using oblique axial proton density-weighted MR imaging (PDWI) perpendicular to the grafts. The signal/noise quotient (SNQ) was calculated to quantitatively determine the normalized SI. For clinical evaluation, the Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT-2000 evaluation, Lysholm score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were used. RESULTS: Arthroscopic findings showed that the graft maturation score in the BTB group (3.6 ± 0.7) was significantly greater than that in the anteromedial bundle (AMB; 2.9 ± 0.2, p = 0.02) and posterolateral bundle (PLB; 2.0 ± 0.9, p = 0.001) in the HT group. The mean MRI-SNQs were as follows: BTB, 2.3 ± 0.5; AMB, 2.9 ± 0.9; and PLB, 4.1 ± 1.1. There were significant differences between BTB, AMB, and PLB (BTB and AMB: p = 0.04, BTB and PLB: p = 0.003, AMB and PLB: p = 0.03). Second-look arthroscopic maturation score and MRI-SNQ value significantly correlated for BTB, AMB, and PLB. No significant differences were detected in clinical scores. There was a significant difference (p = 0.02) in the knee laxity evaluation (BTB: 0.9 ± 1.1 mm; HT: 2.0 ± 1.9 mm). CONCLUSION: BTB maturation is superior to that of double-bundle HT based on morphological and MRI evaluations following anatomical ACLR, although no significant differences were found in clinical scores. Regarding clinical relevance, the advantages of BTB may help clinicians decide on using the autograft option for athletes with higher motivation to return to sporting activity because significant differences were observed in morphological evaluation, MRI assessment, and knee anterior laxity evaluation between BTB and double-bundle HT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Joint effusion at 6 months is a significant predictor of joint effusion 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the risk factors for prolonged joint effusion in patients undergoing double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: In total, 160 patients who underwent primary ACLR using autograft hamstring between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Joint effusion was defined as any grade ≥ 2 (range, 0-3) according to the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 25 years (range 14-68 years) at the time of the surgery; there were 89 women and 71 men. At 1 year, 46 (28.8%) patients experienced knee joint effusion, as defined by the MOAKS. Univariate analysis revealed that age, preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade, and joint effusion at 6 months were significantly associated with joint effusion at 1 year. In the multivariate analysis, joint effusion at 6 months was significantly associated with joint effusion at 1 year (odds ratio, 68.0; 95% confidence interval, 22.1-209.4). No significant difference in the Lysholm scores was observed between patients with and without joint effusion at 1 year (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Joint effusion at 6 months was significantly associated with joint effusion 1 year after ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Femoral nerve versus adductor canal block for early postoperative pain control and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts: a prospective single-blind randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal pain management strategy for postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains unclear. This study compared femoral nerve block (FNB) and adductor canal block (ACB) for pain management of early postoperative pain, knee function, and recovery of activity of daily living (ADL) after ACLR using hamstring autografts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial, 64 patients aged 12-56 years who underwent anatomical double-bundle ACLR with a hamstring autograft between August 2019 and May 2020 were randomised to undergo preoperative FNB (n = 32) or ACB (n = 32). The peripheral nerve block was performed by a single experienced anaesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain as evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively and the need for pain relief. The secondary outcome was knee function, including the recovery of range of motion, contraction of the vastus medialis, and stable walking with a double-crutch (ADL), as evaluated by blinded physical therapists. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. The VAS scores, need for pain relief, knee function, and ADL did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: FNB and ACB provided comparable outcomes related to early postoperative pain, knee function, and ADL after double-bundle ACLR using hamstring autografts. Further research is necessary to evaluate the mid- to long-term effect of each block on recovery of knee function and ADL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Inferior graft maturity in the PL bundle after autograft hamstring double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) for graft maturation and the serial changes observed in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft at a minimum of 5 years after surgery. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent DB ACL reconstruction between 2007 and 2010 were included in this prospective study. All participants underwent postoperative MRI at 3 weeks and 3, 6, 9 and 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 50 months. The signal intensity (SI) characteristics of the reconstructed graft were evaluated on oblique axial proton density-weighted MR imaging (PDWI) perpendicular to the grafts. The signal/noise quotient (SNQ) was calculated to quantitatively determine the normalized SI. The SNQ of the AMB and PLB was evaluated separately. RESULTS: The mean SNQ of the AM bundle (AMB) continued to increase until 6 months after surgery (5.2 ± 1.2), and then gradually decreased and became well stabilized by 18 months (3.3 ± 0.5), after which it remained unchanged. On the other hand, the mean SNQ of the PL bundle (PLB) continued to increase until 9 months after surgery (6.2 ± 1.1), and then decreased incrementally and became well stabilized by 24 months (4.1 ± 0.5). The SI of PLB was significantly higher than that of AMB between 3 and 24 months (p = 0.04, 0.03, 0.01, 0.04, 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that at least 18 months is needed after ACL reconstruction to sufficiently restore the SI of the AMB, while at least 24 months are needed to for the PLB. The SI of the PLB was significantly higher than that of the AMB at 3-24 months after surgery, indicating that the PLB showed inferior graft maturity to the AMB until 24 months after surgery. For clinical relevance, the correct understanding of serial changes in graft maturation may potentially be used in decision-making regarding a return to sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level IV.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Fixation of Chondral Fragments of the Knee in 6 Adolescents Using Autologous Bone Pegs.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the optimal treatment for displaced, purely chondral fragments in the knee. PURPOSE: To report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of chondral fragment fixation in adolescents through use of autologous bone pegs. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study evaluated 6 patients (mean age, 12.9 years) who underwent fixation of chondral fragments (no visualized bone attached) using autologous bone pegs (mean postoperative follow-up, 5.2 years; range, 1.4-10.9 years). The causes were trauma (n = 5) and osteochondritis dissecans (n = 1). Lesions were located in the trochlear groove (lateral, n = 3; medial, n = 2) or posterior part of the lateral femoral condyle (n = 1). The mean lesion size was 3.8 cm2 (range, 0.8-9.0 cm2). Patients were evaluated via physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue scores. RESULTS: In total, 5 patients successfully returned to sports without restrictions at a mean of 7 months (range, 6-8 months) postoperatively. At the latest follow-up, these 5 patients had full range of motion and no joint effusion. The mean magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score was 85 (range, 70-95) at a mean duration of 3 years (range, 1-5 years). One patient experienced failure at 1.3 years postoperatively after a traumatic injury and subsequently underwent removal of the fixed fragment and a drilling procedure. CONCLUSION: In most adolescents, fixation of chondral fragments with no visualized bony portion using autologous bone pegs provided a satisfactory success rate and good healing of cartilage tissue confirmed on MRI scans.

Differences in levels of inflammatory mediators in meniscal and synovial tissue of patients with meniscal lesions.

BACKGROUND: Meniscal injuries are a risk factor for osteoarthritis (OA). While a mechanical pathway between meniscal injury and OA has been described, the biological effects of inflammation on this pathway have yet to be clarified. The aim of our study was to compare levels of specific inflammatory mediators, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and nerve growth factor (NGF), in injured and uninjured meniscal tissue and related knee joint synovium. METHODS: Tissue samples were obtained from 19 patients, 31.1 ± 13.6 years old, who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. For analysis, tissue samples were categorized into the following groups: injured meniscal site (IM), non-injured meniscal site (NIM), synovium 'nearest' the lesion (NS), and synovium from the opposite knee compartment, 'farthest' synovium (FS). Levels of inflammatory mediators were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and between-group differences (IM and NIM; NS and FS) were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The association between pre-operative pain score and the level of each inflammatory mediator was evaluated using Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Higher levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were identified in the IM tissue, compared to NIM (p <0.05). IL-6 levels were also higher in the NS compared to the FS (p <0.05). There was no correlation between pre-operative pain score and level of each inflammatory mediator. CONCLUSIONS: Our outcomes confirm a local increase in inflammatory mediator levels, in both meniscal and synovial tissue, which could contribute to development of OA. Management of these biological effects of meniscal injury might be warranted.