Stepwise prolongation of overall survival from first to third generation EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project (TREAD 01).

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of new-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has afforded promising overall survival outcomes in clinical trials for non-small-cell lung cancer. We aim to investigate the current adoption rate of these agents and the real-world impact on overall survival among institutions. METHODS: In a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 46 Tokushukai Medical Group hospitals in Japan, we analyzed clinical data of consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving EGFR-TKIs between April 2010 and March 2020. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses examined the associations between overall survival and patient/tumor-related factors and first-line EGFR-TKIs. RESULTS: A total of 758 patients (58.5% females; median age, 73 years) were included. Of 40 patients diagnosed in 2010, 72.5% received gefitinib, whereas 81.3% of 107 patients diagnosed in 2019 received osimertinib as the first-line EGFR-TKI. With a median follow-up of 15.8 months, the median overall survival was 28.4 months (95% confidence interval, 15.3-31.0). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, body mass index, disease status, EGFR mutational status and first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor were identified as significant prognostic factors after adjusting for background factors including study period, hospital volume and hospital type. The estimated 2-year overall survival rates for gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib were 70.1% (95% confidence interval 59.7-82.4), 67.8% (95% confidence interval 55.3-83.2), 75.5% (95% confidence interval 64.7-88.0) and 90.8% (95% confidence interval 84.8-97.3), respectively. The median time to treatment failure of gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib were 12.8, 8.8, 12.0 and 16.9 months or more, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data revealed that the swift and widespread utilization of newer-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, and that these newer-generation EGFR-TKIs can prolong overall survival regardless of hospital volume or type. Therefore, osimertinib could be a reasonable first choice treatment for these patients across various clinical practice settings.

Phase III study of adjuvant gemcitabine compared with adjuvant uracil-tegafur in patients with completely resected pathological stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (WJTOG0101).

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) has led to significantly longer postoperative survival among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy is also reportedly effective for NSCLC and has minor adverse events (AEs). This study compared the efficacy of GEM- versus UFT-based adjuvant regimens in patients with completely resected pathological stage (p-stage) IB-IIIA NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with completely resected p-stage IB-IIIA NSCLC were randomly assigned to GEM or UFT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), and AEs. RESULTS: We assigned 305 patients to the GEM group and 303 to the UFT group. Baseline factors were balanced between the arms. Of the 608 patients, 293 (48.1%) had p-stage IB disease, 195 (32.0%) had p-stage II disease and 121 (19.9%) had p-stage IIIA disease. AEs were generally mild in both groups, and only one death occurred, in the GEM group. After a median follow-up of 6.8 years, the two groups did not significantly differ in survival: 5 year OS rates were GEM: 70.0%, UFT: 68.8% (hazard ratio 0.948; 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.23; P = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Although GEM-based adjuvant therapy for patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC was associated with acceptable toxicity, it did not provide longer OS than did UFT.

Combination of extracellular volume fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and QRS duration for the risk stratification for patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

The extracellular volume fraction (ECV) by T1 mapping can quantify diffuse myocardial fibrosis, and useful as a non-invasive marker for risk stratification for patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). Prolonged QRS interval on electrocardiogram is related to worse clinical outcome for heart failure patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the combination of ECV and QRS duration for NIDCM patients. A total of 60 NIDCM patients (mean age 61 ± 12 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 37 ± 10%, mean QRS duration 110 ± 19 ms) were enrolled. Using a 1.5-T MR scanner and 32-channel cardiac coils, the mean ECV value of six myocardial segments at the mid-ventricular level was measured by the modified look-locker inversion recovery method. Adverse events were defined as follows: cardiac death; recurrent hospitalization due to heart failure. Patients were allocated into three groups based on ECV value and QRS duration (group 1: ECV â‰¦ 0.30 and QRS â‰¦ 120 ms; group 2: ECV > 0.30 or QRS > 120 ms; group 3: ECV > 0.30 and QRS > 120 ms). During a median follow-up duration of 370 days, 7 of 60 (12%) NIDCM patients experienced adverse events. NIDCM patients with events had longer QRS duration (134 ± 31 ms vs. 106 ± 14 ms, p = 0.01) and higher ECV (0.34 ± 0.07 vs 0.29 ± 0.05, p = 0.026) compared with those without events. On Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, significant difference was found between group 1 and group 3 (p < 0.001, log-rank test). No significant difference was found between group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.053), group 2 and group 3 (p = 0.115). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting adverse events was 0.778 (95% confidence interval CI 0.612-0.939) for ECV, 0.792 (95% CI 0.539-0.924) for QRS duration, 0.822 (95% CI 0.688-0.966) for combination of ECV and QRS duration. NIDCM patients with high ECV and prolonged QRS duration had significantly worse prognosis compared to those with normal ECV and normal QRS duration. The combination of ECV and QRS duration could be useful as a non-invasive method for better risk stratification for patients with NIDCM.

ASP8273 tolerability and antitumor activity in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations occur in approximately 50% of East Asian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). ASP8273 is an irreversible EGFR-TKI, given orally, that inhibits EGFR activating mutations and has shown clinical activity in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Epidermal growth factor receptor-TKI-naïve Japanese adult patients (≥20 years) with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations were enrolled in this open-label, single-arm, phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02500927). Patients received ASP8273 300 mg once daily until discontinuation criteria were met. The primary end-point was to determine the safety of ASP8273 300 mg; the secondary end-point was antitumor activity defined by RECIST version 1.1. Thirty-one patients (12 men and 19 women; median age, 64 years [range, 31-82 years]) with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were enrolled; as of 23 February 2016, 25 patients (81%) were still on study. Of the 31 patients, 27 (87%) had an exon 19 deletion (n = 13, 42%) or an L858R (n = 14, 45%) EGFR activating mutation, and two (7%) had an L861Q mutation. Five patients (16%) had other EGFR activating mutations, two had an activating mutation and the T790M resistance mutation. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea (n = 24, 77%). All patients had at least one post-baseline scan; one patient (3%) achieved a confirmed complete response, 13 (42%) had a confirmed partial response, and 15 (48%) had confirmed stable disease (disease control rate, 94% [n = 29/31]) per investigator assessment. Once-daily ASP8273 at 300 mg was generally well tolerated and showed antitumor activity in TKI-naïve Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Clinical activity of ASP8273 in Asian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR activating and T790M mutations.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ASP8273 is a highly specific, irreversible, once-daily, oral, EGFR TKI that inhibits both activating and resistance mutations. This ASP8273 dose-escalation/dose-expansion study (NCT02192697) was undertaken in two phases. In phase I, Japanese patients (aged ≥20 years) with NSCLC previously treated with ≥1 EGFR TKI received escalating ASP8273 doses (25-600 mg) to assess safety/tolerability and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) by the Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method. In phase II, adult patients with T790M-positive NSCLC in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan received ASP8273 at RP2D to further assess safety/tolerability and determine antitumor activity, which was evaluated according to Simon's two-stage design (threshold response = 30%, expected response = 50%, α = 0.05, ß = 0.1). Overall, 121 (n = 45 [33W/12M] phase I, n = 76 [48W/28M]) phase 2) patients received ≥1 dose of ASP8273. In phase I, RP2D and MTD were established as 300 and 400 mg, respectively. As 27 of the 63 patients treated with ASP8273 300 mg achieved a clinical response, ASP8273 was determined to have antitumor activity. The overall response rate at week 24 in all patients was 42% (n = 32/76; 95% confidence interval, 30.9-54.0). Median duration of progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval, 5.6, upper bound not reached). The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event in phase II was diarrhea (57%, n = 43/76). ASP8273 300 mg was generally well tolerated and showed antitumor activity in Asian patients with both EGFR-activating and T790M mutations.

Use of hormone therapies in disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow associated with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow (DCBM) is diffusely invasive bone metastasis resulting from solid tumors. DCBM is often associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) or hemolytic anemia. Generally, DCBM treatment includes cytotoxic chemotherapy for underlying solid tumors and management of hematological conditions if present. We report a case of DCBM accompanied with DIC in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Due to her life-threatening condition, we used hormone therapies, not cytotoxic chemotherapies, to treat her DCBM. With zoledronic acid, her DIC and general condition gradually improved and eventually she could return to her daily life. If DCBM occurs in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, hormone therapy can be one of the treatment choices.

Bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer: A nested case control study of risk factors for hemoptysis.

Potentially life-threatening, serious hemoptysis is an adverse event associated with bevacizumab in non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) trials. Suggested risk factors include central tumor location and cavitation; however, the profile of hemoptysis occurrence in clinical practice is still unclear. A nested case-control study was conducted to assess the onset profile and risk factors for hemoptysis in bevacizumab-treated patients in a real-world setting in Japan. After bevacizumab was approved for NSCLC, physicians registered all NSCLC patients scheduled for bevacizumab therapy, from November 2009 to August 2011. Patients developing grade 2 hemoptysis requiring an injectable hemostatic agent or grade ≥3 hemoptysis were selected as case subjects, matched with four control subjects each. Case report forms were collected after an observation period of 24 weeks. Radiologists assessed blinded thoracic images. Risk factors for hemoptysis were assessed by univariate and stepwise multivariate analysis. Of 6774 patients registered, 23 (0.3%) experienced grade ≥2 drug-related hemoptysis. A total of 104 patients (21 cases, 83 controls) were analyzed by central reviewers for risk factors of hemoptysis occurrence. In the univariate analysis seven factors were associated with hemoptysis. In the step-wise multivariate analysis, prior thoracic radiotherapy (P = 0.1844), presence of tumor exposure in the central airway (P = 0.0256) and concomitant radiotherapy (P = 0.1169) were identified as risk factors for hemoptysis. While the incidence of hemoptysis was low in the real-world setting in Japan, the three risk factors identified, prior thoracic radiotherapy, presence of tumor exposure in the central airway and concomitant radiotherapy, should be considered when selecting patients for bevacizumab treatment. Although technically classed as a clinical trial, a nested case-control study was a non-interventional surveillance study analyzing all NSCLC patients receiving bevacizumab in Japan, therefore it was not registered as a phase II/III clinical trial would be.

Characteristics and overall survival of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a retrospective analysis for 1660 Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: The Japan Guidelines of Lung Cancer Therapy recommend epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a first-line therapy for advanced/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Although survival periods in recent reports of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment have been getting longer, the reasons why are unclear. We investigated the survival, prognostic factors and real-world treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in clinical practice. METHODS: Non-small cell lung cancer patients (n = 1660) who started first-line treatment from January 2008 to December 2012 were enrolled. Patients were diagnosed with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer by histology or cytology samples. The primary objective was to estimate overall survival. The secondary objectives were to determine prognostic factors, real-world treatment patterns and efficacy of gefitinib treatment. We calculated the treatment exposure rate for each treatment category using the following formula: exposure rate = person-years for the treatment category/total person-years × 100. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 30.8 months. Sex, age, histology, epidermal growth factor receptor mutation type, clinical stage and performance status affected overall survival. The exposure rates for all epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib and platinum-doublet chemotherapy were 62.1, 46.4 and 8.5% respectively. Overall 56.1% of patients were administered gefitinib as first-line therapy, and 39.0% were treated with ≥2 epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor regimens. The median progression-free survival in the first-line gefitinib group was 11.4 months. Factors affecting prognosis were sex, histology, clinical stage and performance status. CONCLUSION: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, especially gefitinib, are major components of the treatment regimens for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Switching and re-challenging with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors were also practiced in Japan.

Optimal strength and timing of steroids in the management of erlotinib-related skin toxicities in a post-marketing surveillance study (POLARSTAR) of 9909 non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Skin toxicities, such as rash, are the most common adverse reactions associated with erlotinib. Steroids are a key treatment option for rash management; however, optimal timing of administration and selection of steroid strength have not been fully established. In this surveillance study of Japanese non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with erlotinib, rash management using topical steroids was analyzed in routine clinical practice. METHODS: From December 2007 to October 2009, all recurrent/advanced NSCLC patients in Japan treated with erlotinib were enrolled into this study (POst-Launch All-patient Registration Surveillance in TARceva). The observation period was 12 months, and data for all adverse events were collected. Erlotinib-related rash, interventions for the symptoms, and outcomes of the interventions were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 9909 patients were evaluated. Rash occurred in 67.4 % of patients; grade 1, 2, and 3 rash were observed in 26.8 %, 32.4 %, and 7.2 % of patients, respectively. The most common management strategy was topical steroids in 75.0 % of patients with rash. Regardless of rash grade, earlier initiation of steroids resulted in quicker recovery. In those for whom topical steroids were initiated more than 21 days after rash onset, median recovery time was more than 100 days regardless of rash grade, compared with those treated before rash onset, whose median time to recovery was 35-51 days, depending on rash grade. Median time to recovery of rash in the group initiated on medium-rank steroids then changed to strong-rank steroids was 47, 98, and 103 days for those with grade 1, 2, and 3 rash, respectively, compared with 39, 53, and 73 days median recovery for grade 1, 2, and 3 rash, respectively, in patients initiated on strong-rank steroids. CONCLUSION: Earlier initiation of topical steroids for the management of rash with strong or higher-rank steroids could achieve faster improvement.

Erlotinib alone or with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (JO25567): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: With use of EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor monotherapy for patients with activating EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), median progression-free survival has been extended to about 12 months. Nevertheless, new strategies are needed to further extend progression-free survival and overall survival with acceptable toxicity and tolerability for this population. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab compared with erlotinib alone in patients with non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR mutation-positive disease. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study, patients from 30 centres across Japan with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease received erlotinib 150 mg/day plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or erlotinib 150 mg/day monotherapy as a first-line therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as determined by an independent review committee. Randomisation was done with a dynamic allocation method, and the analysis used a modified intention-to-treat approach, including all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had tumour assessment at least once after randomisation. This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-111390. FINDINGS: Between Feb 21, 2011, and March 5, 2012, 154 patients were enrolled. 77 were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and bevacizumab and 77 to erlotinib alone, of whom 75 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 77 in the erlotinib alone group were included in the efficacy analyses. Median progression-free survival was 16·0 months (95% CI 13·9-18·1) with erlotinib plus bevacizumab and 9·7 months (5·7-11·1) with erlotinib alone (hazard ratio 0·54, 95% CI 0·36-0·79; log-rank test p=0·0015). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were rash (19 [25%] patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 15 [19%] patients in the erlotinib alone group), hypertension (45 [60%] vs eight [10%]), and proteinuria (six [8%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in both groups (18 [24%] patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 19 [25%] patients in the erlotinib alone group). INTERPRETATION: Erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination could be a new first-line regimen in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Further investigation of the regimen is warranted. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.

Final safety and efficacy of erlotinib in the phase 4 POLARSTAR surveillance study of 10 708 Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurrence and risk factors were investigated in the Japanese non-small-cell lung cancer, post-marketing, large-scale surveillance study, POLARSTAR. All patients with unresectable, recurrent/advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who were treated with erlotinib in Japan between December 2007 and October 2009 were enrolled. Primary endpoints were patterns of ILD and risk factors for onset of ILD and ILD-related death. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and occurrence of adverse drug reactions were secondary endpoints. Interstitial lung disease was confirmed in 429 (4.3%) patients. Concurrent/previous ILD (hazard ratio, 3.19), emphysema or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 1.86), lung infection (hazard ratio, 1.55), smoking history (hazard ratio, 2.23), and period from initial cancer diagnosis to the start of treatment (<360 days; hazard ratio, 0.58) were identified as significant risk factors for developing ILD by Cox multivariate analysis. Logistic regression analysis identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2-4 (odds ratio, 2.45 [95% confidence interval, 1.41-4.27]; P = 0.0016), ≤50% remaining normal lung area (odds ratio, 3.12 [1.48-6.58]; P = 0.0029), and concomitant honeycombing with interstitial pneumonia (odds ratio, 6.67 [1.35-32.94]; P = 0.02) as poor prognostic factors for ILD death. Median overall survival was 277 days; median progression-free survival was 67 days. These data confirm the well-characterized safety profile of erlotinib. Interstitial lung disease is still an adverse drug reaction of interest in this population, and these results, including ILD risk factors, give helpful information for treatment selection and monitoring. Erlotinib efficacy was additionally confirmed in this population. (POLARSTAR trial ML21590.).

Phase II study of zoledronic acid combined with docetaxel for non-small-cell lung cancer: West Japan Oncology Group.

The aim of this open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in combination with docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and bone metastases. In this study, patients randomly received docetaxel (60 mg/m(2) ) with (group DZ) or without (group D) zoledronic acid every 21 days. There were 50 patients in each group, and the primary endpoint was progression-free survival. In an efficacy analysis of 94 patients (DZ, 48; D, 46), the median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.5 months) for the DZ group and 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.5-3.4 months) for the D group (stratified log-rank test, P = 0.89). The median overall survival was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.0-15.8 months) for the DZ group and 9.7 months (95% CI, 6.1-12.5 months) for the D group (stratified log-rank test, P = 0.62). There were no clinically relevant differences in the frequencies of grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the two groups. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the DZ group. Zoledronic acid combined with docetaxel was well tolerated but did not meet the primary endpoint of demonstrating a longer progression-free survival in advanced NSCLC patients with bone metastases compared with docetaxel alone. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000001098).

Prognostic impact of concomitant pH-regulating drugs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project 01-S1.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the prognostic impact of concomitant pH-regulating drug use in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study and reviewed clinical data of consecutive patients with NSCLC treated with the first-line EGFR-TKIs in 46 hospitals between April 2010 and March 2020. Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the differences in overall survival (OS) between patients treated with and without concomitant pH-regulating drugs, including potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs). RESULTS: A total of 758 patients were included in the final dataset, of which 307 (40%) were administered concomitant pH-regulating drugs while receiving frontline EGFR-TKIs. After adjusting for basic patient characteristics, patients administered gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib with concomitant pH-regulating drugs had lower OS than those without concomitant pH-regulating drugs, with hazard ratios of 1.74 (with a 95% confidence interval of 1.34-2.27), 1.33 (0.80-2.22), 1.73 (0.89-3.36), and 5.04 (1.38-18.44), respectively. The 2-year OS rates of patients receiving gefitinib with or without concomitant pH-regulating drugs were 65.4 and 77.5%, those for erlotinib were 55.8 and 66.6%, and those for afatinib were 63.2 and 76.9%, respectively. The 1-year OS rates of patients receiving osimertinib with or without concomitant pH-regulating drugs were 88.1% and 96.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In addition to the first-generation EGFR-TKIs, the second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs also resulted in OS deterioration in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC when used concurrently with pH-regulating drugs.

A phase II study of cisplatin /S-1 in patients with carcinomas of unknown primary site.

BACKGROUND: Carcinomas of unknown primary site (CUPs) are heterogeneous tumors associated with a poor prognosis. This phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel combination chemotherapy of S-1 and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with CUP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated CUPs were eligible for this trial. The treatment schedule consisted of oral S-1 (40 mg/m(2)) twice a day on days 1-21, and intravenous CDDP (60 mg/m(2)) on day 8. This schedule was repeated every 5 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were enrolled. The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 41.3% and 80.4%, respectively. The median overall survival time was 17.4 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 28.3%, 13.0%, and 2.2% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: CDDP plus S-1 combination chemotherapy is well tolerated and active first-line empiric therapies for patients with CUP.

A phase I study of S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: A phase I study was performed to evaluate dose-limiting toxicity and the recommended dose for the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 administered concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in elderly (≥ 70 years of age) patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: S-1 was administered on days 1 to 14 and 22 to 35 at oral doses of 65 or 80 mg m(-2) day(-1). TRT was administered in 2-Gy fractions five times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy. Twelve previously untreated patients were treated with S-1 at 65 (n=6) or 80 (n=6) mg m(-2) day(-1). RESULTS: All patients completed the planned 60 Gy of TRT. Dose-limiting toxicity included pneumonitis (n=2), infection (n=1), and stomatitis (n=1), each of grade 3, but each event was reversible. The recommended dose for S-1 was determined to be 80 mg m(-2) day(-1). No patient experienced toxicity of grade 4. The dose intensity of S-1 was well maintained and the combination of S-1 plus TRT was well tolerated overall. The overall response rate was 83.3 %, with a median survival time of 34.0 months. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of S-1 at 80 mg m(-2) day(-1) on days 1 to 14 and 22 to 35 can be safely combined with concurrent TRT in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Early palliative intervention for patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Early palliative intervention in advanced cancer patients with metastatic non-small-cell-lung cancer has been shown to improve survival time. Possibly, palliative intervention at the time of outpatient care further improves patient survival time. OBJECTIVE: We performed a comparative study of late and early referrals of patients with advanced cancer to clarify the appropriate time for palliative intervention and the improvement in survival time. METHODS: Two hundred and one cancer patients, all since deceased, who were treated in our department over a period of 4 years were divided into two groups: patients who experienced outpatient services for <7 days (late referral group, 64 patients) and those who experienced outpatient services for ≥7 days (early referral group, 137 patients). Survival time, duration of chemotherapy and post-progression survival were retrospectively analyzed through examination of medical records. RESULTS: Survival time of the early referral group was longer than that of the late referral group in all the cases (19.0 vs. 6.5 months, P < 0.001). Survival time in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer was 3.5 and 14.0 months (P = 0.010) and 16.5 and 20.9 months (P = 0.039) in advanced colorectal cancer, respectively. There was no significant difference in gastric cancer (P = 0.310). Post-progression survival in each group was 0.7 and 2.7 months (P = 0.018) in non-small-cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested that early outpatient referral and palliative intervention leads to improvement of the outcome in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer. A prospective comparative study is warranted.

Gefitinib--a novel targeted approach to treating cancer.

Twenty years after the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was identified as a potential anticancer target, the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib (Iressa; AstraZeneca) has been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in many countries. Studies have indicated its potential for treating patients with other types of solid tumours. Investigation of gefitinib has not only increased our knowledge about the biology of EGFR signalling, but is contributing to our evolving understanding of which tumours are EGFR dependent.

Biomarker analysis of the phase II JO25567 study comparing erlotinib with or without bevacizumab in first-line advanced EGFR+non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as erlotinib, are standard-of-care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients progress within 1 year. Previously, we demonstrated that erlotinib plus bevacizumab (EB) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-positive non-squamous NSCLC in the randomized JO25567 study. To understand this effect, we conducted comprehensive exploratory biomarker analyses. Methods: Using blood and tissue specimens from patients enrolled in the JO25567 study, angiogenesis-related serum factors, plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-A (pVEGFA), angiogenesis-related gene polymorphisms, and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in tumor tissue were analyzed. Interactions between potential predictors and treatment effect on PFS were analyzed in a Cox model. Continuous variable predictors were evaluated by multivariate fractional polynomial interaction methodology and subpopulation treatment effect pattern plotting (STEPP). Results: Overall, 152 patients treated with EB or erlotinib alone (E) were included in the analysis. Among 26 factors analyzed in 134 baseline serum samples, high follistatin and low leptin were identified as potential biomarkers for worse and better outcomes with EB, with interaction P values of 0.0168 and 0.0049, respectively. Serum concentrations of 12 angiogenic factors were significantly higher in patients with high follistatin. Low pVEGFA levels related to better outcomes with EB, interaction P=0.033. VEGF-A165a was the only predictive tissue mRNA, showing a similar trend to pVEGFA. No valid results were obtained in 13 polymorphisms of eight genes. Conclusions: EB treatment showed better treatment outcomes in patients with low pVEGFA and serum leptin, and limited efficacy in patients with high serum follistatin.

Multi-Institutional Randomized Phase II Trial of Gefitinib for Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of gefitinib (Iressa [ZD1839]; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE), a novel epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter phase II trial. Two hundred ten patients with advanced NSCLC who were previously treated with one or two chemotherapy regimens (at least one containing platinum) were randomized to receive either 250-mg or 500-mg oral doses of gefitinib once daily. RESULTS: Efficacy was similar for the 250- and 500-mg/d groups. Objective tumor response rates were 18.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5 to 27.3) and 19.0% (95% CI, 12.1 to 27.9); among evaluable patients, symptom improvement rates were 40.3% (95% CI, 28.5 to 53.0) and 37.0% (95% CI, 26.0 to 49.1); median progression-free survival times were 2.7 and 2.8 months; and median overall survival times were 7.6 and 8.0 months, respectively. Symptom improvements were recorded for 69.2% (250 mg/d) and 85.7% (500 mg/d) of patients with a tumor response. Adverse events (AEs) at both dose levels were generally mild (grade 1 or 2) and consisted mainly of skin reactions and diarrhea. Drug-related toxicities were more frequent in the higher-dose group. Withdrawal due to drug-related AEs was 1.9% and 9.4% for patients receiving gefitinib 250 and 500 mg/d, respectively. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib showed clinically meaningful antitumor activity and provided symptom relief as second- and third-line treatment in these patients. At 250 mg/d, gefitinib had a favorable AE profile. Gefitinib 250 mg/d is an important, novel treatment option for patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC.

A phase 3 study of induction treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy before surgery in patients with pathologically confirmed N2 stage IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer (WJTOG9903).

BACKGROUND: This study sought to ascertain whether induction-concurrent radiotherapy added to chemotherapy could improve the survival of patients undergoing surgery for stage IIIA N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with pathologically proven N2 disease were randomized to receive either induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve] = 5 for 2 cycles) plus concurrent radiation therapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (CRS arm) or induction chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS arm). They subsequently underwent pulmonary resection when possible. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned between December 2000 and August 2005. The study was prematurely terminated in January 2006 because of slow accrual. The most common toxicity was grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in 92.9% of patients in the CRS arm and 46.4% in the CS arm. Induction therapy was generally well tolerated, and there were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. Downstaging in the CS arm and CRS arm was 21% and 40%, respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the CS arm were 9.7 months and 29.9 months (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68, P = .187), and those in the CRS arm were 12.4 months and 39.6 months (OS, HR = 0.77, P = .397), respectively. The PFS with and without downstaging was 55.0 and 9.4 months, respectively (HR = 3.39, P = .001). The OS with and without downstaging was 63.3 and 29.5 months, respectively (HR = 2.62, P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of radiotherapy to induction chemotherapy conferred better local control without significant adverse events. Tumor downstaging is important for prolonging the OS in patients with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC.