Increased toxicities associated with dose escalation of stereotactic body radiation therapy in prostate cancer: results from a phase I/II study.

BACKGROUND: This dose-escalation study evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of different stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) doses for selecting an optimal dose for prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This clinical trial was registered at UMIN (UMIN000014328). Patients with low- or intermediate-risk PCa were equally assigned to 3 SBRT dose levels: 35, 37.5, and 40 Gy per 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was the occurrence rate of late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events at 2 years, while the secondary endpoint was the 2-year biochemical relapse-free (bRF) rate. Adverse events were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (median age, 70 years) were enrolled from March 2014 to January 2018, of whom 10 (15%) and 65 (85%) had low- and intermediate-risk PCa, respectively. The median follow-up time was 48 months. Twelve (16%) patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. The 2-year occurrence rates of grade 2 late GU and GI toxicities were 34 and 7% in all cohorts, respectively (35 Gy: 21 and 4%; 37.5 Gy: 40 and 14%; 40 Gy: 42 and 5%). The occurrence risk of GU toxicities significantly increased with dose escalation (p = 0.0256). Grades 2 and 3 acute GU toxicities were observed in 19 (25%) and 1 (1%), respectively. Grade 2 acute GI toxicity was observed in 8 (11%) patients. No grade ≥3 GI or ≥4 GU acute toxicity or grade ≥3 late toxicity was observed. Clinical recurrence was detected in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: An SBRT dose of 35 Gy per 5 fractions is less likely to cause adverse events in patients with PCa than 375- and 40-Gy SBRT doses. Higher doses of SBRT should be applied with caution.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Early-stage Lung Cancer in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radiotherapy-induced malfunction of pacemakers and cardiac defibrillators has been reported, and corresponding guidelines have been developed in various countries. Although several studies have reported the effects of radiotherapy in patients with implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), its safety remains unclear. Herein, we report three cases of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) using CyberKnife for early-stage lung cancer in patients with implantable LVAD. CASE REPORT: Three patients in their 50s or 60s, including two women and one man, who had LVADs due to dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy and performance status of 0 or 1, were diagnosed with stage IA2 lung cancer (cT1bN0M0) by imaging only. All three patients were deemed inoperable due to cardiac comorbidity and underwent SABR at the Osaka University Hospital. The total radiation dose was 42-52 Gy, administered in four fractions. All treatment plans were designed to keep the LVAD dose below 2 Gy. In all patients, SABR was completed without acute adverse events or LVAD malfunction. During the follow-up period of 3-29 months, no disease progression or chronic adverse events were observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: This case series indicated that SABR using CyberKnife is a safe treatment option for early-stage lung cancer in patients with LVAD by reducing the dose to the LVAD.

Long-term Outcomes of Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in Elderly Patients Aged ≥75 Years.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of radiation therapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer in elderly patients aged ≥75 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated data of patients aged ≥75 years with prostate cancer who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with doses of 70-78 Gy in 35-39 fractions between September 2008 and June 2016. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free (RF) rates, and occurrence rates of toxicities were calculated. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Nineteen patients died, and nine patients reported PSA failure within the follow-up period. The median follow-up time was 83.5 months. The median age was 77 years. In the cohort, 6 were low-risk, 36 were intermediaterisk, and 46 were high-risk patients. The 5-/7-year OS and RF rates were 87.9%/80.2% and 93.5%/89.1%, respectively. By risk, the 5-/7-year RF rates were 100%/80% in the low-, 100%/100% in the intermediate-, and 87.6%/82.7% in the high-risk groups, respectively. The cumulative incidence rates of Grade ≥3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 1.3% and 3.5% at 5 years and 3.3% and 3.5% at 7 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: IMRT and VMAT are effective treatment options for elderly patients with prostate cancer and in a good general condition.