Two- plane point of care ultrasonography helps in the differential diagnosis of pulled elbow.

INTRODUCTION: Pulled elbow (PE) is one of the most common injury in children under the age of five years. Diagnosis of PE is usually based on the typical anamnesis and clinical symptoms. A simple reduction maneuver without the need of any imaging modality can eliminate the problem. Certain fractures however can mimic the physical findings of PE and in this cases reduction should not be attempted. The aim of our prospective diagnostic study was to evaluate the accuracy of a sonographic testing method in the differential diagnosis of PE. METHODS: 205 children aged 0-5 with clinical suspicion for PE were enrolled in our study. Inclusion criteria were the typical clinical sign of PE: painful, motionless, extended or slightly flexed and pronated arm following a traumatic event under the age of five. We excluded older children and patients with pronounced elbow swelling and initially flexed and supinated upper arm position. A two plane point of care sonographic examination was carried out at each patient immediately after history taking and primary physical survey. Presence of the elevated dorsal sonographic fat pad sign(FPS) and the synovial fringe enlargement (SFE) were examined from dorsal and ventral longitudinal planes. Children with FPS positivity and/or unsuccessful reduction were x-rayed. Suspected occult fractures with persistent complains were also x-rayed on the 3rd week. Sonographic pictures and x-rays were analyzed and compared to clinical findings. RESULTS: The diagnosis of PE was confirmed in 196 cases. (95.6%). 9 children had type I. supracondylar humerus fractures. (4.39%) Out of these 2 proved to be occult fractures.(0.97%). SFE positivity was detected only in the PE group (156 cases, 76%) fractures have not shown this sign. Elevated FPS was negative in all but one PE cases, while all fractures showed FPS positivity without exception. Evaluating the two parameters together both sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value were 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The two plane sonographic point of care method is an effective tool for confirming the diagnosis of PE and excluding the presence of fractures. It is an easy, standard and objective procedure which can be used as a fast diagnostic test before reduction attempts.

Standardized sonographic examination of pediatric elbow injuries is an effective screening method and improves diagnostic efficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Positive role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow injuries were confirmed by many papers but no comprehensive, standardized method has been developed for daily clinical practice. The aim of our prospective diagnostic study was to prove the efficacy of a five point sonographic point of care method for detecting different pediatric elbow fractures or dislocations. METHODS: Between 2016 January and 2017 March 365 children (age 1-14) with suspected closed elbow injury were enrolled in our study. Sonographic point of care examination was carried out by a properly trained resident and two orthopedic surgeons immediately after physical survey. We used a standardized five point sonographic examination. Two plane x-rays were made following sonography according to protocol. Utility of sonographic pictures were analyzed by a radiologist. Cases with images which have not met with standard requirements were excluded. In those cases when primary x-rays were negative and/or any of the ultrasound planes showed positive findings, radiography was repeated after 4 weeks of injury. If we detected callus formation the fracture was considered occult. Cases with images which have not met with standard requirements were excluded. Ultrasonic pictures, evaluation sheets and x-ray results were compared. RESULTS: Out of the 365 cases we identified 165 with positive findings (45, 2%) by primary x-rays. Distribution of the different injuries were the following: Radial condylar fractures, (n = 29) supracondylar humeral fractures (n = 84 proximal radial fractures, (n = 19) proximal ulnar fractures, (n = 7) fractures with joint dislocations (n = 3) joint dislocations without fractures, n = 2 medial epicondyle fractures (n = 14) fracture combinations (n = 7) We did not find injuries in this series that we could not categorize into these groups. Evaluating the abnormal sonographic dorsal fat pad sign (FPS) as a sole parameter for fracture detection we found sensitivity: 0, 97, specificity: 0,97, positive predictive value: 0,97, negative predictive value: 0,97 Evaluating the effectivity of the four cortical planes we calculated sensitivity 0, 85 specificity 0.96 positive predictive value: 0. 95 negative predictive value 0.87. The overall values of the five planes were the following: specificity0.97 sensitivity 1, positive predictive value 0.97 negative predictive value: 1 Interrater agreements on the cortical plane abnormality were considered good at two examiners and very good at one examiner. (Kappa = 0.79, 0, 81, 0, 79) Agreements on differentiation of elevated, normal fat pad) or lipohaemarthrosis in sonographic pictures were very good in all cases. (Kappa = 0,83, 0,86,0,82) While identification of any displacement or dislocation was possible in 96%, of all cases(n = 59)the exact determination of the type of the injury was possible in only 70,3% (n = 116) CONCLUSIONS: Using the five point ultrasonic examination provides enough information for excluding or confirming the presence of any pediatric elbow fractures or dislocations. The method is quick, simple and can help in the immediate differentiation of the severity of injuries. Sonographic lipohaemarthrosis seems to be more sensitive than elevated fat pad sign for the detection of potential occult fractures. Positive cases should be cleared by x-rays because the exact nature of the fractures are not identifiable only by ultrasound.

Intraoperative sonography may reduce the risk of extensor pollicis longus tendon injury during dorsal entry elastic intramedullary nailing of the radius in children.

Extensor pollicis longus tendon (EPL) injury is a potential complication of dorsal entry radial elastic nailing technique in children. The aim of this study was to investigate if intraoperative ultrasonographic guidance can reduce the risk of (EPL) injury.Correlation between sonographic and operative findings were examined first in 6 adult cadavers. Position of Lister's tubercle, EPL, and extraosseal end of the elastic nail were detected by ultrasound imaging during a minimally invasive dorsal entry nailing. Radial slope of Lister's eminence was determined as a safe and easily identifiable entry point for opening the medullary canal. Extraosseal ends of the nails were bended in a slight radial direction and cut immediately beneath the skin in a maximally palmar-flexed wrist position. Cadaveric dissections followed our procedures all correlated with ultrasonographic findings, we have not seen tendon damage, obstruction or friction by the implant's end.After cadaveric experiments, we began using intraoperative sonography for monitoring elastic nail insertion in pediatric radial fractures.Between January 2015 and November 2016, 77 pediatric closed diaphyseal radial fractures were operated by dorsal approach ESIN under intraoperative sonographic checking.Procedures were executed by 2 orthopedic surgeons experienced in ESIN technique with basic musculoskeletal ultrasonographic qualifications.Sonographic identification of EPL and Lister's tubercle in the transverse view was possible in all cases. Determination of the position of the nail end to EPL was also possible in all cases. Mean distance of the transverse view center of the EPL and nail was 0.49 cm (range 0.3-0.62 cm, SD = 0.66). Based on the sonographic transverse view, the operator decided repositioning the nails by 2 patients.We have not found EPL injury postoperatively. All patients were followed for at least 12 months after operations. Nails were removed in all children without further complications.Intraoperative sonography helps determining optimal insertion point and the risk of EPL injury may be reduced during dorsal entry approach.Although the procedure is relatively easy, authors take note that surgical and sonoanatomic knowledge, basic sonographic skills and experience in the ESIN technique are equally necessary for its successful application. A greater number of cases is necessary to confirm our initial promising experiences.