Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(11): 2681-92, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22398856

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Lifetime supplementation with vitamin K, vitamin D(3), and calcium is likely to reduce fractures and increase survival in postmenopausal women. It would be a cost-effective intervention at commonly used thresholds, but high uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness estimates persists. Further research on the effect of vitamin K on fractures is warranted. INTRODUCTION: Vitamin K might have a role in the primary prevention of fractures, but uncertainties about its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness persist. METHODS: We developed a state-transition probabilistic microsimulation model to quantify the cost-effectiveness of various interventions to prevent fractures in 50-year-old postmenopausal women without osteoporosis. We compared no supplementation, vitamin D(3) (800 IU/day) with calcium (1,200 mg/day), and vitamin K(2) (45 mg/day) with vitamin D(3) and calcium (at the same doses). An additional analysis explored replacing vitamin K(2) with vitamin K(1) (5 mg/day). RESULTS: Adding vitamin K(2) to vitamin D(3) with calcium reduced the lifetime probability of at least one fracture by 25%, increased discounted survival by 0.7 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.2; 1.3) and discounted costs by $8,956, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $12,268/QALY. At a $50,000/QALY threshold, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 95% and the population expected value of perfect information (EVPI) was $28.9 billion. Adding vitamin K(1) to vitamin D and calcium reduced the lifetime probability of at least one fracture by 20%, increased discounted survival by 0.4 QALYs (95% CrI -1.9; 1.4) and discounted costs by $4,014, yielding an ICER of $9,557/QALY. At a $50,000/QALY threshold, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 80% while the EVPI was $414.9 billion. The efficacy of vitamin K was the most important parameter in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime supplementation with vitamin K, vitamin D(3), and calcium is likely to reduce fractures and increase survival in postmenopausal women. Given high uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness estimates, further research on the efficacy of vitamin K on fractures is warranted.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Vitamina K 2/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Cálcio/economia , Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Canadá/epidemiologia , Colecalciferol/economia , Colecalciferol/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Suplementos Nutricionais , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Vitamina K 1/economia , Vitamina K 1/uso terapêutico , Vitamina K 2/economia
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 18(8): 1091-100, 2007 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17323112

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the characteristics of 1,142 women and men who attended Canadian osteoporosis clinics and had T-score < or = -2.0 and no prior fractures to determine the predictors of first clinical fracture. Greater age and failure to start osteoporosis drug treatment increased the risk of first clinical fracture. INTRODUCTION: Although risk factors for osteoporotic fractures are well-known, it is unclear which factors predict poor prognosis in patients with primary osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to determine prognostic factors for first clinical fracture in patients with T-score < or = -2.0 and no previous clinical fracture. METHODS: We examined prospectively collected data from 1,142 patients aged 40 and over in the Canadian Database of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia. We used prognosis methodology and performed survival analysis to determine factors that increase the risk of first clinical fracture. RESULTS: Our inception cohort (mean age = 60.6 years, 91% females) had a cumulative fracture incidence of 5.1% (incidence rate: 2.53/100 person-years). Age and osteoporosis drug use predicted incident clinical fractures in multivariable regression analyses. The risk of first fracture increased by 3% per year. Failing to initiate osteoporosis treatment increased fracture risk by 2.4 times. In addition, low physical activity, high body mass index and low T-scores were found to predict fracture risk in certain patient subgroups using tree-structured survival analysis. These findings were robust and did not change with most sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Age and osteoporosis drug treatment are the main prognostic predictors of first clinical fracture in patients with T-score < or = -2.0.


Assuntos
Fraturas Espontâneas/etiologia , Osteoporose/complicações , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Feminino , Fraturas Espontâneas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/fisiopatologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA