Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior and Erector Spinae Fascial Plane Blocks: A Retrospective Analysis in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery While Receiving Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Drugs.

OBJECTIVES: Chest wall blocks are an effective strategy for postoperative pain control in minimally invasive cardiac surgery, but, in the absence of clinical trials evaluating their safety in the presence of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs, it still is recommended to follow the same guidelines developed for the neuraxial procedures and for peripheral blocks. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Italy. PARTICIPANTS: Between March 28, 2019 and October 19, 2020, 70 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery via right minithoracotomy were enrolled: 35 treated with continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and 35 with continuous serratus anterior plane block (SAPB). INTERVENTIONS: The primary objective was the evaluation of the number of blocks performed or catheters removed while coagulation was abnormal or antithrombotic and anticoagulant therapies were in progress. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eleven patients (15.7%) received fascial plane block with international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.40, four patients (5.71%) with a platelet count <80 × 103, and one patient received ESPB block during dual-antiplatelet therapy. In 16 patients (22.9%), the catheter was removed with an INR > 1.40, in five patients (7.1%) with a platelet count <80 × 103, and in 53 patients (75.71%) despite low-molecular-weight heparin at therapeutic dose. The median antagonist dose of vitamin K at the time of catheter removal was 2.5 mg (range 2.5-3.44 mg) in both groups. No major adverse effects directly attributable to the blocks were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The authors did not find any problems related to the use of continuous ESPB and SAPB, although they were performed in the presence of anticoagulation and in a context with a high risk of bleeding such as cardiac surgery.

Very long-term outcome following transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Are results maintained after 10 years of follow up?

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) transcatheter ablation is a safe and effective procedure. However, outcome over 10 years of follow-up has never been reported. The aim of this study is to assess outcome, describe predictors of recurrences, and report on quality of life (QoL) the decade after an AF ablation. Methods and results: Patients referred for AF ablation in a single high volume centre from June 2004 to June 2006 were enrolled and followed in a prospective fashion by yearly clinical assessment and Holter monitoring. Among 255 patients (42.7% paroxysmal AF, 77% males, after a follow-up of 125 ± 7 months), 132 (52%) were arrhythmia-free including (58, 32% after a single procedure) while 27 (10%) progressed to permanent AF. At multivariate analysis, a greater left atrium antero-posterior diameter (HR 1.05 95% CI 1.02-1.09, P = 0.02) related to arrhythmic recurrences, while no increase in blood pressure (HR 0.06 95% CI 0.02-0.20, P = 0.01), BMI (HR 0.06 95% CI 0.02-0.09, P < 0.001), and fasting glucose (HR 0.58 95% CI 0.36-0.92, P = 0.02) during follow-up were protective for arrhythmic recurrences. Overall QoL improved significantly, significantly related to the absence of recurrences, arrhythmic burden reduction and blood pressure, and BMI control (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The outcome of AF ablation over more than 10 years is characterized by a low incidence of progression towards permanent AF. Greater LA anteroposterior diameter related to arrhythmic recurrences, while blood pressure, BMI, and fasting blood glucose control emerged as predictors of sinus rhythm maintenance. Eventually, QoL improved significantly over the follow-up.