Mechanical behavior of full-thickness burn human skin is rate-independent.

Skin tissue is recognized to exhibit rate-dependent mechanical behavior under various loading conditions. Here, we report that the full-thickness burn human skin exhibits rate-independent behavior under uniaxial tensile loading conditions. Mechanical properties, namely, ultimate tensile stress, ultimate tensile strain, and toughness, and parameters of Veronda-Westmann hyperelastic material law were assessed via uniaxial tensile tests. Univariate hypothesis testing yielded no significant difference (p > 0.01) in the distributions of these properties for skin samples loaded at three different rates of 0.3 mm/s, 2 mm/s, and 8 mm/s. Multivariate multiclass classification, employing a logistic regression model, failed to effectively discriminate samples loaded at the aforementioned rates, with a classification accuracy of only 40%. The median values for ultimate tensile stress, ultimate tensile strain, and toughness are computed as 1.73 MPa, 1.69, and 1.38 MPa, respectively. The findings of this study hold considerable significance for the refinement of burn care training protocols and treatment planning, shedding new light on the unique, rate-independent behavior of burn skin.

Thermally damaged porcine skin is not a surrogate mechanical model of human skin.

Porcine skin is considered a de facto surrogate for human skin. However, this study shows that the mechanical characteristics of full thickness burned human skin are different from those of porcine skin. The study relies on five mechanical properties obtained from uniaxial tensile tests at loading rates relevant to surgery: two parameters of the Veronda-Westmann hyperelastic material model, ultimate tensile stress, ultimate tensile strain, and toughness of the skin samples. Univariate statistical analyses show that human and porcine skin properties are dissimilar (p < 0.01) for each loading rate. Multivariate classification involving the five mechanical properties using logistic regression can successfully separate the two skin types with a classification accuracy exceeding 95% for each loading rate individually as well as combined. The findings of this study are expected to guide the development of effective training protocols and high-fidelity simulators to train burn care providers.

Synthetic tissues lack the fidelity for the use in burn care simulators.

This work compares the mechanical response of synthetic tissues used in burn care simulators from ten different manufacturers with that of ex vivo full thickness burned porcine skin as a surrogate for human skin tissues. This is of high practical importance since incorrect mechanical properties of synthetic tissues may introduce a negative bias during training due to the inaccurate haptic feedback from burn care simulator. A negative training may result in inadequately performed procedures, such as in escharotomy, which may lead to muscle necrosis endangering life and limb. Accurate haptic feedback in physical simulators is necessary to improve the practical training of non-expert providers for pre-deployment/pre-hospital burn care. With the U.S. Army's emerging doctrine of prolonged field care, non-expert providers must be trained to perform even invasive burn care surgical procedures when indicated. The comparison reported in this article is based on the ultimate tensile stress, ultimate tensile strain, and toughness that are measured at strain rates relevant to skin surgery. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression reveals significant differences in the mechanical properties of the synthetic and the porcine skin tissues. The synthetic and porcine skin tissues show a similar rate dependent behavior. The findings of this study are expected to guide the development of high-fidelity burn care simulators for the pre-deployment/pre-hospital burn care provider education.