FLABRA, frontline approach for BRCA testing in an ovarian cancer population: a Latin America epidemiologic study.

Aim: FLABRA evaluated the prevalence of BRCA mutations, genetic counseling and management approaches in patients with ovarian cancer in Latin America. Patients & methods: Patients with ovarian cancer from six Latin-American countries were enrolled. Tumor samples were tested for BRCA mutations (BRCAmut). In cases with BRCAmut, blood samples were analyzed to determine germline versus somatic mutations. Medical records were reviewed for counseling approach and treatment plan. Results: From 472 patients enrolled, 406 samples yielded conclusive results: 282 were BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt), 115 were BRCAmut and nine were variants of uncertain significance. In total, 110/115 were tested for germline mutations (77 germline and 33 somatic). Conclusion: Tumor testing to identify mutations in BRCA1/2 in ovarian cancer can help optimize treatment choices, meaning fewer patients require germline testing and genetic counseling, a scant resource in Latin America. Clinical trial registration: NCT02984423 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Cancer-associated prothrombotic pathways: leucocytosis, but not thrombocytosis, correlates with venous thromboembolism in women with ovarian cancer.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in cancer vary between tumours. Leucocytosis, thrombocytosis, tumour histology and vascular compression may drive thrombosis in ovarian cancer. Thrombosis developed in 13.4% of our patients. Higher median leucocyte, neutrophil and monocyte counts were related to thrombosis. Thrombocytosis >350 × 109 /L was frequent (63.8%), but not predictive of thrombosis. Identification of prothrombotic biomarkers may help personalise preventive treatments.

Significant clinical impact of recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Frequent recurrent mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility (BRCA) genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Hispanics, including a large rearrangement Mexican founder mutation (BRCA1 exon 9-12 deletion [ex9-12del]), suggest that an ancestry-informed BRCA-testing strategy could reduce disparities and promote cancer prevention by enabling economic screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Mexico. METHODS: In a multistage approach, 188 patients with cancer who were unselected for family cancer history (92 with ovarian cancer and 96 with breast cancer) were screened for BRCA mutations using a Hispanic mutation panel (HISPANEL) of 115 recurrent mutations in a multiplex assay (114 were screened on a mass spectroscopy platform, and a polymerase chain reaction assay was used to screen for the BRCA1 ex9-12del mutation). This was followed by sequencing of all BRCA exons and adjacent intronic regions and a BRCA1 multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay (MLPA) for HISPANEL-negative patients. BRCA mutation prevalence was calculated and correlated with histology and tumor receptor status, and HISPANEL sensitivity was estimated. RESULTS: BRCA mutations were detected in 26 of 92 patients (28%) with ovarian cancer, in 14 of 96 patients (15%) with breast cancer overall, and in 9 of 33 patients (27%) who had tumors that were negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epithelial growth factor 2 (triple-negative breast cancer). Most patients with breast cancer were diagnosed with locally advanced disease. The Mexican founder mutation (BRCA1 ex9-12del) accounted for 35% of BRCA-associated ovarian cancers and 29% of BRCA-associated breast cancers. At 2% of the sequencing and MLPA cost, HISPANEL detected 68% of all BRCA mutations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a remarkably high prevalence of BRCA mutations was observed among patients with ovarian cancer and breast cancer who were not selected for family history, and the BRCA1 ex9-12del mutation explained 33% of the total. The remarkable frequency of BRCA1 ex9-12del in Mexico City supports a nearby origin of this Mexican founder mutation and may constitute a regional public health problem. The HISPANEL mutation panel presents a translational opportunity for cost-effective genetic testing to enable breast and ovarian cancer prevention.

The MAD1 1673 G → A polymorphism alters the function of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint and is associated with a worse response to induction chemotherapy and sensitivity to treatment in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mitotic arrest deficient 1 (MAD1), a protein of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), recognizes MAD2 through two leucine zippers, transporting and activating MAD2, which promotes a metaphase arrest signal. A single nucleotide polymorphism of MAD1 was found to affect the SAC function that could be involved in a poor response to therapeutic agents that alter the dynamics of microtubules. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of the polymorphism MAD1 1673 G → A (rs1801368) with the efficiency of the SAC and the generation of aneuploidies and with the therapeutic response of patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: The polymorphism was evaluated in 144 healthy individuals and 91 patients. Mitotic arrest and the presence of errors in segregation were analyzed in cultured human lymphocytes treated with nocodazole and paclitaxel. Errors in segregation were also evaluated in 27 biopsies of patients. RESULTS: Allele frequencies in healthy individuals were G: 50%, A: 50%, whereas in the patients they were G: 38%, A: 62% (P<0.05). The percentage of cells with mitotic arrest was higher among GG cells (P<0.05). The frequency of micronuclei and nondisjunction events increased in AA cells (P<0.05). Tumors from polymorphic patients had a higher percentage of aneuploid cells (P<0.05). The GG patients showed a higher biochemical response, optimal cytoreduction, and sensitivity to the treatment. There were no differences in progression-free or overall survival between both groups. CONCLUSION: The polymorphism MAD1 1673 G → A affects SAC functionality, increasing the frequency of aneuploid cells. This polymorphism modifies the response to agents that alter the dynamics of microtubules in patients with ovarian cancer.

First-line therapy in ovarian cancer trials.

At the 4th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) held in Vancouver, Canada, in June 2010, representatives of 23 cooperative research groups studying gynecologic cancers gathered to establish international consensus on issues critical to the conduct of large randomized trials. The process focused on 13 predetermined questions. Group A, 1 of the 3 discussion groups, addressed the first 5 questions, examining first-line therapies in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients. A1: What are the appropriate end points for different trials (maintenance, upfront chemotherapy trials including molecular drugs)? A2: Are there any subgroups defined by tumor biology who need specific treatment options/trials? A3: Is the 2004 GCIG-recommended standard comparator arm still valid? A4: What is the role of modifying dose, schedule, and delivery of chemotherapy? A5: What role does surgery play today?

A phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective was the evaluation of the effects of gemcitabine plus cisplatin on the overall response rate (ORR) of patients with advanced ovarian cancer; the secondary assessments included toxicity, time to progressive disease (TtPD) and the duration of response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chemonaive patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (d 1,8) and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (d 1), every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Between March 1999 and June 2003, 28 patients (median age 52 years, range 23-72) had received chemotherapy. Of 26 assessable patients, the ORR was 57.7% (95% CI, 42.7%-83.6%) based on four complete responses and eleven partial responses, six patients experienced stable disease, while five had progressive disease. The median survival was 28.1 months (95% CI, 11.4-33.4 months), the median TtPD was 10.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-44.2 months) and the median duration of response was 24.3 months (95% CI, 12.3-33.4 months). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were nausea/vomiting (15.2%) and neutropenia (10.7%). There was no grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin exhibited activity in advanced ovarian cancer with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and dacarbazine has no effect in recurrence-free survival of malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast treated at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología of Mexico. Twenty-eight patients with malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast enrolled in a observational study from January 1993 to December 2003 to receive four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin 65 mg/m(2) over 48 hours intravenous infusion and dacarbazine 960 mg/m(2) over 48 hours intravenous infusion (n = 17) versus observation (n = 11). All patients had surgical resection, and 38% had an axillary dissection. Seven patients (25%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. Log-rank test was used to test for differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS). The median patient age was 42 years (range, 23-76 years). The median tumor size was 13 cm (range, 3-30 cm), and 46% of the tumors were in the left breast. At a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 2-81 months), there were seven recurrences and five deaths. The 5 year RFS rate was 58% (95% CI = 36% and 92%) for the patients who received adjuvant therapy and 86% (95% CI = 63% and 100%) for the patients who did not (p = 0.17). The median survival after recurrence was 6.5 months. Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and dacarbazine did not affect patient survival. Future studies to identify relevant molecular targets should be implemented in order to define effective therapies for phyllodes tumors of the breast.

Phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in metastatic breast cancer.

Our objectives were to assess the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with stage IV MBC and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with gemcitabine 1200 mg/m on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m on day 1 every 21 days. Up to 6 cycles were given. A total of 46 patients with a median age of 49 years (range 24-77) and Karnofsky performance status of 80 or above were enrolled. In total, 238 cycles were administered. Of the 42 patients evaluable for response, seven (17%) achieved a complete response and 27 (64%) a partial response, for an overall response rate of 81% [95% confidence interval (CI) 69-93%]. Median time to progression was 14.9 months (95% CI 0-30.2 months). Median duration of response was 24.2 months (95% CI 11.2-37.3 months). The median survival was 27.9 months (95% CI 23.1-32.7 months), and the 1- and 2-year survival probabilities were 71.4 and 61.4%, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and grade 3/4 WHO toxicities included neutropenia (41.3%), anemia (8.7%), thrombocytopenia (8.7%), alopecia (26.1%) and nausea/vomiting (32.6%). We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a highly effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with MBC. The time to progression of 14.9 months compares favorably with other standard treatments (anthracyclines, taxanes). A randomized study is required to further investigate the role of this combination as first-line treatment for MBC.

Cisplatino y vinorelbina en cáncer avanzado de células no pequeñas de pulmón. Experiencia en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología / Treatment with cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced no-small cell lung carcinoma

Para determinar la eficacia y seguridad de un régimen de quimioterapia a base de cisplatino y vinorelbina con o sin radioterapia en cáncer de células no pequeñas de pulmón, revisamos retrospectivamente 16 expedientes clínicos (nueve hombres y siete mujeres; edad media de 53 años; dos en etapa clínica IIIA, 11 en IIIB y tres en IV). Distinguimos tres modalidades de tratamiento: quimioterapia sola (cinco casos), quimioterapia y radioterapia concomitantes (dos pacientes) y quimioterapia de induccción seguida de quimioterapia y radioterapia concomitantes (nueve enfermos). La respuesta global fue 68.7 por ciento (18.7 por ciento completas y 50 por ciento parciales). La mediana de supervivencia global fue 13 meses y la de supervivencia libre de progresión 12 meses. La tasa de supervivencia a un año fue 75 por ciento. Se observó una tendencia a mayor supervivencia global, supervivencia libre de progresión, respuestas globales y supervivencia a un año en quienes recibieron alguna modalidad de radioterapia agregada. La toxicicdad grado 3-4 se distribuyó así hematológica (neutropenia) en seis pacientes, ninguno de los cuales requirió hospitalización ni antibióticos; y no hematológica (náuses y vómitos) en siete enfermos. Hubo neuropatía periférica grado 1-2 en cinco sujetos. No observamos mayor toxicidad asociada a tratamiento combinados. Cisplatino y vinorelbina con o sin radioterapia es un régimen eficaz y bien tolerado