HSP90ß prevents aging-related cataract formation through regulation of the charged multivesicular body protein (CHMP4B) and p53.

Cataract is a leading ocular disease causing global blindness. The mechanism of cataractogenesis has not been well defined. Here, we demonstrate that the heat shock protein 90ß (HSP90ß) plays a fundamental role in suppressing cataractogenesis. HSP90ß is the most dominant HSP in normal lens, and its constitutive high level of expression is largely derived from regulation by Sp1 family transcription factors. More importantly, HSP90ß is significantly down-regulated in human cataract patients and in aging mouse lenses, whereas HSP90ß silencing in zebrafish causes cataractogenesis, which can only be rescued by itself but not other HSP90 genes. Mechanistically, HSP90ß can directly interact with CHMP4B, a newly-found client protein involved in control of cytokinesis. HSP90ß silencing causes upregulation of CHMP4B and another client protein, the tumor suppressor p53. CHMP4B upregulation or overexpression induces excessive division of lens epithelial cells without proper differentiation. As a result, these cells were triggered to undergo apoptosis due to activation of the p53/Bak-Bim pathway, leading to cataractogenesis and microphthalmia. Silence of both HSP90ß and CHMP4B restored normal phenotype of zebrafish eye. Together, our results reveal that HSP90ß is a critical inhibitor of cataractogenesis through negative regulation of CHMP4B and the p53-Bak/Bim pathway.

The BET PROTAC inhibitor dBET6 protects against retinal degeneration and inhibits the cGAS-STING in response to light damage.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammation significantly contributes to photoreceptor death in blinding retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that act as key proinflammatory factors. We recently found the first-generation BET inhibitor JQ1 alleviated sodium iodate-induced retinal degeneration by suppressing cGAS-STING innate immunity. Here, we investigated the effects and mechanism of dBET6, a proteolysis­targeting chimera (PROTAC) small molecule that selectively degrades BET by the ubiquitin‒proteasome system, in light-induced retinal degeneration. METHODS: Mice were exposed to bright light to induce retinal degeneration, and the activation of cGAS-STING was determined by RNA-sequencing and molecular biology. Retinal function, morphology, photoreceptor viability and retinal inflammation were examined in the presence and absence of dBET6 treatment. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal injection of dBET6 led to the rapid degradation of BET protein in the retina without detectable toxicity. dBET6 improved retinal responsiveness and visual acuity after light damage (LD). dBET6 also repressed LD-induced retinal macrophages/microglia activation, Müller cell gliosis, photoreceptor death and retinal degeneration. Analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing results revealed cGAS-STING components were expressed in retinal microglia. LD led to dramatic activation of the cGAS-STING pathway, whereas dBET6 suppressed LD-induced STING expression in reactive macrophages/microglia and the related inflammatory response. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates targeted degradation of BET by dBET6 exerts neuroprotective effects by inhibiting cGAS-STING in reactive retinal macrophages/microglia, and is expected to become a new strategy for treatment of retinal degeneration.

SUMO1-regulated DBC1 promotes p53-dependent stress-induced apoptosis of lens epithelial cells.

Deleted in breast cancer 1 (DBC1) was initially identified from a homozygously deleted region in human chromosome 8p21. It has been well established that DBC1 plays a dual role during cancer development. Depending on the physiological context, it can promote or inhibit tumorigenesis. Whether it plays a role in lens pathogenesis remains elusive. In the present study, we demonstrated that DBC1 is highly expressed in lens epithelial cells from different vertebrates and in retina pigment epithelial cells as well. Moreover, DBC1 is SUMOylated through SUMO1 conjugation at K591 residue in human and mouse lens epithelial cells. The SUMOylated DBC1 is localized in the nucleus and plays an essential role in promoting stress-induced apoptosis. Silence of DBC1 attenuates oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. In contrast, overexpression of DBC1 enhances oxidative stress-induced apoptosis, and this process depends on p53. Mechanistically, DBC1 interacts with p53 to regulate its phosphorylation status at multiple sites and the SUMOylation of DBC1 enhances its interaction with p53. Together, our results identify that DBC1 is an important regulator mediating stress-induced apoptosis in lens, and thus participates in control of lens cataractogenesis.

MYPT1/PP1-Mediated EZH2 Dephosphorylation at S21 Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Fibrosis through Control of Multiple Families of Genes.

The methyltransferase EZH2 plays an important role in regulating chromatin conformation and gene transcription. Phosphorylation of EZH2 at S21 by AKT kinase suppresses its function. However, protein phosphatases responsible for the dephosphorylation of EZH2-S21 remain elusive. Here, it is demonstrated that EZH2 is highly expressed in the ocular lens, and AKT-EZH2 axis is important in TGFß-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). More importantly, it is identified that MYPT1/PP1 dephosphorylates EZH2-S21 and thus modulates its functions. MYPT1 knockout accelerates EMT, but expression of the EZH2-S21A mutant suppresses EMT through control of multiple families of genes. Furthermore, the phosphorylation status and gene expression modulation of EZH2 are implicated in control of anterior subcapsular cataracts (ASC) in human and mouse eyes. Together, the results identify the specific phosphatase for EZH2-S21 and reveal EZH2 dephosphorylation control of several families of genes implicated in lens EMT and ASC pathogenesis. These results provide important novel information in EZH2 function and regulation.

PP-1ß and PP-2Aα modulate cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) functions in aging control and stress response through de-regulation of αB-crystallin gene and p300-p53 signaling axis.

The function of the transcription factor, cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), is activated through S133 phosphorylation by PKA and others. Regarding its inactivation, it is not well defined. cAMP response element-binding protein plays an essential role in promoting cell proliferation, neuronal survival and the synaptic plasticity associated with long-term memory. Our recent studies have shown that CREB is an important player in mediating stress response. Here, we have demonstrated that CREB regulates aging process through suppression of αB-crystallin and activation of the p300-p53-Bak/Bax signaling axis. First, we determined that two specific protein phosphatases, PP-1ß and PP-2Aα, can inactivate CREB through S133 dephosphorylation. Subsequently, we demonstrated that cells expressing the S133A-CREB, a mutant mimicking constant dephosphorylation at S133, suppress CREB functions in aging control and stress response. Mechanistically, S133A-CREB not only significantly suppresses CREB control of αB-crystallin gene, but also represses CREB-mediated activation of p53 acetylation and downstream Bak/Bax genes. cAMP response element-binding protein suppression of αB-crystallin and its activation of p53 acetylation are major molecular events observed in human cataractous lenses of different age groups. Together, our results demonstrate that PP-1ß and PP-2Aα modulate CREB functions in aging control and stress response through de-regulation of αB-crystallin gene and p300-p53-Bax/Bak signaling axis, which regulates human cataractogenesis in the aging lens.

The E3 Ligase PIAS1 Regulates p53 Sumoylation to Control Stress-Induced Apoptosis of Lens Epithelial Cells Through the Proapoptotic Regulator Bax.

Protein sumoylation is one of the most important post-translational modifications regulating many biological processes (Flotho A & Melchior F. 2013. Ann Rev. Biochem. 82:357-85). Our previous studies have shown that sumoylation plays a fundamental role in regulating lens differentiation (Yan et al., 2010. PNAS, 107(49):21034-9.; Gong et al., 2014. PNAS. 111(15):5574-9). Whether sumoylation is implicated in lens pathogenesis remains elusive. Here, we present evidence to show that the protein inhibitor of activated STAT-1 (PIAS1), a E3 ligase for sumoylation, is implicated in regulating stress-induced lens pathogenesis. During oxidative stress-induced cataractogenesis, expression of PIAS1 is significantly altered at both mRNA and protein levels. Upregulation and overexpression of exogenous PIAS1 significantly enhances stress-induced apoptosis. In contrast, silence of PIAS1 with CRISPR/Cas9 technology attenuates stress-induced apoptosis. Mechanistically, different from other cells, PIAS1 has little effect to activate JNK but upregulates Bax, a major proapoptotic regulator. Moreover, Bax upregulation is derived from the enhanced transcription activity of the upstream transcription factor, p53. As revealed previously in other cells by different laboratories, our data also demonstrate that PIAS1 promotes SUMO1 conjugation of p53 at K386 residue in lens epithelial cells and thus enhances p53 transcription activity to promote Bax upregulation. Silence of Bax expression largely abrogates PIAS1-mediated enhancement of stress-induced apoptosis. Thus, our results demonstrated that PIAS1 promotes oxidative stress-induced apoptosis through positive control of p53, which specifically upregulates expression of the downstream proapoptotic regulator Bax. As a result, PIAS1-promoted apoptosis induced by oxidative stress is implicated in lens pathogenesis.

Glucose Oxidase- and UVA-Induced Changes in the Expression Patterns of Seven De-sumoylation Enzymes (SENPs) Are Associated with Cataract Development.

OBJECTIVE: It has been well established that sumoylation acts as an important regulatory mechanism that controls many different cellular processes. We and others have shown that sumoylation plays an indispensable role during mouse eye development. Whether sumoylation is implicated in ocular pathogenesis remains to be further studied. In the present study, we have examined the expression patterns of the de-sumoylation enzymes (SENPs) in the in vitro cataract models induced by glucose oxidase and UVA irradiation. METHODS: Four-week-old C57BL/6J mice were used in our experiments. Lenses were carefully dissected out from mouse eyes and cultured in M199 medium for 12 hours. Transparent lenses (without surgical damage) were selected for experimentation. The lenses were exposed to UVA for 60 min or treated with 20 mU/mL glucose oxidase (GO) to induce cataract formation. The mRNA levels were analyzed with qRT-PCR. The protein levels were determined with western blot analysis and quantitated with Image J. RESULTS: GO treatment and UVA irradiation can induce cataract formation in lens cultured in vitro. GO treatment significantly down-regulated the mRNA levels for SENPs from 50% to 85%; on the other hand, expression of seven SENP proteins under GO treatment appeared in 3 situations: upregulation for SENP1, 2 and 6; downregulation for SENP 5 and 8; and unchanged for SENP3 and 7. UVA irradiation upregulates the mRNAs for all seven SENPs; In contrast to the mRNA levels for 7 SENPs, the expression levels for 6 SENPs (SENP1-3, 5-6 and 8) appeared down-regulated from 10% to 50%, and only SENP7 was slightly upregulated. CONCLUSION: Our results for the first time established the differentiation expression patterns of 7 de-sumoylation enzymes (SENPs) under treatment by GO or UVA, which provide preliminary data to link sumoylation to stress-induced cataractogenesis.

Differential Expression of Sumoylation Enzymes SAE1, U BA2, UBC9, PIAS1 and RanBP2 in Major Ocular Tissues of Mouse Eye.

Background: It is now well established that protein sumoylation is an important mechanism to regulate multiple cellular processes including gene transcription, chromatin structure, cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as pathogenesis. Objective: In the vertebrate eye, we and others have previously shown that sumoylation can regulate differentiation of major ocular tissues including retina and lens. However, the expression patterns of the three types of sumoylation enzymes, the activating enzymes SAE1 and UBA2, the conjugating enzyme UBC9, and the ligating enzymes such as RanBP2 and PIAS1 have not been well studied in the ocular tissues. Conclusion: In the present study, using QRT-PCR and western blot analysis, we have determined the differentiatial expression patterns of the above three types of enzymes, and the obtained results lay down a foundation for further exploration of sumoylation functions in vertebrate eye.

Altered Expression Patterns of the Sumoylation Enzymes E1, E2 and E3 Are Associated with Glucose Oxidase- and UVA-Induced Cataractogenesis.

PURPOSE: Protein sumoylation is a well established regulatory mechanism that regulates chromatin structure and dynamics, cell proliferation and differentiation, stress response and cell apoptosis. In the vertebrate eye, we and others have shown that sumoylation plays an indispensable role in regulating eye development. During stress induction and aging process, the ocular tissues gradually loss their normality and develop major ocular diseases such as cataract and aging-related macular degeneration. We have recently demonstrated that sumoylation actively regulates differentiation of lens cells, whether this process is implicated in lens pathogenesis remains to be investigated. In this study, we have demonstrated that transparent mouse lenses treated with glucose oxidase and UVA irradiation undergo in vitro cataract formation, and associated with this process, the expression patterns of the 3 sumoylation enzymes have been found significantly altered. METHODS: Four-week-old C57BL/6J mice were used in our experiment. Lenses were carefully excised from eyes and cultured in M199 medium (Sigma 3769) for at least 12 hours. Transparent lenses (without surgical damage) were selected for experimentation. The lenses were exposed to UVA for 60 min or treated with 30 mU/mL glucose oxidase (GO, MP Biomedicals, 1673) to induce cataract formation. The mRNA levels were analysed with qRT-PCR. The protein levels were determined with western blot analysis and quantitated with Image J. RESULTS: we have obtained the following results: 1) Both GO treatment and UVA irradiation can induce cataract formation in the in vitro cultured mouse lenses; 2) With GO treatment, the mRNAs and proteins for the 5 sumoylation enzymes were all significantly downregulated; 3) With UVA irradiation, the changes in the expression patterns of the mRNAs and proteins for the SAE1, UBA2 , UBC9 and PIAS1 were opposite, while the mRNAs were upregulated either significantly (for SAE1, UBA2 and UBC9) or slightly (PIAS1), the proteins for all 4 sumoylation enzymes were downregulated; For RanBP2, the UVA induced changes in both mRNA and protein are consist with the GO treatment. CONCLUSION: Under GO and UVA irradiation conditions, the expression levels of both mRNA and protein for the three major sumoylation enzymes were significantly changed. Our results suggest that altered expression patterns of the sumoylation enzymes are associated with oxidative stressinduced cataractogenesis.

Analysis of the Differential Expression Patterns of Sumoylation Enzymes E1, E2 and E3 in Ocular Cell Lines.

PURPOSE: Protein sumoylation is a well established regulatory mechanism to control many cellular processes such as chromatin structure dynamics, transcriptional regulation of gene expression, cell proliferation and differentiation, cell transformation and carcinogenesis, autophagy and senescence. In the vertebrate vision system, we and others have revealed that sumoylation plays important roles in regulating differentiation of several ocular tissues during eye development. To further elucidate the functional mechanisms of sumoylation, in vitro assay systems are needed. Currently, the five major cell lines including αTN4-1, FHL124, HLE, N/N1003A and ARPE-19 have been extensively used to test the biochemical and molecular aspects of normal vision physiology and various disease processes. Thus, we conducted the study on the expression patterns of the three types of sumoylation enzymes, the activating enzymes SAE1 and UBA2, the conjugating enzyme UBC9, and the ligating enzymes such as RanBP2 and PIAS1 in these ocular cell lines. METHODS: The 5 major ocular cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing fetal bovine serum (FBS) or rabbit serum (RBS) and 1% Penicillin- Streptomycin. The mRNA levels were analysed with qRT-PCR. The protein levels were determined with western blot analysis and quantitated with Image J. RESULTS: we have obtained the following results: 1) For the mRNAs encoding E1 SAE1 and UBA2, E2 UBC9 and E3 PIAS1, the highest level of expression was observed in αTN4-1 cells; For the mRNA encoding RanBP2, the highest level of expression was detected in N/N1003A cells; 2) In contrast to the mRNA expression patterns, a similar level of the SAE1 protein was observed in the all five cell lines, and so is true with UBA2 protein in all cells except for N/N1003A where over fourfold of enrichment in UBA2 protein was observed compared with other cell lines; 3) A similar level of UBC9 protein was also detected in all cells except for N/N1003A where more than one-fold of decrease in UBC9 level was found compared with other cell lines; 4) For E3 ligases, we did not identify the regular PIAS1 band in N/N1003A cells, the remaining cells have a level of PIAS1 with difference of less than 0.6-fold; all cells except for FHL124 cells have a similar level of RanBP2, and a 70% drop in RanBP2 was observed in FHL124 cell. CONCLUSIONS: Our determination of the differential expression patterns of the three types of sumoylation enzymes in the 5 ocular cell lines help to understand sumoylation functions in vertebrate eye.

Localization Patterns of Sumoylation Enzymes E1, E2 and E3 in Ocular Cell Lines Predict Their Functional Importance.

PURPOSE: It is well established now that protein sumoylation acts as an important regulatory mechanism mediating control of ocular development through regulation of multiple transcription factors. Yet the functional mechanisms of each factor modulated remain to be further explored using the available in vitro systems. In this regard, various ocular cell lines including HLE, FHL124, αTN4-1, N/N1003A and ARPE-19 have been demonstrated to be useful for biochemical and molecular analyses of normal physiology and pathogenesis. We have recently examined that these cell lines express a full set of sumoylation enzymes E1, E2 and E3. Following this study, here we have examined the localization of these enzymes and determined their differential localization patterns in these major ocular cell lines. METHODS: The 5 major ocular cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing fetal bovine serum (FBS) or rabbit serum (RBS) and 1% Penicillin- Streptomycin. The localization of the 3 major sumoylation enzymes in the 5 major ocular cell lines were determined with immunohistochemistry. The images were captured with a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope. RESULTS: we have obtained the following results: 1) The sumoylation enzymes SAE1, UBC9 and PIAS1 are distributed in both nucleus and cytoplasm, with a much higher level concentrated in the nucleus and the neighboring cellular organelle zone in all cell lines; 2) The sumoylation enzyme UBA2 was highly concentrated in both cytoplasm membrane, cytoskeleton and nucleus of all cell lines; 3) The ligase E3, RanBP2 was exclusively localized in the nucleus with homogeneous distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Our results for the first time established the differential localization patterns of the three types of sumoylation enzymes in 5 major ocular cell lines. Our establishment of the differential localization patterns of the three types of sumoylation enzymes in these cell lines help to predict their functional importance of sumoylation in the vision system. Together, our results demonstrate that these cell lines can be used for assay systems to explore the functional mechanisms of sumoylation mediating ocular development and pathogenesis.

Sodium Iodate-Induced Mouse Model of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Displayed Altered Expression Patterns of Sumoylation Enzymes E1, E2 and E3.

PURPOSE: Protein sumoylation is a highly dynamic and reversible post-translational modification, involving covalently conjugation of the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) to the lysine residue of the target protein. Similar to ubiquitination, sumoylation is catalyzed by E1, E2 and several E3 ligases. However, sumoylation usually does not cause protein degradation but alter the target function through diverse mechanisms. Increasing evidences have shown that sumoylation plays pivotal roles in the pathogenesis of human diseases, including neuron degeneration, cancer and heart disease, etc. We and others have shown that sumoylation is critically implicated in mouse eye development. However, the expression of sumoylation machinery has not been characterized in normal and pathogenic retina. Worldwide, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in aged person. In the present study, we investigated the expression of the major sumoylation enzymes in normal mice and sodium iodateinduced AMD mouse model. METHODS: Four-week-old C57BL/6J mice were used in our experiment. A sterile 1% NaIO3 solution was freshly prepared in PBS from solid NaIO3. Experimental mice were injected with 70 mg/kg NaIO3, and similar volumes of PBS as control. Eyes were enucleated and immersion in FAA fixation overnight and processed for eye cross-sections. After fixation, cross sections eyes were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and 6 mm transverse sections were cut using the rotary microtome. Then paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and mouse retinal thickness was observed to assess the histopathologic changes. RESULTS: Significantly declined RNA levels of E1, E2 and E3 ligase PIAS1 in NaIO3-injected mouse RPE one day-post treatment. Consistently, the protein level of PIAS1 was also decreased at this time point. At the late stage of treatment (three days post-injection), significantly reduced expression of E1 enzyme SAE1/UBA2 was detected in NaIO3-injected mouse retinas. In the contrary, dramatically increased E3 ligase RanBP2 was found in the injected-retinas. CONCLUSION: Together, our results demonstrated for the first time the dynamic expression of sumoylation pathway enzymes during the progression of retina degeneration induced by oxidative stress. Dynamic expression of E1, E2 and E3 enzymes were found during the time course of RPE and retina degeneration, which revealed the potential regulatory roles of sumoylation in AMD pathogenesis.