Carbon Dioxide versus Air Insufflation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with air insufflation is commonly used for the staging and treatment of early gastric carcinoma. However, carbon dioxide (CO2) use has been shown to cause less post-procedural pain and fewer adverse events. The objective of this study was to compare the post-procedural pain and adverse events associated with CO2 and air insufflation in ESD. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the two approaches in ESD. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to analyze the data. The mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: Four RCTs with a total of 391 patients who underwent ESD were included in our meta-analysis. The difference in maximal post-procedural pain between the two groups was statistically significant (MD, -7.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.6 - -1.21; p=0.020). However, no significant differences were found in the length of procedure, end-tidal CO2, rate of perforation, and postprocedural hemorrhage between the two groups. The incidence of overall adverse events was significantly lower in the CO2 group (OR, 0.51; CI, 0.32-0.84; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: CO2 insufflation in gastric ESD is associated with less post-operative pain and discomfort, and a lower risk of overall adverse events compared with air insufflation.

Laparoscopic esophageal myotomy versus pneumatic dilation in the treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder of unknown etiology associated with abnormalities in peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. The disease is incurable; however, definitive treatment procedures like pneumatic dilation (PD)/balloon dilation and laparoscopic esophageal myotomy (LEM) are performed to relieve dysphagia and related symptoms. Currently, there is paucity of data comparing the outcomes of these procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the short- and long-term success rates of PD and LEM. METHODS: A thorough systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane library was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of PD versus LEM in the treatment of achalasia. The Mantel-Haenszel method and random effect model were used to analyze the data. RCTs with outcome data at 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year intervals were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 437,378 and 254 patients at 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year intervals were analyzed for outcome data. At 3 months and 1 year, PD was not as effective as LEM (odds ratio [OR]: 0.50; confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.82; P = 0.009 and OR: 0.47; CI 0.22-0.99; P = 0.21) but at 5 years, one procedure was non-inferior to the other (OR: 0.62; 0.33-1.19; P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: PD was as effective as LEM in relieving symptoms of achalasia in the long-term.

1% lymphazurin vs 10% fluorescein for sentinel node mapping in colorectal tumors.

HYPOTHESIS: Ten percent fluorescein may be successfully used as an alternative to 1% Lymphazurin (1% isosulfan blue; US Surgical Corp, North Haven, Conn) in sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for the accurate staging of colorectal tumors. DESIGN: Review of prospectively gathered data. SETTING: University-affiliated regional medical center. PATIENTS: Sentinel lymph node mapping was performed in 120 consecutive patients with colorectal malignancies. INTERVENTIONS: The first 1 to 4 blue nodes detected within 5 minutes were designated as Lymphazurin-detected SLNs. The first 1 to 4 fluorescent nodes seen under the Wood light were designated as fluorescein-detected SLNs. Multilevel serial sections for hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemistry studies for cytokeratin were performed on all SLNs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful mapping, accuracy, skip metastasis, adverse reactions, occult micrometastases detection, and cost. RESULTS: Mapping was successful using Lymphazurin in 99% of the patients vs 97% of the patients using fluorescein (P =.89). The accuracy of predicting nodal metastases with each tracer was 95.8% vs 93.1%, respectively (P =.82). The skip metastases rate was 4.2% for Lymphazurin vs 6.9% for fluorescein (P =.37). The 5 patients in whom nodal disease was only identified as occult micrometastasis in the SLNs had a total of 5 SLNs, all of which were identified by both tracers. No adverse reactions occurred. The cost for Lymphazurin was $99.00, while the cost for fluorescein was $2.10. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of cost, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 dyes. While easy availability and lower cost remain distinct advantages of fluorescein, Lymphazurin remains the gold standard. In patients with known hypersensitivity to Lymphazurin and when availability and cost are an issue, fluorescein may be used effectively for SLN mapping in colorectal tumors.

Aberrant drainage of sentinel lymph nodes in colon cancer and its impact on staging and extent of operation.

BACKGROUND: The role of aberrant lymphatic drainage in changing operations for patients undergoing sentinel lymph node mapping in colon cancer has not been described on a large scale. METHODS: Patients with colon cancer underwent sentinel lymph node mapping and standard oncologic resection. Aberrant lymphatic drainage was identified outside the standard resection margin, requiring change of the extent of operation. Objectives were to identify the frequency of aberrant lymphatic drainage leading to changes of operation and staging. RESULTS: Among 192 patients undergoing standard oncologic resection, 42 (22%) had extended surgery because of aberrant lymphatic drainage. Nodal positivity was higher in patients undergoing change of operation, at 62% compared with 43% of those undergoing only standard oncologic resection. In 19 of 192 patients (10%), positive sentinel nodes were found in aberrant locations. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node mapping in patients with colon cancer detects aberrant drainage in 22% of patients, changing the extent of operation.

Comparative analysis of nodal upstaging between colon and rectal cancers by sentinel lymph node mapping: a prospective trial.

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node mapping accurately predicts nodal status in > 90 percent of melanoma and breast and colorectal cancers. However, because of anatomic differences, sentinel lymph node mapping of rectal cancers has been considered inaccurate and difficult relative to colon. A prospective study was undertaken to identify differences in sentinel lymph node mapping between patients with colon cancer and those with rectal cancer. METHODS: At operation 1 to 3 ml of 1 percent isosulfan blue dye was injected subserosally around colon cancers. The first to fourth blue-staining nodes seen within ten minutes of injection were marked as sentinel lymph nodes. For cancer of the mid-rectum to low rectum, the dye was injected submucosally via rigid scope and spinal needle. The mesorectum was dissected ex vivo to identify blue nodes nearest the tumor as sentinel lymph nodes. Multilevel microsections of sentinel lymph nodes were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunostained for cytokeratin, and standard examination of the entire specimen was performed. RESULTS: There were 407 consecutive patients (336 with colon and 71 rectum). The sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 99.1 percent of colon and 91.5 percent of rectal patients (P < 0.0001). Skip metastases were found in 3.6 percent of colon vs. 2.8 percent of rectal patients (P = 0.16). Occult micrometastases were found in 13.4 percent of colon vs. 7.0 percent of rectal patients (P = 0.24). Except for success rates, no other parameters were statistically different between colon and rectum. Lower success in sentinel lymph node identification in rectal cancer may have been related to neoadjuvant chemoradiation received in all six of the patients with sentinel lymph node mapping failures. CONCLUSION: Despite higher success rates in sentinel lymph node identification for colon patients, sentinel lymph node mapping was highly successful (91.5 percent) in rectal patients. Nodal upstaging, skip metastases, and occult metastases were similar.

Lymphazurin 1% versus 99mTc sulfur colloid for lymphatic mapping in colorectal tumors: a comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The combination of isosulfan blue (Lymphazurin) 1% and 99(m)Tc sulfur colloid (TSC) may improve the feasibility and accuracy of lymphatic mapping for colorectal cancer. METHODS: At laparotomy, 1 to 2 mL of isosulfan blue and 1 mCi of TSC were injected subserosally. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) designation was based on blue staining for isosulfan blue and increased radioactivity for TSC. Focused pathologic analysis of the SLNs and standard pathologic examination of the remaining specimen were performed. RESULTS: A total of 57 consecutive patients were studied (median age, 71 years; 27 men and 30 women). Mapping was successful in 100% of patients with isosulfan blue and in 89% with TSC (P =.47). Lymphatic mapping was accurate in 93% of patients with isosulfan blue versus 92% with TSC (P =.53). The combined accuracy was 95%. A total of 709 lymph nodes were found (12.4 per patient): 553 non-SLNs (5.6% nodal positivity) versus 156 SLNs (16.7% nodal positivity; P <.0001). Isosulfan blue detected 152 SLNs, TSC detected 100, and both modalities detected 96. Of the SLNs detected by isosulfan blue only, 10.7% had nodal metastases, whereas 19.8% of SLNs detected with both modalities had nodal metastases (P =.028). Nodal disease was detected in 41% of patients with invasive carcinoma. Metastases were detected only in the SLNs in 26% and only by micrometastases in 11% of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm the efficacy of isosulfan blue and TSC for SLN mapping in colorectal tumors. No significant difference with respect to feasibility or accuracy exists between isosulfan blue and TSC. The metastatic yield is significantly higher in SLNs identified by both modalities compared with isosulfan blue only.