Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Health Promot Pract ; 11(2): 205-15, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19116415

RESUMO

Patient Navigation is an intervention aimed at addressing cancer health disparities by eliminating barriers to diagnosis, treatment, and services. Three major patient navigation (PN) programs (The National Cancer Institute, The American Cancer Society &The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) are underway to address the needs of medically underserved cancer patients. There has not been national training with a defined curriculum for patient navigators (PNs). Curriculum for training the PNs was created by experts from the three programs. The efficacy of training was evaluated using a pre- and posttest. The data show that overall the posttest scores improved from the pretest. In addition, having a high school education or greater or having more years of work experience were significantly related to improvements on the posttest. The first successful standardized national training program was attended by 116 PNs representing 85 cities with the goal to reduce health disparities for medically underserved.


Assuntos
Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/educação , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Neoplasias/terapia , American Cancer Society , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Competência Cultural , Currículo , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/etnologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
2.
Cancer ; 113(8): 1999-2010, 2008 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18780320

RESUMO

First implemented in 1990, patient navigation interventions are emerging today as an approach to reduce cancer disparities. However, there is lack of consensus about how patient navigation is defined, what patient navigators do, and what their qualifications should be. Little is known about the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation. For this review, the authors conducted a qualitative synthesis of published literature on cancer patient navigation. By using the keywords 'navigator' or 'navigation' and 'cancer,' 45 articles were identified in the PubMed database and from reference searches that were published or in press through October 2007. Sixteen studies provided data on the efficacy of navigation in improving timeliness and receipt of cancer screening, diagnostic follow-up care, and treatment. Patient navigation services were defined and differentiated from other outreach services. Overall, there was evidence of some degree of efficacy for patient navigation in increasing participation in cancer screening and adherence to diagnostic follow-up care after the detection of an abnormality. The reported increases in screening ranged from 10.8% to 17.1%, and increases in adherence to diagnostic follow-up care ranged from 21% to 29.2% compared with control patients. There was less evidence regarding the efficacy of patient navigation in reducing either late-stage cancer diagnosis or delays in the initiation of cancer treatment or improving outcomes during cancer survivorship. There were methodological limitations in most studies, such as a lack of control groups, small sample sizes, and contamination with other interventions. Although cancer-related patient navigation interventions are being adopted increasingly across the United States and Canada, further research will be necessary to evaluate their efficacy and cost-effectiveness in improving cancer care.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Humanos , Área Carente de Assistência Médica
3.
Cancer ; 107(8 Suppl): 1939-44, 2006 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16944469

RESUMO

The Special Populations Networks (SPN) Program was created to address both community needs for cancer information and NCI's desire to obtain community-based answers to research questions and promote training opportunities for racial/ethnic minority and underserved researchers in populations with an unequal burden of cancer. The SPN program included 3 components: 1) infrastructure and capacity building combined with cancer awareness, 2) community-based research, and 3) community-centered training. The 18 SPN grantees conducted more than 1000 cancer awareness activities. More than 2000 community lay health workers were trained. Communities formalized more than 300 partnerships with Memoranda of Understanding (MOU). More than 255 pilot research project applications were submitted by junior researchers and over 135 were funded. Approximately 90% of the applications were submitted by minority junior researchers; of which more than 100 were funded. More than 290 scientific publications thus far have resulted from the work of the SPNs. In the first 3 years of the program, the SPNs also secured an additional $20 million in outside funding. The SPN program effected a paradigm shift for minority research programs by combining community-based cancer awareness, research, and training into a single program. By engaging research leaders of minority and underserved populations to aid their own, train their own, and develop research to help their own, the SPN program activated the power of their commitment to their own. That commitment was reflected in the trust and participation offered by their communities. Cancer 2006. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Redes Comunitárias , Participação da Comunidade , Atenção à Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Grupos Minoritários , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Programas Governamentais , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA