Targeted Therapies and Utility of the Lung-molGPA in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic advances have increased the survival of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients as well as the lifetime risk of being diagnosed with brain metastases (BM). Although BM have historically been associated with poor prognosis, it is unclear whether they remain a strong predictor of reduced survival. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of BM and the utility of the Lung-molGPA. METHODS: This single-center retrospective database analysis included 1,393 NSCLC patients with newly diagnosed BM who registered at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología of Mexico (INCan) from 2010 to 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for the survival analysis. Survival times were calculated from the date of NSCLC diagnosis (OS), or BM diagnosis, to the date of death or last follow-up. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for death and the significance of the parameters evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 1,058 patients who underwent genetic testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and/or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements, 650 had a positive tumor mutational/rearrangement status (543 had EGFR mutations, 104 had ALK rearrangements, and 3 had both EGFR and ALK alterations). Median OS did not differ between patients with BM and without BM (17.7 months [95% CI, 15.4-19.0] vs. 16.6 months [95% CI, 14.3-19.0]; p = 0.362). In contrast, the presence of BM was associated with worse OS in patients with a negative tumor mutational status (HR: 1.225 [95% CI, 1.041-1.443]; p = 0.015), who did not receive TKI therapy (HR: 1.269 [95% CI, 1.082-1.488]; p = 0.003), or with non-adenocarcinoma histology (HR: 1.582 [95% CI, 1.118-2.238]; p = 0.01). The median survival after BM diagnosis was 4.27, 6.96, 14.68, and 18.89 months for adenocarcinoma patients with Lung-molGPA scores 0-1, 1.5-2, 2.5-3, and 3.5-4, respectively (p < 0.0001). For non-adenocarcinoma patients with Lung-molGPA scores 0-1, 1.5-2, and 2.5-3, the corresponding estimates were 0.95, 2.89, and 9.39 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the prognosis of NSCLC patients with BM is no longer uniformly poor and should be individually assessed. Furthermore, the validity of the Lung-molGPA was confirmed in an independent population from a different geographical region.

Identification of a high-risk group for brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Identification of a high-risk group of brain metastases (BM) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could lead to early interventions and probably better prognosis. The objective of the study was to identify this group by generating a multivariable model with recognized and accessible risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort from patients seen at a single center during 2010-2020, was divided into a training (TD) and validation (VD) datasets, associations with BM were measured in the TD with logit, variables significantly associated were used to generate a multivariate model. Model´s performance was measured with the AUC/C-statistic, Akaike information criterion, and Brier score. RESULTS: From 570 patients with NSCLC who met the strict eligibility criteria a TD and VD were randomly assembled, no significant differences were found amid both datasets. Variables associated with BM in the multivariate logit analyses were age [P 0.001, OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.98)]; mutational status positive [P 0.027, OR 1.96 (95% CI 1.07-3.56); and carcinoembryonic antigen levels [P 0.016, OR 1.001 (95% CI 1.000-1.003). BM were diagnosed in 24% of the whole cohort. Stratification into a high-risk group after simplification of the model, displayed a frequency of BM of 63% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A multivariate model comprising age, carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and mutation status allowed the identification of a truly high-risk group of BM in NSCLC patients.

Treatment of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma in Immunocompetent Patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on the findings of recent randomized prospective trials evaluating new therapeutic options for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) in first-line treatment and on the most promising novel agents. RECENT FINDINGS: The current standard treatment of newly diagnosed PCNSL has long been depending on high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based polychemotherapy followed by whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Recent randomized trials have provided evidence that high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a valuable alternative option to WBRT as consolidation after induction HD-MTX-based chemotherapy. For the elderly, cumulative studies confirm that chemotherapy alone as initial treatment is the best approach in this frail population in order to reduce chemoradiation neurotoxicity. If the role of rituximab needs to be further investigated, novel agents such as imids and ibrutinib have shown to be promising drugs to be incorporated in innovative combination treatment. The role of WBRT, at least at conventional dose, is declining in first-line treatment in favor of intensive consolidation chemotherapy with or without ASCT and possibly maintenance chemotherapy in the elderly. Despite their rarity, it has been shown that ambitious randomized trials in PCNSL are feasible thanks to collaborative networks.