The rise of reimbursement-based medicine: the case of bone metastasis radiation treatment.

It has been hypothesised that the reimbursement system pertaining to radiotherapy is influencing prescription practices for patients with cancer with bone metastases. In this paper, we present and discuss the results of an empirical study that was undertaken on patient records, referred to radiotherapy for the treatment of bone metastases, in a medium-size city, in southern Brazil, during the period of March 2006 to March 2014. Our findings seem to confirm this hypothesis: after a change in the reimbursement method, radiation prescriptions were adapted accordingly, in order to maximise profits. Once such patients become highly vulnerable due to their diagnoses, they also become susceptible to a subtle form of exploitation; physicians let patients believe that more radiation will be better for their health, and they do so despite knowing otherwise, and as it seems, out of pecuniary interests.

Access to Healthcare: A Central Question within Brazilian Bioethics.

This article explores the current situation regarding the importance of access to healthcare in relation to the genesis and context of bioethics developed in Brazil, a country in which healthcare is understood through the national constitution to be a universal right of its population. Since the onset of the development of Brazilian bioethics at the beginning of the 1990s, topics relating directly and indirectly to the field of public health have been a priority in the bioethics agenda. The article considers the socioeconomic context within which conflicts occur, an issue that has been addressed in other scientific articles on bioethics in Latin America. It presents the main conceptual bases of intervention bioethics, a critical approach that has been developed as a reference point in this region, with the aim of analyzing (bio)ethical issues and indicating solutions that relate specifically to the different forms of social exclusion that influence the health conditions and lives of people in Brazil, as well as in other peripheral countries in the Southern Hemisphere and of the world in general. The article calls attention to some of the problems and challenges that the Brazilian public health system has been facing. An international agenda of "universal health coverage" is one of the main global threats to implementing the universal right to healthcare as it has been understood in Brazil.

[Interface between bioethics and international relations]. / Interfaz entre bioética y relaciones internacionales.

Recently, bioethics and international relations have gotten closer to one an other, probably as a result of the motivation of bioethics to intervene in global affairs. However, this relationship has only been on the practical level.This study's objective, through a literature review, is to highlight the huge potential that the epistemologies of both areas have to build a more fruitful dialogue. 18 articles relating both areas were retrieved from databases Scopus, Web of Science, Bireme and PubMed. The articles were then grouped in three categories of analysis: bioethics and global health; international organizations and bioethics; and international relations and bioethics. This study concludes that an epistemological approaching between these areas is desirable and proposes the establishment of two new areas of study: international relations in health and international relations from the South, drawing upon the conceptual basis developed by Latin-American bioethics.

Vulnerability.

Collating the concepts of vulnerability through five regional perspectives on bioethics from the United States, Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia, this article proposes a means of integration between the different approaches in order to seek a theoretical and normative basis for the field of global bioethics. It argues that only through opening continuous, critical, and self-critical dialogue within the international bioethical community will it be possible to achieve a sufficiently global understanding of vulnerability that is capable of identifying the means needed for addressing the conditions that leave certain groups and individuals more susceptible to "wounding" than others.

[Reflections on public-private participation in healthcare]. / Reflexiones sobre la participación pública y privada en la asistencia a la salud.

Health care is one of the major issues in social policy, affected by multiple factors, such as the increase in health costs, crisis, and the degree of private participation in the financing of services. In this essay we reflect on this participation of the private sector in health care, with Brazil as a reference country and taking into account member states of the Union of South American Nations. Based on a qualitative study using data from national and international organizations, we found significant private participation in health care of countries in various continents, with an increase of public and private spending between 2000 and 2010. Regardless of the adopted health system, there was an increase of private spending in most countries analyzed, which emphasizes the need to further evaluate the performance of public and private sectors, as well as the regulatory frameworks for their participation in health care, thus enabling policies that promote quality improvement and the expansion of coverage.

[Bioethics and the right of access to health care.] / Bioética y el derecho al acceso a los cuidados de salud.

Access to health care is a universal human right and therefore should not be treated as a commodity only accessible to people with the economic means to acquire it. This study adopts a theoretical framework based on UNESCO's Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. The discussion first explores the rationale for choosing human rights as a foundation for such an endeavor. Secondly, the notion of equity is presented as an indispensable principle that should be incorporated into such discussions, reinforcing the understanding that unequal people and populations must be treated in a differentiated and compensatory manner, with the aim of seeking true equality based on the humanitarian recognition of every individual's rights, accounting for their needs and differences. Thirdly, the text seeks to address the complex problem of prioritizing the allocation of scarce resources in order to ensure access to health care for as many people as possible. In summary, this article intends to demonstrate that access to health care for all people, regardless of their income level, should be considered to be a universal human right. Beyond the obligations of governments and the private sector to support inclusive programs, there is also a need to acknowledge social movements' legitimate struggles for achieving better living conditions and health outcomes for all people, without exception.

El acceso a los cuidados de salud es un derecho universal de todo ser humano y no debe ser reducido a un objeto de consumo disponible solo para las personas con capacidad económica de adquirirlo. Desde el referencial teórico de la Declaración Universal sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos de la Unesco, en primer lugar, se discute la razón de elegir los derechos humanos como base para el trabajo; en segundo lugar, se presenta la equidad como un principio indispensable en el debate para reforzar la comprensión de que las personas y las poblaciones desiguales deben ser tratadas de manera desigual y compensatoria, con el objetivo de buscar la igualdad basada en el reconocimiento humanitario del derecho de cada individuo en función de sus necesidades y diferencias. En tercer lugar, el texto aborda el complejo problema de priorizar la asignación de recursos escasos para garantizar el acceso a la atención médica para la mayor cantidad posible de personas. En resumen, el artículo pretende mostrar que el acceso a la atención médica para todas las personas, independientemente de su nivel de ingresos, debe ser considerado como un derecho humano universal que, además de las responsabilidades gubernamentales y del sector privado en apoyar programas inclusivos, debe reconocer también la legitimidad de la lucha de los movimientos sociales en defensa de mejores condiciones de vida y salud para todas las personas sin distinción.

Supported decision-making for older people living with dementia: contributions from bioethics. / Tomada de decisão apoiada para pessoas idosas que vivem com demência: contribuições da bioética.

The significant increase in the elderly population and the high incidence of chronic and degenerative diseases are a matter of concern with regard to issues inherent to promotion of autonomy and preservation of human rights and quality of life in this population group. Exercising the right to make a decision impacts various aspects of human life, such as health care, asset management, relationships, choice of housing, family care, religious activities and even daily routine activities. Supported decision-making (SDM) can be an important tool for promoting autonomy among elderly people living with dementia, as it consists of an approach based on respect for human rights, in which the aim is to establish control over the mechanisms for provision of support so that all people can exercise the right to make decisions inherent to their lives. In order to implement this more robustly in Brazil, it is fundamental to change the culture towards valuing elderly people and implementing the notion that protection involves offering mechanisms for promoting personal autonomy, which is partly achieved through encouragement of social engagement and strengthening community ties. In this regard, the notion of empowerment, based on concepts arising from Intervention Bioethics, is relevant.

O aumento significativo da população idosa e a alta incidência de doenças crônicas e degenerativas demandam preocupação com aspectos inerentes à promoção da autonomia, preservação de direitos humanos e qualidade de vida desse grupo populacional. O exercício do direito à tomada de decisão impacta diversos aspectos da vida humana, como é o caso dos cuidados em saúde, administração patrimonial, relacionamentos, escolha de moradia, cuidados familiares, atividades religiosas e até mesmo atividades diárias. A Tomada de Decisão Apoiada (TDA) pode ser importante instrumento para promoção da autonomia de pessoas idosas que vivem com demência, pois consiste em uma abordagem pautada no respeito aos direitos humanos, que visa instituir mecanismos de fornecimento de suportes para que todas as pessoas possam exercer o direito de tomar decisões inerentes às suas vidas. Para implementação mais robusta no Brasil, é fundamental a mudança de cultura, no sentido de valorização da pessoa idosa e da noção de que a proteção perpassa por ofertar mecanismos de promoção da autonomia pessoal, que se dá, em parte, pelo incentivo ao engajamento social e fortalecimento de laços comunitários. Nesse aspecto, a noção de empoderamento, pautada em concepções advindas da Bioética de Intervenção, mostra-se relevante.

Hidden risks associated with clinical trials in developing countries.

The academic literature in research ethics has been marked in the past decade by a much broader focus on the need for the protection of developing communities subjected to international clinical trials. Because of the proximity of the revision of the Declaration of Helsinki, completed in October 2008, most papers have addressed the issue of a double standard of care following the use of placebo. However, other no less important issues, such as interactions between the lifestyles structures of low-income communities and the efficiency of risk-minimising procedures also deserve attention. The purpose of this paper is to discuss forms of uncertainty involved in clinical trials in poor and low-income countries that are not addressed by conventional methods of risk assessment. Furthermore, the increase in size of risks that are identified by conventional assessment methods will be addressed. Besides, the difficulty in properly applying risk-minimising procedures will be discussed. Finally, this paper proposes the involvement of research ethics committees in the risk evaluation process and the establishment of national ethics evaluation systems.

Between the needy and the greedy: the quest for a just and fair ethics of clinical research.

The acceleration of the market globalisation process over the last three decades has internationalised clinical research and influenced both the way in which it is funded and the development and application of research practices. In addition, in recent years international multicentre randomised clinical trials have become the model par excellence for research on new medicines. The neoliberal model of globalisation has induced a decline in state power, both with regard to establishing national research for health priorities and to influencing the development of adequate ethical guidelines to protect human beings that participate in multinational research. In this respect, poor and low-income countries, which lack sustainable control and review systems to deal with the ethical and methodological challenges of complex studies conducted by researchers from affluent countries and funded by large multinational pharmaceutical companies, are particularly vulnerable. The aim of the present paper is to explore critically some of the actual and possible ethical pitfalls of globalisation of clinical research and propose mechanisms for turning transnational clinical research into a more cooperative and fairer enterprise.

COVID-19 and Moral Imperialism in Multinational Clinical Research.

A TV debate in April 2020 between two French doctors regarding the benefits of testing a coronavirus vaccine in Africa where there are no masks or treatments available has led to international criticism. This case highlights a problematic ethical double standard in multinational clinical research: trials that would be considered unethical in high income countries (e.g., placebo-controlled where there is an existing treatment) are nonetheless justified in low-and-middle-income countries because the existing standards of care are less (i.e., no access to a treatment). Underlying this ethical double standard in some multinational clinical trials is a moral imperialism and persistent colonialist thinking that must be rejected.

[Autohemotherapy, state intervention and bioethics]. / Auto-hemoterapia, intervenção do estado e bioética.

The increasingly frequent practice of autohemotherapy entails a potential risk to the health of individuals since it is scientifically unproven. There are practically no clinical studies showing the efficacy and safety of this procedure; only experimental research with questionable results from studies on human beings and animals. Over the last years, the sanitary surveillance area has expanded its preventive and risk control actions based upon a precautionary philosophy in the private as well as the public sphere. By observing the theoretical and practical reference points of the "four Ps" (prevention, protection, precaution and prudence), in accordance with the epistemology developed within Intervention Bioethics, sanitary surveillance actions are based upon legal administrative policing powers. These powers are understood to be the Public Administration's competence to set conditions on and restrict the use and benefit of goods, activities and individual rights, on behalf of the common well being of people or the State itself. The Brazilian State, through its sanitary surveillance policing powers at the three levels of government, has intervened in the practice of autohemotherapy. Considering the responsible State intervention in situations of collective interest, vulnerability and susceptibility, the present study proposed to analyze the practice of autohemotherapy in the light of sanitary surveillance actions and their relationship with the "four Ps" of Intervention Bioethics.

Interventional bioethics: epistemology for peripheral countries.

Principlism, which originated in the United States based on four supposedly universal principles, brought international visibility to the field of bioethics over the final years of the twentieth century. Nevertheless, from 1990 onwards, criticism regarding the universal applicability of these principles emerged, especially concerning their limitations in dealing with collective macroproblems--social, sanitary and environmental--that are seen in poor developing countries every day. In this respect, the idea of Intervention Bioethics was presented at the University of Brasília, Brazil, in 1998, and was subsequently expanded to encompass other Latin American countries. From the outset, this epistemological proposal of third-world construction and perspective advocated politicisation of the international bioethics agenda, and this aim was achieved through the content of UNESCO's Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, which was adopted in 2005. Grounded in a utilitarian and consequentialistic approach, Intervention Bioethics gives priority, ahead of vulnerabilities relating to gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity and similar considerations, to the fields of social and sanitary justice in order to defend the poorest and most disempowered populations in the asymmetrical contemporary world.

Bioética y el derecho de acceso a los cuidados de salud / Bioethics and the right of access to health care

RESUMEN El acceso a los cuidados de salud es un derecho universal de todo ser humano y no debe ser reducido a un objeto de consumo disponible solo para las personas con capacidad económica de adquirirlo. Desde el referencial teórico de la Declaración Universal sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos de la Unesco, en primer lugar, se discute la razón de elegir los derechos humanos como base para el trabajo; en segundo lugar, se presenta la equidad como un principio indispensable en el debate para reforzar la comprensión de que las personas y las poblaciones desiguales deben ser tratadas de manera desigual y compensatoria, con el objetivo de buscar la igualdad basada en el reconocimiento humanitario del derecho de cada individuo en función de sus necesidades y diferencias. En tercer lugar, el texto aborda el complejo problema de priorizar la asignación de recursos escasos para garantizar el acceso a la atención médica para la mayor cantidad posible de personas. En resumen, el artículo pretende mostrar que el acceso a la atención médica para todas las personas, independientemente de su nivel de ingresos, debe ser considerado como un derecho humano universal que, además de las responsabilidades gubernamentales y del sector privado en apoyar programas inclusivos, debe reconocer también la legitimidad de la lucha de los movimientos sociales en defensa de mejores condiciones de vida y salud para todas las personas sin distinción.

ABSTRACT Access to health care is a universal human right and therefore should not be treated as a commodity only accessible to people with the economic means to acquire it. This study adopts a theoretical framework based on UNESCO's Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. The discussion first explores the rationale for choosing human rights as a foundation for such an endeavor. Secondly, the notion of equity is presented as an indispensable principle that should be incorporated into such discussions, reinforcing the understanding that unequal people and populations must be treated in a differentiated and compensatory manner, with the aim of seeking true equality based on the humanitarian recognition of every individual's rights, accounting for their needs and differences. Thirdly, the text seeks to address the complex problem of prioritizing the allocation of scarce resources in order to ensure access to health care for as many people as possible. In summary, this article intends to demonstrate that access to health care for all people, regardless of their income level, should be considered to be a universal human right. Beyond the obligations of governments and the private sector to support inclusive programs, there is also a need to acknowledge social movements' legitimate struggles for achieving better living conditions and health outcomes for all people, without exception.

Tomada de decisão apoiada para pessoas idosas que vivem com demência: contribuições da bioética / Supported decision-making for older people living with dementia: contributions from bioethics

Resumo O aumento significativo da população idosa e a alta incidência de doenças crônicas e degenerativas demandam preocupação com aspectos inerentes à promoção da autonomia, preservação de direitos humanos e qualidade de vida desse grupo populacional. O exercício do direito à tomada de decisão impacta diversos aspectos da vida humana, como é o caso dos cuidados em saúde, administração patrimonial, relacionamentos, escolha de moradia, cuidados familiares, atividades religiosas e até mesmo atividades diárias. A Tomada de Decisão Apoiada (TDA) pode ser importante instrumento para promoção da autonomia de pessoas idosas que vivem com demência, pois consiste em uma abordagem pautada no respeito aos direitos humanos, que visa instituir mecanismos de fornecimento de suportes para que todas as pessoas possam exercer o direito de tomar decisões inerentes às suas vidas. Para implementação mais robusta no Brasil, é fundamental a mudança de cultura, no sentido de valorização da pessoa idosa e da noção de que a proteção perpassa por ofertar mecanismos de promoção da autonomia pessoal, que se dá, em parte, pelo incentivo ao engajamento social e fortalecimento de laços comunitários. Nesse aspecto, a noção de empoderamento, pautada em concepções advindas da Bioética de Intervenção, mostra-se relevante.

Abstract The significant increase in the elderly population and the high incidence of chronic and degenerative diseases are a matter of concern with regard to issues inherent to promotion of autonomy and preservation of human rights and quality of life in this population group. Exercising the right to make a decision impacts various aspects of human life, such as health care, asset management, relationships, choice of housing, family care, religious activities and even daily routine activities. Supported decision-making (SDM) can be an important tool for promoting autonomy among elderly people living with dementia, as it consists of an approach based on respect for human rights, in which the aim is to establish control over the mechanisms for provision of support so that all people can exercise the right to make decisions inherent to their lives. In order to implement this more robustly in Brazil, it is fundamental to change the culture towards valuing elderly people and implementing the notion that protection involves offering mechanisms for promoting personal autonomy, which is partly achieved through encouragement of social engagement and strengthening community ties. In this regard, the notion of empowerment, based on concepts arising from Intervention Bioethics, is relevant.

Social responsibility and global health: lessons from the Rio Olympics Zika controversy.

The outbreak of Zika virus infection in the Americas and its possible association with microcephaly raised several concerns among global health authorities regarding the organisation of the Olympic and Paralympic Games scheduled for August and September 2016, in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. It generated an international controversy over the continuation of the Games with debates on the ethical principle of social responsibility. Based on the principles of social responsibility and health in the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights, the present comment ponders on the application of such principles in the context of mega-events and global health.

Ethics in forensic psychiatry.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ethics in forensic expertise has been the focus of important debates. After providing a brief history of the theme, a review is given of the articles published in the last 2 years. As this field is constantly changing, it is possible to identify significant differences and even opposing positions adopted till now by various researchers. RECENT FINDINGS: The review includes a discussion on the current ethical theories applied to the forensic field, the objective and subjective issues involved in forensic work, the care needed to prevent additional and unnecessary suffering to the examinees and, finally, future directions as indicated by the authors. SUMMARY: The authors conclude that the discussion on the ethics of forensic expertise should be more comprehensive. The debate should include the search for equilibrium between objectivity and subjectivity, inherent to forensic expertise work, and also the utilization of advanced technological resources, always bearing in mind the conditions to which the examiner and examinee are subjected.

[Bioethics and biosafety: the use of biomaterials in dental practice]. / Bioética e biossegurança: uso de biomateriais na prática odontológica.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the use of biomaterials in surgical procedures carried out by specialist dental surgeons, in light of the Principalist Bioethics Theory and the Individual and Collective Ethics of Responsibility. METHODS: Dental surgeons (n=95), who were registered as specialists at the Regional Dentistry Council of Brasilia as of 2002, completed questionnaires regarding the use of biomaterials in their work. Data relating to sanitary control were collated, based on these dental surgeons' responses and research at relevant organizations. RESULTS: All of the professionals in the survey used biomaterials on a regular basis; 45% believed their use to be risk-free for patients, and 48% did not classify biomaterials as drugs. About 70% of professionals trust the source of the biomaterials even though membranes and bones are the items most commonly bought from individual suppliers. Nonetheless, 96% of interviewees believed that government sanitation agencies should regulate more. More than half of the professionals (51%) pointed to little or no participation by the patient in the process of therapeutic choice. A copy of the informed consent form was provided by 12% of the dental surgeons interviewed produced. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the professionals use biomaterials without knowing about related risks and adverse side effects, contrary to the principle of beneficence. Government agencies and professional bodies alike do not show evidence of observing public responsibility ethics. Informed consent is not yet integrated fully into professional practice and the doctor-patient relationship in dentistry remains markedly vertical.

[Bioethical study on the expectations of women awaiting assisted reproduction in a public hospital in the Federal District, Brazil]. / Expectativa de mulheres à espera de reprodução assistida em hospital público do DF--estudo bioético.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the expectations of women who wait for Assisted Reproduction Treatment-RA in the public hospital chosen as the reference in the Public Health Network in the Federal District-HRAS, Brazil. METHODS: For thirty days, 51 women of the 56 who went to the HRAS for infertility treatment were interviewed by a questionnaire including 10 objective questions related to the topic. RESULTS: This trial was divided into two groups. The first, the "control group", comprised 27 patients recently sent to the reference public hospital from local health care centers or a regional hospital. The second, the "study group", comprising 24 women already diagnosed by the medical staff of HRAS and in the waiting line for "in vitro" fertilization. According to the input provided by the two groups, results show that the average waiting time for treatment is so long that women actually age during this time and face the risk of having a dangerous pregnancy before they receive treatment. CONCLUSION: These results show that women unable to pay for treatment in a private fertilization clinic have a poorer chance of achieving RA: the health problem concerning this specific population ignores redressing or income distribution processes. Data show that, notwithstanding, this waiting period imposed by the State, expectations of the patients waiting for RA are reinforced. There is no basis to provide information about the waiting time. The unpredictable availability of the medication needed for in vitro fertilization, jeopardizes the future of this service offering the treatment.

[The physician when facing diagnosis and prognosis of advanced cancer]. / O médico frente ao diagnóstico e prognóstico do câncer avançado.

UNLABELLED: Biotechnological scientific progress has brought about some misunderstanding between advances and ethical decisions. The physician-patient relationship when facing seriously ill patients has been altered. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the physician's attitude when facing disclosure to patient, family or both of cancer diagnosis and prognosis including also a bioethical analysis about the conflicts between beneficence, respect for patient autonomy and paternalism. METHODS: Thirty-eight physicians responsible for neoplasic patients in a tertiary hospital were interviewed. The questionnaire was structured in two different parts. The first, with general information about the physicians and the second, with specific questions about diagnosis and prognosis disclosure to the patient, evaluating also the physician's comprehension of beneficence. RESULTS: Although most physicians (97.4%) inform the diagnosis to their patients in cases of fatal diseases, 50.0% rely on the family for support. In cases of fatal prognosis, 63.1% tell only the families while 31.6% prefer to tell only the patients. The study showed that physicians misunderstand beneficence and paternalism. CONCLUSION: Physicians normally disclose diagnosis to their patients. When they run out of therapeutic resources, their attitudes become conflicting in relation to the principles of beneficence and autonomy. The number of physicians who believe in paternalism as a form of beneficence is still significant. The paternalistic attitude arises especially when therapeutic resources no longer seem to really solve the problem.