Time course of 75%-100% efficacy response of adjunctive brivaracetam.

BACKGROUND: Time to sustained seizure frequency reduction can provide clinically meaningful epilepsy outcomes. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To examine the time course of brivaracetam (BRV) efficacy in adults with focal seizures and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). METHODS: Post hoc analysis of data pooled from three randomized controlled trials of oral adjunctive BRV in adults with epilepsy. Patients with focal epilepsy and a subpopulation with FBTCS receiving BRV 50, 100, or 200 mg/d (initiated without up-titration) or placebo for 12 weeks were analyzed for time to sustained ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% seizure reduction without interruption from first day until trial ends. RESULTS: Evaluation included 1160 patients with focal seizures, including 352 patients with FBTCS. Sustained ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% response in focal seizures was higher from day 1 for BRV 100 and 200 mg/d vs placebo (P < .01). Sustained ≥75% and 100% FBTCS reduction from day 1 was higher for BRV 100 and 200-mg/d groups vs placebo (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients achieving 75%-100% sustained seizure frequency reduction (all focal seizure types and the subpopulation with FBTCS) with oral BRV (100 or 200 mg/d) achieved this response on the first-treatment day.

Safety and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in epilepsy: In-depth pooled analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to provide a comprehensive analysis of safety data for adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV), an antiepileptic drug (AED) of the racetam class, for treatment of focal seizures in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Data were pooled from two phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging trials (N01114 [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00175929], N01193 [NCT00175825]) and three phase III, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 12-week trials (N01252 [NCT00490035], N01253 [NCT00464269], and N01358 [NCT01261325]) in patients aged ≥16 years with focal seizures, as well as a phase III, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 16-week trial in patients aged ≥16 years with focal or generalized epilepsy (N01254 [NCT00504881]). Data are presented for the approved therapeutic dose range of 50-200 mg/day. Data for BRV administered intravenously (25-150 mg doses) were pooled separately from one phase III trial (N01258 NCT01405508]) and two clinical pharmacology trials (N01256 [Part B] [UCB Pharma, data on file]; EP0007 [NCT01796899]). Adverse events (AEs) of interest were summarized in relevant categories. RESULTS: The safety pool comprised 1957 patients: 1271 receiving adjunctive BRV and 686 receiving placebo. Overall, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 66.9% with BRV versus 62.8% with placebo. The most frequently reported TEAEs with BRV (≥5% of patients) versus placebo were somnolence (13.3% vs. 7.9%), headache (10.5% vs. 11.5%), dizziness (10.0% vs. 7.0%), and fatigue (8.2% vs. 4.2%). Incidence of psychiatric disorder-related TEAEs was 11.3% with BRV versus 8.2% with placebo. Behavioral disorder-related TEAE incidence was low (4.0% with BRV vs. 2.5% with placebo). Irritability was reported in 2.7% of BRV-treated patients vs. 1.5% of patients receiving placebo; anger, aggression, and agitation were each reported by ≤1% of patients receiving BRV. Treatment-emergent adverse events potentially associated with psychosis were psychotic disorder (three patients on BRV vs. two patients on placebo), auditory hallucination, illusion, visual hallucination (one patient each on BRV), epileptic psychosis, and hallucination (one patient each on placebo). No additional safety concerns were identified in patients with intravenous (IV) BRV administration (n = 104). CONCLUSIONS: These safety data for adjunctive BRV support its acceptable safety and tolerability profile.

Time course of drug-related treatment-emergent adverse side effects of brivaracetam.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in clinical trials are typically reported for the full duration of the treatment period including titration and maintenance. Drug-related central nervous system (CNS) TEAEs are common with antiseizure medications (ASMs) and can affect drug tolerability. In this report, we test the hypothesis that drug-related CNS TEAEs have early onset and decrease with time. Unlike prior ASM clinical trials, a novel design was used for brivaracetam (BRV) without initial drug titration allowing assessment of habituation to TEAEs separate from dose titration. METHODS: Data were pooled from three studies (N01252 [NCT00490035], N01253 [NCT00464269], N01358 [NCT01261325]) in adult patients (≥16 years of age) with focal seizures receiving BRV adjunctive therapy. This post hoc analysis reports data on the prevalence and incidence of all drug-related CNS TEAEs and all TEAEs over time in patients who received BRV doses of 50-200 mg/day (without titration) vs. placebo during a 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: A total of 1262 patients received the following: placebo (n = 459), BRV 50 mg/day (n = 200), BRV 100 mg/day (n = 353), and BRV 200 mg/day (n = 250). Both the incidence (p < .0001) and prevalence (p < .0001) of drug-related CNS TEAEs (all with frequency ≥ 5%) changed across time with peak TEAEs in week 1 then significantly reducing over the first 6 weeks for prevalence and the first 3 weeks for incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-related CNS TEAEs occurred early and substantially habituated over several weeks. TEAEs of ASMs might be better represented by division into early and late phases to guide clinician monitoring and patient expectations.

Long-term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: A large-scale, double-blind trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) demonstrated that lacosamide was noninferior to controlled-release carbamazepine (carbamazepine-CR) in terms of efficacy, and well tolerated as first-line monotherapy in patients (≥16 years of age) with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We report primary safety outcomes from the double-blind extension of the noninferiority trial (SP0994; NCT01465997) and post hoc analyses of pooled long-term safety and efficacy data from both trials. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to lacosamide or carbamazepine-CR. Doses were escalated (lacosamide: 200/400/600 mg/d; carbamazepine-CR: 400/800/1200 mg/d) based on seizure control. Eligible patients continued randomized treatment in the extension. Primary outcomes of the extension were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and discontinuations due to TEAEs. Post hoc analyses of data from combined trials included 12- and 24-month seizure freedom and TEAEs by number of comorbid conditions. RESULTS: A total of 886 patients were treated in the initial trial and 548 in the extension; 211 of 279 patients (75.6%) on lacosamide and 180/269 (66.9%) on carbamazepine-CR completed the extension. In the extension, 181 patients (64.9%) on lacosamide and 182 (67.7%) on carbamazepine-CR reported TEAEs; in both groups, nasopharyngitis, headache, and dizziness were most common. Serious TEAEs were reported by 32 patients (11.5%) on lacosamide and 22 (8.2%) on carbamazepine-CR; 12 (4.3%) and 21 (7.8%) discontinued due to TEAEs. In the combined trials (median exposure: lacosamide 630 days; carbamazepine-CR 589 days), Kaplan-Meier estimated proportions of patients with 12- and 24-month seizure freedom from first dose were 50.8% (95% confidence interval 46.2%-55.4%) and 47.0% (42.2%-51.7%) on lacosamide, and 54.9% (50.3%-59.6%) and 50.9% (46.0%-55.7%) on carbamazepine-CR. Incidences of drug-related TEAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs increased by number of comorbid conditions and were lower in patients on lacosamide. SIGNIFICANCE: Long-term (median ~2 years) lacosamide monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Seizure freedom rates were similar with lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR.

Progressive Supranuclear palsy (PSP) disease progression, management, and healthcare resource utilization: a retrospective observational study in the US and Canada.

BACKGROUND: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a rare neurodegenerative brain disease with rapid progression and currently limited treatment options. A comprehensive understanding of disease progression, management, and healthcare resource utilization is limited, and further research is challenging due to the small population of patients. To address these challenges in conducting PSP research, individuals with PSP were recruited using a multichannel approach tailored specifically to the PSP community. We performed a retrospective observational study using data abstracted from participant medical records collected from multiple patient care centers. RESULTS: Seventy-two individuals with PSP were eligible for inclusion. On average, 144 medical documents per participant were collected from an average of 2.9 healthcare centers per participant, with a mean study period of 7.9 years. Among participants with a date of symptom onset documented in the medical records, the median time for the onset of the first fall was 2.0 years (IQR 3.2) before diagnosis, the median onset of unsteady gait or gait impairment was 1.2 years (IQR 1.8) before diagnosis, and the median onset of mobility problems was 0.8 years (IQR 1.8) before diagnosis. The most widely utilized healthcare resources, with at least 85% of participants using each of these resources at some point during the disease course, were medications (100%), imaging (99%), assistive devices (90%), supportive care (86%), and surgeries and procedures (85%). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study adds to the current understanding of PSP symptoms, comorbidities, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) across the disease journey. By involving individuals with PSP and their caregivers or legally authorized representatives in the research process, this study was unique in its approach to participant recruitment and enabled individuals to participate in research without the need for travel. We collected medical documents from multiple healthcare centers, allowing for broad data collection covering the entire disease journey. This approach to the collection of real-world data may be used to generate valuable insights into many aspects of disease progression and management in PSP and many other rare diseases.

ESPERA study: applicability of the new ILAE criteria for antiepileptic drug resistance of focal epilepsies in current clinical practice.

A European observational cross-sectional study, ESPERA, was conducted in France and Spain in 2010. A random sample of neurologists, including specialists in epilepsy, prospectively enrolled adult patients treated for focal epilepsy with at least two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in combination. Investigators were asked to classify AED responsiveness of each enrolled patient according to the new 2009 ILAE criteria. These classifications were then reviewed by three experts. Potential factors of misclassification were then analyzed in order to evaluate the applicability of the new ILAE criteria for antiepileptic drug resistance in current clinical practice. Because of their complexity, use of the new ILAE criteria needs to be supported by relevant information and training to be adequately applied by neurologists in everyday practice.

The Burden of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy on Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Systems by PSP Phenotype: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a rare, relentlessly progressive, ultimately fatal neurodegenerative brain disease. The objective of this study was to assess the burden of PSP on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems by PSP phenotype. Data were drawn from the Adelphi PSP Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional study of neurologists and people living with PSP in the United States of America, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. All people living with PSP with a reported phenotype were included. PSP phenotype was reported for 242 patients (mean age: 70.2 years, 58% male): PSP-Richardson's syndrome, n = 96; PSP-predominant Parkinsonism, n = 88; PSP-predominant corticobasal syndrome, n = 28; PSP-predominant speech/language disorder, n = 12; PSP-progressive gait freezing, n = 9; PSP-predominant frontal presentation, n = 9. Most patients reported impaired cognitive, motor, behavioral and ocular functionality; 67-100% of patients (across phenotypes) had moderate-to-severe disease at the time of data collection. Post-diagnosis, the majority were provided with a visual and/or mobility aid (55-100%, across phenotypes), and/or required home modification to facilitate their needs (55-78%, across phenotypes). Patients required multiple types of healthcare professionals for disease management (mean 3.6-4.4, across phenotypes), and the majority reported receiving care from at least one caregiver (mean 1.3-1.8, across phenotypes). There is a high burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems across all PSP phenotypes. Although phenotypes manifest different symptoms and are associated with different diagnostic pathways, once diagnosed with PSP, patients typically receive similar care.

Safety and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in children with focal seizures: Interim analysis of pooled data from two open-label trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in children with epilepsy. METHODS: This was an interim analysis (cut-off March 15, 2017) of pooled data from two open-label, single-arm, multicentre trials. N01263 (NCT00422422) was a 3-week trial of BRV 0.8-4 mg/kg/day in patients (1 month-<16 years) with epilepsy. Patients who completed this trial could continue into a long-term follow-up trial (N01266, NCT01364597) which also directly enrolled patients (4-<17 years) with focal seizures. After dose-escalation, patients received BRV 1-5 mg/kg/day (maximum 200 mg/day) during long-term evaluation. Data are reported for patients aged 4 to <16 years with focal seizures. RESULTS: The safety set comprised 149 patients: 34 from the initial trial (26 entered long-term trial) and 115 directly enrolled into the long-term trial. At the cut-off, 90 patients were receiving BRV (total exposure: 299.4 patient-years). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 140/149 (94.0%) patients, most commonly (≥20%) nasopharyngitis (24.8%), pharyngitis (22.1%), convulsion (21.5%), and pyrexia (20.1%). TEAEs considered drug-related by the investigator were reported by 56/149 (37.6%) patients, most commonly somnolence (6.0%). Two patients died; neither death was considered related to BRV. Mean changes from baseline in child behaviour rating scales were small; most patients remained in their baseline category. CONCLUSION: In this pooled analysis of two open-label trials including long-term data, adjunctive BRV was generally well tolerated in children aged 4 to <16 years with focal seizures. These findings supported approval of BRV as a new therapy option for children aged ≥4 years with focal seizures.

Tolerability and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and concomitant psychiatric conditions: Post hoc analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

Psychiatric comorbidities are common in patients with epilepsy. A double-blind noninferiority monotherapy trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) enrolled newly diagnosed patients (≥16 years) with focal or generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lacosamide or carbamazepine controlled-release (carbamazepine-CR). Here, we report data from an exploratory post hoc analysis of patients who reported ongoing psychiatric conditions (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities System Organ Class). Of 886 treated patients in the trial, 126 (14.2%; 64 on lacosamide; 62 on carbamazepine-CR) reported at least one ongoing psychiatric condition at screening, most commonly depression (38.1%), insomnia (27.8%), and anxiety (26.2%). In this subgroup, 32/64 (50.0%) patients on lacosamide and 22/62 (35.5%) on carbamazepine-CR completed the trial. The most common reasons for discontinuation in patients on lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR were adverse events (10.9%, 24.2%) and lack of efficacy (18.8%, 11.3%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 52 (81.3%) of patients on lacosamide and 56 (90.3%) of patients on carbamazepine-CR, most commonly (≥10% patients in either treatment group; lacosamide, carbamazepine-CR) dizziness (12.5%, 16.1%), headache (12.5%, 14.5%), nasopharyngitis (12.5%, 9.7%), fatigue (7.8%, 14.5%), nausea (7.8%, 11.3%), somnolence (1.6%, 12.9%), and gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (1.6%, 12.9%). Overall, 15 (23.4%) lacosamide-treated and 10 (16.1%) carbamazepine-CR treated patients reported psychiatric TEAEs, most commonly (≥3 patients in either treatment group; lacosamide, carbamazepine-CR) depression (4.7%, 0) and anxiety (3.1%, 6.5%). There were no reports of psychotic disorder, epileptic psychosis, acute psychosis, or serious psychiatric TEAEs. Stratified Kaplan-Meier estimates for 6- and 12-month seizure freedom at the last evaluated dose were similar with lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR (6 months 81.0%, 75.6%; 12 months 62.5%, 66.6%). A higher proportion of patients on lacosamide than carbamazepine-CR completed 6 (67.2%, 45.2%) and 12 months (50.0%, 37.1%) of treatment at the last evaluated dose without a seizure. This exploratory post hoc analysis indicated that lacosamide monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and concomitant psychiatric conditions. In this subpopulation, lacosamide showed similar efficacy and numerically better effectiveness than carbamazepine-CR.

A review of the pharmacology and clinical efficacy of brivaracetam.

Brivaracetam (BRV; Briviact) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in adults. BRV is a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle 2A (SV2A) with 15- to 30-fold higher affinity than levetiracetam, the first AED acting on SV2A. It has high lipid solubility and rapid brain penetration, with engagement of the target molecule, SV2A, within minutes of administration. BRV has potent broad-spectrum antiepileptic activity in animal models. Phase I studies indicated BRV was well tolerated and showed a favorable pharmacokinetic profile over a wide dose range following single (10-1,000 mg) and multiple (200-800 mg/day) oral dosing. Three pivotal Phase III studies have demonstrated promising efficacy and a good safety and tolerability profile across doses of 50-200 mg/day in the adjunctive treatment of refractory focal seizures. Long-term data indicate that the response to BRV is sustained, with good tolerability and retention rate. BRV is highly effective in patients experiencing secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Safety data to date suggest a favorable psychiatric adverse effect profile in controlled studies, although limited postmarketing data are available. BRV is easy to use, with no titration and little drug-drug interaction. It can be initiated at target dose with no titration. Efficacy is seen on day 1 of oral use in a significant percentage of patients. Intravenous administration in a 2-minute bolus and 15-minute infusion is well tolerated. Here, we review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical data of BRV.

Conversion to brivaracetam monotherapy for the treatment of patients with focal seizures: Two double-blind, randomized, multicenter, historical control, Phase III studies.

Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for monotherapy (in the USA) and adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in adults, at a dose range of 50-200 mg/day taken in two equal doses, with a recommended starting dose of 100 mg/day. Two Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, historical-controlled, conversion-to-monotherapy studies (N01276, NCT00698581; N01306, NCT00699283) were conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of conversion to BRV 50 mg/day monotherapy in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures. Patients aged 16-75 years, with 2-40 focal seizures per 4 weeks during an 8-week baseline, and on stable doses of 1-2 AEDs were enrolled. Patients were randomized to BRV 50 or 100 mg/day (3:1) in two equal doses without titration. The treatment period comprised 1-week BRV add-on, 8-week baseline AED tapering, and 8-week BRV monotherapy periods. Primary efficacy endpoint was Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative exit rate due to pre-defined exit criteria at Day 112 (50 mg/day, efficacy population). The upper 95% confidence interval (CI) was compared with the historical control threshold (0.722). Safety and tolerability assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; intent-to-treat population). After randomization of 150 patients (N01276: 88; N01306: 62), both studies were terminated due to the confounding effects of a higher-than-expected discontinuation rate. For BRV 50 mg/day, ≥1 exit criterion was met by 26/67 (38.8%) patients (study N01276) and 18/45 (40.0%) patients (study N01306). In both studies, the cumulative exit rate was lower than the historical control threshold (N01276: 0.487, 95% CI 0.347, 0.626; N01306: 0.474, 95% CI 0.310, 0.638). However, with maximum 10% censoring due to early withdrawal (sensitivity analysis), cumulative exit rates were above historical control (N01276: 0.652, 95% CI 0.532, 0.772; N01306: 0.704, 95% CI 0.563, 0.844). Overall incidence of TEAEs was 110/150, 73.3% (treatment period); 78/147, 53.1% (baseline AED tapering period); 41/84, 48.8% (BRV monotherapy period). In conclusion, BRV 50 mg/day monotherapy demonstrated an exit rate lower than historical control. Results should be interpreted with caution as, following termination of both studies, patient numbers were too low to evaluate the efficacy of BRV monotherapy. These are the first published safety and tolerability data for BRV monotherapy. Monotherapy was well tolerated, with a relatively low incidence of TEAEs, though this should be interpreted with the caveat that the majority of common TEAEs were likely to have occurred earlier in the course of treatment with BRV. No new safety concerns were identified, supporting the favorable safety profile of BRV observed in adjunctive studies.