Standard versus personalized schedule of regorafenib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Despite its proven activity as third-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), regorafenib can present a poor tolerability profile which often leads to treatment modifications and transient or permanent discontinuation; thus, in clinical practice physicians usually adopt various dosing and interval schedules to counteract regorafenib-related adverse events and avoid treatment interruption. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of personalized schedules of regorafenib in patients with metastatic GIST, in comparison with the standard schedule (160 mg daily, 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Institutional registries across seven Italian reference centers were retrospectively reviewed and data of interest retrieved to identify patients with GIST who had received regorafenib from February 2013 to January 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test to make comparisons. RESULTS: Of a total of 152 patients with GIST, 49 were treated with standard dose, while 103 received personalized schedules. At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.73-11.0 months] versus 9.7 months (95% CI 7.9-14.5 months) in the standard-dose and the personalized schedule groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.75; P = 0.00052]. Median overall survival was 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-21.8 months) versus 20.5 months (95% CI 15.0-25.4 months), respectively (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.22; P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib-personalized schedules are commonly adopted in daily clinical practice of high-volume GIST expert centers and correlate with significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, regorafenib treatment optimization in patients with GIST may represent the best strategy to maximize long-term therapy.

Analytical performance and clinical decision limit of a new release for cardiac troponin I assay.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponins (cTns) are the 'gold standard' biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome. Analytical performance is critical at low concentrations of cTn, and many of the current assays do not meet the guideline requirement of a 10% coefficient of variation (CV) at the 99th percentile concentrations. The aim of the study was to establish if the newly released Access® AccuTnI®+3 (AccuTnI+3) cardiac troponin I assay (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA) reached this objective. METHODS: All AccuTnI+3 assays were performed on UniCel® DxI800 analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc). Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) were determined according to Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute EP17-A and EP5-A2 protocols. The 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) was determined by analysing serum samples from 330 apparently healthy blood donors (260 men, 70 women, age range 18-70 years, median age 36 years). RESULTS: LoB and LoD values were 2.6 and 12 ng/L, respectively. The 10% CV was at 18 ng/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 8-25). The 99th percentile URL was 22 ng/L (95% CI 11-34). CONCLUSIONS: The newly released assay has improved low-end analytical performance and reaches the goal of having a total imprecision ≤ 10% at 99th percentile of a healthy reference population (guideline acceptable). With this assay, it is now possible to utilize the 99th percentile as decision level for myocardial injury detection.

Capecitabine, a new oral fluoropyrimidine for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Capecitabine (Xeloda)(R) was developed as a tumour-selective fluoropyrimidine carbamate to achieve higher intratumoural 5-FU level and lower toxicity than 5-FU. Capecitabine passes unchanged through the gastrointestinal tract and is metabolised in the liver to 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR). Here it is converted to doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) and finally, 5'-DFUR is metabolised by thymidine phosphorilase to 5-FU at the tumour site. Preclinical studies have demonstrated capecitabine's activity in both 5-FU-sensitive and 5-FU-resistant tumours. In a randomised phase II trial in advanced colorectal cancer the recommended dose and schedule of Capecitabine is 2.510 mg/m(2)/day (total dose divided into two equal morning and evening doses) given in an intermittent schedule (2 weeks on/1 week off). Phase III trials in patients with advanced colorectal cancer show a better response rate than the Mayo Clinic schedule, with no differences in terms of DR, PFS. Diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome were the principal grade 3/4 toxicities noted, occurring in 10% and 16% of patients, respectively. The selectivity of this drug opens an important prospective in the treatment of colorectal cancer in advanced and adjuvant setting.

Decreased myelotoxicity of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with cisplatin infusion on day 15.

In a multicenter phase II Italian trial that used a 28-day dosing schedule of gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin on day 2, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the main dose-limiting toxicities observed. The aim of the present study was to determine whether using 15-day cisplatin in lieu of the standard 2-day schedule in combination with weekly gemcitabine would decrease expected myelotoxicities, particularly thrombocytopenia. Fifty-one patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a median age of 62 years (range 31-76) and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scores of 0-1, were enrolled. Twenty-four patients had stage IIIA-B disease and 27 had stage IV. Patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day-15, every 28 days for a total of 151 cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 16% of patients, grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 35% of patients, and grade 3 anemia in 4% of patients (no grade 4 anemia). Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Two patients had grade 3 vomiting, and another had grade 4 hepatic toxicity only after gemcitabine administration. The dose intensity of gemcitabine and cisplatin was well maintained. Of the 45 patients evaluable for response, there were 22 (49%) partial responders, 7 (15.5%) minimal responders, 9 (20%) with stable disease, and 7 (15.5%) progressions. Compared with the schedule used in a multicenter phase II Italian trial (day 2 cisplatin), day-15 cisplatin decreases incidences of thrombocytopenia (16 vs. 52%) and anemia (4 vs. 25%); the occurrence of neutropenia is similar (35 vs. 36%). Response rates are also similar (49 vs. 54%).

Modulation of fluorouracil by methotrexate, leucovorin, and cisplatin (M-FLP) in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC).

The objective of this trial was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin, methotrexate, and platinum in patients with advanced measurable disease. Thirty-five patients with histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with methotrexate (100 mg/m2 in 500 ml 5% dextrose in a 2-hour infusion, day 1), 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day, i.v. in continuous infusion from days 2 to 5) plus 1-leucovorin (7.5 mg/m2 given per os every 6 hours, from days 2 to 5) and platinum (60 mg/m2 i.v., day 2), every 28 days. Four partial responses (12%; exact 95% confidence interval: 1-23%) were obtained in 34 evaluable patients with a median survival time of 49 weeks (range, 20-77 weeks). Ten (29%) of 34 patients had stable disease. Median time to treatment failure from the beginning of therapy was 11 weeks (range, 4-59 weeks) and median survival time was 20 weeks (range, 4-77 weeks). The most common grade III-IV toxicities were diarrhea (15%), stomatitis (41%), and vomiting (17%). Hematologic toxicity was mild. There were no therapy-related deaths. In conclusion, this trial did not report an increase or improvement in response rate and survival rates, and this regimen cannot be recommended as effective therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

High-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil alone or combined with hydroxyurea in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

Patients with histologically confirmed advanced colorectal cancer were randomized to receive folinic acid (FA; 500 mg/mq in 2-hour intravenous infusion) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU; 600 mg/mq given as an intravenous bolus 1 hour after FA), beginning every week for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period, either without hydroxyurea (HU, arm A) or with HU (35 mg/kg per day) given orally in three administrations (every 8 hours) starting 6 hours after 5FU administration (arm B). Six weekly doses were considered one course. One hundred eighty-two patients were randomized in this trial and 162 (89%) were evaluable for response: 81 patients in arm A and 81 patients in arm B. Objective response was observed in 18 (one complete response and 17 partial responses) of 81 evaluable patients (22%; 95% confidence interval, 13-31%) in arm A, and 24 (nine complete responses and 15 partial responses) of 81 patients (30%; 95% confidence interval, 20-40%) in arm B. There was no difference in terms of median time to progression and median survival. Gastrointestinal toxicity was the most frequently observed toxicity in both arms. The double modulation of 5FU, FA plus HU does not appear to be better than the classic 5FU plus FA schedule. This trial confirms that 5FU and FA reached a plateau of 20% to 30%.

[Adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer]. / La terapia adiuvante nel carcinoma gastrico.

In Western countries gastric cancer represents the third cause of death even if in the last twenty years the epidemiology of disease has changed. Surgery remains the treatment of choice and overall survival is still 7-15%. Survival data after curative resection are higher in Japan than in Western countries due to a substantial different surgical approach and "early" diagnosis. In both countries adjuvant treatment has been developed to increase the survival rate and different schedules and polipharmacological schemes have been tested. In Japanese trials a statistical significance in survival was observed with chemoimmunotherapy using chemotherapy as control arm. In Western countries data are not conclusive: most trial used surgery as control arm and sample size was not sufficient to show a significant difference between the two arms. The meta-analysis performed up to now have shown a trend of advantage in survival with adjuvant chemotherapy and many objections can be raised concerning the methodology of the same. In fact there are different types of meta-analyses according to whether they are based on the literature (MAL) or individual patient data (MAP or IPD meta-analysis). With an IPD meta-analysis a search is not only done in the literature for all relevant published trials, but also in the scientific community unpublished trials. For all trials, whether published or not, individual patient data on the endpoint of interest are obtained from the investigators. No meta-analysis performed up to now has adopted this methodology. Recently, combined therapy (CT/RT) has shown interesting results with an increase in DFS and OS. At the moment trials results are not sufficient to consider adjuvant chemotherapy the standard treatment: other large trials are required and a combined approach such as RT, IP chemotherapy, neoadjuvant plus adjuvant chemotherapy may be a future research possibility.

[Possibilities of palliation in pancreatic cancer]. / Possibilità di palliazione nel carcinoma pancreatico.

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is the cause of 3-4% of cancer related deaths in Italy and over 80% of all patients exhibit advanced disease. Treatment with surgery and chemio-radiotherapy may have meaningful results in resectable and locoregional tumours respectively. Chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in metastatic disease as palliative intent, although pancreatic tumour is considered resistant to treatment with conventional cytotoxicity drugs. Assessment of response of primary tumor is extremely difficult because of its anatomical location and fibrotic reaction around the tumor. Furthermore, medical problems associated with the age of patients, reduced performance status (PS), mainourished conditions, jaundice and pain, limit patients' tolerance and response to chemotherapy. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most frequently used drug in the treatment of pancreatic cancer with a RR of 28% in the trials performed in mid 1980, while more recently studies have reported a RR of 5-15%. Biochemical modulation of 5-FU by leucovorin, PALA and interferon does not appear to produce better results than 5-FU alone. 5-FU-based combination chemotherapy (FAM, SMF, etc) have shown interesting results in phase II (30-40%), but in a randomized trial the results of combination were similar to 5-FU alone (< 15%). Also, regimens containing platinum gave disappointing results just as the other combinations and cannot be recommended outside prospective clinical trials. When chemotherapy was compared to best supportive care (BSC), the results demonstrated a survival gain. Six studies, comparing chemotherapy versus BSC and 3 trials showed statistically significant difference in survival for patients treated with chemotherapy. Recently, new drugs have been introduced in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumour (gemcitabine, CPT11, raltitrexed, taxanes, etc.). Gemcitabine is a novel nucleoside analogue that has shown a very favourable toxicity profile and RR of 10-15% in advanced pancreatic cancer. Data from a phase II and randomized comparative trials suggest that gemcitabine offers an advantage over 5-FU in terms of improvement of PS and general clinical symptoms. Given the difficulty of accurate tumor measurement in this disease, some authors introduced a novel new end-point to evaluate the response: clinical benefit (CB). In a randomized trial of gemcitabine vs. 5-FU, RR using CB was 23.8 with gemcitabine and 4.8 with 5-FU, this difference was statistically significant with a median survival of 5.6 and 4.4 months, respectively. In conclusion, future studies should focus on phase III trials with gemcitabine, alone or in combination and phase II with new promising drugs. Quality of life, pharmaco-economic studies, CB should be the principal end-point of these studies. All patients with advanced pancreatic cancer should be included in clinical cooperative trials.

5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without ifosfamide in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II randomized trial.

AIM: This phase II trial evaluated the biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) with or without ifosfamide (IFO) in chemotherapy-naive patients with colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients were randomized to receive: FA (25 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), followed by 5-FU (750 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), arm A; or FA (25 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), followed by 5-FU (750 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3) plus IFO (2,000 mg/m2 in 1000 mL 5% dextrose in a 2-hr infusion, days 1 to 3), arm B. Mesna was added during and after IFO to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis. Treatment was repeated every 21 days in both arms. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were assessable for response: in arm A, 5 patients achieved a partial response (overall response, 25%), and in arm B, 2 patients achieved a complete and 1 a partial response (overall response, 12%). Time to failure was 3.5 months (range, 1-38) in patients treated with 5-FU plus FA, and 3 months (range, 1-21) in patients treated with the IFO combination. The median survival time was 13.5 months (range, 1-49 months) in arm A and 16 months (range, 1-43 months) in arm B. Diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting were the most common nonhematologic toxicities in both arms. The most notable hematologic toxicity was leukopenia; 15% and 20% of patients experienced grade 4 in arm A and arm B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IFO does not increase the activity of the 5-FU plus FA combination in advanced colorectal cancer.

Weekly paclitaxel plus capecitabine in advanced breast cancer patients: dose-finding trial of GOIRC and GOL.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel and capecitabine have demonstrated a synergic effect and significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer. A weekly schedule of paclitaxel obtained a response rate of 50-68% in advanced breast cancer and less serious side-effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with chemotherapy were enrolled in a dose-finding trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of paclitaxel given on days 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle combined with capecitabine given twice daily from day 1 through day 14, every 21 days. Three patients were recruited at one of six dose levels (paclitaxel 70-100 mg/m2, capecitabine 1650-2500 mg/m2). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were accrued and 31 were evaluated for toxicity. One DLT has been experienced at level VI as diarrhea grade 3. We determined dose level V as the MTD, but we recommend dose level IV for phase II studies (capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally twice daily plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously weekly), owing to cumulative toxicity at level V. The objective response rate was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel plus capecitabine is a safety and active chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

Gemcitabine with or without continuous infusion 5-FU in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised phase II trial of the Italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC).

This study was performed to determine the activity of adding continuous infusion (CI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to gemcitabine (GEM) vs GEM alone in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). In all, 94 chemo-naïve patients with APC were randomised to receive GEM alone (arm A: 1000 mg m(-2) per week for 7 weeks followed by a 2 week rest period, then weekly for 3 consecutive weeks out of every 4 weeks) or in combination with CI 5-FU (arm B: CI 5-FU 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 6 weeks followed by a 2 week rest period, then for 3 weeks every 4 weeks). Overall response rate (RR) was the primary end point and criteria for decision were planned according to the Simon's optimal two-stage design. The overall RR was 8% (arm A) and 11% (arm B) (95% confidence interval: 0.5-16% and 2-22%), respectively, and stable disease was 29 and 28%. The median duration of RR was 34 weeks (range 25-101 weeks) for GEM and 26 weeks (range 16-46 weeks) for the combination. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14 weeks (range 2-65 weeks) and 18 weeks (range 4-51 weeks), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 31 weeks (range 1-101 weeks) and 30 weeks (1-101 weeks). Toxicity was mild in both arms. This study does not show promising activity in terms of RR, PFS and OS for the double combination arm in APC.