Optimizing decision-making process of benign uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture treatment after radical cystectomy.

PURPOSE: To identify preoperative predictors of endo-urological treatment (EUT) failure while promoting a new diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for benign uretero-enteric anastomosis stricture (UES) management after radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We relied on a prospectively maintained database including 96 individuals (122 renal units) who developed a benign UES at our institution between 1990 and 2018. UES was classified into two different types according to morphology: FP1 (i.e., sharp or duckbill) and FP2 (i.e., flat or concave). EUT feasibility, success rate, as well as intra and postoperative complications were recorded. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) assessed for predictors of EUT failure. RESULTS: Overall, 78 (63.9%) and 32 (26.3%) cases were defined as FP1 and FP2, respectively. EUT was not feasible in 33 (27.1%) cases. After a median follow-up of 50 (IQR 5-240) months, successful treatment was reached only in 15/122 (12.3%) cases. EUT success rates raised when considering short (< 1 cm) (16.8%), FP1 morphology (16.7%) strictures, or the combination of these characteristics (22.4%). Overall, 5 (5.2%) cases had CD ≥ III complications. FP2 (OR: 1.91, 95%CI 1.21-5.31, p = 0.03) and stricture length ≥ 1 cm (OR: 9.08, 95%CI 2.09-65.71, p = 0.009) were associated with treatment failure at MVA. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment for benign UES after RC is feasible but harbors a low success rate. Stricture length and radiological morphology of the stricture are related to endoscopic treatment failure. Surgeons should be aware of the stricture features during the preoperative decision-making process to choose the optimal candidate for endoscopic treatment.

Prospective evaluation of the performances of narrow-band imaging flexible videoscopy relative to white-light imaging flexible videoscopy, in patients scheduled for transurethral resection of a primary NMIBC.

PURPOSE: To evaluate on a lesion-by-lesion basis Narrow-Band Imaging flexible videoscopy (NBI-FV) in the detection of cancer compared to White-Light Imaging flexible videoscopy (WLI-FV). METHODS: WLI-FV and NBI-FV were sequentially performed in patients scheduled for TURBT for primary bladder cancer. Suspicious findings were individually harvested and characterized under WLI-FV (suspicious/non-suspicious) and NBI-FV (5-point Likert scale) and pathology. The primary objective was to determine if NBI-FV informed at least 20% more cancer lesions than WLI-FV (Relative true-positive rate > 1.19). A minimum of 120 specimens was to be analyzed to reach 90% power. RESULTS: Of 147 specimens taken in 68 patients, 101 were found suspicious under WLI-FV and 64 (64/101, 63.4%) confirmed as cancer. Of the 46 lesions undetected by WLI-VF, 16 were found positive for cancer (16/46, 34.8%). For NBI-FV, a significant increase in positive samples was observed with increments in Likert scale (p < 0.0002). Relative true-positive rate was 1.22 (95% CI 1.12-1.39)-NBI-FV detected 22% more cancer lesions compared to WLI-FV. Relative false-positive rate was 1.35 (95% CI 1.19-1.59). CONCLUSION: Researching alterations in mucosa and microvasculature by narrow-band imaging flexible videoscopy augmented by 22% the detection of cancer foci and contributed to the objective of complete resection of all visible lesions. Conversely, it entailed a 35% increase in false-positive results compared to white-light imaging, although the structured analysis of narrow-band imaging findings might be used to grade suspicion according to the Likert scale and balance the risk of a false-positive result to the benefit of demonstrating cancer.

ΔNp63 expression is a protective factor of progression in clinical high grade T1 bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: Several risk factors have been claimed to predict the progression of clinically high grade T1 bladder tumors. However, these factors are not specific enough to define which patients should be treated immediately with radical cystectomy. Therefore, it is critical to identify molecular markers that can help provide individualized, risk stratified decision making. Our main goal was to evaluate the role of total p63, p53 and ΔNp63 expression in cases of clinically high grade T1 bladder cancer progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total p63, p53 and ΔNp63 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 134 clinically high grade T1 tumors. We assessed clinical progression to muscle invasive disease or radical cystectomy as a patient outcome end point. Survival analysis was done for recurrence-free, progression-free, disease specific and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients (98.5%) underwent repeat transurethral resection. Cases of early progression (less than 3 months) were excluded from study to avoid under staging. Of the tumors 90 (67.2%) showed ΔNp63 expression loss. During a median followup of 62.1 months 19 patients (14.2%) progressed to muscle invasive disease. The progression rate was 21.1% in patients with tumors characterized by ΔNp63 loss but no progression was observed in those with tumors with ΔNp63 expression (p <0.001). There was no difference in the number of patients who underwent repeat transurethral resection, had associated carcinoma in situ, showed lymphovascular invasion or received followup intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin courses. CONCLUSIONS: ΔNp63 expression is a favorable prognostic factor in clinically high grade T1 bladder cancer. This marker identifies patients at low risk for progression who could benefit from conservative therapy with transurethral bladder tumor resection and bacillus Calmette-Guérin, avoiding over treatment with immediate radical cystectomy.

The role of preoperative prostatic urethral biopsy in clinical decision-making at the time of radical cystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Involvement of the prostatic urethra by bladder cancer directly impacts prognosis, risk of urethral recurrence, and timing of radical cystectomy (RC); it also affects the type of urinary diversion chosen. Both cold cup biopsies and transurethral (TUR) loop biopsies have been used to evaluate the status of the prostatic urethra. We report our 20 year experience with preoperative and intro-operative prostatic urethral biopsies in order to determine relative efficacy and associated treatment implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Columbia University urologic oncology database was reviewed and yielded 234 men who underwent preoperative endoscopic biopsies of the prostatic urethra before RC between 1990 and 2010. Two techniques were described: 1) cold cup biopsy, and 2) TUR loop biopsy. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for these respective techniques relative to the final pathological status of the prostatic urethra (PU) in the RC specimen. RESULTS: Of the 234 urethral biopsies 115 (49.1%) were cold cup and 96 (41.1%) were TUR loop biopsies. In the remaining 9.8% of patients, the technique could not be determined. Eighty-one preoperative biopsies (34.6%) revealed involvement of the urethra. No differences were observed in predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity between the two preoperative techniques. The negative predictive value (NPV) was higher than positive predictive value (PPV) for both preoperative approaches. Thirty-eight patients (16.2%) had a urethral frozen section analysis done intra-operatively. Only 1 patient (3%) had an abnormality on frozen section, being the negative predictive value (NPV) higher than the positive predictive value (PPV) for the test's ability to predict the status of the final urethral margin. Urethrectomy was performed at cystectomy in 52 patients with a positive biopsy; 15 (28.8%) of these patients ultimately had a negative PU on final pathology. Only 2/182 (1%) of the patients with an intact urethra presented with a urethral recurrence with a median follow up of 30.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative prostatic urethral biopsy does not adequately predict final prostatic urethral status at radical cystectomy. No differences in predictive capacity could be detected with either cold cup biopsy or TUR biopsy. Intra-operative biopsy of the prostatic urethra is predictive of a negative urethral margin. Simultaneous radical urethrectomy should not be performed based up on preoperative prostatic urethral biopsy results alone.

Oncologic surveillance intensity after endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The optimal oncologic surveillance in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) elected for conservative treatment is still a matter of debate. METHODS: Patients elected for endoscopic treatment of UTUC were followed up according to EAU guidelines recommendations after treatment. Bladder cancer recurrence-free survival (BCa-RFS), UTUC recurrence-free survival (UTUC-RFS), radical nephroureterectomy-free survival (RNU-FS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The crude risks of BCa and UTUC recurrences over time were estimated with the Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing method. RESULTS: Overall, 54 and 55 patients had low- and high-risk diseases, respectively. Median follow-up was 46.9 (IQR: 28.7-68.7) and 36.9 (IQR: 19.8-60.1) months in low and high-risk patients, respectively. In low-risk patients, BCa recurrence risk was more than 20% at 24 months follow-up. At 60 months, time point after which cystoscopy and imaging should be interrupted, the risk of BCa recurrence and UTUC recurrence were 14% and 7%, respectively. In high-risk patients, the risk of BCa and UTUC recurrence at 36 months was approximately 40% and 10%, respectively. Conversely, at 60 months, the risk of bladder recurrence and UTUC recurrence was 28% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For low-risk patients, cystoscopy should be performed semi-annually until 24 months, while upper tract assessment should be obtained up to 60 months, as per current EAU guidelines recommendations. For high-risk patients, upper tract assessment should be intensified to semi-annually up to 36 months, then obtained yearly. Conversely, cystoscopy should be ideally performed semi-annually until 60 months and yearly thereafter.

Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: location as a predictive factor for concomitant bladder carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the existence of predictive factors for concomitant, primary UUT-UCC and BC. Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UUT-UCC) is a pan-urothelial disease of the transitional epithelial cells. Although several studies have shown the association of bladder recurrence following UUT-UCC, little is known on the incidence of concomitant UUT-UCC and bladder cancer (BC) without previous BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 673 patients diagnosed and treated for UUT-UCC was performed. Patients with history of BC were excluded. We investigated age, sex, location of the upper tract tumor (calyx, renal pelvis, upper ureter, mid-ureter, lower ureter), multifocality, clinical symptoms, tumor grade and pathological stage. Contingency tables and chi-square test were used for categorical variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for quantitative variables. RESULTS: 450 patients eligible for inclusion were identified. Of these, 76 (17 %) presented concomitant primary UUT-UCC and BC. Location of primary UUT-UCC was in calyx and/or renal pelvis in 25 patients (34 %), upper ureter 8 (11 %) and lower ureter 37 (49 %). In 6 patients (8 %), data were missing. Concomitant BC was found in 10, 18, and 33 % of patients with primary caliceal/renal pelvis, upper ureter and lower ureter UUT-UCC, respectively. On multivariate analysis, location of UUT-UCC was the only predictive factor for concomitant bladder tumor (OR: 1.7; 95 % CI, 1.007-2.906 p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the possibility of concomitant BC in primary diagnosed patient with UUT-UCC is as high as 33 % and mainly depends on upper tract tumor location.

To drain or not to drain in uro-oncological robotic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of routine drainage insertion vs. no drainage in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was conducted through April 2022 using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eleven studies comprising 8447 RARPs and 1890 RAPNs met our inclusion criteria. Our search strategy did not identify any studies within the RARC framework. In RARP, patients without postoperative drainage had lower rate of postoperative ileus (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.74; P<0.001) and similar low-grade (Clavien 1-2, P=0.41) and high-grade (Clavien ≥3; P=0.85) complications, urinary leakage (P=0.07), pelvic hematoma (P=0.35), symptomatic lymphocele (P=0.13), fever (P=0.25), incisional hernia (P=0.31), reintervention (P=0.57), length of hospital stay (P=0.22), and readmission (P=0.74) compared with routinely drained patients. In RAPN, patients without postoperative drainage had shorter length of hospital stay (mean difference: -0.84 days, 95% CI: -1.06 to -0.63; P<0.001) and similar low-grade (P=0.94) and high-grade (P=0.31) complications, urinary leakage (P=0.49), hemorrhage (P=0.39), reintervention (P=0.69), and readmission (P=0.20) compared with routinely drained patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, patients without drainage had similar perioperative course to patients with prophylactic drain insertion after RARP and RAPN. Omission of drain insertion was associated with a lower rate of postoperative ileus for RARP and a shorter hospital stay for RAPN. In the era of robotic surgery, routine drain placement is no longer indicated in unselected patients.

Simultaneous Bilateral Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Penile Carcinoma: Surgical Setting, Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Oncological Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) plays an important role for both staging and treatment purposes in patients diagnosed with penile carcinoma (PeCa). Video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) has been introduced to reduce complications, and in those patients elected for bilateral ILND, a simultaneous bilateral VEIL (sB-VEIL) has also been proposed. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary oncological outcomes of sB-VEIL compared to consecutive bilateral VEIL (cB-VEIL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical N0-2 patients diagnosed with PeCa and treated with cB-VEIL and sB-VEIL between 2015 and 2023 at our institution were included. Modified ILND was performed in cN0 patients, while cN+ patients underwent a radical approach. Intra- and postoperative complications, operative time, time of drainage maintenance, length of hospital stay and readmission within 90 days, as well as lymph node yield, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Overall, 30 patients were submitted to B-VEIL. Of these, 20 and 10 patients underwent cB-VEIL and sB-VEIL, respectively. Overall, 16 (80%) and 7 (70%) patients were submitted to radical ILND due to cN1-2 disease in the cB-VEIL and sB-VEIL groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference emerged in terms of median nodal yield (13.5 vs. 14, p = 0.7) and median positive LNs (p = 0.9). sD-VEIL was associated with a shorter operative time (170 vs. 240 min, p < 0.01). No statistically significant difference emerged in terms of intraoperative estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, time to drainage tube removal, major complications, and hospital readmission in the cB-VEIL and sB-VEIL groups, respectively (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous bilateral VEIL is a feasible and safe technique in patients with PeCA, showing similar oncological results and shorter operative time compared to a consecutive bilateral approach. Patients with higher preoperative comorbidity burden or anesthesiological risk are those who may benefit the most from this technique.

Immediate radical cystectomy vs conservative management for high grade cT1 bladder cancer: is there a survival difference?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a survival difference exists between patients with high grade (HG) cT1 urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) receiving immediate radical cystectomy (IRC) as opposed to those choosing bladder-sparing therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1990 and August 2010, 349 patients were retrospectively identified with a diagnosis of HG cT1 UCC of the bladder. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent IRC and those treated with conservative management (CM), consisting of transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT) and intravesical therapy. IRC was defined as surgery within 90 days of HG cT1 diagnosis with no intervening transurethral resection (TUR) or intravesical therapy (IVT). Trends in patient selection and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed over consecutive decades. The primary outcome was to compare CSS among patients during consecutive decades whereby management paradigms shifted from IRC to CM. The secondary outcome was to examine whether patient selection changed over time for each respective intervention. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients underwent IRC and 236 had CM. From 1990 to 1999, only 90 patients were diagnosed with HG cT1 disease, and a majority of patients (n= 54) underwent IRC. From 2000 to 2010, only 23% (59/259) of the patients with HG cT1 underwent IRC. Despite 42.3% more patients successfully maintaining their bladder in the long-term, no difference in 5 year bladder CSS was noted between decades (77% vs 80% consecutively, P= 0.566). A subset analysis of risk factors for bladder cancer progression/recurrence demonstrated more patients with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) on TUR underwent IRC in the current era (13/59 (22.0%) vs 13/200 (6.5%), P < 0.001). These findings remain to be validated in prospective work at other institutions. CONCLUSION: Conservative management strategies are a viable treatment option within a well selected subset of patients with HG cT1 UCC.

Can we identify those patients who will benefit from prostate-sparing surgery? Predictive factors for invasive prostatic involvement by transitional cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To determine which patients may benefit from prostate-sparing surgery and which factors are predictive of invasive prostatic involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 717 men underwent radical cystoprostatectomy (RC) for bladder transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) between 1978 and 2002. Analysis of prostatic urethral involvement by transitional cell carcinoma (pTCC) and of invasive prostatic involvement by TCC was performed according to recurrence, presence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) and multifocality, previous intravesical chemotherapy, grade, stage and location of bladder tumor, presence of CIS in precystectomy transurethral resection (TUR) and indication for RC. RESULTS: pTCC was present in specimens from 140 patients (19.5%), of whom 83 (59.3%) showed invasive prostatic involvement. Tumor location at the trigone or bladder neck (p = 0.011, OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.21-4.33) and a history of CIS (p = 0.003, OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.27-3.22) were independent predictors of pTCC. Presence of a solitary T2-T3 bladder tumor was a predictive factor for invasive prostatic involvement (p = 0.001, OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.70-8.16). Neither solitary tumors nor T2-T3 bladder tumors showed significant differences in 5 year specific survival (p = 0.277 and p = 0.618 respectively) when comparing patients according to the presence of superficial or invasive prostatic involvement. Bladder tumor stage in precystectomy TUR was a predictor of disease-specific survival (p = 0.018, OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.08-2.44). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of CIS and bladder tumor location at the trigone or bladder neck are not candidates for prostate-sparing surgery. The only variables that can predict invasive prostatic involvement are the presence of a solitary T2-T3 bladder tumor at the trigone or bladder neck.

Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: State of art. / Trasplante renal asistido por robot: estado actual.

OBJECTIVES: Nowadays, Robotic assistedkidney transplantation (RAKT) is considered a lessinvasive alternative to the Open Kidney Transplantation(OKT) with several advantages such as image magnification,3D vision and articulated instruments and with arelatively short learning curve for an experienced surgeon.RAKT has shown comparable outcomes with theOKT literature data in terms of surgical and functionalresults. RAKT may decrease the complication rate, meanhospital stay, postoperative pain, and also improve aestheticoutcomes. The aim of this study was to perform asystematic review of the literature on this novel approachof KT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred ReportingItems for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)statement. The search was conducted using the databases PubMed/Medline, including as outcomes: (1) indications, (2) step-by-step technique for RAKT, (3) RAKT in special cases (4) surgical and functional outcomes,and (5) future perspectives in RAKT. RESULTS: The indications for RAKT are expanding, sothat including obese recipients, graft with multiple vesselsand graft from deceased donor. To date, the two absolute contraindications to RAKT are patients unfitfor pneumoperitoneum and presenting advanced atheromatic plaques where vessel clamping could result challenging. As far as the outcomes, the surgical and functional results are in line with the OKT experience.Complication rate is low in RAKT, particularly in terms of arterial and venous thrombosis (1%), lymphocele (3%),ureteral stricture (2%), and wound infection (0.3%). Arobotic assisted kidney auto-transplantation (RAKAT) has been recently described, as novel approach in case of complex proximal benign ureteral stenosis. Despite great advances in this field, some limits still need to be approached such as the modality to main tain the graft to a constant low temperature ( <20 ºC) and to find the proper location of arteriotomy in advanced atheromatic disease without the tactile feedback. CONCLUSION: The present review has confirmed that RAKT is as safe and feasible as OKT with comparable surgical and functional results. Complication rate is lower in RAKT than OKT and the indications are expanding quickly. Furthermore, new technologies are being introduced in order to improve the surgical performances and to expand more the indications for robotic surgery.However, a prospective randomized study in order to compare RAKT versus OKT is still required.

OBJETIVO: Hoy en día, el trasplante de riñón asistido robótico (TRAR) se considera una alternativa menos invasiva al Trasplante Renal Abierto (TRA) con varias ventajas como la imagen magnificada 3D y los instrumentos articulados. Además, con curva de aprendizaje relativamente corta para cirujanos expertos. El TRAR ha demostrado resultados quirúrgicos y funcionales comparables con los publicados sobre el TRA. El TRAR parece que disminuye la tasa de complicaciones, la estancia hospitalaria, el dolor postoperatorio y todo ello mejorando los resultados estéticos. El objetivo de este estudio es realizar una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre este abordaje quirúrgico para el trasplante renal.MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de conformidad con la declaración de Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). La búsqueda se llevó a cabo utilizando las bases de datos PubMed/Medline, incluyendo como resultados: (1) indicaciones, (2) técnica paso a paso para TRAR, (3) TRAR en casos especiales, (4) resultados quirúrgicos y funcionales, y (5) perspectivas futuras en TRAR. RESULTADOS: Las indicaciones para TRAR se están expandiendo, de modo que incluyen receptores obesos, injerto con múltiples vasos e injerto de donante fallecido. Las dos contraindicaciones absolutas el TRAR son pacientes que no puedan tolerar el pneumoperitoneo y/o que presentan placas ateromatosas lo que podría dificultar el clampaje arterial. En cuanto a los resultados, los resultados quirúrgicos y funcionales están en línea con la experiencia de OKT. La tasa de complicaciones es baja en RAKT, particularmente en lo que se refiere a trombosis arterial y venosa (1%), linfocele (3%), estenosis ureteral (2%), infección de herida quirúrgica (0,3%). Recientemente, se ha descrito el auto-trasplante renal asistido robótico como abordaje novedoso en caso de estenosis ureteral benigna compleja y localización proximal. A pesar de los grandes avances en este campo, todavía hay que abordar algunos límites comola dificultad para mantener el injerto renal a una temperatura baja constante (<20ºC) y cómo elegir el sitioa decuado donde realizar la arteriotomía en pacientes con enfermedad ateromatosa avanzada, ante la imposibilidad de palpar la arteria.CONCLUSIÓN: La presente revisión ha confirmado que TRAR es tan seguro y reproducible como el TRA con resultados quirúrgicos y funcionales comparables. La tasa de complicaciones es más baja en el TRAR y las indicaciones se están expandiendo rápidamente. Además, se están introduciendo nuevas tecnologías y nuevos dispositivos con el fin de mejorar el rendimiento quirúrgico y ampliar aun más las indicaciones para la cirugía robótica. Sin embargo, no existe y quizás sea necesario un estudio prospectivo aleatorizado para comparar los 2 abordajes.

Endoscopic exploration directly impacts clinical decision making in the management of patients with suspected upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical cystectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the use of endoscopic exploration (EE) as a routine diagnostic tool in patients with clinical suspicion of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) following radical cystectomy (RC) significantly impacts management decision-making and to describe the oncological outcomes of patients with UTUC after RC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of medical records of patients with suspicion of UTUC after RC between 2000 and 2019. Patient demographics, clinicopathological features, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 60 patients with suspicion of UTUC. After diagnostic work-up, 16 were submitted to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and 44 underwent diagnostic EE. After EE, a further 18/44 (40.9%) were submitted to RNU, while no evidence of tumor was found in 12 (27.3%) and the remaining 12 (27.3%) underwent endoscopic treatment (ET). Thus, in 24/44 (54.5%) patients the primary treatment strategy, i.e., RNU, was altered. Twenty-nine (85.3%) of the 34 patients who underwent RNU had high-grade tumors and 16 (47%) had the muscle-invasive disease. In the ET group, 6 (50%) had high-grade tumors and 10 (83.4%) had tumors less than 2 cm. The 5-year estimated recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were, respectively, 58.4% and 45.6% in the RNU group and 25% and 80.8% in the ET group. CONCLUSION: EE significantly impacts clinical decision-making in patients with suspicion of UTUC after RC, resulting in a change in treatment strategy in approximately half of the patients. UTUC following RC has a poor prognosis and although RNU is the gold standard, ET could be considered in a selected group of patients.

Endoscopic Management of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Oncologic Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in a Contemporary Cohort.

Introduction: Appropriate risk stratification and complete tumor ablation are the key factors to optimize the oncologic outcomes of patients undertaking endoscopic management for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We aimed to identify risk factors associated to tumor recurrence and progression in a contemporary cohort of patients diagnosed and treated with the latest endourologic technologies. Patients and Methods: Forty-seven patients were selected between January-2015 and March-2019 for an endoscopic management of UTUC. Last generation of digital ureteroscopes with image-enhancing technologies were used for the detection of the lesions. The retrograde approach was the most frequent access (n = 45/47). The confocal laser endomicroscopy and multiple biopsy devices were variably used according to site and tumor presentation for their characterization. Holmium and Thulium lasers were variably used, with their combination being the preferred approach in case of larger lesions. Primary endpoints included the identification of factors associated with UTUC recurrence and progression, and bladder tumor recurrence. Results: Median follow-up (FU) was 24 months (interquartile range 17-44). On multivariate analysis, bladder cancer (BC) recurrence was associated to previous contralateral UTUC (hazard ratios: 5.08 confidence interval [95% CI: 1.35-18.94], p < 0.05) and tumor size (hazard ratios: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.00-1.14], p < 0.05). UTUC recurrence was associated to incomplete clearance after primary treatment (hazard ratios: 4.99 [95% CI: 1.15-21.62], p < 0.05), while UTUC progression was significantly related to the number of UTUC recurrences (hazard ratios: 3.10 [95% CI: 1.27-7.53], p < 0.05). No significant survival differences in BC/UTUC recurrence, as well as in UTUC progression, were detected between risk groups. No Clavien-Dindo grade >2 were detected; one patient developed ureteric stricture at 7-month FU. Limitations involve retrospective nature of the study and relatively small number of patients. Conclusions: The appropriate use of latest technology may enhance the oncologic outcomes of the endoscopic management of UTUC without compromising the safety of the approach. Among the prognostic factors identified in our series, UTUC recurrence seems to be associated to disease progression.

The case for conservative management in the treatment of patients with non-muscle-invasive micropapillary bladder carcinoma without carcinoma in situ.

INTRODUCTION: Micropapillary carcinoma is a rare pathologic variant of urothelial cell carcinoma. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has been reported to be ineffective and to entail an increased risk of development of non-organ-confined, metastatic disease. We assess the treatment response and disease progression in patients with micropapillary carcinoma of the bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 18 patients with micropapillary carcinoma of the bladder who underwent transurethral resection of a bladder tumor and multiple random biopsies between 1997 and 2003. We retrospectively analyzed treatment response and clinical and pathological cancer evolution related to cancer stage and the percentage of the micropapillary component of the cancer. RESULTS: Seven of the 18 patients (38.8%) had carcinoma in situ. At diagnosis, 8 of the 18 patients had non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; 6 of these patients were treated with intravesical BCG therapy and were alive and free of disease at a median follow up of more than 5 years. Ten of the 18 patients had muscle-invasive bladder cancer; 8 of these patients underwent radical cystectomy, and 7 of the 8 patients (87.5%) had non-organ-confined disease in cystectomy specimens. Seventy percent of patients with muscle-invasive disease at diagnosis had a micropapillary carcinoma component of more than 50% in transurethral resection of the bladder specimens, compared with only 25% of patients with non-muscle-invasive disease. Patients treated successfully with intravesical BCG therapy had a low micropapillary carcinoma component. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was significantly lower in patients with muscle-invasive disease (30%) than in patients with non-muscle-invasive disease (87.5%) after a median follow up of 52 months (p = 0.001), and it was also significantly lower in patients with a high percentage of the micropapillary component of the carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study of 18 patients with micropapillary carcinoma of the bladder suggests that tumor stage and patient outcome may be related to the percentage of the micropapillary component of the carcinoma. Radical surgery is mandatory in muscle-invasive disease, even though patients with lymph node involvement die from the disease. In non-muscle-invasive disease and in the absence of associated carcinoma in situ, intravesical BCG treatment may be offered when the micropapillary component of the carcinoma component is a small percentage.

[Prostate cancer and COVID-19 pandemia: Current recommendations.] / Cáncer de próstata y la pandemia Covid-19. Recomendaciones ante una nueva realidad.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this publicationis to provide recommendations in the management of prostate cancer (PC) in a new reality framework based on the presence of COVID-19 disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The document is based on the scarce evidence on SARS/Cov-2 and the experience of the authors in handling COVID-19 in their institutions, including specialists from Andalusia, Cantabria, Catalonia, Madrid and the Valencian Community. RESULTS: The authors defined different priorities for the different clinical situations in PC. Emergency/urgency (life-threatening or urgent even in normal situation), highpriority/elective urgency (potentially dangerous if postponed for more than 1 month), intermediate/electivepriority (it is recommended not to delay more than 6 months), low priority/delayed (can be postponed more than 6 months). According to this classification, the working panel agreed on the distribution of the different diagnostic, therapeutic and follow-up scenarios for PC. The risk of severe morbidity as a result of SARS-CoV-2 infection may out weigh the risk of PC morbidity/mortalityin many men; therefore, in the short term it is unlikely that delays in diagnosis or treatment can led to worse cancer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a challenge for our health system, which raises several considerations in the treatment of patients with PC. The redistribution of surgical procedures according to the degrees of priority is essential during the period of the pandemic and the transition to the new normality. The change of the out-clinics with the adequate security measures for healthcare practitioners and patients, andt he development of a telemedicine program is highly recommended.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de esta publicaciónes proporcionar recomendaciones en el manejo del cáncer de próstata (CP) en el marco de la nueva realidad que supone la presencia de la COVID-19.MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: El documento se basa en la escasa evidencia sobre SARS/CoV-2 y la experiencia de los autores en el manejo de la COVID-19 en sus instituciones incluyendo especialistas de Andalucía, Cantabria, Cataluña, Madrid y Comunidad Valenciana. RESULTADOS: Los autores definieron diferentes prioridades para los distintos supuestos clínicos en CP. Emergencia/urgencia (riesgo vital o urgencia aún en situación de normalidad), alta prioridad/urgencia electiva (potencialmente peligrosa si se pospone más de 1mes), prioridad intermedia/electiva (se recomienda no retrasar más de 6 meses), baja prioridad/demorable (se puede posponer más de 6 meses). Acorde a esta clasificación, el grupo de trabajo consensuó la distribución de los diferentes escenarios diagnósticos, terapéuticos y de seguimiento del CP. El riesgo de morbilidad grave como resultado de la infección por SARS-CoV-2puede superar el riesgo de morbi-mortalidad por CP en muchos hombres; por lo tanto, a corto plazo es pocoprobable que los retrasos en el diagnóstico o tratamiento conduzcan a peores resultados oncológicos. CONCLUSIONES: La pandemia COVID-19 ha resultado en un desafío para nuestro sistema de salud, lo que plantea varias consideraciones en el tratamiento de pacientes con CP. La planificación de los procedimientos quirúrgicos en función de los grados de prioridades imprescindible durante el periodo de pandemia y transición a la nueva normalidad. La reorganización de las consultas incluyendo la adaptación a las medidas de seguridad para profesionales y pacientes y el desarrollo de un programa de telemedicina es altamente recomendable.

Robotic radical cystectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex and morbid surgical procedures in Urology. Several retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that robotic-assisted RC (RARC) represents a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery, showing non-inferiority in mid-term oncological outcomes. Moreover, important advantages related with  perioperative complications have also been published. The aim of this article is to describe RARC surgical steps and to review the most relevant ndings in the eld of RARC, focusing on its strengths and weaknesses when compared with open RC. METHODS: We performed a detailed step-by-step description of the RARC surgical technique, paying particular attention to its specific surgical details and adding our tips and tricks for an out standing performance. We also conducted a review of the most relevant articles in literature in terms of oncological, pathological and perioperative results. All these findings have been compared with the classical open radical cystectomy (ORC) technique. RESULTS: None of the studies published have demonstrated RARC to have worse oncological outcomes (PSM,RFS, CSS, OS) compared to ORC. RARC shows a decrease in blood loss and transfusion rates. No differences have been observed in complications rate, length of hospital stay, quality of life, and time to bowel movement between both approaches. The two disadvantages of RARC compared to ORC are a longer operative time and increased cost. Operating time can be reduced with surgeons gaining experience and technique standardization. The cost disparities and operative time between ORC and RARC at high-volume academic centers are less pronounced than in the general medical community. CONCLUSIONS: RARC is a technically feasible and safe approach, with oncological, pathological and perioperative results, at least, equivalent to ORC.

ARTICULO SOLO EN INGLES.OBJETIVO: La cistectomía radical (CR) esuno de los procedimientos quirúrgicos más complejosy con mayor morbilidad. Varios estudios retrospectivosy prospectivos han demostrado que la CR asistida porrobot (CRAR) representa una alternativa mínimamente invasivaa la cirugía abierta, mostrando no inferioridad enlos resultados oncológicos a medio plazo. Además, sehan publicado importantes ventajas en relación con lascomplicaciones peroperatorias. El objetivo de este artículoes describir los pasos quirúrgicos de la CRAR y revisarlos hallazgos más relevantes en el campo de la CRAR,focalizando en sus fortalezas y debilidades cuando secomparan con la CR abierta. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una descripción paso a paso,detallada, de la técnica quirúrgica de CRAR, poniendoparticular atención a sus detalles quirúrgicos específicos yañadiendo nuestros trucos y consejos para una ejecución excelente. También realizamos una revisión de los artículos más relevantes de la literatura en términos de resultadosoncológicos, patológicos y peroperatorios. Todosestos hallazgos se han comparado con los de la técnicaclásica de cistectomía radical abierta (CRA). RESULTADOS: Ninguno de los estudios publicados hademostrado que la CRAR tenga peores resultados oncológicos(márgenes quirúrgicos positivos, supervivencia librede recurrencia, cáncer específica y global) en comparación con la CRA. La CRAR muestra un descenso del sangradoy las tasas de transfusión. No se han observadodiferencias entre ambos abordajes en las tasas de complicaciones,estancias hospitalarias, calidad de vida y eltiempo hasta la deposición. Dos desventajas de la CRARen comparación con la CRA son el tiempo operatoriomás largo y el aumento del coste. El tiempo operatorio puede reducirse con el aumento de la experiencia de loscirujanos y la estandarización de la técnica. Las disparidadesen los costes y la duración de la cirugía son menospronunciadas en centros académicos de gran volumen que en los de la comunidad médica general. CONCLUSIONES: La CRAR es un abordaje técnicamentefactible y seguro, con resultados oncológicos, patológicosy peroperatorios, al menos, equivalentes a los dela CRA.

Current role of robotic bladder cancer surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex and morbid surgical procedures in urology, that is not devoid of postoperative complications. Minimally invasive surgery, and especially robot-assisted RC (RARC) has emerged as an alternative to open RC (ORC) in an attempt to minimize surgical morbidity and facilitate the surgical approach. The aim of this paper was to present the current knowledge on the oncological efficacy and complication outcomes of RARC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A non-systematic review on all relevant studies with the keywords "Radical cystectomy," "Open," "Robot-assisted," "Complications," "Recurrence," "Survival," "Neobladder," "Potency," "Continence" and "Intracorporeal" was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, American Urological Association (AUA), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: RARC shows similar lymph node yields and positive surgical margin rates as well as perioperative complication outcomes compared with ORC. RARC exhibits significantly less blood loss and less intra- and postoperative blood transfusion. Moreover, survival and recurrence rates are not related to the surgical approach. Finally, RARC seems to be more expensive and has a longer operating time compared to the open technique. CONCLUSIONS: As current evidence shows, RARC seems as a technically feasible and safe procedure, providing equivalent perioperative and oncological results compared to ORC. More prospective, randomized-controlled trials are necessary to draw definitive conclusions on all comparative aspects.

The European Urology Residents Education Programme Hands-on Training Format: 4 Years of Hands-on Training Improvements from the European School of Urology.

BACKGROUND: The European School of Urology (ESU) started the European Urology Residents Education Programme (EUREP) in 2003 for final year urology residents, with hands-on training (HOT) added later in 2007. OBJECTIVE: To assess the geographical reach of EUREP, trainee demographics, and individual quality feedback in relation to annual methodology improvements in HOT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From September 2014 to October 2017 (four EUREP courses) several new features have been applied to the HOT format of the EUREP course: 1:1 training sessions (2015), fixed 60-min time slots (2016), and standardised teaching methodology (2017). The resulting EUREP HOT format was verified by collecting and prospectively analysing the following data: total number of participants attending different HOT courses; participants' age; country of origin; and feedback obtained annually. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 796 participants from 54 countries participated in 1450 HOT sessions over the last 4 yr. This included 294 (20%) ureteroscopy (URS) sessions, 237 (16.5%) transurethral resection (TUR) sessions, 840 (58%) basic laparoscopic sessions, and 79 (5.5%) intermediate laparoscopic sessions. While 712 residents (89%) were from Europe, 84 (11%) were from non-European nations. Of the European residents, most came from Italy (16%), Germany (15%), Spain (15%), and Romania (8%). Feedback for the basic laparoscopic session showed a constant improvement in scores over the last 4 yr, with the highest scores achieved last year. This included feedback on improvements in tutor rating (p=0.017), organisation (p<0.001), and personal experience with EUREP (p<0.001). Limitations lie in the difficulties associated with the use of an advanced training curriculum with wet laboratory or cadaveric courses in this format, although these could be performed in other training centres in conjunction with EUREP. CONCLUSIONS: The EUREP trainee demographics show that the purpose of the course is being achieved, with excellent feedback reported. While European trainees dominate the demographics, participation from a number of non-European countries suggests continued ESU collaboration with other national societies and wider dissemination of simulation training worldwide. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this paper we look at methodological improvements and feedback for the European Urology Residents Education Programme hands-on-training over the last 4 yr.

[Surgical treatment of local disease in metastatic prostate cancer.] / Tratamiento quirúrgico de la enfermedad local en cáncer de prástata metastásico.

OBJECTIVES: Metastatic prostate cancer is a very heterogeneous disease with several treatment options. In some cases of oligometastatic disease, local treatment of the primary tumor complemented by metastasis directed therapy seems to improve oncological results. The objectives of this study are to define and understand oligometastatic prostate cancer, to show the usefulness and rationale of cytoreductive surgery in this scenario and to review all published studies about radical prostatectomy in patients with initially metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: We performed a Pubmed bibliographic search using the keywords: prostate cancer, metastatic, oligometastatic, local treatment, radical prostatectomy, and cytoreductive surgery. We included all published works on radical prostatectomy in initially metastatic patient. Furthermore, we reviewed published articles about cytoreductive surgery and biology of the oligometastatic disease in journals of different medical specialties. RESULTS: Oligometastatic prostate cancer is recognized as an intermediate clinical stage between local and disseminated disease that seems to benefit from local treatment of the primary tumor plus metastasis directed treatment. In this scenario, different retrospective studies have demonstrated that radical prostatectomy diminishes local complication rate and improves oncological results without increasing morbidity. Currently, there is no consensus definition about the number, location, and imaging techniques to employ to consider a patient oligometastatic. Thus, it is difficult to compare the results of the different studies and identification of a subgroup of patients that could benefit from this local treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In absence of prospective randomized data, radical prostatectomy seems to be useful for local treatment of the primary tumor in a selected group of patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.