Hands train the brain-what is the role of hand tremor and anxiety in undergraduate microsurgical skills?

INTRODUCTION: Physiological hand tremor occurs naturally, due to oscillations of the upper extremities. Tremor can be exacerbated by stress and anxiety, interfering with fine motor tasks and potentially impact on surgical performance, particularly in microsurgery. We investigated the link between tremor, anxiety and performance in a neurosurgical module as part of an international surgical course. METHODS: Essential Skills in the Management of Surgical Cases (ESMSC) course recruits medical students from European Union (EU) medical schools. Students are asked to suture the dura mater in an ex vivo swine model, of which the first suture completed was assessed. Questionnaires were distributed before and after the module, eliciting tremor risk factors, self-perception of tremor and anxiety. Johnson O'Connor dexterity pad was used to objectively measure dexterity. Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) was used to assess skills-based performance. Anxiety was assessed using the Westside Test Anxiety Scale (WTAS). Tremor was evaluated by four qualified neurosurgeons. RESULTS: Forty delegates participated in the study. Overall performance decreased with greater subjective perception of anxiety (p = 0.032, rho = - 0.392). Although increasing scores for tremor at rest and overall WTAS score were associated with decreased performance, this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Tremor at rest did not affect dexterity (p = 0.876, rho = - 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Physiological tremor did not affect student performance and microsurgical dexterity in a simulation-based environment. Self-perception of anxiety affected performance in this module, suggesting that more confident students perform better in a simulated neurosurgical setting.

The Role of Anxiety in Simulation-Based Dexterity and Overall Performance: Does It Really Matter?

BACKGROUND: Essential Skills in the Management of Surgical Cases (ESMSC) is an international undergraduate surgical masterclass which combines ex vivo, dry lab and high fidelity in vivo simulation-based learning (SBL). It consists of 32 stations of skills-based learning, including open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of fractures. Current literature suggests early involvement in skills-based learning at the undergraduate level is vital. AIMS: To compare students' dexterity and skills-based performance with demographic and educational background parameters. METHODS: 112 medical students from European Union countries including the United Kingdom, Germany, Greece, Cyprus, Germany, and Bulgaria were selected from a competitive pool of candidates to attend the course. Students undertook ORIF in an ex vivo swine model, and in a simulated fracture on a bamboo rod. Skills-based performance was assessed by two consultant surgeons with validated direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) forms. Anxiety was self-assessed using the Westside Anxiety Scale prior to the ORIF stations. Dexterity was measured with the O'Connor tweezer dexterity test. RESULTS: Female students had significantly higher dexterity scores (median difference 7, p =.003). Right-handed students achieved higher dexterity than left-handed students (median difference 7, p =.043). There was no difference in students' performance across different medical schools, and across year groups (p <.05 for any correlation). Self-reported anxiety was not correlated with high fidelity skills-based performance (r = 0.032, p =.74). CONCLUSION: Anxiety does not seem to play a significant role in Simulation Skills-Based learning. Undergraduate surgical curricula should incorporate SBL-based modules to enhance practical skills learning and motivate future orthopedic surgeons.

Is In-Vivo laparoscopic simulation learning a step forward in the Undergraduate Surgical Education?

BACKGROUND: Essentials Skills in the Management of Surgical Cases - ESMSC is an International Combined Applied Surgical Science and Wet Lab course addressed at the Undergraduate level. Laparoscopic Skills is a fundamental element of Surgical Education and various Simulation-Based Learning (SBL) models have been endorsed. This study aims to explore if there is any significant difference in delegates' performance depending on whether they completed In Vivo module prior to the equivalent in the laparoscopic simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 37 Medical Students from various EU countries were divided in 2 groups, and both completed the "Fundamentals in Laparoscopic Surgery" module in the Dry-lab Laparoscopic Simulator as well as the same module "In Vivo" on a swine model. Group A (18 students, 48.6%) completed the "Fundamentals in Laparoscopic Surgery - FLS" module prior to the "In Vivo", whereas group B completed the "In Vivo" module first. Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) were used to assess delegates' performance. RESULTS: The mean DOPS scores for the "FLS" and "In Vivo" models were 2.27 ± 0.902 and 2.03 ± 0.833, respectively, and the delegates' performance was not statistically significantly different between them (p = 0.128). There was no statistically significant difference in the scores among different gender, year of study, school and handedness groups. The alteration in the sequence between Dry-lab "FLS" and "In Vivo" modules did not affect the performance in neither the "FLS" nor the "In Vivo" models. CONCLUSIONS: The inexpensive, but low-fidelity "FLS" model could serve an equal alternative Simulation-Based Learning model for the early undergraduate training. Our study demonstrated that high fidelity In Vivo simulation for laparoscopic skills does not affect significantly the improvement in the delegates' performance at the undergraduate level. Further studies should be conducted to identify at which stage of training should high fidelity simulation be introduced.

Promoting Undergraduate Surgical Education: Current Evidence and Students' Views on ESMSC International Wet Lab Course.

BACKGROUND: Undergraduate Surgical Education is becoming an essential element in the training of the future generation of safe and efficient surgeons. Essential Skills in the Management of Surgical Cases (ESMSC), is an international, joint applied surgical science and simulation-based learning wet lab course. METHODS: We performed a review of the existing literature on the topic of undergraduate surgical education. Following that, we analyzed the feedback questionnaire received 480 from 2 recent series of ESMSC courses (May 2015, n = 49 and November 2015, n = 40), in order to evaluate European Union students' (UK, Germany, Greece) views on the ESMSC course, as well as on the undergraduate surgical education. Results Using a 10 point graded scale, the overall ESMSC concept was positively evaluated, with a mean score of 9.41 ± 0.72 (range: 8-10) and 8.94 ± 1.1 (range: 7-10). The majority of delegates from both series [9.86 ± 0.43 (range: 8-10) and 9.58 ± 0.91 (range: 6-10), respectively] believed that ESMSC should be incorporated in the undergraduate surgical curriculum. Comparison of responses from the UK to the Greek Medical Student, as well as the findings from the third and fourth year versus the fifth and sixth year Medical Students, revealed no statistically significant differences pertaining to any of the questions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence in the literature supports the enhancement of surgical education through the systematic use of various modalities that provide Simulation-Based Training (SBT) hands-on experience, starting from the early undergraduate level. The findings of the present study are in agreement with these previous reports.