Cutting balloon angioplasty and stent implantation for aorto-ostial lesions: clinical outcome and 1-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous interventions for aorto-ostial narrowing of native coronary arteries are challenging because of early elastic recoil after the procedure and the high restenosis rate. Cutting balloon angioplasty may reduce this complication. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cutting balloon angioplasty and stent implantation for aorto-ostial lesions with a 1-year clinical follow-up. METHODS: All patients with aorto-ostial lesions in our laboratory underwent cutting balloon angioplasty and were followed for approximately 1 year. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients underwent balloon angioplasty; 36 of whom had lesions in the ostial right coronary artery, and 12 of whom had lesions in the left main coronary artery (LMCA). Thirty-five patients (73%) had a stent implanted. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. The in-hospital rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) was 2.1% because of the death of 1 patient following urgent bypass surgery. Mean clinical follow-up was 11.6 +/- 7 month. Twelve patients (27%) required repeat coronary angiography, and restenosis was found in 7 patients (16%). Six patients (13.6%) had MACEs. CONCLUSIONS: Cutting balloon angioplasty in combination with bare metal stent (BMS) implantation has a good clinical outcome. This technique should be compared with implantation of drug-eluting stents (DESs) in a controlled study.

Relation of spontaneous reperfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction to more distal coronary culprit narrowings.

Spontaneous reperfusion (SR) of the infarct-related artery may occur in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs). Limited data are available on the angiographic characteristics of these patients. The objective of this study was to determine if there are differences in the distance of the culprit lesion from the coronary ostium in patients with STEMIs with and without SR. Patients who presented with acute STEMIs<12 hours after pain onset and who underwent coronary angiography were entered into the study. Measurement of the distance from the coronary ostium to the culprit lesion was performed. A total of 469 patients with STEMIs were included in the study, of whom 77 met criteria for SR (significant relief of chest pain associated with >or=50% resolution of ST-segment elevation on follow-up electrocardiography) and 392 did not. A highly significant difference was seen in ostial to culprit lesion distance, with the culprit lesions in the SR group being more distal than those in the non-SR group (45+/-22 vs 39+/-20 mm, p<0.009). In conclusion, the findings of this study demonstrate that the location of the culprit lesion in patients with STEMIs who undergo SR is more distal in the involved artery than in patients with STEMIs who do not undergo SR.

Distal protection of bifurcating vessels: a novel approach.

Distal protection devices protect only a single distal vessel. We describe a novel technique to protect both branches following a thrombus-containing bifurcation lesion. The combination of an occlusive balloon and an arterial filter system provides an attractive solution to the challenging environment of a lesion at high risk for distal embolization supplying more than a single major branch.